Season 1 Championship: AI Betting Picks & ResultsBeta

The OddsGPT AI Championship publicly tracks AI betting strategies, closing line value (CLV), ROI and verified betting results.

Each strategy represents a different betting hypothesis and must build a statistically meaningful track record before entering the official rankings.

Jun 18, 2026 · May 31 – Jul 30, 2026 · Completed

AI Beyond Picks.

Value Beyond Odds.

Every AI strategy starts with a clean slate and must build a track record before entering the official rankings.

Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Season Review

Season 1 Championship Review

Anti-Steam AI won the Season 1 Championship with a season ROI of +118.2% across 60 settled picks.

Balanced AI finished second at +69.6% ROI.

Conservative AI recorded the highest win rate of the season at 100.0%.

Across five official competitors, the season produced 301 settled picks from May 31 – Jul 30, 2026.

🏆 Champion

😈 Anti-Steam AI

ROI +118.2% · Win Rate 68.3% · 41-19

AI Profile →

Final Standings

# AI Sample Confidence Positive CLV ROI Record Win Rate Units Won
1 ⚖️ Balanced AI 75 / 50 High Theory Verified 44% +47.4% 9-66 12.0% +35.6u
2 😈 Anti-Steam AI 62 / 50 High Theory Verified 61% +33.0% 20-42 32.3% +16.5u
3 🚀 Momentum AI 135 / 50 High Theory Verified 45% -12.5% 21-114 15.6% -32.2u

Provisional Standings

Building evidence toward official qualification.

Day Picks

⚖️ Balanced AI

1 Uzbekistan vs Colombia World Cup 2026-06-18 BET Uzbekistan Win 10.00 9.60 +0.4pp 75 🔥
Entry 103d ago
10.00
→
Expected Closing
9.60
Expected CLV +0.4pp
Why

Uzbekistan has a strong model probability of 38.97% compared to the market's 10.0%, resulting in a significant closing edge of 28.97 percentage points. The steam score of 97 and sharp repricing signal indicate strong market support. Main risk: Colombia's higher ELO rating and potential underestimation of their quality.

Replaced with updated pick
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ○ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 8.50
  1. 2026-06-11 Lens filter Lens reject: requires edge≥5 or steam≥75. (Current: steam=66, breadth=69%, signal=market_steam, kickoff_in=169.0h)
  2. 2026-06-12 Lens filter Lens reject: requires edge≥5 or steam≥75. (Current: steam=68, breadth=77%, signal=market_steam, kickoff_in=145.0h)
  3. 2026-06-13 Candidate pick @ 8.50
  4. 2026-06-13 Withdrawn before validation @ 8.50
  5. 2026-06-14 Pass Ranked 13/117 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 3 picks. (Pre-LLM score 83.03). Main risk: N/A.
  6. 2026-06-15 Candidate pick @ 8.50
  7. 2026-06-15 Replaced with updated pick @ 8.50
  8. 2026-06-16 Candidate pick @ 9.00 (Candidate pick 8.50)
  9. 2026-06-17 Update @ 9.00 (Candidate pick 8.50)
  10. 2026-06-17 Replaced with updated pick @ 9.00 (Candidate pick 8.50)
  11. 2026-06-18 Candidate pick @ 10.00 (Candidate pick 8.50)
  12. 2026-06-18 Replaced with updated pick @ 10.00 (Candidate pick 8.50)
  13. — Closing @ 9.60
2 Ecuador vs Curaçao World Cup 2026-06-18 FADE Draw 11.00 8.00 +3.4pp 70 🔥
Entry 103d ago
11.00
→
Expected Closing
8.00
Expected CLV +3.4pp
Why

The draw for Ecuador vs Curaçao has seen extreme odds movement (from 6.0 to 11.0) with a steam score of 99, suggesting market overreaction. Despite a high model probability of 30.57%, the sharp repricing and high volatility make this a contrarian fade. Main risk: The model's strong value signal could still materialize.

Withdrawn before validation
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ○ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 11.00
  1. 2026-06-14 Pass Ranked 74/117 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 20 picks. (Pre-LLM score 50.92). Main risk: N/A.
  2. 2026-06-15 Pass Ranked 18/66 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 3 picks. (Pre-LLM score 56.52). Main risk: N/A.
  3. 2026-06-16 Pass LLM did not select this match (rank 1/60, pre-LLM score 99.65). Main risk: N/A.
  4. 2026-06-17 Pass LLM did not select this match (rank 1/86, pre-LLM score 99.65). Main risk: N/A.
  5. 2026-06-18 Candidate pick @ 11.00
  6. 2026-06-18 Withdrawn before validation @ 11.00
  7. 2026-06-19 Pass Ranked 4/118 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 3 picks. (Pre-LLM score 94.67). Main risk: N/A.
  8. 2026-06-20 Pass Ranked 6/138 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 3 picks. (Pre-LLM score 94.67). Main risk: N/A.
  9. — Closing @ 8.00

🚀 Momentum AI

1 Ecuador vs Curaçao World Cup 2026-06-18 BET Draw 11.00 8.00 +3.4pp 93 🔥
Entry 103d ago
11.00
→
Expected Closing
8.00
Expected CLV +3.4pp
Why

Strong money flow with favorable price action. Main risk: line reverses before kickoff.

Withdrawn before validation
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ○ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 11.00
  1. 2026-06-14 Pass Ranked 22/46 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 20 picks. (Pre-LLM score 93.22). Main risk: N/A.
  2. 2026-06-15 Pass LLM did not select this match (rank 2/17, pre-LLM score 103.95). Main risk: N/A.
  3. 2026-06-16 Candidate pick @ 10.00
  4. 2026-06-16 Replaced with updated pick @ 10.00
  5. 2026-06-17 Candidate pick @ 11.00
  6. 2026-06-17 Replaced with updated pick @ 11.00
  7. 2026-06-18 Candidate pick @ 11.00
  8. 2026-06-18 Withdrawn before validation @ 11.00
  9. 2026-06-19 Pass Ranked 10/59 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 5 picks. (Pre-LLM score 102.36). Main risk: N/A.
  10. 2026-06-20 Pass Ranked 15/78 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 5 picks. (Pre-LLM score 102.36). Main risk: N/A.
  11. — Closing @ 8.00
2 Estudiantes La Plata Res vs Central Córdoba SdE Res. Reserve League 2026-06-18 BET Central Córdoba SdE Res. Win 6.00 6.38 -1.0pp 93 🔥
Entry 103d ago
6.00
→
Expected Closing
6.38
Expected CLV -1.0pp
Why

Strong money flow with favorable price action. Main risk: line reverses before kickoff.

Withdrawn before validation
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ○ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 6.00
  1. 2026-06-18 Candidate pick @ 6.00
  2. 2026-06-18 Withdrawn before validation @ 6.00
  3. 2026-06-19 Pass Ranked 29/59 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 20 picks. (Pre-LLM score 97.6). Main risk: N/A.
  4. — Closing @ 6.38
3 FCI Levadia II vs Tartu Welco 1-3 ✗ Incorrect Esiliiga A 2026-06-18 BET FCI Levadia II Win 4.10 4.12 -0.1pp 93 🔥
Entry 103d ago
4.10
→
Expected Closing
4.12
Expected CLV -0.1pp
Why

Strong money flow with favorable price action. Main risk: line reverses before kickoff.

🔥 Very Strong Money Signal
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ✓ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 4.10
  1. 2026-06-18 Candidate pick @ 4.10
  2. — Closing @ 4.12
4 Uzbekistan vs Colombia World Cup 2026-06-18 BET Uzbekistan Win 10.00 9.60 +0.4pp 92 🔥
Entry 103d ago
10.00
→
Expected Closing
9.60
Expected CLV +0.4pp
Why

Strong money flow with favorable price action. Main risk: line reverses before kickoff.

Replaced with updated pick
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ○ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 8.50
  1. 2026-06-11 Pass Uzbekistan's odds have drifted higher, but the steam score and breadth percentage are moderate compared to the other candidate. Additionally, there is no model probability or closing edge data to support a bet. Main risk: Lack of supporting data and limited historical pattern make this fixture less compelling.
  2. 2026-06-12 Pass Uzbekistan's steam indicators are moderate, but the significant elo disadvantage and low market probability reduce confidence in backing the home side. Main risk: Uzbekistan's weak comparative metrics against Colombia.
  3. 2026-06-13 Pass Ranked 50/60 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 20 picks. (Pre-LLM score 77.11). Main risk: N/A.
  4. 2026-06-14 Pass Ranked 42/46 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 20 picks. (Pre-LLM score 77.11). Main risk: N/A.
  5. 2026-06-15 Candidate pick @ 8.50
  6. 2026-06-15 Replaced with updated pick @ 8.50
  7. 2026-06-16 Candidate pick @ 9.00 (Candidate pick 8.50)
  8. 2026-06-17 Update @ 9.00 (Candidate pick 8.50)
  9. 2026-06-17 Replaced with updated pick @ 9.00 (Candidate pick 8.50)
  10. 2026-06-18 Candidate pick @ 10.00 (Candidate pick 8.50)
  11. 2026-06-18 Replaced with updated pick @ 10.00 (Candidate pick 8.50)
  12. — Closing @ 9.60
5 Tunisia vs Netherlands World Cup 2026-06-18 BET Tunisia Win 10.00 28.50 -6.5pp 92 🔥
🚀 Strong Price Change
🚀 Strong Price Change
Entry 103d ago
10.00
→
Expected Closing
28.50
Expected CLV -6.5pp
Why

Strong money flow with favorable price action. Main risk: line reverses before kickoff.

Withdrawn before validation
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ○ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 10.00
  1. 2026-06-18 Candidate pick @ 10.00
  2. 2026-06-18 Withdrawn before validation @ 10.00
  3. 2026-06-19 Pass Ranked 12/59 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 5 picks. (Pre-LLM score 101.49). Main risk: N/A.
  4. 2026-06-20 Pass Ranked 16/78 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 5 picks. (Pre-LLM score 101.49). Main risk: N/A.
  5. 2026-06-21 Pass Ranked 9/54 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 5 picks. (Pre-LLM score 104.74). Main risk: N/A.
  6. 2026-06-22 Candidate pick @ 23.00
  7. 2026-06-22 Withdrawn before validation @ 23.00
  8. 2026-06-23 Pass Ranked 6/30 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 5 picks. (Pre-LLM score 104.74). Main risk: N/A.
  9. 2026-06-24 Pass Ranked 11/32 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 5 picks. (Pre-LLM score 102.36). Main risk: N/A.
  10. 2026-06-25 Candidate pick @ 26.00
  11. — Closing @ 28.50

😈 Anti-Steam AI

1 Häcken W vs Rosengård W 2-0 ✓ Correct Damallsvenskan 2026-06-18 FADE Valuation disagreement Häcken W Win 9.00 1.22 +70.9pp 65 ⚠️
Historical signal — current rules would not generate this fade.
⚠️ Major Price Change
⚠️ Major Price Change
Entry 103d ago
9.00
→
Expected Closing
1.22
Expected CLV +70.9pp
Why

Rosengård W has seen a significant odds drop from 12.0 to 9.0, driven by sharp-led activity. However, the model probability (5.75%) is well below the market probability (11.11%), suggesting the move is overdone. The xG difference of 2.38 heavily favors Rosengård W, but the sharp repricing appears exaggerated. Main risk: Häcken W's home advantage could still pose a challenge despite market movement.

⚡ Solid Money Signal
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ✓ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 9.00
  1. 2026-06-17 Candidate pick @ 9.00
  2. 2026-06-18 Update @ 9.00
  3. — Closing @ 1.22
2 Nõmme United II vs Tallinna Kalev 1-2 ✓ Correct Esiliiga A 2026-06-18 FADE Contrarian Tallinna Kalev Win 2.40 2.14 +5.1pp 68 🔥
🚀 Strong Price Change
🚀 Strong Price Change
Entry 103d ago
2.40
→
Expected Closing
2.14
Expected CLV +5.1pp
Why

The market has sharply repriced against Nõmme United II, with their odds drifting from 2.0 to 2.4. However, the model probability (36.11%) is below the market probability (41.67%), indicating no edge on the home side. The steam score of 94 and breadth_pct of 85.7 suggest strong public backing, likely overheating the market. Main risk: Tallinna Kalev's away performance could still outperform expectations.

🔥 Very Strong Money Signal
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ✓ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 2.40
  1. 2026-06-18 Candidate pick @ 2.40
  2. — Closing @ 2.14
Hypothesis: Late market moves contain information that improves betting decisions.
Theory Building Confidence: Medium
Building Qualification 21 / 50 Settled Bets
29 more settled picks required for official ranking
ROI
-100.0%
Positive CLV
Insufficient Data
Record 0-1 · Win Rate 0.0% · Profit -2.0u · Total Staked 2.0u · Avg Stake 2.00u
Recent Results L
Latest Picks
  • Draw
  • Central Córdoba SdE Res. Win
  • FCI Levadia II Win
Hypothesis: Combining multiple signals is more reliable than relying on a single factor.
Theory Building Confidence: Medium
Building Qualification 12 / 50 Settled Bets
38 more settled picks required for official ranking
ROI
—
Positive CLV
Insufficient Data
Recent Results
Latest Picks
  • Uzbekistan Win
  • Fade Draw
Hypothesis: Recurring market patterns appear often enough to support systematic betting.
No picks tracked yet
Theory in Testing Confidence: Low
Building Qualification 0 / 50 Settled Bets
50 more settled picks required for official ranking
Hypothesis: Selective betting beats betting volume.
No picks tracked yet
Theory in Testing Confidence: Low
Building Qualification 1 / 50 Settled Bets
49 more settled picks required for official ranking
Hypothesis: The market sometimes overreacts, creating value on the opposite side.
Theory Building Confidence: Medium
Building Qualification 11 / 50 Settled Bets
39 more settled picks required for official ranking
ROI
+448.0%
Positive CLV
Insufficient Data
Record 2-0 · Win Rate 100.0% · Profit +6.7u · Total Staked 1.5u · Avg Stake 0.75u
Recent Results W W
Latest Picks
  • Fade Häcken W Win
  • Fade Tallinna Kalev Win

Confidence reflects sample size only. Each AI needs 50 settled picks to enter the official ranking. CLV rate appears after 10 settled picks.

Community Benchmark

Hypothesis: Multiple independent opinions outperform individual opinions.
No picks tracked yet
Theory in Testing Confidence: Low
Building Qualification 4 / 50 Settled Bets
46 more settled picks required for official ranking

Why This Matters

Every bettor has a theory.

  • Follow the market.
  • Fade the market.
  • Trust only high-confidence picks.
  • Look for recurring patterns.

We track each approach publicly and measure the results over time.

The goal is simple:

Which ideas actually beat the market?

Example Betting Hypotheses

  • Following major market moves reveals useful information.
  • Betting against popular market sentiment creates value.
  • Fewer high-conviction bets outperform high-volume betting.
  • Combining multiple signals is more reliable than relying on a single factor.
  • Recurring market patterns can be identified and exploited over time.
  • Consensus opinions outperform individual opinions.

The Championship does not assume any of these ideas are true.

The purpose is to test them publicly.

← Current Championship