Season 1 Championship: AI Betting Picks & ResultsBeta

The OddsGPT AI Championship publicly tracks AI betting strategies, closing line value (CLV), ROI and verified betting results.

Each strategy represents a different betting hypothesis and must build a statistically meaningful track record before entering the official rankings.

Jun 28, 2026 · May 31 – Jul 30, 2026 · Completed

AI Beyond Picks.

Value Beyond Odds.

Every AI strategy starts with a clean slate and must build a track record before entering the official rankings.

Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Season Review

Season 1 Championship Review

Anti-Steam AI won the Season 1 Championship with a season ROI of +118.2% across 60 settled picks.

Balanced AI finished second at +69.6% ROI.

Conservative AI recorded the highest win rate of the season at 100.0%.

Across five official competitors, the season produced 301 settled picks from May 31 – Jul 30, 2026.

🏆 Champion

😈 Anti-Steam AI

ROI +118.2% · Win Rate 68.3% · 41-19

AI Profile →

Final Standings

# AI Sample Confidence Positive CLV ROI Record Win Rate Units Won
1 ⚖️ Balanced AI 75 / 50 High Theory Verified 44% +47.4% 9-66 12.0% +35.6u
2 😈 Anti-Steam AI 62 / 50 High Theory Verified 61% +33.0% 20-42 32.3% +16.5u
3 🚀 Momentum AI 135 / 50 High Theory Verified 45% -12.5% 21-114 15.6% -32.2u

Provisional Standings

Building evidence toward official qualification.

Day Picks

⚖️ Balanced AI

1 Jordan vs Argentina World Cup 2026-06-28 BET Jordan Win 19.00 19.00 +0.0pp 85 🔥
Entry 93d ago
19.00
→
Expected Closing
19.00
Expected CLV +0.0pp
Why

Jordan shows a massive positive closing edge of 34.04 percentage points and strong steam signals, indicating significant market interest despite high volatility. The model probability of 39.3% far exceeds the market's 5.26%, suggesting value. Main risk: Argentina's superior Elo rating and potential market overreaction to steam.

Replaced with updated pick
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ○ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 15.00
  1. 2026-06-21 Lens filter Lens reject: requires edge≥5 or steam≥75. (Current: steam=62, breadth=46%, signal=sharp_led, kickoff_in=169.0h)
  2. 2026-06-22 Pass Ranked 45/65 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 20 picks. (Pre-LLM score 46.0). Main risk: N/A.
  3. 2026-06-23 Pass Ranked 28/59 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 20 picks. (Pre-LLM score 66.95). Main risk: N/A.
  4. 2026-06-24 Pass Ranked 16/73 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 3 picks. (Pre-LLM score 83.2). Main risk: N/A.
  5. 2026-06-25 Pass Ranked 10/89 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 3 picks. (Pre-LLM score 94.05). Main risk: N/A.
  6. 2026-06-26 Pass LLM did not select this match (rank 3/129, pre-LLM score 99.65). Main risk: N/A.
  7. 2026-06-27 Candidate pick @ 15.00
  8. 2026-06-27 Pass Ranked 4/151 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 3 picks. (Pre-LLM score 97.02). Main risk: N/A.
  9. 2026-06-27 Replaced with updated pick @ 15.00
  10. 2026-06-28 Candidate pick @ 19.00 (Candidate pick 15.00)
  11. 2026-06-28 Replaced with updated pick @ 19.00 (Candidate pick 15.00)
  12. — Closing @ 19.00
2 KPV-j vs PKKU 1-3 ✗ Incorrect Ykkönen 2026-06-28 BET KPV-j Win 5.25 5.36 -0.4pp 78 🔥
Entry 93d ago
5.25
→
Expected Closing
5.36
Expected CLV -0.4pp
Why

KPV-j has a strong closing edge of 20.41 percentage points and a model probability of 39.46%, significantly higher than the market's 19.05%. The steam score of 96 supports the bet, and the low volatility reduces risk. Main risk: Moderate Elo advantage for PKKU could challenge the model's edge.

🔥 Very Strong Money Signal
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ✓ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 5.25
  1. 2026-06-28 Candidate pick @ 5.25
  2. — Closing @ 5.36
3 IFK Norrkoping vs Norrby IF 0-1 ✓ Correct Superettan 2026-06-28 BET Norrby IF Win 5.75 6.68 -2.4pp 82 🔥
Entry 93d ago
5.75
→
Expected Closing
6.68
Expected CLV -2.4pp
Why

Norrby IF has a strong closing edge of 30.77 percentage points and a model probability of 48.16%, far exceeding the market's 17.39%. The sharp-led signal and pattern similarity of 45% further validate the value. Main risk: Elo and xG disadvantages could limit upside.

Money Signal
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ✓ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 5.75
  1. 2026-06-23 Pass Ranked 24/59 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 20 picks. (Pre-LLM score 73.9). Main risk: N/A.
  2. 2026-06-27 Pass Ranked 32/151 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 20 picks. (Pre-LLM score 74.62). Main risk: N/A.
  3. 2026-06-27 Pass Ranked 45/115 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 20 picks. (Pre-LLM score 74.62). Main risk: N/A.
  4. 2026-06-28 Candidate pick @ 5.75
  5. — Closing @ 6.68

🚀 Momentum AI

1 Jordan vs Argentina World Cup 2026-06-28 BET Jordan Win 19.00 19.00 +0.0pp 93 🔥
Entry 93d ago
19.00
→
Expected Closing
19.00
Expected CLV +0.0pp
Why

Strong money flow with favorable price action. Main risk: line reverses before kickoff.

Replaced with updated pick
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ○ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 15.00
  1. 2026-06-21 Lens filter Lens reject: steam score must be ≥65. (Current: steam=62, breadth=46%, signal=sharp_led, kickoff_in=169.0h)
  2. 2026-06-22 Pass Ranked 23/33 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 20 picks. (Pre-LLM score 90.78). Main risk: N/A.
  3. 2026-06-23 Lens filter Lens reject: steam score must be ≥65. (Current: steam=55, breadth=31%, signal=sharp_led, kickoff_in=121.0h)
  4. 2026-06-24 Pass Ranked 26/32 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 20 picks. (Pre-LLM score 82.7). Main risk: N/A.
  5. 2026-06-25 Pass Ranked 17/32 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 5 picks. (Pre-LLM score 101.49). Main risk: N/A.
  6. 2026-06-26 Pass LLM did not select this match (rank 3/46, pre-LLM score 107.3). Main risk: N/A.
  7. 2026-06-27 Candidate pick @ 15.00
  8. 2026-06-27 Pass Ranked 9/84 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 5 picks. (Pre-LLM score 104.74). Main risk: N/A.
  9. 2026-06-27 Replaced with updated pick @ 15.00
  10. 2026-06-28 Candidate pick @ 19.00 (Candidate pick 15.00)
  11. 2026-06-28 Replaced with updated pick @ 19.00 (Candidate pick 15.00)
  12. — Closing @ 19.00
2 Juventud Antoniana vs Defensores de Vilelas 4-0 ✗ Incorrect Torneo Federal A 2026-06-28 BET Defensores de Vilelas Win 8.00 8.16 -0.2pp 93 🔥
Entry 93d ago
8.00
→
Expected Closing
8.16
Expected CLV -0.2pp
Why

Strong money flow with favorable price action. Main risk: line reverses before kickoff.

🔥 Very Strong Money Signal
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ✓ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 8.00
  1. 2026-06-26 Lens filter Lens reject: steam score must be ≥65. (Current: steam=40, breadth=100%, signal=tracking, kickoff_in=66.8h)
  2. 2026-06-27 Pass Ranked 16/84 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 5 picks. (Pre-LLM score 102.36). Main risk: N/A.
  3. 2026-06-27 Pass Ranked 12/103 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 5 picks. (Pre-LLM score 102.36). Main risk: N/A.
  4. 2026-06-28 Candidate pick @ 8.00
  5. — Closing @ 8.16
3 Botafogo SP vs CRB Serie B 2026-06-28 BET CRB Win 3.40 3.48 -0.7pp 93 🔥
Entry 93d ago
3.40
→
Expected Closing
3.48
Expected CLV -0.7pp
Why

Strong money flow with favorable price action. Main risk: line reverses before kickoff.

Withdrawn before validation
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ○ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 3.40
  1. 2026-06-27 Pass Ranked 6/103 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 5 picks. (Pre-LLM score 103.95). Main risk: N/A.
  2. 2026-06-27 Lens filter Lens reject: steam score must be ≥65. (Current: steam=60, breadth=42%, signal=sharp_led, kickoff_in=93.8h)
  3. 2026-06-28 Candidate pick @ 3.40
  4. 2026-06-28 Withdrawn before validation @ 3.40
  5. 2026-06-29 Pass LLM did not select this match (rank 4/14, pre-LLM score 104.74). Main risk: N/A.
  6. 2026-06-30 Candidate pick @ 3.50
  7. — Closing @ 3.48
4 Algeria vs Austria 3-3 ✗ Incorrect World Cup 2026-06-28 BET Austria Win 3.50 3.79 -2.2pp 92 🔥
Entry 93d ago
3.50
→
Expected Closing
3.79
Expected CLV -2.2pp
Why

Strong money flow with favorable price action. Main risk: line reverses before kickoff.

🔥 Very Strong Money Signal
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ✓ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 3.50
  1. 2026-06-21 Lens filter Lens reject: steam score must be ≥65. (Current: steam=51, breadth=85%, signal=sharp_led, kickoff_in=169.0h)
  2. 2026-06-22 Pass Ranked 33/33 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 20 picks. (Pre-LLM score 75.21). Main risk: N/A.
  3. 2026-06-23 Pass Ranked 29/30 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 20 picks. (Pre-LLM score 79.63). Main risk: N/A.
  4. 2026-06-24 Pass Ranked 9/32 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 5 picks. (Pre-LLM score 104.74). Main risk: N/A.
  5. 2026-06-25 Pass Ranked 9/32 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 5 picks. (Pre-LLM score 104.74). Main risk: N/A.
  6. 2026-06-26 Pass Ranked 6/46 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 5 picks. (Pre-LLM score 104.74). Main risk: N/A.
  7. 2026-06-27 Candidate pick @ 2.20
  8. 2026-06-27 Pass Ranked 10/84 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 5 picks. (Pre-LLM score 104.74). Main risk: N/A.
  9. 2026-06-27 Replaced with updated pick @ 2.20
  10. 2026-06-28 Candidate pick @ 3.50
  11. — Closing @ 2.07
5 Skeid vs Trygg/Lade 7-1 ✗ Incorrect 2. Division - Group 2 2026-06-28 BET Trygg/Lade Win 5.00 5.81 -2.8pp 92 🔥
Entry 93d ago
5.00
→
Expected Closing
5.81
Expected CLV -2.8pp
Why

Strong money flow with favorable price action. Main risk: line reverses before kickoff.

🔥 Very Strong Money Signal
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ✓ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 5.00
  1. 2026-06-28 Candidate pick @ 5.00
  2. — Closing @ 5.81

📊 Pattern AI

1 BIT vs Tai'an Tiankuang 1-1 ✓ Correct League Two 2026-06-28 FADE Draw 3.25 3.35 -0.9pp 70 🔥
Entry 93d ago
3.25
→
Expected Closing
3.35
Expected CLV -0.9pp
Why

The market is undergoing sharp repricing with a slight negative closing edge (-1.13pp), suggesting overreaction to sharp-led signals. Historical CLV is marginally positive (52%), but the pattern similarity is moderate (60%). Main risk: The low volatility and sharp-led signals could still align with a draw outcome.

Money Signal
Pattern Evidence
Pattern Confidence: Moderate (B)
Sample Size 83
Historical CLV 52%
Historical ROI +29.5%
Coverage Tier Low
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ✓ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 3.25
  1. 2026-06-28 Candidate pick @ 3.25
  2. — Closing @ 3.35
2 FC Isloch Minsk R. vs Belshina 4-0 ✗ Incorrect Premier League 2026-06-28 FADE Draw 4.64 4.72 -0.4pp 68 🔥
Entry 93d ago
4.64
→
Expected Closing
4.72
Expected CLV -0.4pp
Why

The sharp-led market repricing and significant odds drop (-12.3%) suggest an overreaction. Despite a strong model edge (7.99pp) and historical CLV (52%), the pattern similarity is low (50%), reducing confidence in the replayability of this scenario. Main risk: Sharp-led signals may still align with the draw outcome.

Money Signal
Pattern Evidence
Pattern Confidence: Moderate (B)
Sample Size 83
Historical CLV 52%
Historical ROI +29.5%
Coverage Tier Low
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ✓ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 4.64
  1. 2026-06-25 Lens filter Lens reject: historical sample must be ≥15; historical ROI must be >0%; edge must be <8pp (Pattern axis). (Current: steam=57, breadth=50%, signal=market_fading, kickoff_in=83.8h)
  2. 2026-06-26 Lens filter Lens reject: historical sample must be ≥15; historical ROI must be >0%; edge must be <8pp (Pattern axis). (Current: steam=57, breadth=50%, signal=market_fading, kickoff_in=62.3h)
  3. 2026-06-28 Candidate pick @ 4.64
  4. — Closing @ 4.72

😈 Anti-Steam AI

1 Carolina Core vs Huntsville City 1-0 ✗ Incorrect MLS Next Pro 2026-06-28 FADE Contrarian Huntsville City Win 2.38 2.49 -1.9pp 75 🔥
Entry 93d ago
2.38
→
Expected Closing
2.49
Expected CLV -1.9pp
Why

Carolina Core has seen strong steam with odds drifting from 2.0 to 2.38, but the model probability (31.94%) is below the market's 42.02%. The Elo difference of -92.3 and slightly negative xG differential suggest Carolina Core is overvalued. Main risk: Potential underestimation of Carolina Core's home advantage.

🔥 Sharp Money Signal
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ✓ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 2.38
  1. 2026-06-28 Candidate pick @ 2.38
  2. — Closing @ 2.49
2 Curico Unido vs Universidad de Concepcion 2-2 ✗ Incorrect Copa Chile 2026-06-28 FADE Valuation disagreement Curico Unido Win 2.35 2.65 -4.8pp 70 ⚡
Historical signal — current rules would not generate this fade.
🚀 Strong Price Change
🚀 Strong Price Change
Entry 93d ago
2.35
→
Expected Closing
2.65
Expected CLV -4.8pp
Why

Universidad de Concepcion has been steamed with odds shortening from 2.1 to 2.35, but the model probability (36.11%) is below the market's 42.55%. The Elo difference slightly favors Universidad de Concepcion, but the xG difference is negligible. Main risk: Universidad de Concepcion's form may justify the market move.

⚡ Solid Money Signal
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ✓ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 2.35
  1. 2026-06-27 Lens filter Lens reject: steam score must be ≥70; model must disagree with market. (Current: steam=48, breadth=78%, signal=sharp_led, kickoff_in=35.1h, hist_n=319, hist_clv_rate=3%)
  2. 2026-06-28 Candidate pick @ 2.35
  3. — Closing @ 2.65
Hypothesis: Late market moves contain information that improves betting decisions.
Theory Building Confidence: Medium
Building Qualification 47 / 50 Settled Bets
3 more settled picks required for official ranking
ROI
-100.0%
Positive CLV
Insufficient Data
Record 0-3 · Win Rate 0.0% · Profit -6.0u · Total Staked 6.0u · Avg Stake 2.00u
Recent Results L L L
Latest Picks
  • Jordan Win
  • Defensores de Vilelas Win
  • CRB Win
Hypothesis: Combining multiple signals is more reliable than relying on a single factor.
Theory Building Confidence: Medium
Building Qualification 24 / 50 Settled Bets
26 more settled picks required for official ranking
ROI
+187.5%
Positive CLV
Insufficient Data
Record 1-1 · Win Rate 50.0% · Profit +3.8u · Total Staked 2.0u · Avg Stake 1.00u
Recent Results L W
Latest Picks
  • Jordan Win
  • KPV-j Win
  • Norrby IF Win
Hypothesis: Recurring market patterns appear often enough to support systematic betting.
Theory in Testing Confidence: Low
Building Qualification 5 / 50 Settled Bets
45 more settled picks required for official ranking
ROI
+62.5%
Positive CLV
Insufficient Data
Record 1-1 · Win Rate 50.0% · Profit +1.2u · Total Staked 2.0u · Avg Stake 1.00u
Recent Results W L
Latest Picks
  • Fade Draw
  • Fade Draw
Hypothesis: Selective betting beats betting volume.
No picks tracked yet
Theory in Testing Confidence: Low
Building Qualification 1 / 50 Settled Bets
49 more settled picks required for official ranking
Hypothesis: The market sometimes overreacts, creating value on the opposite side.
Theory Building Confidence: Medium
Building Qualification 23 / 50 Settled Bets
27 more settled picks required for official ranking
ROI
-100.0%
Positive CLV
Insufficient Data
Record 0-2 · Win Rate 0.0% · Profit -1.5u · Total Staked 1.5u · Avg Stake 0.75u
Recent Results L L
Latest Picks
  • Fade Huntsville City Win
  • Fade Curico Unido Win

Confidence reflects sample size only. Each AI needs 50 settled picks to enter the official ranking. CLV rate appears after 10 settled picks.

Community Benchmark

Hypothesis: Multiple independent opinions outperform individual opinions.
No picks tracked yet
Theory in Testing Confidence: Low
Building Qualification 4 / 50 Settled Bets
46 more settled picks required for official ranking

Why This Matters

Every bettor has a theory.

  • Follow the market.
  • Fade the market.
  • Trust only high-confidence picks.
  • Look for recurring patterns.

We track each approach publicly and measure the results over time.

The goal is simple:

Which ideas actually beat the market?

Example Betting Hypotheses

  • Following major market moves reveals useful information.
  • Betting against popular market sentiment creates value.
  • Fewer high-conviction bets outperform high-volume betting.
  • Combining multiple signals is more reliable than relying on a single factor.
  • Recurring market patterns can be identified and exploited over time.
  • Consensus opinions outperform individual opinions.

The Championship does not assume any of these ideas are true.

The purpose is to test them publicly.

← Current Championship