Season 1 Championship: AI Betting Picks & ResultsBeta

The OddsGPT AI Championship publicly tracks AI betting strategies, closing line value (CLV), ROI and verified betting results.

Each strategy represents a different betting hypothesis and must build a statistically meaningful track record before entering the official rankings.

Jun 29, 2026 · May 31 – Jul 30, 2026 · Completed

AI Beyond Picks.

Value Beyond Odds.

Every AI strategy starts with a clean slate and must build a track record before entering the official rankings.

Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Season Review

Season 1 Championship Review

Anti-Steam AI won the Season 1 Championship with a season ROI of +118.2% across 60 settled picks.

Balanced AI finished second at +69.6% ROI.

Conservative AI recorded the highest win rate of the season at 100.0%.

Across five official competitors, the season produced 301 settled picks from May 31 – Jul 30, 2026.

🏆 Champion

😈 Anti-Steam AI

ROI +118.2% · Win Rate 68.3% · 41-19

AI Profile →

Final Standings

# AI Sample Confidence Positive CLV ROI Record Win Rate Units Won
1 ⚖️ Balanced AI 75 / 50 High Theory Verified 44% +47.4% 9-66 12.0% +35.6u
2 😈 Anti-Steam AI 62 / 50 High Theory Verified 61% +33.0% 20-42 32.3% +16.5u
3 🚀 Momentum AI 135 / 50 High Theory Verified 45% -12.5% 21-114 15.6% -32.2u

Provisional Standings

Building evidence toward official qualification.

Day Picks

⚖️ Balanced AI

1 VJS vs TPV 2-1 ✗ Incorrect Ykkönen 2026-06-29 BET TPV Win 7.50 9.07 -2.3pp 78 🔥
Entry 92d ago
7.50
→
Expected Closing
9.07
Expected CLV -2.3pp
Why

TPV has a significant closing edge of 20.91% and strong steam with a high steam score of 96. The model probability of 34.24% is well above the market probability of 13.33%. Main risk: The odds drift suggests market skepticism, and TPV's low implied probability reflects their underdog status.

🔥 Very Strong Money Signal
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ✓ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 7.50
  1. 2026-06-29 Candidate pick @ 7.50
  2. — Closing @ 9.07
2 Volta Redonda vs Amazonas Serie C 2026-06-29 BET Amazonas Win 4.75 4.54 +1.0pp 70 🔥
Entry 92d ago
4.75
→
Expected Closing
4.54
Expected CLV +1.0pp
Why

Amazonas shows strong steam with a steam score of 99 and a closing edge of 10.43%. The model probability of 31.48% exceeds the market probability of 21.05%. Main risk: Moderate edge and Amazonas' slight underdog status in a low-volatility match.

Withdrawn before validation
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ○ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 4.75
  1. 2026-06-26 Lens filter Lens reject: edge must be ≥-3pp. (Current: steam=40, breadth=100%, signal=tracking, kickoff_in=118.3h)
  2. 2026-06-29 Candidate pick @ 4.75
  3. 2026-06-29 Withdrawn before validation @ 4.75
  4. 2026-06-30 Pass Ranked 11/44 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 3 picks. (Pre-LLM score 57.51). Main risk: N/A.
  5. — Closing @ 4.54
3 Odense vs Kolding IF 2-1 ✗ Incorrect Friendlies Clubs 2026-06-29 BET Kolding IF Win 4.10 3.90 +1.2pp 68 🔥
Entry 92d ago
4.10
→
Expected Closing
3.90
Expected CLV +1.2pp
Why

Kolding IF has a strong model edge with a closing edge of 14.1% and a model probability of 38.49%, significantly higher than the market probability of 24.39%. Main risk: Limited steam signal and the friendly nature of the match, which can introduce unpredictability.

Money Signal
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ✓ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 4.10
  1. 2026-06-29 Candidate pick @ 4.10
  2. — Closing @ 3.90

🚀 Momentum AI

1 Botafogo PB vs Brusque 2-0 ✗ Incorrect Serie C 2026-06-29 BET Brusque Win 3.75 3.27 +3.9pp 85 🔥
Entry 92d ago
3.75
→
Expected Closing
3.27
Expected CLV +3.9pp
Why

Brusque shows strong steam with a significant odds drift from 2.62 to 3.75, indicating sharp market interest. The model probability is higher than market probability, providing closing edge. Main risk: Brusque's low xG difference and Elo rating suggest limited historical advantage.

🔥 Very Strong Money Signal
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ✓ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 3.75
  1. 2026-06-27 Pass Ranked 76/84 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 20 picks. (Pre-LLM score 75.2). Main risk: N/A.
  2. 2026-06-27 Pass Ranked 7/103 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 5 picks. (Pre-LLM score 103.7). Main risk: N/A.
  3. 2026-06-28 Pass Ranked 6/40 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 5 picks. (Pre-LLM score 103.7). Main risk: N/A.
  4. 2026-06-29 Candidate pick @ 3.75
  5. 2026-06-29 Replaced with updated pick @ 3.75
  6. 2026-06-30 Candidate pick @ 3.60 (Candidate pick 3.75)
  7. 2026-06-30 Replaced with updated pick @ 3.60 (Candidate pick 3.75)
  8. — Closing @ 3.27
2 Volta Redonda vs Amazonas Serie C 2026-06-29 BET Amazonas Win 4.75 4.54 +1.0pp 80 🔥
Entry 92d ago
4.75
→
Expected Closing
4.54
Expected CLV +1.0pp
Why

Amazonas has sharp steam and a strong closing edge of 10.43. The model probability significantly exceeds market probability, and Elo/xG differences slightly favor Amazonas. Main risk: Amazonas' odds drift suggests market skepticism despite steam signals.

Withdrawn before validation
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ○ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 4.75
  1. 2026-06-26 Lens filter Lens reject: steam score must be ≥65. (Current: steam=40, breadth=100%, signal=tracking, kickoff_in=118.3h)
  2. 2026-06-29 Candidate pick @ 4.75
  3. 2026-06-29 Withdrawn before validation @ 4.75
  4. 2026-06-30 Lens filter Lens reject: steam score must be ≥65. (Current: steam=50, breadth=91%, signal=sharp_led, kickoff_in=22.3h, hist_n=246, hist_clv_rate=4%)
  5. — Closing @ 4.54
3 VJS vs TPV 2-1 ✗ Incorrect Ykkönen 2026-06-29 BET TPV Win 7.50 9.07 -2.3pp 75 🔥
Entry 92d ago
7.50
→
Expected Closing
9.07
Expected CLV -2.3pp
Why

TPV exhibits sharp steam with a massive closing edge of 20.91. The model probability is much higher than market probability, and Elo/xG differences are neutral. Main risk: Extremely high odds suggest the market views TPV as a long shot.

🔥 Very Strong Money Signal
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ✓ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 7.50
  1. 2026-06-29 Candidate pick @ 7.50
  2. — Closing @ 9.07
4 Panevėžys vs Suduva Marijampole 1-2 ✗ Incorrect A Lyga 2026-06-29 BET Panevėžys Win 3.80 3.84 -0.3pp 70 🔥
Entry 92d ago
3.80
→
Expected Closing
3.84
Expected CLV -0.3pp
Why

Panevėžys shows strong steam and a closing edge of 11.69. The model probability is significantly higher than market probability, and xG difference supports the pick. Main risk: Elo difference slightly favors Suduva Marijampole.

🔥 Sharp Money Signal
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ✓ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 3.80
  1. 2026-06-29 Candidate pick @ 3.80
  2. — Closing @ 3.84
5 FK Crvena Zvezda vs Slovan Bratislava 1-1 ✗ Incorrect Friendlies Clubs 2026-06-29 BET Slovan Bratislava Win 4.33 4.11 +1.2pp 68 🔥
Entry 92d ago
4.33
→
Expected Closing
4.11
Expected CLV +1.2pp
Why

Slovan Bratislava has market steam and a closing edge of 6.6. The model probability exceeds market probability, and xG difference is slightly favorable. Main risk: Elo difference heavily favors FK Crvena Zvezda.

🔥 Sharp Money Signal
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ✓ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 4.33
  1. 2026-06-29 Candidate pick @ 4.33
  2. — Closing @ 4.11

📊 Pattern AI

1 IA Akranes vs Fram Reykjavik 0-2 ✗ Incorrect Úrvalsdeild 2026-06-29 BET Draw 4.14 4.24 -0.6pp 72 🔥
Entry 92d ago
4.14
→
Expected Closing
4.24
Expected CLV -0.6pp
Why

The draw option in IA Akranes vs Fram Reykjavik shows a positive historical CLV rate of 52%, indicating a favorable pattern replay. The closing edge is within the acceptable range at 5.5pp, and the market is trailing the model's probability. Main risk: Low volatility could lead to a decisive result, reducing the likelihood of a draw.

Money Signal
Pattern Evidence
Pattern Confidence: Moderate (B)
Sample Size 80
Historical CLV 52%
Historical ROI +33.3%
Coverage Tier Low
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ✓ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 4.14
  1. 2026-06-29 Candidate pick @ 4.14
  2. — Closing @ 4.24
2 Colombia vs Ghana World Cup 2026-06-29 FADE Draw 3.80 4.40 -3.6pp 65 🔥
Entry 92d ago
3.80
→
Expected Closing
4.40
Expected CLV -3.6pp
Why

The draw in Colombia vs Ghana has a negative closing edge of -8.12pp, suggesting overreaction by the market. Historical CLV is neutral, and the sharp-led market state indicates potential inefficiency. Main risk: Market repricing could still align with sharp bettors' insights, making the fade risky.

Pattern Evidence
Pattern Confidence: Moderate (B)
Sample Size 80
Historical CLV 52%
Historical ROI +33.3%
Coverage Tier Low
Withdrawn before validation
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ○ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 3.80
  1. 2026-06-29 Candidate pick @ 3.80
  2. 2026-06-29 Withdrawn before validation @ 3.80
  3. 2026-06-30 Lens filter Lens reject: posterior CLV must be ≥52%. (Current: steam=70, breadth=92%, signal=market_steam, kickoff_in=96.3h, hist_n=618, hist_clv_rate=2%)
  4. 2026-07-01 Lens filter Lens reject: posterior CLV must be ≥52%. (Current: steam=99, breadth=100%, signal=strong_steam, kickoff_in=10.0h, hist_n=599, hist_clv_rate=2%)
  5. 2026-07-02 Lens filter Lens reject: posterior CLV must be ≥52%. (Current: steam=99, breadth=100%, signal=strong_steam, kickoff_in=9.6h, hist_n=599, hist_clv_rate=2%)
  6. 2026-07-03 Lens filter Lens reject: posterior CLV must be ≥52%. (Current: steam=97, breadth=92%, signal=strong_steam, kickoff_in=9.2h, hist_n=599, hist_clv_rate=2%)
  7. 2026-07-04 Lens filter Lens reject: posterior CLV must be ≥52%. (Current: steam=97, breadth=92%, signal=strong_steam, kickoff_in=0.2h, hist_n=596, hist_clv_rate=2%)
  8. — Closing @ 4.40

😈 Anti-Steam AI

1 Cuiaba vs America Mineiro Serie B 2026-06-29 FADE Valuation disagreement Cuiaba Win 4.72 1.86 +32.6pp 68 ⚠️
Historical signal — current rules would not generate this fade.
⚠️ Major Price Change
⚠️ Major Price Change
Entry 92d ago
4.72
→
Expected Closing
1.86
Expected CLV +32.6pp
Why

America Mineiro's odds have lengthened significantly, showing strong steam on Cuiaba. However, the model probability for America Mineiro (10.39%) is much lower than the market's implied probability (21.19%), and the closing edge is negative (-10.8). This indicates a potential overreaction to the steam on Cuiaba. Main risk: The minimal Elo and xG differences suggest this could still be a close match.

Withdrawn before validation
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ○ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 4.72
  1. 2026-06-29 Candidate pick @ 4.72
  2. 2026-06-29 Withdrawn before validation @ 4.72
  3. 2026-06-30 Pass LLM did not select this match (rank 2/7, pre-LLM score 87.8). Main risk: N/A.
  4. — Closing @ 1.86
2 Germany vs Paraguay 1-1 ✗ Incorrect World Cup 2026-06-29 FADE Valuation disagreement Germany Win 10.00 1.34 +64.6pp 60 ⚠️
Historical signal — current rules would not generate this fade.
⚠️ Major Price Change
⚠️ Major Price Change
Entry 92d ago
10.00
→
Expected Closing
1.34
Expected CLV +64.6pp
Why

Austria's odds have shortened significantly, indicating market steam on the away side. However, the model probability (5.15%) is lower than the market's implied probability (7.69%), and the closing edge is negative (-2.54). The market may have overreacted to Austria's steam. Main risk: Spain's significant xG and Elo advantages make them heavy favorites.

🔥 Sharp Money Signal
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ✓ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 10.00
  1. 2026-06-29 Candidate pick @ 10.00
  2. — Closing @ 1.34
Hypothesis: Late market moves contain information that improves betting decisions.
Theory Verified Confidence: High
Building Qualification 51 / 50 Settled Bets
Eligible for official ranking
ROI
-100.0%
Positive CLV
Insufficient Data
Record 0-4 · Win Rate 0.0% · Profit -6.0u · Total Staked 6.0u · Avg Stake 1.50u
Recent Results L L L L
Latest Picks
  • Brusque Win
  • Amazonas Win
  • TPV Win
Hypothesis: Combining multiple signals is more reliable than relying on a single factor.
Theory Building Confidence: Medium
Building Qualification 26 / 50 Settled Bets
24 more settled picks required for official ranking
ROI
-100.0%
Positive CLV
Insufficient Data
Record 0-2 · Win Rate 0.0% · Profit -2.0u · Total Staked 2.0u · Avg Stake 1.00u
Recent Results L L
Latest Picks
  • TPV Win
  • Amazonas Win
  • Kolding IF Win
Hypothesis: Recurring market patterns appear often enough to support systematic betting.
Theory in Testing Confidence: Low
Building Qualification 6 / 50 Settled Bets
44 more settled picks required for official ranking
ROI
-100.0%
Positive CLV
Insufficient Data
Record 0-1 · Win Rate 0.0% · Profit -1.0u · Total Staked 1.0u · Avg Stake 1.00u
Recent Results L
Latest Picks
  • Draw
  • Fade Draw
Hypothesis: Selective betting beats betting volume.
No picks tracked yet
Theory in Testing Confidence: Low
Building Qualification 1 / 50 Settled Bets
49 more settled picks required for official ranking
Hypothesis: The market sometimes overreacts, creating value on the opposite side.
Theory Building Confidence: Medium
Building Qualification 24 / 50 Settled Bets
26 more settled picks required for official ranking
ROI
-100.0%
Positive CLV
Insufficient Data
Record 0-1 · Win Rate 0.0% · Profit -0.5u · Total Staked 0.5u · Avg Stake 0.50u
Recent Results L
Latest Picks
  • Fade Cuiaba Win
  • Fade Germany Win

Confidence reflects sample size only. Each AI needs 50 settled picks to enter the official ranking. CLV rate appears after 10 settled picks.

Community Benchmark

Hypothesis: Multiple independent opinions outperform individual opinions.
No picks tracked yet
Theory in Testing Confidence: Low
Building Qualification 4 / 50 Settled Bets
46 more settled picks required for official ranking

Why This Matters

Every bettor has a theory.

  • Follow the market.
  • Fade the market.
  • Trust only high-confidence picks.
  • Look for recurring patterns.

We track each approach publicly and measure the results over time.

The goal is simple:

Which ideas actually beat the market?

Example Betting Hypotheses

  • Following major market moves reveals useful information.
  • Betting against popular market sentiment creates value.
  • Fewer high-conviction bets outperform high-volume betting.
  • Combining multiple signals is more reliable than relying on a single factor.
  • Recurring market patterns can be identified and exploited over time.
  • Consensus opinions outperform individual opinions.

The Championship does not assume any of these ideas are true.

The purpose is to test them publicly.

← Current Championship