Season 1 Championship: AI Betting Picks & ResultsBeta

The OddsGPT AI Championship publicly tracks AI betting strategies, closing line value (CLV), ROI and verified betting results.

Each strategy represents a different betting hypothesis and must build a statistically meaningful track record before entering the official rankings.

Jul 19, 2026 · May 31 – Jul 30, 2026 · Completed

AI Beyond Picks.

Value Beyond Odds.

Every AI strategy starts with a clean slate and must build a track record before entering the official rankings.

Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Season Review

Season 1 Championship Review

Anti-Steam AI won the Season 1 Championship with a season ROI of +118.2% across 60 settled picks.

Balanced AI finished second at +69.6% ROI.

Conservative AI recorded the highest win rate of the season at 100.0%.

Across five official competitors, the season produced 301 settled picks from May 31 – Jul 30, 2026.

🏆 Champion

😈 Anti-Steam AI

ROI +118.2% · Win Rate 68.3% · 41-19

AI Profile →

Final Standings

# AI Sample Confidence Positive CLV ROI Record Win Rate Units Won
1 ⚖️ Balanced AI 75 / 50 High Theory Verified 44% +47.4% 9-66 12.0% +35.6u
2 😈 Anti-Steam AI 62 / 50 High Theory Verified 61% +33.0% 20-42 32.3% +16.5u
3 🚀 Momentum AI 135 / 50 High Theory Verified 45% -12.5% 21-114 15.6% -32.2u

Provisional Standings

Building evidence toward official qualification.

Day Picks

⚖️ Balanced AI

1 Gualberto Villarroel SJ vs The Strongest 0-0 ✗ Incorrect Primera División 2026-07-19 BET Gualberto Villarroel SJ Win 3.25 3.08 +1.7pp 72 🔥
Entry 72d ago
3.25
→
Expected Closing
3.08
Expected CLV +1.7pp
Why

Fits this AI strategy's typical setup. Main risk: unfavorable line movement after entry.

🔥 Very Strong Money Signal
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ✓ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 3.25
  1. 2026-07-17 Candidate pick @ 3.25
  2. 2026-07-17 Withdrawn before validation @ 3.25
  3. 2026-07-18 Pass Ranked 12/128 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 3 picks. (Pre-LLM score 90.02). Main risk: N/A.
  4. 2026-07-19 Candidate pick @ 3.25
  5. — Closing @ 3.08
2 Western United II vs Bulleen Lions 2-4 ✗ Incorrect Victoria NPL 2 2026-07-19 BET Western United II Win 3.60 4.03 -3.0pp 72 🔥
Entry 72d ago
3.60
→
Expected Closing
4.03
Expected CLV -3.0pp
Why

Fits this AI strategy's typical setup. Main risk: unfavorable line movement after entry.

🔥 Very Strong Money Signal
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ✓ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 3.60
  1. 2026-07-19 Candidate pick @ 3.60
  2. — Closing @ 4.03
3 Cooma Tigers FC vs Western Sydney Wanderers Australia Cup 2026-07-19 BET Cooma Tigers FC Win 23.00 12.49 +3.7pp 72 🔥
Entry 72d ago
23.00
→
Expected Closing
12.49
Expected CLV +3.7pp
Why

Fits this AI strategy's typical setup. Main risk: unfavorable line movement after entry.

Withdrawn before validation
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ○ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 23.00
  1. 2026-07-17 Pass LLM did not select this match (rank 3/144, pre-LLM score 97.55). Main risk: N/A.
  2. 2026-07-18 Pass Ranked 6/128 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 3 picks. (Pre-LLM score 90.45). Main risk: N/A.
  3. 2026-07-19 Candidate pick @ 23.00
  4. 2026-07-19 Withdrawn before validation @ 23.00
  5. 2026-07-20 Pass LLM did not select this match (rank 1/69, pre-LLM score 92.65). Main risk: N/A.
  6. 2026-07-21 Pass Ranked 37/120 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 20 picks. (Pre-LLM score 72.83). Main risk: N/A.
  7. 2026-07-22 Pass Ranked 41/125 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 20 picks. (Pre-LLM score 71.85). Main risk: N/A.
  8. — Closing @ 12.49

🚀 Momentum AI

1 Laagri vs Paide 5-2 ✓ Correct Meistriliiga 2026-07-19 BET Laagri Win 3.20 3.10 +1.0pp 85 🔥
Entry 72d ago
3.20
→
Expected Closing
3.10
Expected CLV +1.0pp
Why

Laagri has experienced strong steam with a sharp odds drop from 4.75 to 3.2, indicating significant market support. Despite a slight negative closing edge, the market probability aligns closely with the model probability, suggesting value. Main risk: Elo and xG differences slightly favor Paide.

🔥 Very Strong Money Signal
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ✓ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 3.20
  1. 2026-07-19 Candidate pick @ 3.20
  2. — Closing @ 3.10
2 Nantong Haimen Codion vs Rizhao Yuqi 0-0 ✗ Incorrect League Two 2026-07-19 BET Rizhao Yuqi Win 3.10 4.02 -7.4pp 80 🔥
🚀 Strong Price Change
🚀 Strong Price Change
Entry 72d ago
3.10
→
Expected Closing
4.02
Expected CLV -7.4pp
Why

Rizhao Yuqi has seen a sharp odds drop from 4.5 to 3.1, backed by strong steam and high breadth. Elo and xG differences favor Rizhao slightly, supporting the market move. Main risk: Model probability slightly under market probability, suggesting limited value.

🔥 Very Strong Money Signal
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ✓ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 3.10
  1. 2026-07-18 Lens filter Lens reject: steam score must be ≥65. (Current: steam=40, breadth=100%, signal=tracking, kickoff_in=33.8h, hist_n=230, hist_clv_rate=4%)
  2. 2026-07-19 Candidate pick @ 3.10
  3. — Closing @ 4.02
3 Wuhan Three Towns II vs Guizhou Zhucheng 0-1 ✗ Incorrect League Two 2026-07-19 BET Wuhan Three Towns II Win 3.10 3.45 -3.3pp 72 🔥
Entry 72d ago
3.10
→
Expected Closing
3.45
Expected CLV -3.3pp
Why

Wuhan Three Towns II shows strong steam with odds dropping from 4.33 to 3.1. Market probability aligns closely with model probability, and closing edge is positive. Main risk: Elo and xG differences favor Guizhou Zhucheng.

🔥 Very Strong Money Signal
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ✓ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 3.10
  1. 2026-07-19 Candidate pick @ 3.10
  2. — Closing @ 3.45
4 Tai'an Tiankuang vs Qingdao Red Lions 1-0 ✗ Incorrect League Two 2026-07-19 BET Qingdao Red Lions Win 2.80 3.69 -8.6pp 78 🔥
🚀 Strong Price Change
🚀 Strong Price Change
Entry 72d ago
2.80
→
Expected Closing
3.69
Expected CLV -8.6pp
Why

Qingdao Red Lions has strong steam and sharp odds movement from 3.75 to 2.8. Elo difference and xG are neutral, and market probability aligns closely with model probability. Main risk: Limited historical pattern similarity for this scenario.

🔥 Very Strong Money Signal
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ✓ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 2.80
  1. 2026-07-19 Candidate pick @ 2.80
  2. — Closing @ 3.69
5 Ulverstone vs Glenorchy Knights Tasmania NPL 2026-07-19 BET Ulverstone Win 4.00 3.36 +4.8pp 70 🔥
🚀 Strong Price Change
🚀 Strong Price Change
Entry 72d ago
4.00
→
Expected Closing
3.36
Expected CLV +4.8pp
Why

Ulverstone has seen a significant odds drop from 7.0 to 4.0, indicating strong market momentum. Model probability exceeds market probability, suggesting value. Main risk: High volatility in the league and significant Elo difference favoring Glenorchy Knights.

Replaced with updated pick
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ○ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 5.75
  1. 2026-07-18 Candidate pick @ 5.75
  2. 2026-07-18 Replaced with updated pick @ 5.75
  3. 2026-07-19 Candidate pick @ 4.00 (Candidate pick 5.75)
  4. 2026-07-19 Replaced with updated pick @ 4.00 (Candidate pick 5.75)
  5. — Closing @ 3.36

📊 Pattern AI

1 FH hafnarfjordur vs Breidablik Úrvalsdeild 2026-07-19 FADE Draw 4.22 4.08 +0.8pp 70 🔥
Entry 72d ago
4.22
→
Expected Closing
4.08
Expected CLV +0.8pp
Why

The draw shows a model edge with a closing edge of 5.95pp and a historical CLV positive rate of 52%. However, the market probability is significantly lower than the model probability, suggesting potential overestimation by the model. Additionally, the historical pattern similarity is moderate at 54.1%, which does not strongly support the model's view. Main risk: The model's edge might still materialize if the market is underestimating the draw outcome.

Pattern Evidence
Pattern Confidence: Moderate (B)
Sample Size 52
Historical CLV 52%
Historical ROI +38.9%
Coverage Tier Low
Withdrawn before validation
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ○ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 4.22
  1. 2026-07-18 Lens filter Lens reject: posterior CLV must be ≥52%. (Current: steam=51, breadth=90%, signal=sharp_led, kickoff_in=65.5h, hist_n=230, hist_clv_rate=4%)
  2. 2026-07-19 Candidate pick @ 4.22
  3. 2026-07-19 Withdrawn before validation @ 4.22
  4. 2026-07-20 Pass Despite a 6.34pp closing edge and a positive historical CLV rate (52%), the pattern similarity is relatively low (53.3), and the market state indicates the model leads the market. This suggests the edge may not hold. Main risk: The model's edge could materialize if the market fails to adjust.
  5. — Closing @ 4.08

😈 Anti-Steam AI

1 Universitatea Cluj vs Farul Constanta 2-1 ✗ Incorrect Liga I 2026-07-19 FADE Valuation disagreement Farul Constanta Win 3.40 3.36 +0.3pp 80 🔥
Historical signal — current rules would not generate this fade.
Entry 72d ago
3.40
→
Expected Closing
3.36
Expected CLV +0.3pp
Why

Farul Constanta has seen significant steam with odds shortening from 4.75 to 3.4, but the model probability (12.81%) is far below the market probability (29.41%), indicating a substantial overreaction. Main risk: Farul Constanta's xG advantage of 1.4 suggests they could outperform expectations.

🔥 Very Strong Money Signal
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ✓ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 3.50
  1. 2026-07-17 Lens filter Lens reject: steam score must be ≥70. (Current: steam=44, breadth=69%, signal=sharp_led, kickoff_in=60.4h, hist_n=193, hist_clv_rate=5%)
  2. 2026-07-18 Candidate pick @ 3.50
  3. 2026-07-19 Update @ 3.40 (Candidate pick 3.50)
  4. — Closing @ 3.36
Hypothesis: Late market moves contain information that improves betting decisions.
Theory Verified Confidence: High
Building Qualification 109 / 50 Settled Bets
Eligible for official ranking
ROI
+0.0%
Positive CLV
Insufficient Data
Record 1-3 · Win Rate 25.0% · Profit +0.0u · Total Staked 8.0u · Avg Stake 2.00u
Recent Results W L L L
Latest Picks
  • Laagri Win
  • Rizhao Yuqi Win
  • Wuhan Three Towns II Win
Hypothesis: Combining multiple signals is more reliable than relying on a single factor.
Theory Verified Confidence: High
Building Qualification 62 / 50 Settled Bets
Eligible for official ranking
ROI
-100.0%
Positive CLV
Insufficient Data
Record 0-2 · Win Rate 0.0% · Profit -2.0u · Total Staked 2.0u · Avg Stake 1.00u
Recent Results L L
Latest Picks
  • Gualberto Villarroel SJ Win
  • Western United II Win
  • Cooma Tigers FC Win
Hypothesis: Recurring market patterns appear often enough to support systematic betting.
Theory Building Confidence: Medium
Building Qualification 35 / 50 Settled Bets
15 more settled picks required for official ranking
ROI
—
Positive CLV
Insufficient Data
Recent Results
Latest Picks
  • Fade Draw
Hypothesis: Selective betting beats betting volume.
No picks tracked yet
Theory in Testing Confidence: Low
Building Qualification 1 / 50 Settled Bets
49 more settled picks required for official ranking
Hypothesis: The market sometimes overreacts, creating value on the opposite side.
Theory Verified Confidence: High
Building Qualification 52 / 50 Settled Bets
Eligible for official ranking
ROI
-100.0%
Positive CLV
Insufficient Data
Record 0-1 · Win Rate 0.0% · Profit -1.0u · Total Staked 1.0u · Avg Stake 1.00u
Recent Results L
Latest Picks
  • Fade Farul Constanta Win

Confidence reflects sample size only. Each AI needs 50 settled picks to enter the official ranking. CLV rate appears after 10 settled picks.

Community Benchmark

Hypothesis: Multiple independent opinions outperform individual opinions.
No picks tracked yet
Theory in Testing Confidence: Low
Building Qualification 4 / 50 Settled Bets
46 more settled picks required for official ranking

Why This Matters

Every bettor has a theory.

  • Follow the market.
  • Fade the market.
  • Trust only high-confidence picks.
  • Look for recurring patterns.

We track each approach publicly and measure the results over time.

The goal is simple:

Which ideas actually beat the market?

Example Betting Hypotheses

  • Following major market moves reveals useful information.
  • Betting against popular market sentiment creates value.
  • Fewer high-conviction bets outperform high-volume betting.
  • Combining multiple signals is more reliable than relying on a single factor.
  • Recurring market patterns can be identified and exploited over time.
  • Consensus opinions outperform individual opinions.

The Championship does not assume any of these ideas are true.

The purpose is to test them publicly.

← Current Championship