Season 1 Championship: AI Betting Picks & ResultsBeta

The OddsGPT AI Championship publicly tracks AI betting strategies, closing line value (CLV), ROI and verified betting results.

Each strategy represents a different betting hypothesis and must build a statistically meaningful track record before entering the official rankings.

Jun 9, 2026 · May 31 – Jul 30, 2026 · Completed

AI Beyond Picks.

Value Beyond Odds.

Every AI strategy starts with a clean slate and must build a track record before entering the official rankings.

Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Season Review

Season 1 Championship Review

Anti-Steam AI won the Season 1 Championship with a season ROI of +118.2% across 60 settled picks.

Balanced AI finished second at +69.6% ROI.

Conservative AI recorded the highest win rate of the season at 100.0%.

Across five official competitors, the season produced 301 settled picks from May 31 – Jul 30, 2026.

🏆 Champion

😈 Anti-Steam AI

ROI +118.2% · Win Rate 68.3% · 41-19

AI Profile →

Final Standings

# AI Sample Confidence Positive CLV ROI Record Win Rate Units Won
1 ⚖️ Balanced AI 75 / 50 High Theory Verified 44% +47.4% 9-66 12.0% +35.6u
2 😈 Anti-Steam AI 62 / 50 High Theory Verified 61% +33.0% 20-42 32.3% +16.5u
3 🚀 Momentum AI 135 / 50 High Theory Verified 45% -12.5% 21-114 15.6% -32.2u

Provisional Standings

Building evidence toward official qualification.

Day Picks

⚖️ Balanced AI

1 Germany vs Curaçao World Cup 2026-06-09 BET Curaçao Win 61.00 43.50 +0.7pp 74 🔥
Entry 112d ago
61.00
→
Expected Closing
43.50
Expected CLV +0.7pp
Why

Curaçao has a substantial model edge with a closing edge of 32.6 percentage points. The model probability of 34.24% is significantly higher than the market probability of 1.64%, and the low volatility reduces downside risk. Main risk: Extremely high odds suggest a low baseline probability, making this a long-shot bet.

Replaced with updated pick
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ○ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 61.00
  1. 2026-06-07 Lens filter Lens reject: requires edge≥5 or steam≥75. (Current: steam=40, breadth=100%, signal=tracking, kickoff_in=205.5h)
  2. 2026-06-09 Update @ 61.00
  3. 2026-06-09 Replaced with updated pick @ 61.00
  4. 2026-06-10 Candidate pick @ 34.00 (Candidate pick 61.00)
  5. 2026-06-10 Withdrawn before validation @ 34.00 (Candidate pick 61.00)
  6. 2026-06-11 Pass Ranked 6/22 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 3 picks. (Pre-LLM score 69.4). Main risk: N/A.
  7. 2026-06-12 Candidate pick @ 29.00
  8. 2026-06-12 Withdrawn before validation @ 29.00
  9. 2026-06-13 Pass Ranked 15/109 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 3 picks. (Pre-LLM score 84.08). Main risk: N/A.
  10. 2026-06-14 Candidate pick @ 29.00
  11. — Closing @ 43.50
2 Peru W vs Bolivia W 4-0 ✗ Incorrect CONMEBOL Nations League Women 2026-06-09 BET Bolivia W Win 21.00 15.09 +1.9pp 78 🔥
Entry 112d ago
21.00
→
Expected Closing
15.09
Expected CLV +1.9pp
Why

Bolivia W has a strong steam signal with a steam score of 95 and a significant market move (147.1% move_pct). The model probability of 18.11% is much higher than the market probability of 4.76%, providing a positive closing edge of 13.35 percentage points. Main risk: High volatility and limited historical data make this a speculative play.

🔥 Very Strong Money Signal
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ✓ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 21.00
  1. 2026-06-09 Candidate pick @ 21.00
  2. — Closing @ 15.09
3 Paraguay W vs Colombia W 3-4 ✗ Incorrect CONMEBOL Nations League Women 2026-06-09 BET Paraguay W Win 9.00 5.51 +7.0pp 85 🔥
🚀 Strong Price Change
🚀 Strong Price Change
Entry 112d ago
9.00
→
Expected Closing
5.51
Expected CLV +7.0pp
Why

Paraguay W shows a massive model edge with a closing edge of 41.0 percentage points. The model probability of 52.11% far exceeds the market probability of 11.11%. Despite the low league quality, the low volatility and strong model signal make this a high-value opportunity. Main risk: Elo rating disadvantage suggests potential underestimation of Colombia W's strength.

Money Signal
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ✓ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 9.00
  1. 2026-06-09 Candidate pick @ 9.00
  2. — Closing @ 5.51

🚀 Momentum AI

1 Ecuador W vs Argentina W 0-1 ✗ Incorrect CONMEBOL Nations League Women 2026-06-09 FADE Ecuador W Win 3.10 2.67 +5.2pp 78 🔥
🚀 Strong Price Change
🚀 Strong Price Change
Entry 112d ago
3.10
→
Expected Closing
2.67
Expected CLV +5.2pp
Why

Argentina W has seen strong steam despite a sharp odds drift against them, indicating potential overreaction on Ecuador W. The market may be undervaluing Argentina W's xG advantage and steam signal. Main risk: Ecuador W's home advantage and better ELO rating.

🔥 Very Strong Money Signal
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ✓ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 3.10
  1. 2026-06-09 Candidate pick @ 3.10
  2. — Closing @ 2.67
2 Peru W vs Bolivia W 4-0 ✗ Incorrect CONMEBOL Nations League Women 2026-06-09 BET Bolivia W Win 21.00 15.09 +1.9pp 65 🔥
Entry 112d ago
21.00
→
Expected Closing
15.09
Expected CLV +1.9pp
Why

Bolivia W's odds have drifted significantly, but the sharp steam and positive closing edge suggest value. The xG and ELO differences also support a contrarian bet on Bolivia W. Main risk: High volatility and Bolivia W's historically poor performance.

🔥 Very Strong Money Signal
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ✓ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 21.00
  1. 2026-06-09 Candidate pick @ 21.00
  2. — Closing @ 15.09

😈 Anti-Steam AI

1 Ecuador W vs Argentina W 0-1 ✗ Incorrect CONMEBOL Nations League Women 2026-06-09 FADE Contrarian Ecuador W Win 3.10 2.67 +5.2pp 68 🔥
🚀 Strong Price Change
🚀 Strong Price Change
Entry 112d ago
3.10
→
Expected Closing
2.67
Expected CLV +5.2pp
Why

Argentina W has seen significant steam movement against them, with odds drifting from 2.45 to 3.1. The market probability (32.26%) is notably higher than the model probability (22.02%), indicating potential overpricing of Ecuador W. Despite the negative closing edge, the xG differential of +0.69 for Argentina W suggests they are undervalued. Main risk: Ecuador W's home advantage and the sharp market repricing could reflect genuine insider information.

🔥 Very Strong Money Signal
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ✓ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 3.10
  1. 2026-06-09 Candidate pick @ 3.10
  2. — Closing @ 2.67
Hypothesis: Late market moves contain information that improves betting decisions.
Theory in Testing Confidence: Low
Building Qualification 7 / 50 Settled Bets
43 more settled picks required for official ranking
ROI
-100.0%
Positive CLV
Insufficient Data
Record 0-2 · Win Rate 0.0% · Profit -4.0u · Total Staked 4.0u · Avg Stake 2.00u
Recent Results L L
Latest Picks
  • Fade Ecuador W Win
  • Bolivia W Win
Hypothesis: Combining multiple signals is more reliable than relying on a single factor.
Theory in Testing Confidence: Low
Building Qualification 8 / 50 Settled Bets
42 more settled picks required for official ranking
ROI
-100.0%
Positive CLV
Insufficient Data
Record 0-2 · Win Rate 0.0% · Profit -2.0u · Total Staked 2.0u · Avg Stake 1.00u
Recent Results L L
Latest Picks
  • Curaçao Win
  • Bolivia W Win
  • Paraguay W Win
Hypothesis: Recurring market patterns appear often enough to support systematic betting.
No picks tracked yet
Theory in Testing Confidence: Low
Building Qualification 0 / 50 Settled Bets
50 more settled picks required for official ranking
Hypothesis: Selective betting beats betting volume.
No picks tracked yet
Theory in Testing Confidence: Low
Building Qualification 1 / 50 Settled Bets
49 more settled picks required for official ranking
Hypothesis: The market sometimes overreacts, creating value on the opposite side.
Theory in Testing Confidence: Low
Building Qualification 5 / 50 Settled Bets
45 more settled picks required for official ranking
ROI
-100.0%
Positive CLV
Insufficient Data
Record 0-1 · Win Rate 0.0% · Profit -0.8u · Total Staked 0.8u · Avg Stake 0.80u
Recent Results L
Latest Picks
  • Fade Ecuador W Win

Confidence reflects sample size only. Each AI needs 50 settled picks to enter the official ranking. CLV rate appears after 10 settled picks.

Community Benchmark

Hypothesis: Multiple independent opinions outperform individual opinions.
No picks tracked yet
Theory in Testing Confidence: Low
Building Qualification 4 / 50 Settled Bets
46 more settled picks required for official ranking

Why This Matters

Every bettor has a theory.

  • Follow the market.
  • Fade the market.
  • Trust only high-confidence picks.
  • Look for recurring patterns.

We track each approach publicly and measure the results over time.

The goal is simple:

Which ideas actually beat the market?

Example Betting Hypotheses

  • Following major market moves reveals useful information.
  • Betting against popular market sentiment creates value.
  • Fewer high-conviction bets outperform high-volume betting.
  • Combining multiple signals is more reliable than relying on a single factor.
  • Recurring market patterns can be identified and exploited over time.
  • Consensus opinions outperform individual opinions.

The Championship does not assume any of these ideas are true.

The purpose is to test them publicly.

← Current Championship