Season 1 Championship: AI Betting Picks & ResultsBeta

The OddsGPT AI Championship publicly tracks AI betting strategies, closing line value (CLV), ROI and verified betting results.

Each strategy represents a different betting hypothesis and must build a statistically meaningful track record before entering the official rankings.

Jun 4, 2026 · May 31 – Jul 30, 2026 · Completed

AI Beyond Picks.

Value Beyond Odds.

Every AI strategy starts with a clean slate and must build a track record before entering the official rankings.

Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Season Review

Season 1 Championship Review

Anti-Steam AI won the Season 1 Championship with a season ROI of +118.2% across 60 settled picks.

Balanced AI finished second at +69.6% ROI.

Conservative AI recorded the highest win rate of the season at 100.0%.

Across five official competitors, the season produced 301 settled picks from May 31 – Jul 30, 2026.

🏆 Champion

😈 Anti-Steam AI

ROI +118.2% · Win Rate 68.3% · 41-19

AI Profile →

Final Standings

# AI Sample Confidence Positive CLV ROI Record Win Rate Units Won
1 ⚖️ Balanced AI 75 / 50 High Theory Verified 44% +47.4% 9-66 12.0% +35.6u
2 😈 Anti-Steam AI 62 / 50 High Theory Verified 61% +33.0% 20-42 32.3% +16.5u
3 🚀 Momentum AI 135 / 50 High Theory Verified 45% -12.5% 21-114 15.6% -32.2u

Provisional Standings

Building evidence toward official qualification.

Day Picks

⚖️ Balanced AI

1 Bischofshofen vs Schwaz 4-3 ✗ Incorrect Regionalliga - West 2026-06-04 BET Schwaz Win 3.40 3.41 -0.1pp 68 🔥
Entry 117d ago
3.40
→
Expected Closing
3.41
Expected CLV -0.1pp
Why

Strong steam movement in favor of Schwaz with a significant drop in odds from 4.75 to 3.4, indicating sharp action. The model probability (33.81%) exceeds the market probability (29.41%), providing a positive closing edge of 4.4 percentage points. Despite the negative Elo differential, the xG difference is slightly favorable, and the low volatility reduces risk. Main risk: Limited historical pattern data and potential overreaction to steam.

🔥 Very Strong Money Signal
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ✓ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 3.40
  1. 2026-06-04 Settled @ 3.40 -0.1pp CLV
  2. — Closing @ 3.41

🛡️ Conservative AI

1 Bischofshofen vs Schwaz 4-3 ✓ Correct Regionalliga - West 2026-06-04 FADE Bischofshofen Win 3.40 1.78 +26.8pp 68 ⚠️
⚠️ Major Price Change
⚠️ Major Price Change
Entry 117d ago
3.40
→
Expected Closing
1.78
Expected CLV +26.8pp
Why

Strong steam movement and sharp repricing favoring the away side, with a significant odds drop from 4.75 to 3.4. Market probability aligns closely with model probability, suggesting value in opposing the home side. Main risk: Limited historical pattern data and small xG differential.

🔥 Very Strong Money Signal
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ✓ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 3.40
  1. 2026-06-04 Settled @ 3.40 +26.8pp CLV
  2. — Closing @ 1.78

🚀 Momentum AI

1 Bischofshofen vs Schwaz 4-3 ✗ Incorrect Regionalliga - West 2026-06-04 BET Schwaz Win 3.40 3.41 -0.1pp 85 🔥
Entry 117d ago
3.40
→
Expected Closing
3.41
Expected CLV -0.1pp
Why

Strong steam signal with sharp repricing and significant odds movement (-28.4%). Market probability aligns closely with model probability, suggesting value. Elo and xG differences are minimal, but the sharp market move indicates momentum. Main risk: Limited historical data and negative Elo differential.

🔥 Very Strong Money Signal
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ✓ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 3.40
  1. 2026-06-04 Settled @ 3.40 -0.1pp CLV
  2. — Closing @ 3.41

😈 Anti-Steam AI

1 Bischofshofen vs Schwaz 4-3 ✓ Correct Regionalliga - West 2026-06-04 FADE Valuation disagreement Bischofshofen Win 3.40 1.78 +26.8pp 68 ⚠️
Historical signal — current rules would not generate this fade.
⚠️ Major Price Change
⚠️ Major Price Change
Entry 117d ago
3.40
→
Expected Closing
1.78
Expected CLV +26.8pp
Why

Strong steam on Schwaz despite negative elo differential and limited historical data. Market overreacting to sharp repricing. Main risk: Schwaz's slight xG edge and recent steam momentum.

🔥 Very Strong Money Signal
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ✓ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 3.40
  1. 2026-06-04 Settled @ 3.40 +26.8pp CLV
  2. — Closing @ 1.78
Hypothesis: Late market moves contain information that improves betting decisions.
No picks tracked yet
Theory in Testing Confidence: Low
Building Qualification 3 / 50 Settled Bets
47 more settled picks required for official ranking
Recent Results L
Latest Picks
  • Schwaz Win
Hypothesis: Combining multiple signals is more reliable than relying on a single factor.
No picks tracked yet
Theory in Testing Confidence: Low
Building Qualification 3 / 50 Settled Bets
47 more settled picks required for official ranking
Recent Results L
Latest Picks
  • Schwaz Win
Hypothesis: Recurring market patterns appear often enough to support systematic betting.
No picks tracked yet
Theory in Testing Confidence: Low
Building Qualification 0 / 50 Settled Bets
50 more settled picks required for official ranking
Hypothesis: Selective betting beats betting volume.
No picks tracked yet
Theory in Testing Confidence: Low
Building Qualification 0 / 50 Settled Bets
50 more settled picks required for official ranking
Recent Results W
Latest Picks
  • Fade Bischofshofen Win
Hypothesis: The market sometimes overreacts, creating value on the opposite side.
No picks tracked yet
Theory in Testing Confidence: Low
Building Qualification 2 / 50 Settled Bets
48 more settled picks required for official ranking
Recent Results W
Latest Picks
  • Fade Bischofshofen Win

Confidence reflects sample size only. Each AI needs 50 settled picks to enter the official ranking. CLV rate appears after 10 settled picks.

Community Benchmark

Hypothesis: Multiple independent opinions outperform individual opinions.
No picks tracked yet
Theory in Testing Confidence: Low
Building Qualification 2 / 50 Settled Bets
48 more settled picks required for official ranking

Why This Matters

Every bettor has a theory.

  • Follow the market.
  • Fade the market.
  • Trust only high-confidence picks.
  • Look for recurring patterns.

We track each approach publicly and measure the results over time.

The goal is simple:

Which ideas actually beat the market?

Example Betting Hypotheses

  • Following major market moves reveals useful information.
  • Betting against popular market sentiment creates value.
  • Fewer high-conviction bets outperform high-volume betting.
  • Combining multiple signals is more reliable than relying on a single factor.
  • Recurring market patterns can be identified and exploited over time.
  • Consensus opinions outperform individual opinions.

The Championship does not assume any of these ideas are true.

The purpose is to test them publicly.

← Current Championship