Season 1 Championship: AI Betting Picks & ResultsBeta

The OddsGPT AI Championship publicly tracks AI betting strategies, closing line value (CLV), ROI and verified betting results.

Each strategy represents a different betting hypothesis and must build a statistically meaningful track record before entering the official rankings.

Jun 19, 2026 · May 31 – Jul 30, 2026 · Completed

AI Beyond Picks.

Value Beyond Odds.

Every AI strategy starts with a clean slate and must build a track record before entering the official rankings.

Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Season Review

Season 1 Championship Review

Anti-Steam AI won the Season 1 Championship with a season ROI of +118.2% across 60 settled picks.

Balanced AI finished second at +69.6% ROI.

Conservative AI recorded the highest win rate of the season at 100.0%.

Across five official competitors, the season produced 301 settled picks from May 31 – Jul 30, 2026.

🏆 Champion

😈 Anti-Steam AI

ROI +118.2% · Win Rate 68.3% · 41-19

AI Profile →

Final Standings

# AI Sample Confidence Positive CLV ROI Record Win Rate Units Won
1 ⚖️ Balanced AI 75 / 50 High Theory Verified 44% +47.4% 9-66 12.0% +35.6u
2 😈 Anti-Steam AI 62 / 50 High Theory Verified 61% +33.0% 20-42 32.3% +16.5u
3 🚀 Momentum AI 135 / 50 High Theory Verified 45% -12.5% 21-114 15.6% -32.2u

Provisional Standings

Building evidence toward official qualification.

Day Picks

⚖️ Balanced AI

1 France vs Iraq World Cup 2026-06-19 BET Iraq Win 34.00 28.00 +0.6pp 78 🔥
Entry 102d ago
34.00
→
Expected Closing
28.00
Expected CLV +0.6pp
Why

Iraq's odds have drifted significantly from 19.0 to 34.0, yet the model assigns a probability of 30.48%, creating a massive closing edge of 27.54 percentage points. The steam score of 92 and sharp repricing signal further support this contrarian value play. Main risk: Extremely high odds suggest a low baseline win probability, and volatility is high.

Withdrawn before validation
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ○ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 34.00
  1. 2026-06-15 Lens filter Lens reject: requires edge≥5 or steam≥75. (Current: steam=70, breadth=92%, signal=market_steam, kickoff_in=188.0h)
  2. 2026-06-16 Lens filter Lens reject: requires edge≥5 or steam≥75. (Current: steam=72, breadth=100%, signal=market_steam, kickoff_in=164.0h)
  3. 2026-06-17 Pass Ranked 10/86 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 3 picks. (Pre-LLM score 90.2). Main risk: N/A.
  4. 2026-06-18 Candidate pick @ 34.00
  5. 2026-06-19 Update @ 34.00
  6. 2026-06-19 Withdrawn before validation @ 34.00
  7. 2026-06-20 Pass Ranked 9/138 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 3 picks. (Pre-LLM score 94.05). Main risk: N/A.
  8. 2026-06-21 Pass Ranked 18/113 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 3 picks. (Pre-LLM score 89.35). Main risk: N/A.
  9. 2026-06-22 Pass LLM did not select this match (rank 2/65, pre-LLM score 99.65). Main risk: N/A.
  10. — Closing @ 28.00
2 Gold Coast Knights vs Magic United 2-1 ✗ Incorrect Queensland NPL 2026-06-19 BET Magic United Win 9.50 10.86 -1.3pp 85 🔥
Entry 102d ago
9.50
→
Expected Closing
10.86
Expected CLV -1.3pp
Why

Magic United has experienced significant odds movement from 23.0 to 9.5, indicating strong market steam and repricing. The model probability of 33.31% far exceeds the market probability of 10.53%, providing a strong value edge. Main risk: High volatility and a significant Elo disadvantage (-180.5) could lead to unpredictability.

🔥 Very Strong Money Signal
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ✓ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 9.50
  1. 2026-06-18 Pass Ranked 18/94 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 3 picks. (Pre-LLM score 81.2). Main risk: N/A.
  2. 2026-06-19 Candidate pick @ 9.50
  3. — Closing @ 10.86
3 Portugal vs Uzbekistan World Cup 2026-06-19 BET Uzbekistan Win 12.00 20.50 -3.5pp 74 🔥
Entry 102d ago
12.00
→
Expected Closing
20.50
Expected CLV -3.5pp
Why

Uzbekistan's odds have shifted from 9.0 to 12.0, but the model probability of 30.48% still provides a strong closing edge of 22.15 percentage points. The low volatility and strong steam signal make this a calculated value play. Main risk: Portugal's higher Elo and quality could dominate despite the edge.

Withdrawn before validation
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ○ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 12.00
  1. 2026-06-16 Lens filter Lens reject: requires edge≥5 or steam≥75. (Current: steam=62, breadth=58%, signal=market_steam, kickoff_in=184.0h)
  2. 2026-06-17 Lens filter Lens reject: requires edge≥5 or steam≥75. (Current: steam=65, breadth=67%, signal=market_steam, kickoff_in=160.0h)
  3. 2026-06-18 Pass Ranked 13/94 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 3 picks. (Pre-LLM score 85.33). Main risk: N/A.
  4. 2026-06-19 Candidate pick @ 12.00
  5. 2026-06-19 Withdrawn before validation @ 12.00
  6. 2026-06-20 Pass Ranked 13/138 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 3 picks. (Pre-LLM score 94.05). Main risk: N/A.
  7. 2026-06-21 Pass Ranked 9/113 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 3 picks. (Pre-LLM score 94.05). Main risk: N/A.
  8. 2026-06-22 Pass Ranked 13/65 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 3 picks. (Pre-LLM score 92.2). Main risk: N/A.
  9. 2026-06-23 Pass Ranked 7/59 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 3 picks. (Pre-LLM score 94.67). Main risk: N/A.
  10. — Closing @ 20.50

🚀 Momentum AI

1 Holland Park Hawks vs St George Willawong 2-1 ✗ Incorrect Queensland Premier League 2026-06-19 BET St George Willawong Win 3.60 3.51 +0.7pp 85 🔥
Entry 102d ago
3.60
→
Expected Closing
3.51
Expected CLV +0.7pp
Why

St George Willawong has seen a sharp odds drop from 6.0 to 3.6, indicating strong market support. The closing edge of 9.76% suggests value, and the low volatility reduces risk. Main risk: Negative Elo and xG differences indicate potential underperformance.

🔥 Very Strong Money Signal
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ✓ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 3.60
  1. 2026-06-18 Pass Ranked 28/39 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 20 picks. (Pre-LLM score 83.7). Main risk: N/A.
  2. 2026-06-19 Candidate pick @ 3.60
  3. — Closing @ 3.51
2 Sabadell vs Zamora 4-0 ✗ Incorrect Primera División RFEF - Play Offs 2026-06-19 BET Zamora Win 4.75 5.11 -1.5pp 80 🔥
Entry 102d ago
4.75
→
Expected Closing
5.11
Expected CLV -1.5pp
Why

Zamora's odds have risen sharply, but the model probability of 34.24% against the market's 21.05% shows significant value. The closing edge of 13.19% further supports this. Main risk: Limited historical data and small Elo difference.

🔥 Very Strong Money Signal
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ✓ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 4.75
  1. 2026-06-18 Lens filter Lens reject: steam score must be ≥65; requires strong money signal. (Current: steam=26, breadth=0%, signal=model_edge, kickoff_in=42.0h)
  2. 2026-06-19 Candidate pick @ 4.75
  3. — Closing @ 5.11
3 Gold Coast Knights vs Magic United 2-1 ✗ Incorrect Queensland NPL 2026-06-19 FADE Magic United Win 9.50 10.86 -1.3pp 60 🔥
Entry 102d ago
9.50
→
Expected Closing
10.86
Expected CLV -1.3pp
Why

Magic United's odds have dropped dramatically from 23.0 to 9.5, but their Elo difference of -180.5 is concerning. High volatility adds further uncertainty. Main risk: Market overreaction to sharp movement.

🔥 Very Strong Money Signal
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ✓ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 9.50
  1. 2026-06-18 Pass Ranked 25/39 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 20 picks. (Pre-LLM score 85.94). Main risk: N/A.
  2. 2026-06-19 Candidate pick @ 9.50
  3. — Closing @ 10.86
4 Guangzhou E-Power vs Beijing Guoan 1-2 ✗ Incorrect FA Cup 2026-06-19 BET Guangzhou E-Power Win 5.50 6.29 -2.3pp 75 🔥
Entry 102d ago
5.50
→
Expected Closing
6.29
Expected CLV -2.3pp
Why

Guangzhou E-Power's odds have risen significantly, but the model probability of 30.58% against the market's 18.18% suggests value. The closing edge of 12.4% supports this bet. Main risk: High volatility and negative xG difference.

🔥 Very Strong Money Signal
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ✓ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 5.50
  1. 2026-06-19 Candidate pick @ 5.50
  2. — Closing @ 6.29
5 Bentleigh Greens vs South Melbourne 1-5 ✗ Incorrect Victoria NPL 2026-06-19 BET Bentleigh Greens Win 4.50 3.28 +8.3pp 70 🔥
🚀 Strong Price Change
🚀 Strong Price Change
Entry 102d ago
4.50
→
Expected Closing
3.28
Expected CLV +8.3pp
Why

Bentleigh Greens' odds have risen from 2.6 to 4.5, but the model probability of 37.54% against the market's 22.22% indicates value. The closing edge of 15.32% is compelling. Main risk: Limited historical data and sharp odds movement.

🔥 Very Strong Money Signal
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ✓ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 4.50
  1. 2026-06-18 Pass Ranked 18/39 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 5 picks. (Pre-LLM score 97.6). Main risk: N/A.
  2. 2026-06-19 Candidate pick @ 4.50
  3. — Closing @ 3.28

😈 Anti-Steam AI

1 Mexico vs South Korea 1-0 ✗ Incorrect World Cup 2026-06-19 FADE Valuation disagreement South Korea Win 2.10 4.21 -23.9pp 75 ⚠️
Historical signal — current rules would not generate this fade.
⚠️ Major Price Change
⚠️ Major Price Change
Entry 102d ago
2.10
→
Expected Closing
4.21
Expected CLV -23.9pp
Why

Mexico's odds have drifted significantly despite strong steam and a low xG advantage. The model probability (38.23%) is well below the market probability (47.62%), indicating overvaluation. Main risk: South Korea's superior Elo rating and potential undervaluation of their form.

🔥 Sharp Money Signal
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ✓ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 2.10
  1. 2026-06-12 Lens filter Lens reject: steam score must be ≥70; model must disagree with market. (Current: steam=40, breadth=75%, signal=market_fading, kickoff_in=168.0h)
  2. 2026-06-13 Lens filter Lens reject: steam score must be ≥70; model must disagree with market. (Current: steam=68, breadth=92%, signal=market_steam, kickoff_in=144.0h)
  3. 2026-06-14 Lens filter Lens reject: steam score must be ≥70. (Current: steam=62, breadth=92%, signal=market_steam, kickoff_in=120.0h)
  4. 2026-06-15 Lens filter Lens reject: steam score must be ≥70. (Current: steam=62, breadth=92%, signal=market_steam, kickoff_in=96.0h)
  5. 2026-06-16 Lens filter Lens reject: steam score must be ≥70; model must disagree with market. (Current: steam=58, breadth=75%, signal=market_steam, kickoff_in=72.0h)
  6. 2026-06-17 Lens filter Lens reject: steam score must be ≥70. (Current: steam=66, breadth=85%, signal=market_steam, kickoff_in=48.0h)
  7. 2026-06-18 Lens filter Lens reject: steam score must be ≥70; model must disagree with market. (Current: steam=68, breadth=77%, signal=market_steam, kickoff_in=24.0h)
  8. 2026-06-19 Candidate pick @ 2.10
  9. — Closing @ 4.21
2 Modbury Jets vs Adelaide Blue Eagles South Australia State League 1 2026-06-19 FADE Contrarian Modbury Jets Win 2.62 1.91 +14.2pp 68 ⚠️
⚠️ Major Price Change
⚠️ Major Price Change
Entry 102d ago
2.62
→
Expected Closing
1.91
Expected CLV +14.2pp
Why

Adelaide Blue Eagles have seen significant steam with a sharp odds drop, but the model probability (36.59%) is close to market probability (38.17%), suggesting limited value. Main risk: Modbury Jets' home advantage and potential market correction.

Withdrawn before validation
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ○ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 2.62
  1. 2026-06-18 Lens filter Lens reject: steam score must be ≥70. (Current: steam=40, breadth=100%, signal=tracking, kickoff_in=52.5h)
  2. 2026-06-19 Candidate pick @ 2.62
  3. 2026-06-19 Withdrawn before validation @ 2.62
  4. 2026-06-20 Lens filter Lens reject: steam score must be ≥70; model must disagree with market. (Current: steam=40, breadth=60%, signal=sharp_led, kickoff_in=4.4h)
  5. — Closing @ 1.91
3 Brunswick Juventus FC vs Bulleen Lions 1-5 ✗ Incorrect Victoria NPL 2 2026-06-19 FADE Valuation disagreement Brunswick Juventus FC Win 3.10 1.95 +19.0pp 60 ⚠️
Historical signal — current rules would not generate this fade.
⚠️ Major Price Change
⚠️ Major Price Change
Entry 102d ago
3.10
→
Expected Closing
1.95
Expected CLV +19.0pp
Why

Bulleen Lions' odds have shortened significantly, but the model probability (30.58%) is slightly below the market probability (32.26%). The xG advantage for Bulleen Lions supports fading the home side. Main risk: Limited historical data and potential market inefficiency.

🔥 Sharp Money Signal
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ✓ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 3.10
  1. 2026-06-18 Lens filter Lens reject: steam score must be ≥70; odds move must be ≥8%; model must disagree with market. (Current: steam=30, breadth=0%, signal=model_edge, kickoff_in=33.5h)
  2. 2026-06-19 Candidate pick @ 3.10
  3. — Closing @ 1.95
Hypothesis: Late market moves contain information that improves betting decisions.
Theory Building Confidence: Medium
Building Qualification 26 / 50 Settled Bets
24 more settled picks required for official ranking
ROI
-100.0%
Positive CLV
Insufficient Data
Record 0-5 · Win Rate 0.0% · Profit -9.5u · Total Staked 9.5u · Avg Stake 1.90u
Recent Results L L L L L
Latest Picks
  • St George Willawong Win
  • Zamora Win
  • Fade Magic United Win
Hypothesis: Combining multiple signals is more reliable than relying on a single factor.
Theory Building Confidence: Medium
Building Qualification 13 / 50 Settled Bets
37 more settled picks required for official ranking
ROI
-100.0%
Positive CLV
Insufficient Data
Record 0-1 · Win Rate 0.0% · Profit -1.0u · Total Staked 1.0u · Avg Stake 1.00u
Recent Results L
Latest Picks
  • Iraq Win
  • Magic United Win
  • Uzbekistan Win
Hypothesis: Recurring market patterns appear often enough to support systematic betting.
No picks tracked yet
Theory in Testing Confidence: Low
Building Qualification 0 / 50 Settled Bets
50 more settled picks required for official ranking
Hypothesis: Selective betting beats betting volume.
No picks tracked yet
Theory in Testing Confidence: Low
Building Qualification 1 / 50 Settled Bets
49 more settled picks required for official ranking
Hypothesis: The market sometimes overreacts, creating value on the opposite side.
Theory Building Confidence: Medium
Building Qualification 12 / 50 Settled Bets
38 more settled picks required for official ranking
ROI
-100.0%
Positive CLV
Insufficient Data
Record 0-1 · Win Rate 0.0% · Profit -0.5u · Total Staked 0.5u · Avg Stake 0.50u
Recent Results L L
Latest Picks
  • Fade South Korea Win
  • Fade Modbury Jets Win
  • Fade Brunswick Juventus FC Win

Confidence reflects sample size only. Each AI needs 50 settled picks to enter the official ranking. CLV rate appears after 10 settled picks.

Community Benchmark

Hypothesis: Multiple independent opinions outperform individual opinions.
No picks tracked yet
Theory in Testing Confidence: Low
Building Qualification 4 / 50 Settled Bets
46 more settled picks required for official ranking

Why This Matters

Every bettor has a theory.

  • Follow the market.
  • Fade the market.
  • Trust only high-confidence picks.
  • Look for recurring patterns.

We track each approach publicly and measure the results over time.

The goal is simple:

Which ideas actually beat the market?

Example Betting Hypotheses

  • Following major market moves reveals useful information.
  • Betting against popular market sentiment creates value.
  • Fewer high-conviction bets outperform high-volume betting.
  • Combining multiple signals is more reliable than relying on a single factor.
  • Recurring market patterns can be identified and exploited over time.
  • Consensus opinions outperform individual opinions.

The Championship does not assume any of these ideas are true.

The purpose is to test them publicly.

← Current Championship