Season 1 Championship: AI Betting Picks & ResultsBeta

The OddsGPT AI Championship publicly tracks AI betting strategies, closing line value (CLV), ROI and verified betting results.

Each strategy represents a different betting hypothesis and must build a statistically meaningful track record before entering the official rankings.

Jun 27, 2026 · May 31 – Jul 30, 2026 · Completed

AI Beyond Picks.

Value Beyond Odds.

Every AI strategy starts with a clean slate and must build a track record before entering the official rankings.

Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Season Review

Season 1 Championship Review

Anti-Steam AI won the Season 1 Championship with a season ROI of +118.2% across 60 settled picks.

Balanced AI finished second at +69.6% ROI.

Conservative AI recorded the highest win rate of the season at 100.0%.

Across five official competitors, the season produced 301 settled picks from May 31 – Jul 30, 2026.

🏆 Champion

😈 Anti-Steam AI

ROI +118.2% · Win Rate 68.3% · 41-19

AI Profile →

Final Standings

# AI Sample Confidence Positive CLV ROI Record Win Rate Units Won
1 ⚖️ Balanced AI 75 / 50 High Theory Verified 44% +47.4% 9-66 12.0% +35.6u
2 😈 Anti-Steam AI 62 / 50 High Theory Verified 61% +33.0% 20-42 32.3% +16.5u
3 🚀 Momentum AI 135 / 50 High Theory Verified 45% -12.5% 21-114 15.6% -32.2u

Provisional Standings

Building evidence toward official qualification.

Day Picks

⚖️ Balanced AI

1 New Zealand vs Belgium World Cup 2026-06-27 BET New Zealand Win 15.00 14.00 +0.5pp 70 🔥
Entry 94d ago
15.00
→
Expected Closing
14.00
Expected CLV +0.5pp
Why

New Zealand shows a strong steam signal with a closing edge of 33.92 percentage points. The model probability of 40.59% far exceeds the market's 6.67%, indicating significant value. The sharp repricing suggests market inefficiency. Main risk: Belgium's Elo advantage and high volatility.

Replaced with updated pick
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ○ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 13.00
  1. 2026-06-20 Pass Ranked 82/138 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 20 picks. (Pre-LLM score 57.02). Main risk: N/A.
  2. 2026-06-21 Pass Ranked 59/113 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 20 picks. (Pre-LLM score 57.02). Main risk: N/A.
  3. 2026-06-22 Pass Ranked 6/65 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 3 picks. (Pre-LLM score 97.02). Main risk: N/A.
  4. 2026-06-23 Candidate pick @ 13.00
  5. 2026-06-23 Replaced with updated pick @ 13.00
  6. 2026-06-24 Candidate pick @ 11.00 (Candidate pick 13.00)
  7. 2026-06-24 Replaced with updated pick @ 11.00 (Candidate pick 13.00)
  8. 2026-06-25 Candidate pick @ 15.00 (Candidate pick 13.00)
  9. 2026-06-26 Update @ 15.00 (Candidate pick 13.00)
  10. 2026-06-27 Update @ 15.00 (Candidate pick 13.00)
  11. 2026-06-27 Replaced with updated pick @ 15.00 (Candidate pick 13.00)
  12. — Closing @ 14.00
2 Panama vs England World Cup 2026-06-27 BET Panama Win 17.00 17.50 -0.2pp 72 🔥
Entry 94d ago
17.00
→
Expected Closing
17.50
Expected CLV -0.2pp
Why

Panama's odds have drifted significantly, creating a large positive closing edge of 34.98 percentage points. The model probability of 40.86% is much higher than the market's 5.88%, suggesting value. The strong steam signal and sharp repricing indicate market overreaction. Main risk: Panama's low Elo rating and high volatility.

Replaced with updated pick
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ○ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 13.00
  1. 2026-06-20 Pass Ranked 94/138 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 20 picks. (Pre-LLM score 51.95). Main risk: N/A.
  2. 2026-06-21 Pass Ranked 58/113 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 20 picks. (Pre-LLM score 57.55). Main risk: N/A.
  3. 2026-06-22 Pass LLM did not select this match (rank 3/65, pre-LLM score 99.65). Main risk: N/A.
  4. 2026-06-23 Pass LLM did not select this match (rank 3/59, pre-LLM score 99.65). Main risk: N/A.
  5. 2026-06-24 Pass LLM did not select this match (rank 3/73, pre-LLM score 99.65). Main risk: N/A.
  6. 2026-06-25 Pass LLM did not select this match (rank 2/89, pre-LLM score 99.65). Main risk: N/A.
  7. 2026-06-26 Candidate pick @ 13.00
  8. 2026-06-26 Replaced with updated pick @ 13.00
  9. 2026-06-27 Candidate pick @ 17.00 (Candidate pick 13.00)
  10. 2026-06-27 Replaced with updated pick @ 17.00 (Candidate pick 13.00)
  11. — Closing @ 17.50
3 Perth Glory II vs Stirling Lions 1-1 ✗ Incorrect Western Australia NPL 2026-06-27 FADE Stirling Lions Win 4.00 1.56 +39.1pp 65 ⚠️
⚠️ Major Price Change
⚠️ Major Price Change
Entry 94d ago
4.00
→
Expected Closing
1.56
Expected CLV +39.1pp
Why

Perth Glory II's odds have drifted, but the closing edge is only 8.31 percentage points, which is relatively low. The model probability of 33.31% does not strongly justify a bet. Main risk: Potential underestimation of Stirling Lions' form.

🔥 Very Strong Money Signal
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ✓ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 4.00
  1. 2026-06-27 Candidate pick @ 4.00
  2. — Closing @ 1.56
4 Jordan vs Argentina 1-3 ✗ Incorrect World Cup 2026-06-27 BET Jordan Win 15.00 19.00 -1.4pp 83 🔥
Entry 93d ago
15.00
→
Expected Closing
19.00
Expected CLV -1.4pp
Why

Jordan's odds have also drifted heavily, with a closing edge of 32.63 percentage points. The model probability of 39.3% is significantly higher than the market's 6.67%, and the steam score is at the maximum level of 99. Main risk: Argentina's overwhelming strength and potential market inefficiency.

🔥 Very Strong Money Signal
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ✓ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 15.00
  1. 2026-06-21 Lens filter Lens reject: requires edge≥5 or steam≥75. (Current: steam=62, breadth=46%, signal=sharp_led, kickoff_in=169.0h)
  2. 2026-06-22 Pass Ranked 45/65 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 20 picks. (Pre-LLM score 46.0). Main risk: N/A.
  3. 2026-06-23 Pass Ranked 28/59 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 20 picks. (Pre-LLM score 66.95). Main risk: N/A.
  4. 2026-06-24 Pass Ranked 16/73 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 3 picks. (Pre-LLM score 83.2). Main risk: N/A.
  5. 2026-06-25 Pass Ranked 10/89 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 3 picks. (Pre-LLM score 94.05). Main risk: N/A.
  6. 2026-06-26 Pass LLM did not select this match (rank 3/129, pre-LLM score 99.65). Main risk: N/A.
  7. 2026-06-27 Candidate pick @ 15.00
  8. 2026-06-27 Pass Ranked 4/151 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 3 picks. (Pre-LLM score 97.02). Main risk: N/A.
  9. 2026-06-27 Replaced with updated pick @ 15.00
  10. 2026-06-28 Candidate pick @ 19.00 (Candidate pick 15.00)
  11. 2026-06-28 Replaced with updated pick @ 19.00 (Candidate pick 15.00)
  12. — Closing @ 19.00
5 Plzen vs Artis 4-2 ✓ Correct Friendlies Clubs 2026-06-27 FADE Plzen Win 8.50 1.20 +71.6pp 70 ⚠️
⚠️ Major Price Change
⚠️ Major Price Change
Entry 93d ago
8.50
→
Expected Closing
1.20
Expected CLV +71.6pp
Why

Plzen's odds have shortened significantly, but the market probability of 83.33% is not supported by the model's lower implied probability. The steam score for Artis is strong at 90, suggesting potential value on the away side. Main risk: Plzen's clear quality advantage and home dominance.

🔥 Very Strong Money Signal
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ✓ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 8.50
  1. 2026-06-27 Candidate pick @ 8.50
  2. 2026-06-27 Pass Ranked 8/151 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 3 picks. (Pre-LLM score 93.73). Main risk: N/A.
  3. — Closing @ 1.20

🚀 Momentum AI

1 Panama vs England World Cup 2026-06-27 BET Panama Win 17.00 17.50 -0.2pp 93 🔥
Entry 94d ago
17.00
→
Expected Closing
17.50
Expected CLV -0.2pp
Why

Strong money flow with favorable price action. Main risk: line reverses before kickoff.

Replaced with updated pick
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ○ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 17.00
  1. 2026-06-20 Pass Ranked 37/78 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 20 picks. (Pre-LLM score 95.49). Main risk: N/A.
  2. 2026-06-21 Pass Ranked 27/54 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 20 picks. (Pre-LLM score 101.3). Main risk: N/A.
  3. 2026-06-22 Candidate pick @ 7.00
  4. 2026-06-23 Update @ 7.00
  5. 2026-06-23 Replaced with updated pick @ 7.00
  6. 2026-06-24 Candidate pick @ 8.00
  7. 2026-06-24 Replaced with updated pick @ 8.00
  8. 2026-06-25 Candidate pick @ 13.00
  9. 2026-06-25 Withdrawn before validation @ 13.00
  10. 2026-06-26 Pass LLM did not select this match (rank 2/46, pre-LLM score 107.3). Main risk: N/A.
  11. 2026-06-27 Candidate pick @ 17.00
  12. 2026-06-27 Replaced with updated pick @ 17.00
  13. — Closing @ 9.00
2 Zlin vs Skalica Friendlies Clubs 2026-06-27 BET Skalica Win 2.62 3.29 -7.8pp 93 🔥
🚀 Strong Price Change
🚀 Strong Price Change
Entry 94d ago
2.62
→
Expected Closing
3.29
Expected CLV -7.8pp
Why

Strong money flow with favorable price action. Main risk: line reverses before kickoff.

Withdrawn before validation
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ○ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 2.62
  1. 2026-06-27 Candidate pick @ 2.62
  2. 2026-06-27 Pass Ranked 73/103 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 20 picks. (Pre-LLM score 81.62). Main risk: N/A.
  3. 2026-06-27 Withdrawn before validation @ 2.62
  4. — Closing @ 3.29
3 Guangdong Mingtu vs Xiamen Feilu League Two 2026-06-27 BET Guangdong Mingtu Win 3.10 3.36 -2.5pp 93 🔥
Entry 94d ago
3.10
→
Expected Closing
3.36
Expected CLV -2.5pp
Why

Strong money flow with favorable price action. Main risk: line reverses before kickoff.

Withdrawn before validation
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ○ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 3.10
  1. 2026-06-27 Candidate pick @ 3.10
  2. 2026-06-27 Pass Ranked 14/103 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 5 picks. (Pre-LLM score 100.1). Main risk: N/A.
  3. 2026-06-27 Withdrawn before validation @ 3.10
  4. — Closing @ 3.36
4 Merelbeke vs Gent Friendlies Clubs 2026-06-27 BET Merelbeke Win 26.00 18.91 +1.4pp 93 🔥
Entry 94d ago
26.00
→
Expected Closing
18.91
Expected CLV +1.4pp
Why

Strong money flow with favorable price action. Main risk: line reverses before kickoff.

Withdrawn before validation
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ○ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 26.00
  1. 2026-06-27 Candidate pick @ 26.00
  2. 2026-06-27 Pass Ranked 72/103 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 20 picks. (Pre-LLM score 82.3). Main risk: N/A.
  3. 2026-06-27 Withdrawn before validation @ 26.00
  4. — Closing @ 18.91
5 Perth Glory II vs Stirling Lions 1-1 ✗ Incorrect Western Australia NPL 2026-06-27 BET Perth Glory II Win 4.00 3.69 +2.1pp 93 🔥
Entry 94d ago
4.00
→
Expected Closing
3.69
Expected CLV +2.1pp
Why

Strong money flow with favorable price action. Main risk: line reverses before kickoff.

🔥 Very Strong Money Signal
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ✓ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 4.00
  1. 2026-06-27 Candidate pick @ 4.00
  2. — Closing @ 3.69
6 Jordan vs Argentina 1-3 ✗ Incorrect World Cup 2026-06-27 BET Jordan Win 15.00 19.00 -1.4pp 93 🔥
Entry 93d ago
15.00
→
Expected Closing
19.00
Expected CLV -1.4pp
Why

Strong money flow with favorable price action. Main risk: line reverses before kickoff.

🔥 Very Strong Money Signal
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ✓ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 15.00
  1. 2026-06-21 Lens filter Lens reject: steam score must be ≥65. (Current: steam=62, breadth=46%, signal=sharp_led, kickoff_in=169.0h)
  2. 2026-06-22 Pass Ranked 23/33 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 20 picks. (Pre-LLM score 90.78). Main risk: N/A.
  3. 2026-06-23 Lens filter Lens reject: steam score must be ≥65. (Current: steam=55, breadth=31%, signal=sharp_led, kickoff_in=121.0h)
  4. 2026-06-24 Pass Ranked 26/32 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 20 picks. (Pre-LLM score 82.7). Main risk: N/A.
  5. 2026-06-25 Pass Ranked 17/32 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 5 picks. (Pre-LLM score 101.49). Main risk: N/A.
  6. 2026-06-26 Pass LLM did not select this match (rank 3/46, pre-LLM score 107.3). Main risk: N/A.
  7. 2026-06-27 Candidate pick @ 15.00
  8. 2026-06-27 Pass Ranked 9/84 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 5 picks. (Pre-LLM score 104.74). Main risk: N/A.
  9. 2026-06-27 Replaced with updated pick @ 15.00
  10. 2026-06-28 Candidate pick @ 19.00 (Candidate pick 15.00)
  11. 2026-06-28 Replaced with updated pick @ 19.00 (Candidate pick 15.00)
  12. — Closing @ 19.00
7 Tacuary vs Atlético Tembetary 4-2 ✗ Incorrect Division Intermedia 2026-06-27 BET Atlético Tembetary Win 3.00 2.54 +6.0pp 93 🔥
🚀 Strong Price Change
🚀 Strong Price Change
Entry 93d ago
3.00
→
Expected Closing
2.54
Expected CLV +6.0pp
Why

Strong money flow with favorable price action. Main risk: line reverses before kickoff.

🔥 Very Strong Money Signal
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ✓ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 3.00
  1. 2026-06-26 Lens filter Lens reject: steam score must be ≥65. (Current: steam=40, breadth=100%, signal=tracking, kickoff_in=35.8h)
  2. 2026-06-27 Candidate pick @ 3.00
  3. — Closing @ 2.54
8 Congo DR vs Uzbekistan 3-1 ✗ Incorrect World Cup 2026-06-27 BET Uzbekistan Win 5.00 5.10 -0.4pp 92 🔥
Entry 93d ago
5.00
→
Expected Closing
5.10
Expected CLV -0.4pp
Why

Strong money flow with favorable price action. Main risk: line reverses before kickoff.

🔥 Very Strong Money Signal
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ✓ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 5.00
  1. 2026-06-20 Lens filter Lens reject: steam score must be ≥65. (Current: steam=51, breadth=85%, signal=sharp_led, kickoff_in=190.4h)
  2. 2026-06-21 Lens filter Lens reject: steam score must be ≥65. (Current: steam=48, breadth=77%, signal=sharp_led, kickoff_in=166.5h)
  3. 2026-06-22 Lens filter Lens reject: steam score must be ≥65. (Current: steam=51, breadth=85%, signal=sharp_led, kickoff_in=142.5h)
  4. 2026-06-23 Lens filter Lens reject: steam score must be ≥65. (Current: steam=63, breadth=85%, signal=market_steam, kickoff_in=118.5h)
  5. 2026-06-24 Pass Ranked 21/32 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 20 picks. (Pre-LLM score 94.82). Main risk: N/A.
  6. 2026-06-25 Pass Ranked 8/32 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 5 picks. (Pre-LLM score 104.74). Main risk: N/A.
  7. 2026-06-26 Pass LLM did not select this match (rank 5/46, pre-LLM score 104.74). Main risk: N/A.
  8. 2026-06-27 Candidate pick @ 5.00
  9. 2026-06-27 Pass Ranked 8/84 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 5 picks. (Pre-LLM score 104.74). Main risk: N/A.
  10. — Closing @ 5.10
9 Algeria vs Austria World Cup 2026-06-27 BET Draw 2.20 2.07 +2.9pp 92 🔥
Entry 93d ago
2.20
→
Expected Closing
2.07
Expected CLV +2.9pp
Why

Strong money flow with favorable price action. Main risk: line reverses before kickoff.

Replaced with updated pick
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ○ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 2.20
  1. 2026-06-21 Lens filter Lens reject: steam score must be ≥65. (Current: steam=51, breadth=85%, signal=sharp_led, kickoff_in=169.0h)
  2. 2026-06-22 Pass Ranked 33/33 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 20 picks. (Pre-LLM score 75.21). Main risk: N/A.
  3. 2026-06-23 Pass Ranked 29/30 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 20 picks. (Pre-LLM score 79.63). Main risk: N/A.
  4. 2026-06-24 Pass Ranked 9/32 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 5 picks. (Pre-LLM score 104.74). Main risk: N/A.
  5. 2026-06-25 Pass Ranked 9/32 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 5 picks. (Pre-LLM score 104.74). Main risk: N/A.
  6. 2026-06-26 Pass Ranked 6/46 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 5 picks. (Pre-LLM score 104.74). Main risk: N/A.
  7. 2026-06-27 Candidate pick @ 2.20
  8. 2026-06-27 Pass Ranked 10/84 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 5 picks. (Pre-LLM score 104.74). Main risk: N/A.
  9. 2026-06-27 Replaced with updated pick @ 2.20
  10. 2026-06-28 Candidate pick @ 3.50
  11. — Closing @ 2.07

📊 Pattern AI

1 Lyn vs hodd 1-4 ✗ Incorrect 1. Division 2026-06-27 BET Draw 3.60 3.77 -1.2pp 72 🔥
Entry 93d ago
3.60
→
Expected Closing
3.77
Expected CLV -1.2pp
Why

The match between Lyn and Hodd shows a low volatility environment with a closing edge of 1.37pp, which is within acceptable limits for a pattern replay. Historical CLV data supports the draw side with a 52% positive rate. The market state indicates sharp repricing, and the pattern similarity is 60%, suggesting a reasonable match to historical trends. Main risk: The xG differential slightly favors Lyn, which could reduce the likelihood of a draw.

Money Signal
Pattern Evidence
Pattern Confidence: Moderate (B)
Sample Size 85
Historical CLV 52%
Historical ROI +27.0%
Coverage Tier Low
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ✓ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 3.60
  1. 2026-06-27 Candidate pick @ 3.60
  2. — Closing @ 3.77
2 Strommen vs Moss 3-2 ✗ Incorrect 1. Division 2026-06-27 BET Draw 3.90 4.00 -0.6pp 74 🔥
Entry 93d ago
3.90
→
Expected Closing
4.00
Expected CLV -0.6pp
Why

The Strommen vs Moss fixture has a closing edge of 3.95pp, supported by a 52% historical CLV positive rate and a pattern similarity of 58.1%. The market is in sharp repricing mode, and the odds movement aligns with historical patterns. The low volatility and balanced xG differential further support this bet. Main risk: Elo differential slightly favors Moss, which could tilt the outcome away from a draw.

Money Signal
Pattern Evidence
Pattern Confidence: Moderate (B)
Sample Size 85
Historical CLV 52%
Historical ROI +27.0%
Coverage Tier Low
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ✓ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 3.90
  1. 2026-06-25 Lens filter Lens reject: historical sample must be ≥15; historical ROI must be >0%. (Current: steam=62, breadth=83%, signal=market_steam, kickoff_in=60.8h)
  2. 2026-06-26 Lens filter Lens reject: historical sample must be ≥15; historical ROI must be >0%. (Current: steam=62, breadth=83%, signal=market_steam, kickoff_in=36.8h)
  3. 2026-06-27 Candidate pick @ 3.90
  4. 2026-06-27 Lens filter Lens reject: historical sample must be ≥15; historical ROI must be >0%. (Current: steam=50, breadth=77%, signal=sharp_led, kickoff_in=12.8h)
  5. — Closing @ 4.00
3 Völsungur vs Grotta 2-2 ✓ Correct 1. Deild 2026-06-27 FADE Draw 3.90 4.63 -4.0pp 65 🔥
🚀 Strong Price Change
🚀 Strong Price Change
Entry 93d ago
3.90
→
Expected Closing
4.63
Expected CLV -4.0pp
Why

The Völsungur vs Grotta match shows a closing edge of 4.01pp, but the pattern similarity is only 58%, which is on the lower end of acceptable thresholds. Additionally, the market state is in discovery mode, indicating less confidence in the current odds. While historical CLV data is positive, the high Elo differential in favor of Grotta raises concerns about the likelihood of a draw. Main risk: The market may still be adjusting, leading to potential mispricing.

Money Signal
Pattern Evidence
Pattern Confidence: Moderate (B)
Sample Size 85
Historical CLV 52%
Historical ROI +27.0%
Coverage Tier Low
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ✓ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 3.90
  1. 2026-06-26 Lens filter Lens reject: historical sample must be ≥15; historical ROI must be >0%. (Current: steam=52, breadth=50%, signal=market_steam, kickoff_in=37.8h)
  2. 2026-06-27 Candidate pick @ 3.90
  3. 2026-06-27 Lens filter Lens reject: historical sample must be ≥15; historical ROI must be >0%. (Current: steam=42, breadth=85%, signal=market_fading, kickoff_in=13.8h)
  4. — Closing @ 4.63

😈 Anti-Steam AI

1 Algeria vs Austria World Cup 2026-06-27 FADE Contrarian Draw 2.20 2.07 +2.9pp 75 🔥
Entry 93d ago
2.20
→
Expected Closing
2.07
Expected CLV +2.9pp
Why

The market has strongly steamed the draw, with odds dropping significantly from 3.25 to 2.2. However, the model probability for a draw is only 29.91%, far below the market's implied probability of 45.45%. This suggests the draw is overvalued. Main risk: The low volatility of the match could favor a draw outcome.

Withdrawn before validation
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ○ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 2.75
  1. 2026-06-21 Lens filter Lens reject: steam score must be ≥70; model must disagree with market. (Current: steam=51, breadth=85%, signal=sharp_led, kickoff_in=169.0h)
  2. 2026-06-22 Lens filter Lens reject: steam score must be ≥70; model must disagree with market. (Current: steam=66, breadth=85%, signal=market_steam, kickoff_in=145.0h)
  3. 2026-06-23 Candidate pick @ 2.75
  4. 2026-06-23 Replaced with updated pick @ 2.75
  5. 2026-06-24 Candidate pick @ 2.35 (Candidate pick 2.75)
  6. 2026-06-25 Update @ 2.38 (Candidate pick 2.75)
  7. 2026-06-25 Replaced with updated pick @ 2.38 (Candidate pick 2.75)
  8. 2026-06-26 Candidate pick @ 2.30 (Candidate pick 2.75)
  9. 2026-06-26 Replaced with updated pick @ 2.30 (Candidate pick 2.75)
  10. 2026-06-27 Candidate pick @ 2.20 (Candidate pick 2.75)
  11. 2026-06-27 Update @ 2.20 (Candidate pick 2.75)
  12. 2026-06-27 Withdrawn before validation @ 2.20 (Candidate pick 2.75)
  13. 2026-06-28 Lens filter Lens reject: model must disagree with market. (Current: steam=97, breadth=92%, signal=strong_steam, kickoff_in=0.8h, hist_n=661, hist_clv_rate=2%)
  14. — Closing @ 2.07
2 Inter De Limeira vs Maringá Serie C 2026-06-27 FADE Contrarian Inter De Limeira Win 2.25 2.37 -2.2pp 75 🔥
Entry 94d ago
2.25
→
Expected Closing
2.37
Expected CLV -2.2pp
Why

Inter De Limeira's odds have drifted despite strong steam, and the model probability (34.24%) is much lower than the market probability (44.44%). This suggests the market overvalues the home side. Main risk: Small positive Elo differential for the home team.

Withdrawn before validation
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ○ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 2.25
  1. 2026-06-26 Lens filter Lens reject: model must disagree with market. (Current: steam=84, breadth=70%, signal=strong_steam, kickoff_in=36.8h)
  2. 2026-06-27 Candidate pick @ 2.25
  3. 2026-06-27 Pass Ranked 5/17 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 3 picks. (Pre-LLM score 80.8). Main risk: N/A.
  4. 2026-06-27 Withdrawn before validation @ 2.25
  5. — Closing @ 2.37
3 Shanghai Second vs Qingdao Red Lions League Two 2026-06-27 FADE Contrarian Shanghai Second Win 2.70 2.77 -0.9pp 70 🔥
Entry 94d ago
2.70
→
Expected Closing
2.77
Expected CLV -0.9pp
Why

Shanghai Second has strong steam and a slight edge in model probability (36.11% vs. 37.04% market), but the closing edge is negative, and the odds movement suggests overpricing. Main risk: Limited data and potential for market correction.

Withdrawn before validation
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ○ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 2.70
  1. 2026-06-27 Candidate pick @ 2.70
  2. 2026-06-27 Pass Ranked 11/17 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 3 picks. (Pre-LLM score 60.48). Main risk: N/A.
  3. 2026-06-27 Withdrawn before validation @ 2.70
  4. — Closing @ 2.77
4 Botafogo SP vs CRB Serie B 2026-06-27 FADE Valuation disagreement CRB Win 3.40 3.48 -0.7pp 70 🔥
Historical signal — current rules would not generate this fade.
Entry 93d ago
3.40
→
Expected Closing
3.48
Expected CLV -0.7pp
Why

CRB has seen strong steam with odds drifting from 2.75 to 3.4, but the model probability of 13.15% is significantly lower than the market's implied probability of 29.41%. The sharp repricing suggests the market is overestimating CRB's chances. Main risk: CRB's xG advantage of 1.53 could indicate a potential upset.

Replaced with updated pick
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ○ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 3.40
  1. 2026-06-27 Candidate pick @ 3.40
  2. 2026-06-27 Lens filter Lens reject: steam score must be ≥70. (Current: steam=60, breadth=42%, signal=sharp_led, kickoff_in=93.8h)
  3. 2026-06-27 Replaced with updated pick @ 3.40
  4. 2026-06-28 Candidate pick @ 3.40
  5. 2026-06-29 Update @ 3.40
  6. 2026-06-30 Update @ 3.50 (Candidate pick 3.40)
  7. — Closing @ 3.48
5 NSÍ II vs B36 II 0-1 ✗ Incorrect 1. Deild 2026-06-27 FADE Valuation disagreement NSÍ II Win 2.20 2.01 +4.3pp 68 🔥
Historical signal — current rules would not generate this fade.
🚀 Strong Price Change
🚀 Strong Price Change
Entry 93d ago
2.20
→
Expected Closing
2.01
Expected CLV +4.3pp
Why

NSÍ II has been heavily steamed, with odds shortening from 1.75 to 2.2. However, the model probability of 36.11% is below the market's implied probability of 45.45%. This suggests the home side is overvalued. Main risk: The xG and elo differences are minimal, indicating a tight match.

🔥 Very Strong Money Signal
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ✓ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 2.20
  1. 2026-06-27 Candidate pick @ 2.20
  2. 2026-06-27 Pass Ranked 13/13 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 3 picks. (Pre-LLM score 44.84). Main risk: N/A.
  3. — Closing @ 2.01
Hypothesis: Late market moves contain information that improves betting decisions.
Theory Building Confidence: Medium
Building Qualification 44 / 50 Settled Bets
6 more settled picks required for official ranking
ROI
-100.0%
Positive CLV
Insufficient Data
Record 0-4 · Win Rate 0.0% · Profit -8.0u · Total Staked 8.0u · Avg Stake 2.00u
Recent Results L L L L
Latest Picks
  • Panama Win
  • Skalica Win
  • Guangdong Mingtu Win
Hypothesis: Combining multiple signals is more reliable than relying on a single factor.
Theory Building Confidence: Medium
Building Qualification 22 / 50 Settled Bets
28 more settled picks required for official ranking
ROI
-100.0%
Positive CLV
Insufficient Data
Record 0-2 · Win Rate 0.0% · Profit -2.0u · Total Staked 2.0u · Avg Stake 1.00u
Recent Results L L W
Latest Picks
  • New Zealand Win
  • Panama Win
  • Fade Stirling Lions Win
Hypothesis: Recurring market patterns appear often enough to support systematic betting.
Theory in Testing Confidence: Low
Building Qualification 3 / 50 Settled Bets
47 more settled picks required for official ranking
ROI
+30.0%
Positive CLV
Insufficient Data
Record 1-2 · Win Rate 33.3% · Profit +0.9u · Total Staked 3.0u · Avg Stake 1.00u
Recent Results L L W
Latest Picks
  • Draw
  • Draw
  • Fade Draw
Hypothesis: Selective betting beats betting volume.
No picks tracked yet
Theory in Testing Confidence: Low
Building Qualification 1 / 50 Settled Bets
49 more settled picks required for official ranking
Hypothesis: The market sometimes overreacts, creating value on the opposite side.
Theory Building Confidence: Medium
Building Qualification 21 / 50 Settled Bets
29 more settled picks required for official ranking
ROI
-100.0%
Positive CLV
Insufficient Data
Record 0-1 · Win Rate 0.0% · Profit -0.7u · Total Staked 0.7u · Avg Stake 0.70u
Recent Results L
Latest Picks
  • Fade Draw
  • Fade Inter De Limeira Win
  • Fade Shanghai Second Win

Confidence reflects sample size only. Each AI needs 50 settled picks to enter the official ranking. CLV rate appears after 10 settled picks.

Community Benchmark

Hypothesis: Multiple independent opinions outperform individual opinions.
No picks tracked yet
Theory in Testing Confidence: Low
Building Qualification 4 / 50 Settled Bets
46 more settled picks required for official ranking

Why This Matters

Every bettor has a theory.

  • Follow the market.
  • Fade the market.
  • Trust only high-confidence picks.
  • Look for recurring patterns.

We track each approach publicly and measure the results over time.

The goal is simple:

Which ideas actually beat the market?

Example Betting Hypotheses

  • Following major market moves reveals useful information.
  • Betting against popular market sentiment creates value.
  • Fewer high-conviction bets outperform high-volume betting.
  • Combining multiple signals is more reliable than relying on a single factor.
  • Recurring market patterns can be identified and exploited over time.
  • Consensus opinions outperform individual opinions.

The Championship does not assume any of these ideas are true.

The purpose is to test them publicly.

← Current Championship