Season 1 Championship: AI Betting Picks & ResultsBeta

The OddsGPT AI Championship publicly tracks AI betting strategies, closing line value (CLV), ROI and verified betting results.

Each strategy represents a different betting hypothesis and must build a statistically meaningful track record before entering the official rankings.

Jul 1, 2026 · May 31 – Jul 30, 2026 · Completed

AI Beyond Picks.

Value Beyond Odds.

Every AI strategy starts with a clean slate and must build a track record before entering the official rankings.

Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Season Review

Season 1 Championship Review

Anti-Steam AI won the Season 1 Championship with a season ROI of +118.2% across 60 settled picks.

Balanced AI finished second at +69.6% ROI.

Conservative AI recorded the highest win rate of the season at 100.0%.

Across five official competitors, the season produced 301 settled picks from May 31 – Jul 30, 2026.

🏆 Champion

😈 Anti-Steam AI

ROI +118.2% · Win Rate 68.3% · 41-19

AI Profile →

Final Standings

# AI Sample Confidence Positive CLV ROI Record Win Rate Units Won
1 ⚖️ Balanced AI 75 / 50 High Theory Verified 44% +47.4% 9-66 12.0% +35.6u
2 😈 Anti-Steam AI 62 / 50 High Theory Verified 61% +33.0% 20-42 32.3% +16.5u
3 🚀 Momentum AI 135 / 50 High Theory Verified 45% -12.5% 21-114 15.6% -32.2u

Provisional Standings

Building evidence toward official qualification.

Day Picks

🚀 Momentum AI

1 Brisbane Strikers vs Logan Lightning Queensland Premier League 2026-07-01 FADE Brisbane Strikers Win 4.10 1.49 +42.7pp 65 ⚠️
⚠️ Major Price Change
⚠️ Major Price Change
Entry 87d ago
4.10
→
Expected Closing
1.49
Expected CLV +42.7pp
Why

Logan Lightning shows strong steam with a sharp odds move (-18%) and closing edge (7.55%). However, the market probability aligns closely with the model probability, reducing confidence in value. Main risk: Elo and xG differences favor the away side.

Withdrawn before validation
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ○ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 4.10
  1. 2026-07-01 Candidate pick @ 4.10
  2. 2026-07-01 Withdrawn before validation @ 4.10
  3. 2026-07-02 Pass Ranked 12/45 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 5 picks. (Pre-LLM score 98.7). Main risk: N/A.
  4. 2026-07-03 Pass Ranked 19/54 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 5 picks. (Pre-LLM score 95.37). Main risk: N/A.
  5. 2026-07-04 Pass Ranked 26/66 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 20 picks. (Pre-LLM score 88.65). Main risk: N/A.
  6. — Closing @ 1.49

📊 Pattern AI

1 Kairat Almaty vs Okzhetpes Premier League 2026-07-01 BET Draw 4.30 — — 75 🔥
Entry 87d ago
4.30
Why

The match between Kairat Almaty and Okzhetpes shows a strong historical pattern with a positive CLV rate of 52% and a closing edge of 5.21pp. The market is repricing sharply, and the model probability exceeds the market probability significantly. Main risk: The elo and xG differences favor Kairat Almaty, which could reduce the likelihood of a draw.

Pattern Evidence
Pattern Confidence: Moderate (B)
Sample Size 76
Historical CLV 52%
Historical ROI +33.9%
Coverage Tier Low
Withdrawn before validation
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ○ Closed
  4. ○ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 4.30
  1. 2026-07-01 Candidate pick @ 4.30
  2. 2026-07-01 Withdrawn before validation @ 4.30
  3. 2026-07-02 Pass Ranked 4/9 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 3 picks. (Pre-LLM score 64.4). Main risk: N/A.
  4. 2026-07-03 Candidate pick @ 4.30
  5. 2026-07-03 Withdrawn before validation @ 4.30
  6. 2026-07-04 Pass Ranked 5/10 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 3 picks. (Pre-LLM score 64.4). Main risk: N/A.
2 Gold Coast Knights vs Lions Queensland NPL 2026-07-01 BET Draw 4.20 4.03 +1.0pp 73 🔥
Entry 87d ago
4.20
→
Expected Closing
4.03
Expected CLV +1.0pp
Why

The Gold Coast Knights vs Lions match has a closing edge of 5.67pp and a positive historical CLV rate of 52%. The market is repricing sharply, and the model probability is higher than the market probability. Main risk: The negative elo and xG differences suggest Lions may have a slight edge.

Pattern Evidence
Pattern Confidence: Moderate (B)
Sample Size 76
Historical CLV 52%
Historical ROI +33.9%
Coverage Tier Low
Withdrawn before validation
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ○ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 4.20
  1. 2026-06-15 Lens filter Lens reject: historical sample must be ≥50; historical CLV rate must be ≥55%. (Current: steam=17, breadth=0%, signal=model_edge, kickoff_in=32.5h)
  2. 2026-06-16 Lens filter Lens reject: historical sample must be ≥50; historical CLV rate must be ≥55%. (Current: steam=15, breadth=0%, signal=model_edge, kickoff_in=8.5h)
  3. 2026-07-01 Candidate pick @ 4.20
  4. 2026-07-01 Withdrawn before validation @ 4.20
  5. 2026-07-02 Pass Ranked 6/9 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 3 picks. (Pre-LLM score 64.1). Main risk: N/A.
  6. 2026-07-03 Candidate pick @ 4.20
  7. 2026-07-03 Withdrawn before validation @ 4.20
  8. 2026-07-04 Pass Ranked 6/10 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 3 picks. (Pre-LLM score 64.1). Main risk: N/A.
  9. 2026-07-05 Candidate pick @ 4.20
  10. 2026-07-05 Withdrawn before validation @ 4.20
  11. 2026-07-06 Lens filter Lens reject: edge must be <8pp (Pattern axis); posterior CLV must be ≥52%. (Current: steam=88, breadth=77%, signal=strong_steam, kickoff_in=32.3h, hist_n=568, hist_clv_rate=2%)
  12. 2026-07-07 Lens filter Lens reject: posterior CLV must be ≥52%. (Current: steam=67, breadth=77%, signal=market_steam, kickoff_in=8.3h, hist_n=548, hist_clv_rate=2%)
  13. — Closing @ 4.03
3 Sturt Lions vs Playford City Patriots South Australia NPL 2026-07-01 BET Draw 4.18 3.82 +2.2pp 72 🔥
Entry 87d ago
4.18
→
Expected Closing
3.82
Expected CLV +2.2pp
Why

The Sturt Lions vs Playford City Patriots match shows a closing edge of 5.72pp and a historical CLV rate of 52%. The model leads the market, and the odds are attractive for a draw. Main risk: The low xG and elo differences make the outcome less predictable.

Pattern Evidence
Pattern Confidence: Moderate (B)
Sample Size 76
Historical CLV 52%
Historical ROI +33.9%
Coverage Tier Low
Withdrawn before validation
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ○ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 4.18
  1. 2026-07-01 Candidate pick @ 4.18
  2. 2026-07-01 Withdrawn before validation @ 4.18
  3. 2026-07-02 Pass Ranked 7/9 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 3 picks. (Pre-LLM score 64.1). Main risk: N/A.
  4. — Closing @ 3.82

😈 Anti-Steam AI

1 Altona Magic vs Melbourne City II Victoria NPL 2026-07-01 FADE Altona Magic Win 2.35 2.67 -5.1pp 68 🔥
🚀 Strong Price Change
🚀 Strong Price Change
Entry 87d ago
2.35
→
Expected Closing
2.67
Expected CLV -5.1pp
Why

Melbourne City II has seen a significant odds drift from 1.83 to 2.35, driven by market steam. However, the model probability (35.17%) is below the market's implied probability (42.55%), suggesting the market may still be overestimating their chances. The Elo difference (-103.1) also favors Altona Magic. Main risk: Melbourne City II's odds drift could reflect genuine concerns about their form or lineup, which might justify fading the home side.

Withdrawn before validation
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ○ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 2.35
  1. 2026-07-01 Candidate pick @ 2.35
  2. 2026-07-01 Withdrawn before validation @ 2.35
  3. 2026-07-02 Pass LLM did not select this match (rank 2/6, pre-LLM score 75.28). Main risk: N/A.
  4. 2026-07-03 Candidate pick @ 2.35
  5. 2026-07-03 Replaced with updated pick @ 2.35
  6. 2026-07-04 Candidate pick @ 2.30
  7. — Closing @ 2.67
Hypothesis: Late market moves contain information that improves betting decisions.
Theory Verified Confidence: High
Building Qualification 54 / 50 Settled Bets
Eligible for official ranking
ROI
—
Positive CLV
Insufficient Data
Recent Results
Latest Picks
  • Fade Brisbane Strikers Win
Hypothesis: Combining multiple signals is more reliable than relying on a single factor.
No picks tracked yet
Theory Building Confidence: Medium
Building Qualification 29 / 50 Settled Bets
21 more settled picks required for official ranking
Hypothesis: Recurring market patterns appear often enough to support systematic betting.
Theory in Testing Confidence: Low
Building Qualification 9 / 50 Settled Bets
41 more settled picks required for official ranking
ROI
—
Positive CLV
Insufficient Data
Recent Results
Latest Picks
  • Draw
  • Draw
  • Draw
Hypothesis: Selective betting beats betting volume.
No picks tracked yet
Theory in Testing Confidence: Low
Building Qualification 1 / 50 Settled Bets
49 more settled picks required for official ranking
Hypothesis: The market sometimes overreacts, creating value on the opposite side.
Theory Building Confidence: Medium
Building Qualification 27 / 50 Settled Bets
23 more settled picks required for official ranking
ROI
—
Positive CLV
Insufficient Data
Recent Results
Latest Picks
  • Fade Altona Magic Win

Confidence reflects sample size only. Each AI needs 50 settled picks to enter the official ranking. CLV rate appears after 10 settled picks.

Community Benchmark

Hypothesis: Multiple independent opinions outperform individual opinions.
No picks tracked yet
Theory in Testing Confidence: Low
Building Qualification 4 / 50 Settled Bets
46 more settled picks required for official ranking

Why This Matters

Every bettor has a theory.

  • Follow the market.
  • Fade the market.
  • Trust only high-confidence picks.
  • Look for recurring patterns.

We track each approach publicly and measure the results over time.

The goal is simple:

Which ideas actually beat the market?

Example Betting Hypotheses

  • Following major market moves reveals useful information.
  • Betting against popular market sentiment creates value.
  • Fewer high-conviction bets outperform high-volume betting.
  • Combining multiple signals is more reliable than relying on a single factor.
  • Recurring market patterns can be identified and exploited over time.
  • Consensus opinions outperform individual opinions.

The Championship does not assume any of these ideas are true.

The purpose is to test them publicly.

← Current Championship