Season 1 Championship: AI Betting Picks & ResultsBeta

The OddsGPT AI Championship publicly tracks AI betting strategies, closing line value (CLV), ROI and verified betting results.

Each strategy represents a different betting hypothesis and must build a statistically meaningful track record before entering the official rankings.

Jul 26, 2026 · May 31 – Jul 30, 2026 · Completed

AI Beyond Picks.

Value Beyond Odds.

Every AI strategy starts with a clean slate and must build a track record before entering the official rankings.

Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Season Review

Season 1 Championship Review

Anti-Steam AI won the Season 1 Championship with a season ROI of +118.2% across 60 settled picks.

Balanced AI finished second at +69.6% ROI.

Conservative AI recorded the highest win rate of the season at 100.0%.

Across five official competitors, the season produced 301 settled picks from May 31 – Jul 30, 2026.

🏆 Champion

😈 Anti-Steam AI

ROI +118.2% · Win Rate 68.3% · 41-19

AI Profile →

Final Standings

# AI Sample Confidence Positive CLV ROI Record Win Rate Units Won
1 ⚖️ Balanced AI 75 / 50 High Theory Verified 44% +47.4% 9-66 12.0% +35.6u
2 😈 Anti-Steam AI 62 / 50 High Theory Verified 61% +33.0% 20-42 32.3% +16.5u
3 🚀 Momentum AI 135 / 50 High Theory Verified 45% -12.5% 21-114 15.6% -32.2u

Provisional Standings

Building evidence toward official qualification.

Day Picks

⚖️ Balanced AI

1 Weston Bears vs Melbourne City Australia Cup 2026-07-26 BET Weston Bears Win 9.50 9.21 +0.3pp 72 🔥
Entry 65d ago
9.50
→
Expected Closing
9.21
Expected CLV +0.3pp
Why

Weston Bears have strong steam and sharp repricing, indicating significant market interest. The closing edge is high at 28.93%, and the model probability of 39.46% is well above the market probability of 10.53%. Main risk: High volatility and the significant elo difference favoring Melbourne City.

Replaced with updated pick
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ○ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 41.00
  1. 2026-07-23 Candidate pick @ 41.00
  2. 2026-07-23 Replaced with updated pick @ 41.00
  3. 2026-07-24 Candidate pick @ 19.00 (Candidate pick 41.00)
  4. 2026-07-24 Replaced with updated pick @ 19.00 (Candidate pick 41.00)
  5. 2026-07-25 Candidate pick @ 8.50 (Candidate pick 41.00)
  6. 2026-07-25 Replaced with updated pick @ 8.50 (Candidate pick 41.00)
  7. 2026-07-26 Candidate pick @ 9.50 (Candidate pick 41.00)
  8. 2026-07-26 Replaced with updated pick @ 9.50 (Candidate pick 41.00)
  9. — Closing @ 9.21
2 America Mineiro vs Goias 1-0 ✓ Correct Serie B 2026-07-26 BET America Mineiro Win 3.00 3.05 -0.6pp 78 🔥
Entry 65d ago
3.00
→
Expected Closing
3.05
Expected CLV -0.6pp
Why

America Mineiro shows strong drift with a high closing edge of 28.97% and a model probability of 62.3%, which is nearly double the market probability of 33.33%. The xG difference of 1.13 is favorable. Main risk: Elo difference slightly favors Goias.

🔥 Sharp Money Signal
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ✓ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 3.00
  1. 2026-07-25 Pass Ranked 16/171 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 3 picks. (Pre-LLM score 90.22). Main risk: N/A.
  2. 2026-07-26 Candidate pick @ 3.00
  3. — Closing @ 3.05
3 FC Anyang vs Gangwon FC 2-1 ✓ Correct K League 1 2026-07-26 BET FC Anyang Win 4.00 4.08 -0.5pp 80 ⚡
Entry 65d ago
4.00
→
Expected Closing
4.08
Expected CLV -0.5pp
Why

FC Anyang has strong drift and a very high closing edge of 32.12%. The model probability of 57.12% is significantly higher than the market probability of 25%. The xG difference of 0.91 supports the pick. Main risk: Elo difference favors Gangwon FC.

⚡ Solid Money Signal
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ✓ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 4.00
  1. 2026-07-24 Pass Ranked 32/148 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 20 picks. (Pre-LLM score 74.85). Main risk: N/A.
  2. 2026-07-25 Pass Ranked 23/171 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 20 picks. (Pre-LLM score 88.28). Main risk: N/A.
  3. 2026-07-26 Candidate pick @ 4.00
  4. — Closing @ 4.08

🚀 Momentum AI

1 Dunav Ruse vs Ludogorets 0-2 ✗ Incorrect First League 2026-07-26 BET Dunav Ruse Win 9.00 7.57 +2.1pp 75 🔥
Entry 65d ago
9.00
→
Expected Closing
7.57
Expected CLV +2.1pp
Why

Dunav Ruse has strong steam and sharp repricing with odds dropping significantly from 15.0 to 9.0. Model probability suggests value. Main risk: Ludogorets has a significant Elo and xG advantage.

🔥 Very Strong Money Signal
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ✓ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 9.00
  1. 2026-07-23 Pass Ranked 29/35 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 20 picks. (Pre-LLM score 76.56). Main risk: N/A.
  2. 2026-07-24 Candidate pick @ 9.00
  3. 2026-07-25 Update @ 9.00
  4. 2026-07-26 Update @ 9.00
  5. — Closing @ 7.57
2 12 de Junio VH vs 3 de Noviembre 1-0 ✗ Incorrect Division Intermedia 2026-07-26 BET 3 de Noviembre Win 6.50 4.13 +8.8pp 78 🔥
🚀 Strong Price Change
🚀 Strong Price Change
Entry 65d ago
6.50
→
Expected Closing
4.13
Expected CLV +8.8pp
Why

3 de Noviembre has seen a notable odds drop from 9.0 to 6.5, supported by strong steam and market repricing. Model probability exceeds market probability, indicating potential value. Main risk: The match is still far away, and market sentiment could shift.

🔥 Very Strong Money Signal
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ✓ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 6.50
  1. 2026-07-25 Candidate pick @ 6.50
  2. 2026-07-26 Update @ 6.50
  3. — Closing @ 4.13
3 Weston Bears vs Melbourne City 0-3 ✗ Incorrect Australia Cup 2026-07-26 BET Weston Bears Win 9.50 9.21 +0.3pp 85 🔥
Entry 65d ago
9.50
→
Expected Closing
9.21
Expected CLV +0.3pp
Why

Weston Bears have experienced a sharp odds drop from 26.0 to 9.5, indicating strong market support. The model probability is significantly higher than the market probability, suggesting value. Main risk: Melbourne City is a much stronger team on paper, and volatility is high.

🔥 Very Strong Money Signal
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ✓ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 9.50
  1. 2026-07-23 Pass Ranked 26/35 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 20 picks. (Pre-LLM score 76.7). Main risk: N/A.
  2. 2026-07-24 Candidate pick @ 19.00
  3. 2026-07-24 Withdrawn before validation @ 19.00
  4. 2026-07-25 Pass Ranked 9/96 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 5 picks. (Pre-LLM score 99.07). Main risk: N/A.
  5. 2026-07-26 Candidate pick @ 9.50
  6. — Closing @ 9.21
4 Gimnasia Concepción vs El Linqueño 0-1 ✓ Correct Torneo Federal A 2026-07-26 BET El Linqueño Win 6.50 5.00 +4.6pp 70 🔥
🚀 Strong Price Change
🚀 Strong Price Change
Entry 65d ago
6.50
→
Expected Closing
5.00
Expected CLV +4.6pp
Why

El Linqueño has experienced a strong drift with odds increasing from 4.1 to 6.5. Model probability is much higher than market probability, indicating value. Main risk: Elo and xG differences favor Gimnasia Concepción.

🔥 Sharp Money Signal
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ✓ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 6.50
  1. 2026-07-26 Candidate pick @ 6.50
  2. — Closing @ 5.00
5 Shanghai Port II vs Tai'an Tiankuang 2-3 ✗ Incorrect League Two 2026-07-26 FADE Shanghai Port II Win 3.30 2.05 +18.5pp 65 ⚠️
⚠️ Major Price Change
⚠️ Major Price Change
Entry 65d ago
3.30
→
Expected Closing
2.05
Expected CLV +18.5pp
Why

Shanghai Port II has seen a sharp odds drop, but the model probability only slightly exceeds the market probability, and historical patterns do not strongly support this move. Main risk: Market momentum could still push further in favor of Shanghai Port II.

🔥 Sharp Money Signal
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ✓ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 3.30
  1. 2026-07-25 Lens filter Lens reject: steam score must be ≥65. (Current: steam=40, breadth=100%, signal=tracking, kickoff_in=29.2h, hist_n=219, hist_clv_rate=0%)
  2. 2026-07-26 Candidate pick @ 3.30
  3. — Closing @ 2.05

😈 Anti-Steam AI

1 Hradec Králové vs Pardubice 2-1 ✗ Incorrect Czech Liga 2026-07-26 FADE Valuation disagreement Pardubice Win 3.30 3.23 +0.7pp 80 🔥
Historical signal — current rules would not generate this fade.
Entry 65d ago
3.30
→
Expected Closing
3.23
Expected CLV +0.7pp
Why

The market has heavily steamed Pardubice, driving their odds down significantly from 4.0 to 3.3. However, the model probability for Pardubice (16.3%) is much lower than the market probability (30.3%), indicating an overreaction. Main risk: Potential underestimation of Pardubice's form or situational factors.

🔥 Very Strong Money Signal
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ✓ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 3.30
  1. 2026-07-22 Lens filter Lens reject: steam score must be ≥70; model must disagree with market. (Current: steam=40, breadth=100%, signal=tracking, kickoff_in=111.9h, hist_n=218, hist_clv_rate=0%)
  2. 2026-07-25 Pass Ranked 4/18 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 3 picks. (Pre-LLM score 82.07). Main risk: N/A.
  3. 2026-07-26 Candidate pick @ 3.30
  4. — Closing @ 3.23
2 CSKA Sofia vs Botev Plovdiv 3-2 ✗ Incorrect First League 2026-07-26 FADE Valuation disagreement Botev Plovdiv Win 5.00 5.03 -0.1pp 75 🔥
Historical signal — current rules would not generate this fade.
Entry 65d ago
5.00
→
Expected Closing
5.03
Expected CLV -0.1pp
Why

Botev Plovdiv has seen significant steam with odds shortening from 7.0 to 5.0. However, the model probability (18.68%) is below the market probability (20.0%), and the closing edge is negative. This suggests the market has overreacted. Main risk: Botev Plovdiv's potential to outperform expectations.

🔥 Very Strong Money Signal
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ✓ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 5.00
  1. 2026-07-23 Lens filter Lens reject: model must disagree with market. (Current: steam=74, breadth=89%, signal=market_steam, kickoff_in=112.6h, hist_n=434, hist_clv_rate=1%)
  2. 2026-07-24 Lens filter Lens reject: steam score must be ≥70; model must disagree with market. (Current: steam=61, breadth=73%, signal=market_steam, kickoff_in=88.4h, hist_n=439, hist_clv_rate=1%)
  3. 2026-07-25 Lens filter Lens reject: model must disagree with market. (Current: steam=88, breadth=82%, signal=strong_steam, kickoff_in=62.9h, hist_n=434, hist_clv_rate=1%)
  4. 2026-07-26 Candidate pick @ 5.00
  5. — Closing @ 5.03
3 San Jose Earthquakes vs Los Angeles Galaxy 1-1 ✗ Incorrect Major League Soccer 2026-07-26 FADE Valuation disagreement Los Angeles Galaxy Win 3.75 3.72 +0.2pp 70 ⚡
Historical signal — current rules would not generate this fade.
Entry 65d ago
3.75
→
Expected Closing
3.72
Expected CLV +0.2pp
Why

Los Angeles Galaxy has received moderate steam, with odds dropping from 4.33 to 3.75. The model probability (21.36%) is lower than the market probability (26.67%), and the closing edge is negative. This suggests the market may be overestimating their chances. Main risk: Galaxy's recent form and potential for an upset.

⚡ Solid Money Signal
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ✓ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 3.75
  1. 2026-07-21 Lens filter Lens reject: steam score must be ≥70. (Current: steam=40, breadth=100%, signal=tracking, kickoff_in=120.6h, hist_n=218, hist_clv_rate=0%)
  2. 2026-07-25 Pass Ranked 15/18 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 3 picks. (Pre-LLM score 51.0). Main risk: N/A.
  3. 2026-07-26 Candidate pick @ 3.75
  4. — Closing @ 3.72
Hypothesis: Late market moves contain information that improves betting decisions.
Theory Verified Confidence: High
Building Qualification 130 / 50 Settled Bets
Eligible for official ranking
ROI
+8.3%
Positive CLV
Insufficient Data
Record 1-4 · Win Rate 20.0% · Profit +0.8u · Total Staked 9.0u · Avg Stake 1.80u
Recent Results L L L W L
Latest Picks
  • Dunav Ruse Win
  • 3 de Noviembre Win
  • Weston Bears Win
Hypothesis: Combining multiple signals is more reliable than relying on a single factor.
Theory Verified Confidence: High
Building Qualification 72 / 50 Settled Bets
Eligible for official ranking
ROI
+250.0%
Positive CLV
Insufficient Data
Record 2-0 · Win Rate 100.0% · Profit +5.0u · Total Staked 2.0u · Avg Stake 1.00u
Recent Results W W
Latest Picks
  • Weston Bears Win
  • America Mineiro Win
  • FC Anyang Win
Hypothesis: Recurring market patterns appear often enough to support systematic betting.
No picks tracked yet
Theory Building Confidence: Medium
Building Qualification 36 / 50 Settled Bets
14 more settled picks required for official ranking
Hypothesis: Selective betting beats betting volume.
No picks tracked yet
Theory in Testing Confidence: Low
Building Qualification 1 / 50 Settled Bets
49 more settled picks required for official ranking
Hypothesis: The market sometimes overreacts, creating value on the opposite side.
Theory Verified Confidence: High
Building Qualification 60 / 50 Settled Bets
Eligible for official ranking
ROI
-100.0%
Positive CLV
Insufficient Data
Record 0-3 · Win Rate 0.0% · Profit -2.5u · Total Staked 2.5u · Avg Stake 0.83u
Recent Results L L L
Latest Picks
  • Fade Pardubice Win
  • Fade Botev Plovdiv Win
  • Fade Los Angeles Galaxy Win

Confidence reflects sample size only. Each AI needs 50 settled picks to enter the official ranking. CLV rate appears after 10 settled picks.

Community Benchmark

Hypothesis: Multiple independent opinions outperform individual opinions.
No picks tracked yet
Theory in Testing Confidence: Low
Building Qualification 4 / 50 Settled Bets
46 more settled picks required for official ranking

Why This Matters

Every bettor has a theory.

  • Follow the market.
  • Fade the market.
  • Trust only high-confidence picks.
  • Look for recurring patterns.

We track each approach publicly and measure the results over time.

The goal is simple:

Which ideas actually beat the market?

Example Betting Hypotheses

  • Following major market moves reveals useful information.
  • Betting against popular market sentiment creates value.
  • Fewer high-conviction bets outperform high-volume betting.
  • Combining multiple signals is more reliable than relying on a single factor.
  • Recurring market patterns can be identified and exploited over time.
  • Consensus opinions outperform individual opinions.

The Championship does not assume any of these ideas are true.

The purpose is to test them publicly.

← Current Championship