Prediction Audit: Häcken vs Rosengård W Prediction, Odds & AI Betting Tips

Häcken

Jun 18, 2026 - 16:00

2 3.23

0 0.85

xG Accuracy: 56%

Rosengård W

AI correctly predicted the Häcken win.

The match finished 2–0, validating the model's directional assessment.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Prediction grade F

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

Market Prediction Result Outcome
Over / Under 2.5 Over 2.5 Under 2.5 (2 goals) ✖ Incorrect
Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes No ✖ Incorrect
1X2 Häcken Häcken ✔ Correct
Correct Score Insights 3-0, 2-0, 3-1, 4-0, 2-1 2-0 ✔ Correct

Model vs Closing Market

Outcome	Model	Closing Market	Difference	Signal
Häcken	82.3%	75.4%	+6.9 pp	Model Higher
Draw	11.9%	14.9%	-3.0 pp	Aligned
Rosengård W	5.8%	9.7%	-4.0 pp	Aligned

The statistical model estimates Häcken's win probability at 82.3%, compared with the closing market's implied probability of 75.4%, a difference of 6.9 percentage points. This highlights a substantial disagreement between the model's assessment and the market consensus, rather than indicating which view is ultimately correct.

Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.

After full time, the model's directional lean matched the result (Häcken win 2–0).

Market Assessment

The fair estimate shows a modest edge over current market pricing on Häcken.

Monitor line movement before kickoff — not a betting recommendation.

Post Match Insights

What worked

Häcken attacking xG significantly stronger (3.23 vs 0.85)
Exact score 2–0 fell within the model's highlighted bins

What failed

Both Teams To Score: model leaned BTTS Yes; match finished BTTS No
Over / Under 2.5: model leaned Over 2.5; match finished Under 2.5 (2 goals)

Market lesson

Large model–market gaps do not automatically mean the market is right. Here the closing market priced Häcken more conservatively (75.4% vs model 82.3%, 6.9 pp), but the model's lean was validated (Häcken win 2–0).

Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Prediction Timeline

How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.

Jun 18, 2026 · 19:42 UTC Forecast generated
- Model 1X2 · Häcken 82.4% · Draw 11.9% · Rosengård W 5.7%
- xG · Häcken 3.23 — Rosengård W 0.85
Jun 18, 2026 · 15:29 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
- 1X2 odds · Häcken 1.22 · Draw 6.19 · Rosengård W 9.47
- Implied 1X2 · Häcken 75.4% · Draw 14.9% · Rosengård W 9.7%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
Jun 18, 2026 · 15:59 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
- 1X2 odds · Häcken 1.22 · Draw 6.19 · Rosengård W 9.47
- Implied 1X2 · Häcken 75.4% · Draw 14.9% · Rosengård W 9.7%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
Jun 18, 2026 · 16:00 UTC Kickoff
FT Full-time result Häcken win · 2–0
FT Prediction validated Directional lean matched full-time result
Archived Prediction review

Historical Snapshot

Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.

Historical verdict: Observe

Historical Decision No Primary Bet

Outcome Validated

Pre-match metrics (historical context)

Prediction Reliability 64/100 · Moderate

Validation: Pass
High xG deviation from league baseline (139%+)

Evidence ★★★★★

Strong model lean
Direction agrees with model lean
Validation passed

Pricing proximity (inverse gap) 65/100

Betting Confidence 67/100

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Aug 06, 2026 · 07:34 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-3109478

Closing Odds 1.22

AI Fair Odds —

CLV Pending

Final Result Häcken win · Häcken 2–0 Rosengård W

Prediction ✔ Correct

Decision Grade F

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Review FAQ

How accurate was the prediction?: This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
What does xG Accuracy measure?: xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
Why wasn't the exact score predicted?: Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
Does this improve the AI record?: Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.

Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Below is a compact, numbers-first snapshot aligned with the same engine as the cards above.

League: Damallsvenskan
Fixture: Häcken vs Rosengård W
Kickoff: 2026-06-18 16:00:00
1X2 (model): Home 45.0% · Draw 45.0% · Away 10.0%
xG (showing): Häcken 3.23 — Rosengård W 0.85 (total xG ≈ 4.08)
Value headline: None — no positive EV could be estimated on tracked lines at current best prices (missing odds or thin book depth).
Structural leans (not bets): See the Over/Under and BTTS cards for any directional lean text.
BTTS (model): Yes N/A · No N/A
Correct score (top bin): N/A

When book depth is thin or odds are missing, EV may be unavailable even though the model still prefers one side on totals or BTTS — wait for cleaner prices or skip.

If lines move materially, re-run generation or refresh — implied probabilities and any future EV readouts will change first.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: No Primary Bet

Outcome: Validated — Pre-match lean validated against the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

September 29, 2026 (UTC)

Related Predictions

See Upcoming Damallsvenskan Matches Track Häcken Next Match Prediction Track Rosengård W Next Match Prediction View Today's Football Predictions

Explore More Predictions Content

Get Premium Predictions for Häcken & Rosengård W!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now

Back to Predictions

Damallsvenskan — Standings

#	TEAM	MP	W	D	L	PTS
1	Häcken	20	18	1	1	55
2	Hammarby	20	16	2	2	50
3	Malmö FF W	19	10	6	3	36
4	AIK	20	10	4	6	34
5	Kristianstad	20	8	5	7	29
6	Vittsjö	20	8	5	7	29
7	Eskilstuna United	20	8	3	9	27
8	Brommapojkarna W	19	8	2	9	26
9	Piteå W	19	6	5	8	23
10	Djurgården	20	6	3	11	21
11	Växjö	20	5	3	12	18
12	Rosengård W	19	4	5	10	17
13	Norrköping W	20	3	7	10	16
14	Uppsala W	20	1	3	16	6

#	TEAM	MP	GS	GC	+/-	PTS
1	Häcken	20	61	13	+48	55
2	Hammarby	20	49	10	+39	50
3	Malmö FF W	19	38	11	+27	36
4	Kristianstad	20	33	32	+1	29
5	AIK	20	29	27	+2	34
6	Vittsjö	20	27	26	+1	29
7	Brommapojkarna W	19	25	33	-8	26
8	Djurgården	20	25	33	-8	21
9	Piteå W	19	23	28	-5	23
10	Växjö	20	23	40	-17	18
11	Rosengård W	19	20	25	-5	17
12	Eskilstuna United	20	18	25	-7	27
13	Norrköping W	20	17	35	-18	16
14	Uppsala W	20	14	64	-50	6

#	TEAM	MP	xG	xGC	+/-	PTS
1	Hammarby	20	2.9	2.2	+0.7	50
2	AIK	20	2.2	2.9	-0.7	34
3	Häcken	20	—	—	—	55
4	Malmö FF W	19	—	—	—	36
5	Kristianstad	20	—	—	—	29
6	Vittsjö	20	—	—	—	29
7	Eskilstuna United	20	—	—	—	27
8	Brommapojkarna W	19	—	—	—	26
9	Piteå W	19	—	—	—	23
10	Djurgården	20	—	—	—	21
11	Växjö	20	—	—	—	18
12	Rosengård W	19	—	—	—	17
13	Norrköping W	20	—	—	—	16
14	Uppsala W	20	—	—	—	6