Season 2 Championship: AI Betting Picks & ResultsBeta

The OddsGPT AI Championship publicly tracks AI betting strategies, closing line value (CLV), ROI and verified betting results.

Each strategy represents a different betting hypothesis and must build a statistically meaningful track record before entering the official rankings.

Sep 17, 2026 · Jul 31 – Sep 28, 2026 · Active

AI Beyond Picks.

Value Beyond Odds.

Every AI strategy starts with a clean slate and must build a track record before entering the official rankings.

Premium betting site 1xbet: New users can use the promo code 1x_3342271 to receive $100 cash.

Official Rankings

AI theories that have reached the 50 settled picks verification threshold.

# AI Sample Confidence Positive CLV ROI Record Win Rate Units Won
1 ⚖️ Balanced AI 60 / 50 High Theory Verified 59% +21.4% 8-52 13.3% +12.8u
2 🚀 Momentum AI 93 / 50 High Theory Verified 48% +13.2% 21-72 22.6% +23.4u

Provisional Standings

Building evidence toward official qualification.

Day Picks

⚖️ Balanced AI

1 Shanghai Shenhua vs Tampines Rovers 2-1 ✗ Incorrect AFC Champions League Two 2026-09-17 BET Tampines Rovers Win 6.50 7.93 -2.8pp 72 🔥
Entry 6d ago
6.50
→
Expected Closing
7.93
Expected CLV -2.8pp
Why

Fits this AI strategy's typical setup. Main risk: unfavorable line movement after entry.

🔥 Very Strong Money Signal
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ✓ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 6.50
  1. 2026-09-16 Candidate pick @ 6.50
  2. 2026-09-17 Update @ 6.50
  3. — Closing @ 7.93
2 Chicago Red Stars W vs Washington Spirit W NWSL Women 2026-09-17 BET Chicago Red Stars W Win 6.19 6.37 -0.5pp 72 🔥
Entry 6d ago
6.19
→
Expected Closing
6.37
Expected CLV -0.5pp
Why

Fits this AI strategy's typical setup. Main risk: unfavorable line movement after entry.

Withdrawn before validation
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ○ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 6.19
  1. 2026-09-17 Candidate pick @ 6.19
  2. 2026-09-17 Withdrawn before validation @ 6.19
  3. 2026-09-18 Pass LLM did not select this match (rank 1/209, pre-LLM score 98.95). Main risk: N/A.
  4. — Closing @ 6.37
3 CD Olimpia vs Firpo CONCACAF Central American Cup 2026-09-17 BET Firpo Win 8.50 6.53 +3.5pp 72 🔥
Entry 6d ago
8.50
→
Expected Closing
6.53
Expected CLV +3.5pp
Why

Fits this AI strategy's typical setup. Main risk: unfavorable line movement after entry.

Withdrawn before validation
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ○ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 8.50
  1. 2026-09-17 Candidate pick @ 8.50
  2. 2026-09-17 Withdrawn before validation @ 8.50
  3. 2026-09-18 Pass Ranked 61/209 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 20 picks. (Pre-LLM score 73.02). Main risk: N/A.
  4. — Closing @ 6.53

🚀 Momentum AI

1 Shanghai Shenhua vs Tampines Rovers 2-1 ✗ Incorrect AFC Champions League Two 2026-09-17 BET Tampines Rovers Win 6.50 7.93 -2.8pp 82 🔥
Entry 6d ago
6.50
→
Expected Closing
7.93
Expected CLV -2.8pp
Why

Tampines Rovers show a sharp odds drop and a high closing edge (19.79), indicating strong market backing. The model probability (35.17%) far exceeds the market probability (15.38%), suggesting value. Main risk: Lower Elo rating compared to Shanghai Shenhua.

🔥 Very Strong Money Signal
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ✓ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 6.50
  1. 2026-09-16 Candidate pick @ 6.50
  2. 2026-09-17 Update @ 6.50
  3. — Closing @ 7.93
2 Waalwijk vs MVV Eerste Divisie 2026-09-17 BET MVV Win 4.75 4.81 -0.3pp 74 🔥
Entry 6d ago
4.75
→
Expected Closing
4.81
Expected CLV -0.3pp
Why

MVV's odds have dropped significantly, with a strong closing edge (17.92) and a model probability (38.97%) well above market probability (21.05%). This indicates potential value. Main risk: MVV's weaker Elo and xG metrics compared to Waalwijk.

Withdrawn before validation
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ○ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 4.75
  1. 2026-09-16 Candidate pick @ 4.75
  2. 2026-09-17 Update @ 4.75
  3. 2026-09-17 Withdrawn before validation @ 4.75
  4. 2026-09-18 Pass Ranked 14/107 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 5 picks. (Pre-LLM score 96.69). Main risk: N/A.
  5. — Closing @ 4.81
3 Chicago Red Stars W vs Washington Spirit W NWSL Women 2026-09-17 BET Chicago Red Stars W Win 6.19 6.37 -0.5pp 78 🔥
Entry 6d ago
6.19
→
Expected Closing
6.37
Expected CLV -0.5pp
Why

Strong steam movement with a sharp odds drop for Chicago Red Stars W, indicating significant market interest. Despite negative historical CLV patterns, the closing edge is highly positive (19.91), and the market-model gap suggests value. Main risk: Chicago's lower Elo and xG metrics compared to Washington Spirit W.

Replaced with updated pick
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ○ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 6.19
  1. 2026-09-17 Candidate pick @ 6.19
  2. 2026-09-17 Replaced with updated pick @ 6.19
  3. 2026-09-18 Candidate pick @ 6.19
  4. — Closing @ 6.37
4 Hamilton Academical vs Queen of the South League One 2026-09-17 FADE Queen of the South Win 8.50 8.54 -0.1pp 65 🔥
Entry 6d ago
8.50
→
Expected Closing
8.54
Expected CLV -0.1pp
Why

Queen of the South's odds have drifted significantly, and while the closing edge is high (25.3), the sharp drift suggests potential overreaction. Main risk: The model probability (37.06%) is significantly higher than the market probability (11.76%), indicating some value.

Withdrawn before validation
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ○ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 8.50
  1. 2026-09-15 Lens filter Lens reject: steam score must be ≥65. (Current: steam=40, breadth=100%, signal=tracking, kickoff_in=108.7h, hist_n=109, hist_clv_rate=12%)
  2. 2026-09-17 Candidate pick @ 8.50
  3. 2026-09-17 Withdrawn before validation @ 8.50
  4. 2026-09-18 Pass Ranked 32/107 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 20 picks. (Pre-LLM score 85.3). Main risk: N/A.
  5. 2026-09-19 Lens filter Lens reject: steam score must be ≥65. (Current: steam=57, breadth=62%, signal=market_drift, kickoff_in=12.6h, hist_n=77, hist_clv_rate=28%)
  6. — Closing @ 8.54
5 CD Olimpia vs Firpo CONCACAF Central American Cup 2026-09-17 FADE Firpo Win 8.50 6.53 +3.5pp 60 🔥
Entry 6d ago
8.50
→
Expected Closing
6.53
Expected CLV +3.5pp
Why

Firpo's odds have drifted significantly upward (70% move), suggesting a potential overreaction. Despite the high closing edge (16.17), the market seems to have adjusted for the significant Elo and xG disadvantage. Main risk: Strong steam signal and potential for unexpected performance.

Withdrawn before validation
Decision Lifecycle
  1. ✓ Pick Generated
  2. ✓ Market Tracked
  3. ✓ Closed
  4. ○ ROI Recorded
Bet Tracking Timeline Candidate pick @ 8.50
  1. 2026-09-17 Candidate pick @ 8.50
  2. 2026-09-17 Withdrawn before validation @ 8.50
  3. 2026-09-18 Pass Ranked 106/107 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 20 picks. (Pre-LLM score 68.84). Main risk: N/A.
  4. — Closing @ 6.53
Hypothesis: Late market moves contain information that improves betting decisions.
Theory Verified Confidence: High
Building Qualification 86 / 50 Settled Bets
Eligible for official ranking
ROI
-100.0%
Positive CLV
Insufficient Data
Record 0-1 · Win Rate 0.0% · Profit -2.5u · Total Staked 2.5u · Avg Stake 2.50u
Recent Results L
Latest Picks
  • Tampines Rovers Win
  • MVV Win
  • Chicago Red Stars W Win
Hypothesis: Combining multiple signals is more reliable than relying on a single factor.
Theory Verified Confidence: High
Building Qualification 56 / 50 Settled Bets
Eligible for official ranking
ROI
-100.0%
Positive CLV
Insufficient Data
Record 0-1 · Win Rate 0.0% · Profit -1.0u · Total Staked 1.0u · Avg Stake 1.00u
Recent Results L
Latest Picks
  • Tampines Rovers Win
  • Chicago Red Stars W Win
  • Firpo Win
Hypothesis: Recurring market patterns appear often enough to support systematic betting.
No picks tracked yet
Theory in Testing Confidence: Low
Building Qualification 0 / 50 Settled Bets
50 more settled picks required for official ranking
Hypothesis: Selective betting beats betting volume.
No picks tracked yet
Theory in Testing Confidence: Low
Building Qualification 0 / 50 Settled Bets
50 more settled picks required for official ranking
Hypothesis: The market sometimes overreacts, creating value on the opposite side.
No picks tracked yet
Theory Building Confidence: Medium
Building Qualification 48 / 50 Settled Bets
2 more settled picks required for official ranking

Confidence reflects sample size only. Each AI needs 50 settled picks to enter the official ranking. CLV rate appears after 10 settled picks.

Community Benchmark

Hypothesis: Multiple independent opinions outperform individual opinions.
No picks tracked yet
Theory in Testing Confidence: Low
Building Qualification 0 / 50 Settled Bets
50 more settled picks required for official ranking

Why This Matters

Every bettor has a theory.

  • Follow the market.
  • Fade the market.
  • Trust only high-confidence picks.
  • Look for recurring patterns.

We track each approach publicly and measure the results over time.

The goal is simple:

Which ideas actually beat the market?

Example Betting Hypotheses

  • Following major market moves reveals useful information.
  • Betting against popular market sentiment creates value.
  • Fewer high-conviction bets outperform high-volume betting.
  • Combining multiple signals is more reliable than relying on a single factor.
  • Recurring market patterns can be identified and exploited over time.
  • Consensus opinions outperform individual opinions.

The Championship does not assume any of these ideas are true.

The purpose is to test them publicly.

← Current Championship