賽季 1 錦標賽:AI投注推薦與結果測試版

OddsGPT AI錦標賽公開追蹤AI投注策略、封盤賠率價值(CLV)、ROI與經過驗證的投注結果。

每個策略代表不同的投注假設,並且必須建立統計上有意義的追蹤記錄,才能進入官方排名。

Jul 2, 2026 · May 31 – Jul 30, 2026 · 已完成

AI超越投注。

價值超越賠率。

每個AI策略都從零開始,必須建立記錄後才能進入官方排名。

Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

賽季回顧

Season 1 Championship Review

Anti-Steam AI won the Season 1 Championship with a season ROI of +118.2% across 60 settled picks.

Balanced AI finished second at +69.6% ROI.

Conservative AI recorded the highest win rate of the season at 100.0%.

Across five official competitors, the season produced 301 settled picks from May 31 – Jul 30, 2026.

🏆 冠軍

😈 Anti-Steam AI

ROI +118.2% · Win Rate 68.3% · 41-19

AI Profile →

最終排名

# AI 樣本 信心指數 正CLV 投資回報率 (ROI) 記錄 勝率 贏得單位
1 ⚖️ 平衡型AI 75 / 50 高 理論已驗證 44% +47.4% 9-66 12.0% +35.6u
2 😈 反Steam型AI 62 / 50 高 理論已驗證 61% +33.0% 20-42 32.3% +16.5u
3 🚀 動量型AI 135 / 50 高 理論已驗證 45% -12.5% 21-114 15.6% -32.2u

臨時排名

正在累積證據以達到官方資格。

每日推薦

⚖️ 平衡型AI

1 Ægir vs Fylkir 1. Deild 2026-07-02 投注 Ægir Win 5.25 6.43 -3.5pp 72 🔥
參賽 87 天前
5.25
→
預期封盤
6.43
預期CLV -3.5pp
為什麼

Ægir has strong steam and sharp repricing signals, with significant closing edge (15.19) and a model probability far exceeding market probability (34.24% vs 19.05%). The odds movement suggests value despite low league quality. Main risk: Elo and xG differences are marginally against Ægir.

驗證前已撤回
決策生命周期
  1. ✓ 推荐已生成
  2. ✓ 市场已跟踪
  3. ✓ 已收盘
  4. ○ ROI 已记录
投注追蹤時間線 候選選擇 @ 5.25
  1. 2026-07-01 候選選擇 @ 5.25
  2. 2026-07-02 更新 @ 5.25
  3. 2026-07-02 驗證前已撤回 @ 5.25
  4. 2026-07-03 跳過 Ranked 7/101 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 3 picks. (Pre-LLM score 94.05). Main risk: N/A.
  5. — 結束中 @ 6.43
2 Glenorchy Knights vs Clarence Zebras Tasmania NPL 2026-07-02 投注 Glenorchy Knights Win 2.80 2.46 +4.9pp 78 🔥
🚀 強烈價格變動
🚀 強烈價格變動
參賽 87 天前
2.80
→
預期封盤
2.46
預期CLV +4.9pp
為什麼

Glenorchy Knights exhibit strong steam (99) and sharp repricing with a closing edge of 8.63. Elo and xG differences heavily favor the home side, and the model probability (44.34%) exceeds market probability (35.71%). Main risk: Odds movement suggests some market skepticism.

驗證前已撤回
決策生命周期
  1. ✓ 推荐已生成
  2. ✓ 市场已跟踪
  3. ✓ 已收盘
  4. ○ ROI 已记录
投注追蹤時間線 候選選擇 @ 2.80
  1. 2026-07-01 候選選擇 @ 2.80
  2. 2026-07-02 更新 @ 2.80
  3. 2026-07-02 驗證前已撤回 @ 2.80
  4. 2026-07-03 跳過 Ranked 16/101 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 3 picks. (Pre-LLM score 82.66). Main risk: N/A.
  5. 2026-07-04 鏡頭篩選器 Lens reject: requires edge≥5 or steam≥75. (Current: steam=74, breadth=67%, signal=market_steam, kickoff_in=5.5h, hist_n=596, hist_clv_rate=2%)
  6. — 結束中 @ 2.46

🚀 動量型AI

1 Glenorchy Knights vs Clarence Zebras Tasmania NPL 2026-07-02 投注 Glenorchy Knights Win 2.80 2.46 +4.9pp 85 🔥
🚀 強烈價格變動
🚀 強烈價格變動
參賽 87 天前
2.80
→
預期封盤
2.46
預期CLV +4.9pp
為什麼

Glenorchy Knights show strong steam with a sharp market repricing and significant closing edge (8.63%). The model probability is higher than the market probability, indicating value. Main risk: Clarence Zebras could outperform expectations despite low volatility.

驗證前已撤回
決策生命周期
  1. ✓ 推荐已生成
  2. ✓ 市场已跟踪
  3. ✓ 已收盘
  4. ○ ROI 已记录
投注追蹤時間線 候選選擇 @ 2.80
  1. 2026-07-01 候選選擇 @ 2.80
  2. 2026-07-02 更新 @ 2.80
  3. 2026-07-02 驗證前已撤回 @ 2.80
  4. 2026-07-03 跳過 LLM did not select this match (rank 2/54, pre-LLM score 107.3). Main risk: N/A.
  5. 2026-07-04 跳過 Ranked 38/66 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 20 picks. (Pre-LLM score 82.93). Main risk: N/A.
  6. — 結束中 @ 2.46
2 Ægir vs Fylkir 1. Deild 2026-07-02 投注 Ægir Win 5.25 6.43 -3.5pp 78 🔥
參賽 87 天前
5.25
→
預期封盤
6.43
預期CLV -3.5pp
為什麼

Ægir has strong steam and a sharp repricing with a significant closing edge (15.19%). The model probability is notably higher than the market probability, suggesting value. Main risk: Fylkir's slight edge in xG could impact the outcome.

驗證前已撤回
決策生命周期
  1. ✓ 推荐已生成
  2. ✓ 市场已跟踪
  3. ✓ 已收盘
  4. ○ ROI 已记录
投注追蹤時間線 候選選擇 @ 5.25
  1. 2026-07-01 候選選擇 @ 5.25
  2. 2026-07-02 更新 @ 5.25
  3. 2026-07-02 驗證前已撤回 @ 5.25
  4. 2026-07-03 跳過 Ranked 12/54 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 5 picks. (Pre-LLM score 101.49). Main risk: N/A.
  5. — 結束中 @ 6.43
3 Deutschlandsberger SC vs SV Kapfenberg Friendlies Clubs 2026-07-02 投注 Deutschlandsberger SC Win 3.80 3.78 +0.1pp 70 🔥
參賽 87 天前
3.80
→
預期封盤
3.78
預期CLV +0.1pp
為什麼

Deutschlandsberger SC shows strong steam and a sharp repricing with a closing edge of 9.32%. The model probability is higher than the market probability, suggesting value. Main risk: SV Kapfenberg's Elo is slightly better, which could impact the result.

驗證前已撤回
決策生命周期
  1. ✓ 推荐已生成
  2. ✓ 市场已跟踪
  3. ✓ 已收盘
  4. ○ ROI 已记录
投注追蹤時間線 候選選擇 @ 3.80
  1. 2026-07-01 候選選擇 @ 3.80
  2. 2026-07-02 更新 @ 3.80
  3. 2026-07-02 驗證前已撤回 @ 3.80
  4. 2026-07-03 跳過 Deutschlandsberger SC has moderate steam and closing edge but lacks compelling evidence for strong value. Main risk: Limited odds movement and low historical pattern similarity.
  5. — 結束中 @ 3.78
4 Sunshine Georgies vs Oakleigh Cannons Victoria NPL 2026-07-02 投注 Sunshine Georgies Win 6.50 6.27 +0.6pp 74 🔥
參賽 87 天前
6.50
→
預期封盤
6.27
預期CLV +0.6pp
為什麼

Sunshine Georgies has strong steam with a significant move percentage (50.1%) and closing edge (16.1%). The model probability is much higher than the market probability, indicating value. Main risk: Oakleigh Cannons have an Elo advantage and could dominate.

驗證前已撤回
決策生命周期
  1. ✓ 推荐已生成
  2. ✓ 市场已跟踪
  3. ✓ 已收盘
  4. ○ ROI 已记录
投注追蹤時間線 候選選擇 @ 6.50
  1. 2026-07-01 候選選擇 @ 6.50
  2. 2026-07-02 更新 @ 6.50
  3. 2026-07-02 驗證前已撤回 @ 6.50
  4. 2026-07-03 跳過 Ranked 27/54 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 20 picks. (Pre-LLM score 88.22). Main risk: N/A.
  5. 2026-07-04 跳過 Ranked 13/66 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 5 picks. (Pre-LLM score 98.93). Main risk: N/A.
  6. — 結束中 @ 6.27

📊 模式型AI

1 BFC Dynamo vs Phönix Lübeck Friendlies Clubs 2026-07-02 反向投注 Draw 3.40 3.40 +0.0pp 70 🔥
參賽 87 天前
3.40
→
預期封盤
3.40
預期CLV +0.0pp
為什麼

The market is undergoing sharp repricing with a slight negative move in odds (-5.6%), indicating potential overreaction to sharp action. The historical CLV is only marginally positive (52%), and the closing edge is negligible (0.1pp). Main risk: The match is in a low-volatility setting, which could favor a draw.

模式證據
模式信心: Moderate (B)
樣本量 76
歷史CLV 52%
歷史ROI +33.9%
覆蓋層級 Low
驗證前已撤回
決策生命周期
  1. ✓ 推荐已生成
  2. ✓ 市场已跟踪
  3. ✓ 已收盘
  4. ○ ROI 已记录
投注追蹤時間線 候選選擇 @ 3.40
  1. 2026-07-01 跳過 LLM did not select this match (rank 1/8, pre-LLM score 65.7). Main risk: N/A.
  2. 2026-07-02 候選選擇 @ 3.40
  3. 2026-07-02 驗證前已撤回 @ 3.40
  4. 2026-07-03 跳過 LLM did not select this match (rank 1/10, pre-LLM score 65.7). Main risk: N/A.
  5. — 結束中 @ 3.40
2 Argentina vs Cape Verde Islands 3-2 ✗ 錯誤 World Cup 2026-07-02 反向投注 Draw 8.00 8.75 -1.1pp 75 🔥
參賽 87 天前
8.00
→
預期封盤
8.75
預期CLV -1.1pp
為什麼

The odds have shortened significantly (-11.1% move), suggesting potential overreaction to sharp money. The closing edge is negative (-0.17pp), and the model probability (12.33%) aligns closely with the market probability (12.5%). Main risk: The high odds for a draw could still offer value if the market is mispricing the probability.

資金信號
模式證據
模式信心: Moderate (B)
樣本量 76
歷史CLV 52%
歷史ROI +33.9%
覆蓋層級 Low
決策生命周期
  1. ✓ 推荐已生成
  2. ✓ 市场已跟踪
  3. ✓ 已收盘
  4. ✓ ROI 已记录
投注追蹤時間線 候選選擇 @ 8.00
  1. 2026-06-29 鏡頭篩選器 Lens reject: posterior CLV must be ≥52%. (Current: steam=78, breadth=58%, signal=market_steam, kickoff_in=116.8h, hist_n=640, hist_clv_rate=2%)
  2. 2026-06-30 鏡頭篩選器 Lens reject: posterior CLV must be ≥52%. (Current: steam=94, breadth=83%, signal=strong_steam, kickoff_in=92.8h, hist_n=618, hist_clv_rate=2%)
  3. 2026-07-01 跳過 LLM did not select this match (rank 3/8, pre-LLM score 65.7). Main risk: N/A.
  4. 2026-07-02 候選選擇 @ 8.00
  5. — 結束中 @ 8.75
3 Brazil vs Norway World Cup 2026-07-02 反向投注 Draw 3.60 3.74 -1.0pp 80 🔥
參賽 87 天前
3.60
→
預期封盤
3.74
預期CLV -1.0pp
為什麼

The market has moved against the draw (+5.9% move), and the closing edge is significantly negative (-14.1pp). The model probability (13.68%) is much lower than the market probability (27.78%), indicating a potential overvaluation of the draw. Main risk: The sharp-led signal could indicate insider knowledge favoring the draw.

模式證據
模式信心: Moderate (B)
樣本量 76
歷史CLV 52%
歷史ROI +33.9%
覆蓋層級 Low
驗證前已撤回
決策生命周期
  1. ✓ 推荐已生成
  2. ✓ 市场已跟踪
  3. ✓ 已收盘
  4. ○ ROI 已记录
投注追蹤時間線 候選選擇 @ 3.60
  1. 2026-07-01 跳過 Ranked 8/8 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 3 picks. (Pre-LLM score 61.2). Main risk: N/A.
  2. 2026-07-02 候選選擇 @ 3.60
  3. 2026-07-02 驗證前已撤回 @ 3.60
  4. 2026-07-03 跳過 Ranked 10/10 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 3 picks. (Pre-LLM score 61.2). Main risk: N/A.
  5. 2026-07-04 跳過 Ranked 9/10 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 3 picks. (Pre-LLM score 61.2). Main risk: N/A.
  6. 2026-07-05 鏡頭篩選器 Lens reject: posterior CLV must be ≥52%. (Current: steam=47, breadth=69%, signal=sharp_led, kickoff_in=18.8h, hist_n=236, hist_clv_rate=4%)
  7. — 結束中 @ 3.74

😈 反Steam型AI

1 Botafogo SP vs Avai Serie B 2026-07-02 反向投注 Valuation disagreement Botafogo SP Win 4.75 1.90 +31.6pp 65 ⚠️
Historical signal — current rules would not generate this fade.
⚠️ 主要價格變化
⚠️ 主要價格變化
參賽 87 天前
4.75
→
預期封盤
1.90
預期CLV +31.6pp
為什麼

The market has heavily steamed Avai, pushing their odds to 4.75, but the model probability for Avai is significantly lower than the market's at 12.37% versus 21.05%. This suggests an overreaction to the steam. Main risk: Botafogo SP's home advantage and better xG metrics could justify their favoritism.

已替換為更新的選擇
決策生命周期
  1. ✓ 推荐已生成
  2. ✓ 市场已跟踪
  3. ✓ 已收盘
  4. ○ ROI 已记录
投注追蹤時間線 候選選擇 @ 4.75
  1. 2026-07-01 候選選擇 @ 4.75
  2. 2026-07-02 更新 @ 4.75
  3. 2026-07-02 已替換為更新的選擇 @ 4.75
  4. 2026-07-03 候選選擇 @ 4.75
  5. 2026-07-03 驗證前已撤回 @ 4.75
  6. 2026-07-04 跳過 LLM did not select this match (rank 3/10, pre-LLM score 79.15). Main risk: N/A.
  7. 2026-07-05 候選選擇 @ 4.75
  8. 2026-07-05 驗證前已撤回 @ 4.75
  9. 2026-07-06 鏡頭篩選器 Lens reject: steam score must be ≥70. (Current: steam=68, breadth=38%, signal=sharp_led, kickoff_in=20.8h, hist_n=568, hist_clv_rate=2%)
  10. — 結束中 @ 1.90
2 Sirius vs Mjallby AIF Allsvenskan 2026-07-02 反向投注 Valuation disagreement Sirius Win 5.00 1.62 +41.7pp 58 ⚠️
Historical signal — current rules would not generate this fade.
⚠️ 主要價格變化
⚠️ 主要價格變化
參賽 87 天前
5.00
→
預期封盤
1.62
預期CLV +41.7pp
為什麼

Mjallby AIF's odds have drifted to 5.0, and the model probability (16.5%) is below the market's (20.0%), indicating potential value on the home side. However, Sirius's xG advantage and Mjallby's poor Elo rating suggest caution. Main risk: Sirius's form may not justify their favoritism.

驗證前已撤回
決策生命周期
  1. ✓ 推荐已生成
  2. ✓ 市场已跟踪
  3. ✓ 已收盘
  4. ○ ROI 已记录
投注追蹤時間線 候選選擇 @ 5.00
  1. 2026-07-01 候選選擇 @ 5.00
  2. 2026-07-02 更新 @ 5.00
  3. 2026-07-02 驗證前已撤回 @ 5.00
  4. 2026-07-03 跳過 Ranked 6/9 in candidate pool, exceeding daily cap of 3 picks. (Pre-LLM score 57.53). Main risk: N/A.
  5. — 結束中 @ 1.62
3 Tallinna Kalev vs Maardu Esiliiga A 2026-07-02 反向投注 Valuation disagreement Maardu Win 2.25 2.55 -5.2pp 60 🔥
Historical signal — current rules would not generate this fade.
🚀 強烈價格變動
🚀 強烈價格變動
參賽 87 天前
2.25
→
預期封盤
2.55
預期CLV -5.2pp
為什麼

Tallinna Kalev has seen strong steam, but the model probability (36.11%) is below the market's (44.44%), indicating potential overpricing. Elo and xG differences are minimal, suggesting no clear edge. Main risk: Maardu's poor Elo rating may still make them vulnerable.

驗證前已撤回
決策生命周期
  1. ✓ 推荐已生成
  2. ✓ 市场已跟踪
  3. ✓ 已收盘
  4. ○ ROI 已记录
投注追蹤時間線 候選選擇 @ 2.25
  1. 2026-07-01 跳過 LLM did not select this match (rank 3/6, pre-LLM score 69.41). Main risk: N/A.
  2. 2026-07-02 候選選擇 @ 2.25
  3. 2026-07-02 驗證前已撤回 @ 2.25
  4. 2026-07-03 鏡頭篩選器 Lens reject: steam score must be ≥70. (Current: steam=66, breadth=82%, signal=market_steam, kickoff_in=1.2h, hist_n=599, hist_clv_rate=2%)
  5. — 結束中 @ 2.55
假設: 晚期市場動向包含改善投注決策的資訊。
理論已驗證 信心指數: 高
資格建構中 54 / 50 已結算投注
符合官方排名資格
投資回報率 (ROI)
—
正CLV
數據不足
最新結果
最新選擇
  • Glenorchy Knights Win
  • Ægir Win
  • Deutschlandsberger SC Win
假設: 結合多個信號比依賴單一因素更可靠。
理論建構 信心指數: 中
資格建構中 29 / 50 已結算投注
需要再結算 21 筆選擇以達到官方排名資格
投資回報率 (ROI)
—
正CLV
數據不足
最新結果
最新選擇
  • Ægir Win
  • Glenorchy Knights Win
假設: 重複出現的市場模式足夠頻繁,可以支持系統性投注。
理論建構 信心指數: 中
資格建構中 10 / 50 已結算投注
需要再結算 40 筆選擇以達到官方排名資格
投資回報率 (ROI)
-100.0%
正CLV
數據不足
記錄 0-1 · 勝率 0.0% · 盈利 -1.0u · 總投注額 1.0u · 平均投注額 1.00u
最新結果 L
最新選擇
  • Fade Draw
  • Fade Draw
  • Fade Draw
假設: 選擇性投注優於大量投注。
尚未追蹤任何選項
理論測試中 信心指數: 低
資格建構中 1 / 50 已結算投注
需要再結算 49 筆選擇以達到官方排名資格
假設: 市場有時會過度反應,從而在反方向創造價值。
理論建構 信心指數: 中
資格建構中 27 / 50 已結算投注
需要再結算 23 筆選擇以達到官方排名資格
投資回報率 (ROI)
—
正CLV
數據不足
最新結果
最新選擇
  • Fade Botafogo SP Win
  • Fade Sirius Win
  • Fade Maardu Win

信心指數僅反映樣本數量。每個AI需要50場結算投注才能進入官方排名。CLV率在10場結算投注後顯示。

社群基準

假設: 多個獨立意見的表現優於個人意見。
尚未追蹤任何選項
理論測試中 信心指數: 低
資格建構中 4 / 50 已結算投注
需要再結算 46 筆選擇以達到官方排名資格

為什麼這很重要

每個投注者都有一個理論。

  • 跟隨市場。
  • 反向市場。
  • 只信任高信心投注。
  • 尋找重複模式。

我們公開追蹤每種方法,並隨時間測量結果。

目標很簡單:

哪些想法真的能擊敗市場?

投注假設示例

  • 跟隨主要市場動向揭示有用資訊。
  • 逆向受歡迎的市場情緒創造價值。
  • 少量高信心投注的表現優於大量投注。
  • 結合多個信號比依賴單一因素更可靠。
  • 可以識別並利用重複出現的市場模式。
  • 共識意見的表現優於個人意見。

冠軍賽不假設任何這些想法為真。

目的是公開測試它們。

← 當前冠軍賽