Statistics / Football / France. Ligue 1 / Nice vs Metz

Nice vs Metz Statistics & Analysis

Nice Nice
May 17, 2026 - 19:00
0 1.65
0 1.21
xG Accuracy: 46%
Metz Metz
Premium betting site 1xbet: New users can use the promo code 1x_3342271 to receive $100 cash.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Each row compares the model’s highlighted side (or lean) to what happened at full time.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Under 2.5 (0 goals) ✔ Correct
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes No ✖ Incorrect
  • 1X2 Nice Draw ✖ Incorrect
  • Correct Score Insights 1-1 0-0 ✖ Incorrect

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Below is a compact, numbers-first snapshot aligned with the same engine as the cards above.

  • League: Ligue 1
  • Fixture: Nice vs Metz
  • Kickoff: 2026-05-16 19:00:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 46.2% · Draw 27.3% · Away 26.6%
  • xG (showing): Nice 1.65 — Metz 1.21 (total xG ≈ 2.86)
  • Value headline: At least one tracked line reaches the headline EV threshold — align with the hero / Primary card if shown.
  • Structural leans (not bets): Structural lean (model): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5 (Under 2.5 45.5% · Over 2.5 54.5%); BTTS Yes (Yes 58.2% · No 41.8%) Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5; BTTS Yes
  • BTTS (model): Yes 58.2% · No 41.8%
  • Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (11.4%)

When book depth is thin or odds are missing, EV may be unavailable even though the model still prefers one side on totals or BTTS — wait for cleaner prices or skip.

If lines move materially, re-run generation or refresh — implied probabilities and any future EV readouts will change first.

Best Bet + Reason

No clear +EV headline on this snapshot.

Treat this page as a read-only diagnostic: totals/BTTS structure can be informative even when the honest answer is to wait.

Re-check after material price moves; edges appear and disappear with liquidity.

FAQ

Should I still read the 1X2 card?

Yes — it shows whether any winner price clears value. Here it often explains why there is no headline: probabilities can be clustered while prices already embed that uncertainty.

When would a headline +EV return?

When odds move enough that implied probabilities drop relative to the same model snapshot, or when more book prices arrive so EV can be computed reliably — then re-run the pipeline.

What do the grey “lean” labels mean then?

They summarise where the model tilts (e.g. Under 2.5 or BTTS No) without claiming a positive economic edge. Use them as context; size to zero unless you deliberately accept discretionary risk.

Why is there no “best bet” on this page?

The headline engine uses a minimum +EV threshold (e.g. 2%) for a default pick. A line can still show tiny +EV that fails that bar — we still call it no default bet so readers do not over-size thin edges.

Risk Factors

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Methodology

  • Inputs: Same structured facts bundle as the public prediction page (xG / Poisson snapshot, market EV where available, decision engine v2).
  • Compliance: Educational framing only; not personalised advice.

Last Updated

May 18, 2026 (UTC)

How to use this
  • When there is no Primary line, compare the +EV rows in the market cards below (not only 1X2).
  • Do not parlay many thin-edge picks together; edges do not add reliably.
  • Treat longshots as optional, high-stake-sizing plays only.

Get Premium Predictions for Nice & Metz!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Statistics
Ligue 1 Ligue 1 — Standings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 Paris Saint Germain 33 24 4 5 76
2 Lens 33 21 4 8 67
3 Lille 33 18 7 8 61
4 Lyon 33 18 6 9 60
5 Rennes 33 17 8 8 59
6 Marseille 33 17 5 11 56
7 Monaco 33 16 6 11 54
8 Strasbourg 33 14 8 11 50
9 Lorient 33 11 12 10 45
10 Toulouse 33 12 8 13 44
11 Paris FC 33 10 11 12 41
12 Stade Brestois 29 33 10 8 15 38
13 Angers 33 9 8 16 35
14 Le Havre 33 6 14 13 32
15 Auxerre 33 7 10 16 31
16 Nice 33 7 10 16 31
17 Nantes 33 5 8 20 23
18 Metz 33 3 7 23 16
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 Paris Saint Germain 33 73 27 +46 76
2 Lens 33 62 35 +27 67
3 Marseille 33 60 44 +16 56
4 Rennes 33 58 47 +11 59
5 Monaco 33 56 49 +7 54
6 Lyon 33 53 36 +17 60
7 Strasbourg 33 53 43 +10 50
8 Lille 33 52 35 +17 61
9 Lorient 33 48 49 -1 45
10 Toulouse 33 47 46 +1 44
11 Paris FC 33 45 49 -4 41
12 Stade Brestois 29 33 42 54 -12 38
13 Nice 33 37 60 -23 31
14 Auxerre 33 32 44 -12 31
15 Metz 33 32 76 -44 16
16 Le Havre 33 30 44 -14 32
17 Nantes 33 29 52 -23 23
18 Angers 33 28 47 -19 35
# TEAM MP xG xGC +/- PTS
1 Paris Saint Germain 33 63.7 27.4 +36.3 76
2 Lens 33 66.7 42.7 +24.0 67
3 Marseille 33 60.2 42.1 +18.1 56
4 Lille 33 54.6 36.8 +17.8 61
5 Strasbourg 33 51.4 43.9 +7.5 50
6 Lyon 33 51.1 43.7 +7.4 60
7 Monaco 33 56.9 50.0 +6.9 54
8 Rennes 33 54.0 52.8 +1.2 59
9 Lorient 33 45.4 45.0 +0.4 45
10 Toulouse 33 42.9 42.6 +0.3 44
11 Stade Brestois 29 33 44.3 50.0 -5.7 38
12 Nantes 33 33.4 43.5 -10.1 23
13 Paris FC 33 44.4 56.1 -11.7 41
14 Le Havre 33 38.3 50.9 -12.6 32
15 Auxerre 33 35.5 48.1 -12.6 31
16 Nice 33 43.1 59.2 -16.1 31
17 Angers 33 32.4 55.4 -23.0 35
18 Metz 33 34.4 62.7 -28.3 16
Popular Leagues