Market Movement - Georgia - Erovnuli Liga
Near kickoff: publish line vs. current sharp price — pseudo-CLV and whether the market followed or faded your signal.
Today's Market Analysis
- Only 1 fixture generated significant repricing — steam centred on Rustavi vs Dila (0.0%).
Today's Market Health
Low liquidity · Strong consensus · Reliable closing data
Market Metrics
-
Steam Activity 0 moves > thresholdLow
-
Bookmaker Consensus 1 broad repricing eventsLow
-
Market Trend 0% shortening · 0% lengtheningLow
-
CLV Context 1 fixtures with CLV dataActive
League Intelligence (30 days)
Not enough completed fixtures with meaningful repricing in the last 30 days.
Erovnuli Liga (Georgia) markets are monitored for opening odds, steam repricing, and closing-line movement across major sportsbooks. Domestic league fixtures typically offer steadier liquidity and more predictable closing lines than cup ties. When sufficient pricing data is available, OddsGPT tracks breadth, steam score, and CLV validation for each fixture.Over the last 30 days, average steam score reached 15.0 while bookmaker consensus averaged 57% breadth.
Over the past 30 days, Georgia - Erovnuli Liga has produced quiet repricing patterns with an average Steam Score of 15.0. Typical line moves averaged —% and the largest swing reached —%. Historical closing-line validation has remained balanced (0% positive). Home-side steam represented —% of tracked signals; favourites drew —% of steam-backed moves.
Filters apply to the match list below — highlights above stay unchanged.
Login to filter market moves
Sign in free to filter by steam score, move size, kickoff window, and signal type.
No matches for this filter.
Type at least 2 characters
No matching teams
No results under current filters — try All
| Match(1) | Side | Open | Current | Move | Signal | Ref book | Market Breadth? Number of sportsbooks confirming the same directional move. Number of sportsbooks confirming the same directional move. | Steam Score? Measures how aggressively odds moved across sharp sportsbooks. Measures how aggressively odds moved across sharp sportsbooks. | Context | Market state | CLV Validation? Opening vs closing on the largest-move side — descriptive only, not strategy performance. Opening vs closing on the largest-move side — descriptive only, not strategy performance. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rustavi vs Dila Erovnuli Liga · Sat 14:00 | Rustavi | 2.3 |
2.3
since pub · 20h 13m |
+0.0%
2.3
2.3
— Stable line 2.48 → 2.22 → 2.30 |
ℹ️ Low-intensity market activity |
Bet365
Sharp-led move: Betfair |
4/7
Books moving same direction
Dafabet
↓ -1.2%
Bet365 Sharp
+0.0%
Betfair Sharp
+0.0%
Pinnacle Sharp
+0.0%
|
Steam Score:
17
C
Limited conviction
Price swings look choppy — volatility reduced overall confidence in the directional signal. Why It Matters
Historically:
50-60 = 57% beat the closing line
60-70 = 64% beat the closing line
70+ = 71% beat the closing line
Key drivers
ReliabilityLow confidence — elevated volatility undermines the signal.
Score breakdown
Book synchronization: +17/30
Books reacting: +8/10
Volatility adjustment: -10
Closing-window persistence: +2/8
Login to see the full betting verdict Sign in free to unlock the Final betting verdict — which markets pass, where +EV may exist, and steam warnings. |
— | Volatile | P5: 2.16 | Net move flat on Rustavi (0.0%), but intraday swing reached 6.1% — price repriced then reverted. |