Estadísticas / Fútbol / Argentina. Primera Nacional / Quilmes vs Gimnasia de Jujuy

Quilmes vs Gimnasia de Jujuy Statistics & Analysis

Aug 05, 2026 - 22:00
2 1.29
0 1.31
xG Accuracy: 57%
Casa de apuestas premium stake: los nuevos usuarios pueden usar el código promoFHn2uDc1 FHn2uDc1. Registrarse

Mercados rastreados versus resultado de tiempo completo

Cada fila compara el modelo previo al partido con el resultado de tiempo completo.

  • Mercado Predicción Resultado Resultado
  • Más / Menos 2.5 Menos de 2.5 Menos de 2.5 (2 objetivos) ✔ Correcto
  • Ambos Equipos Marcarán BTTS Sí No ✖ Incorrecto
  • 1X2 Gimnasia de Jujuy Quilmes ✖ Incorrecto
  • Perspectivas de marcador exacto 1-1, 0-1, 1-0, 1-2, 2-1 2-0 ✖ Incorrecto

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Jul 23, 2026 · 14:57 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-1463803

Closing Odds 3.86
AI Fair Odds —
CLV +0.0%
Final Result Quilmes win · Quilmes 2–0 Gimnasia de Jujuy
Prediction ✖ Missed
Decision Grade F

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Inteligencia de mercado

Lectura de apoyo tras la elección principal: cómo se movió el feed de cierre priorizado frente al modelo.

Briefing de mercado

El mercado se mantuvo estable antes del inicio. No se detectó un cambio implícito relevante entre PRE30 y PRE1 en la captura priorizada.

A pesar del movimiento tardío limitado, el modelo sigue tasando Gimnasia de Jujuy (1X2),Más de 2,5 goles claramente por encima de lo implícito en esas capturas de cierre: es una lectura estática de «modelo vs precio», no de persecución tardía.

El modelo aún supera la implícita de cierre en Gimnasia de Jujuy (1X2) en unos 10.9 puntos porcentuales — la señal de desajuste más clara de esta página.

Modelo vs implícita de cierre

Mercado Modelo % Implícita cierre % Brecha (pp)
Quilmes (1X2) 34.7 44.9 -10.2
Dibujar (1X2) 29.7 30.4 -0.7
Gimnasia de Jujuy (1X2) 35.6 24.7 +10.9
Más de 2,5 goles 48.2 40.5 +7.7
Menos de 2,5 goles 51.8 59.5 -7.7
Qué significa

En simple: el modelo ronda el 35.6% en Gimnasia de Jujuy (1X2), mientras la captura de cierre implicaba unos 24.7%. La diferencia —unos 10.9 puntos porcentuales— es la mayor brecha modelo-mercado destacada aquí.

Definiciones rápidas: «implícita de cierre» es la probabilidad implícita en las cuotas finales capturadas (tras un de-vig simple). «Brecha (pp)» = porcentaje del modelo menos esa implícita, en puntos porcentuales (pp).

Movimiento de cuota antes del inicio

Una casa prioritaria por instantáneo (no todas). Ruta de capturas: PRE30 → PRE1 · Casa: Pinnacle

Entre paréntesis en columnas: Cierre = primera captura disponible en PRE1→PRE5→PRE10→PRE30; Temprano = primera en PRE30→PRE10→PRE5 distinta de Cierre.

Las cuotas detalladas están plegadas abajo — el movimiento implícito fue insignificante.

Ver tabla completa línea a línea
Mercado Temprano (PRE30) Cierre (PRE1) Δ implícita (pp)
Quilmes (1X2) 2.12 2.12 0.0
Dibujar (1X2) 3.13 3.13 0.0
Gimnasia de Jujuy (1X2) 3.86 3.86 0.0
Más de 2,5 goles 2.35 2.35 0.0
Menos de 2,5 goles 1.6 1.6 0.0

El informe IA aún no está disponible para este partido. Vuelva a ejecutar «Generación masiva de cuotas» tras actualizar el servidor para generar el resumen.

View technical JSON
{
  "bundle_version": 1,
  "content_hash": "081c8a2de0c7549517cd4ab7721386753cab36f5c0ae779c2c0a4bf00ae28610",
  "decision_algo_version": "2.5.0",
  "facts": {
    "ai_fp": {
      "away_predicted_xg": 1.31,
      "away_win_prob": 0.3564,
      "away_win_prob_posterior": null,
      "bayes_applied": 0,
      "btts_no_prob": 0.455,
      "btts_yes_prob": 0.546,
      "dc_rho": -0.13,
      "draw_prob": 0.2965,
      "draw_prob_posterior": null,
      "fair_odds_away": 2.81,
      "fair_odds_away_posterior": null,
      "fair_odds_draw": 3.37,
      "fair_odds_draw_posterior": null,
      "fair_odds_home": 2.88,
      "fair_odds_home_posterior": null,
      "home_predicted_xg": 1.29,
      "home_win_prob": 0.347,
      "home_win_prob_posterior": null,
      "over_25_prob": 0.482,
      "prediction_confidence": "very_low",
      "under_25_prob": 0.518
    },
    "api_prediction": {
      "advice": "Double chance : Quilmes or draw",
      "main_pick_display": "No Strong Winner Bet",
      "percent_away": "10%",
      "percent_draw": "45%",
      "percent_home": "45%",
      "winner_name": "Quilmes"
    },
    "away_xg": 1.31,
    "betting_insight": {
      "bet_label": "Gimnasia de Jujuy",
      "confidence": null,
      "main_pick_meta": {
        "confidence": "low",
        "display_text": "No Strong Winner Bet",
        "edge": 0.1093,
        "edge_gap": 0.0087,
        "market": "1X2",
        "market_prob": 0.2467,
        "model_prob": 0.3559,
        "pick_type": "no_strong",
        "probabilities": {
          "away": 35.6,
          "draw": 29.7,
          "home": 34.7
        },
        "reason": "No clear edge in 1X2 market",
        "selection": null,
        "selection_name": null
      },
      "market_comparison": [
        {
          "affi_link": "",
          "bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
          "odd": 3.86
        }
      ],
      "risk_color": null,
      "risk_key": null,
      "stacked_market": null,
      "value_bet": {
        "best_odds": 3.86,
        "bookmaker_id": 0,
        "bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
        "display_market": "Gimnasia de Jujuy Win",
        "is_value": true,
        "label": "Away",
        "market_fair_odds": 4.05,
        "market_odds": 3.86,
        "model_odds": 2.81,
        "overround": 5.0,
        "prob_edge": 9.7,
        "value_pct": 37.4,
        "value_rating": "strong_value"
      }
    },
    "betting_markets": {
      "btts": {
        "away_clean_sheet": 5,
        "away_failed_to_score": 4,
        "away_played": 20,
        "away_score_rate": 73.0,
        "home_clean_sheet": 9,
        "home_failed_to_score": 11,
        "home_played": 20,
        "home_score_rate": 72.5,
        "no_prob": 45.5,
        "pick": "Yes",
        "pick_prob": 54.5,
        "source": "xG_dc",
        "strong_pick": false,
        "yes_prob": 54.5
      },
      "correct_score": {
        "away_expected": 1.31,
        "home_expected": 1.29,
        "scores": [
          {
            "away": 1,
            "home": 1,
            "label": "1-1",
            "prob": 12.6
          },
          {
            "away": 1,
            "home": 0,
            "label": "0-1",
            "prob": 9.7
          },
          {
            "away": 0,
            "home": 1,
            "label": "1-0",
            "prob": 9.6
          },
          {
            "away": 2,
            "home": 1,
            "label": "1-2",
            "prob": 8.2
          },
          {
            "away": 1,
            "home": 2,
            "label": "2-1",
            "prob": 8.1
          }
        ],
        "source": "xG"
      },
      "double_chance": {
        "options": [
          {
            "key": "1X",
            "label": "Quilmes or Draw",
            "prob": 64.3
          },
          {
            "key": "12",
            "label": "Quilmes or Gimnasia de Jujuy",
            "prob": 70.3
          },
          {
            "key": "X2",
            "label": "Draw or Gimnasia de Jujuy",
            "prob": 65.2
          }
        ],
        "pick_key": "12",
        "pick_label": "Quilmes or Gimnasia de Jujuy",
        "pick_prob": 70.3
      },
      "match_winner": {
        "away_pct": 35.6,
        "draw_pct": 29.6,
        "home_pct": 34.7,
        "lean_key": "away",
        "lean_label": "Gimnasia de Jujuy"
      },
      "over_under": {
        "api_hint": null,
        "avg_total": 2.6,
        "away_avg_scored": 1.6,
        "confidence": "low",
        "home_avg_scored": 0.9,
        "over_prob": 48.2,
        "pick": "Under 2.5",
        "pick_prob": 51.8,
        "source": "xG_dc",
        "strong_pick": false,
        "total_expected": 2.6,
        "under_prob": 51.8
      },
      "prob_source": "poisson",
      "value_bet_enhanced": {
        "bookmaker_id": 0,
        "bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
        "edge": 37.4,
        "implied_prob": 25.9,
        "is_value": true,
        "label": "Away",
        "market": "Gimnasia de Jujuy Win",
        "model_prob": 35.6,
        "odds": 3.86
      }
    },
    "closing_line_bundle": {
      "away_team": "Gimnasia de Jujuy",
      "closing_1x2_probs_pct": {
        "away": 24.67,
        "draw": 30.42,
        "home": 44.91
      },
      "closing_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
      "closing_capture": "PRE1",
      "closing_fetched_at": "2026-08-05 21:59:01",
      "early_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
      "early_capture": "PRE30",
      "early_fetched_at": "2026-08-05 21:29:02",
      "has_data": true,
      "home_team": "Quilmes",
      "largest_move_kind": null,
      "max_abs_move_pp": 0.0,
      "model_vs_closing": [
        {
          "closing_implied_pct": 44.91,
          "gap_pp": -10.18,
          "kind": "1x2_h",
          "model_pct": 34.73
        },
        {
          "closing_implied_pct": 30.42,
          "gap_pp": -0.74,
          "kind": "1x2_d",
          "model_pct": 29.68
        },
        {
          "closing_implied_pct": 24.67,
          "gap_pp": 10.93,
          "kind": "1x2_a",
          "model_pct": 35.59
        },
        {
          "closing_implied_pct": 40.51,
          "gap_pp": 7.69,
          "kind": "ou_o",
          "model_pct": 48.2
        },
        {
          "closing_implied_pct": 59.49,
          "gap_pp": -7.69,
          "kind": "ou_u",
          "model_pct": 51.8
        }
      ],
      "movement": [
        {
          "closing": 2.12,
          "early": 2.12,
          "implied_closing_pct": 44.91,
          "implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
          "implied_early_pct": 44.91,
          "kind": "1x2_h"
        },
        {
          "closing": 3.13,
          "early": 3.13,
          "implied_closing_pct": 30.42,
          "implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
          "implied_early_pct": 30.42,
          "kind": "1x2_d"
        },
        {
          "closing": 3.86,
          "early": 3.86,
          "implied_closing_pct": 24.67,
          "implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
          "implied_early_pct": 24.67,
          "kind": "1x2_a"
        },
        {
          "closing": 2.35,
          "early": 2.35,
          "implied_closing_pct": 40.51,
          "implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
          "implied_early_pct": 40.51,
          "kind": "ou_o"
        },
        {
          "closing": 1.6,
          "early": 1.6,
          "implied_closing_pct": 59.49,
          "implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
          "implied_early_pct": 59.49,
          "kind": "ou_u"
        }
      ],
      "movement_negligible": true,
      "same_bookmaker": true,
      "top_value_gap": {
        "gap_pp": 10.9,
        "kind": "1x2_a"
      }
    },
    "correct_score_insight": {
      "best_value": null,
      "most_likely": {
        "label": "1-1",
        "prob": 12.6
      }
    },
    "home_xg": 1.29,
    "homepage_pick": null,
    "market_cards": [
      {
        "authority_action": "monitor",
        "authority_note": "Validation pending \u2014 monitor the line before acting.",
        "consensus_odds": 3.86,
        "decision": "value_bet",
        "disagreement_label": "Moderate",
        "disagreement_level": "moderate",
        "ev": 0.0579,
        "ev_available": true,
        "ev_display": {
          "capped": false,
          "raw_pct": 5.8,
          "text": "+5.8%"
        },
        "featured": true,
        "id": "1x2",
        "implied_prob": 0.2467,
        "is_extreme_disagreement": false,
        "max_ev": 0.0579,
        "max_ev_display": {
          "capped": false,
          "raw_pct": 5.8,
          "text": "+5.8%"
        },
        "model_prob": 0.3559,
        "raw_edge_display": "+10.9 percentage points",
        "raw_edge_pp": 10.9,
        "raw_signal_ev": 0.3738,
        "raw_signal_ev_display": "+37.4%",
        "show_primary_label": false,
        "side_label": "Gimnasia de Jujuy",
        "sort_key": 10202.11,
        "tier": "best"
      },
      {
        "decision": "lean",
        "ev_available": false,
        "ev_no": null,
        "ev_no_display": null,
        "ev_yes": null,
        "ev_yes_display": null,
        "featured": false,
        "id": "btts",
        "max_ev": null,
        "no_prob": 45.5,
        "sort_key": 4050.0,
        "tier": "lean",
        "value_side": "yes",
        "yes_prob": 54.5
      },
      {
        "decision": "no_bet",
        "ev_available": false,
        "ev_over": null,
        "ev_over_display": null,
        "ev_under": null,
        "ev_under_display": null,
        "featured": false,
        "id": "ou_2_5",
        "max_ev": null,
        "over_prob": 48.2,
        "sort_key": 2050.0,
        "tier": "pass",
        "under_prob": 51.8,
        "value_side": "under"
      },
      {
        "featured": false,
        "id": "correct_score",
        "sort_key": 817.8,
        "tier": "risk",
        "top_label": "1-1",
        "top_prob": 12.6
      }
    ],
    "market_intelligence": {
      "betting_signal": {
        "alert_breadth": "5/12",
        "alert_breadth_note": "5/12 sportsbooks confirmed",
        "alert_move": "\u2193 -6.2%",
        "alert_team": "Gimnasia de Jujuy",
        "alert_title": "Sharp Money Alert",
        "divergence_pp": 11.0,
        "has_alert": false,
        "hero_edge_pp": 10.97,
        "hero_label": "Gimnasia de Jujuy",
        "market_prob_pct": 24.7,
        "market_team": "Quilmes",
        "model_prob_pct": 35.6,
        "model_team": "Gimnasia de Jujuy",
        "show": true,
        "status_icon": "!",
        "status_key": "caution",
        "status_label": "Use caution",
        "status_line": "Use caution \u2014 signals are mixed",
        "steam_score": 32,
        "steam_subtitle": "Limited conviction",
        "steam_tier": "C",
        "title": "Betting Signal"
      },
      "decision_chain": {
        "academy_links": [
          {
            "key": "market_disagree",
            "read_min": 5,
            "title": "When Should You Trust AI Over the Market?",
            "url": "/academy/ai-betting/when-should-you-trust-ai-over-the-market/en"
          },
          {
            "key": "steam",
            "read_min": 4,
            "title": "What Is a Steam Move?",
            "url": "/academy/betting-market/what-is-a-steam-move/en"
          },
          {
            "key": "clv_pending",
            "read_min": 3,
            "title": "Why CLV Matters More Than Win Rate",
            "url": "/academy/clv/why-clv-matters-more-than-win-rate/en"
          }
        ],
        "alignment": {
          "direction_aligned": false,
          "direction_key": "conflict",
          "gap_pp": 11.0,
          "key": "agree",
          "label": "Agree",
          "model_strong": false,
          "pricing_aligned": true,
          "pricing_key": "moderate",
          "probability_gap_pp": 11.0,
          "summary": "Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (Gimnasia de Jujuy)."
        },
        "authority": {
          "action": "monitor",
          "alignment": {
            "direction_aligned": false,
            "direction_key": "conflict",
            "gap_pp": 11.0,
            "key": "agree",
            "label": "Agree",
            "model_strong": false,
            "pricing_aligned": true,
            "pricing_key": "moderate",
            "probability_gap_pp": 11.0,
            "summary": "Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (Gimnasia de Jujuy)."
          },
          "alignment_key": "agree",
          "best_consensus_ev": 0.0579,
          "best_outlier_ev": 0.3739,
          "confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
          "decision_strength": 3.7,
          "decision_strength_v1": 5.0,
          "decision_strength_v2": 5.7,
          "decision_type": "VALUE_ALERT",
          "execution_confidence": 52,
          "extreme_disagreement": false,
          "final_verdict_audit": {
            "action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
            "action_label": "Action",
            "decision": "Monitor - No Primary Bet",
            "is_primary": false,
            "snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Gimnasia de Jujuy at 35.6%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 24.7%.",
            "why": [
              {
                "text": "Decision Model identifies Gimnasia de Jujuy as the value side (35.6%)",
                "tone": "ok"
              },
              {
                "text": "Market broadly agrees with the direction",
                "tone": "ok"
              },
              {
                "text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
                "tone": "bad"
              },
              {
                "text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
                "tone": "bad"
              }
            ],
            "why_label": "Decision Summary"
          },
          "gap_pp": 10.9,
          "gates_failed": [
            "Execution confidence below 65"
          ],
          "has_top_pick": true,
          "headline": "Monitor - No Primary Bet",
          "hero_mode": "default",
          "icon": "\ud83d\udc41",
          "label": "Monitor \u2014 validate before acting",
          "market_signal": "Market aligns with model lean",
          "model_conflict_detail": null,
          "model_lean": "Gimnasia de Jujuy",
          "no_primary_reasons": {
            "all_triggered": [
              "market_quality",
              "calibration_risk"
            ],
            "calibration_mode": "soft",
            "codes": [
              "market_quality",
              "calibration_risk"
            ],
            "label": "Reason",
            "other_factors": [
              {
                "code": "calibration_risk",
                "detail": "Confidence reduced because model assumptions exceed the normal range.",
                "name": "Calibration Risk",
                "short": "Calibration Risk",
                "tone": "danger"
              }
            ],
            "other_label": "Other factors",
            "primary": {
              "code": "market_quality",
              "detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
              "name": "Market Quality Risk",
              "short": "Market Quality Risk",
              "tone": "warn"
            },
            "secondary": {
              "code": "calibration_risk",
              "detail": "Confidence reduced because model assumptions exceed the normal range.",
              "name": "Calibration Risk",
              "short": "Calibration Risk",
              "tone": "danger"
            },
            "version": "v1"
          },
          "outlier_detected": true,
          "outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market 1X2 \u00b7 side Gimnasia de Jujuy \u00b7 decimal odds ~3.86 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +37% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1498664 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22483.86 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +5.8% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
          "primary_allowed": false,
          "primary_block_explain": {
            "entries": [
              {
                "key": "positive_ev",
                "label": "Consensus EV +5.8% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
                "ok": true
              },
              {
                "key": "gate",
                "label": "Execution confidence below 65",
                "ok": false
              }
            ],
            "lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
            "primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
            "subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
            "title": "Why not Primary?"
          },
          "primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +5.8% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.7/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
          "primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +5.8% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.7/10 (display only)",
          "primary_gates": {
            "items": [
              {
                "key": "extreme_gap",
                "label": "Extreme gap",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "no"
              },
              {
                "key": "xg_calibration",
                "label": "xG calibration",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "warning"
              },
              {
                "key": "reliability",
                "label": "Rel",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "65 (\u226565)"
              },
              {
                "key": "execution",
                "label": "Exec",
                "ok": false,
                "value": "52 (\u226565)"
              },
              {
                "key": "alignment",
                "label": "Align",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "agree"
              },
              {
                "key": "consensus_ev",
                "label": "ConsEV",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "+5.8% (\u2265+5.0%)"
              },
              {
                "key": "top_pick",
                "label": "Pick",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "true"
              },
              {
                "key": "validation",
                "label": "Validation",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "true"
              }
            ],
            "passed": 7,
            "total": 8
          },
          "primary_type": null,
          "reasons": [
            "Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (Gimnasia de Jujuy).",
            "Decision strength: 3.7/10",
            "Execution confidence below 65",
            "Outlier price +37% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
          ],
          "reliability_score": 65,
          "speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
          "strength_v2_breakdown": [
            "Base decision score (v1)",
            "Reliability supports action",
            "Market aligns with model",
            "Consensus-line +EV",
            "Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
          ],
          "subline": "Validation pending \u2014 monitor the line before acting.",
          "thresholds": {
            "extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
            "lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
            "lean_min_strength": 5.0,
            "min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
            "min_execution": 65,
            "min_reliability": 65,
            "min_strength": 7.0,
            "source": "db",
            "user_id": 2
          },
          "thresholds_source": "db",
          "thresholds_user_id": 2,
          "tier": "monitor",
          "validation_ok": true,
          "value_context": {
            "consensus_ev": 0.0579,
            "consensus_ev_display": "+5.8%",
            "consensus_odds": 3.86,
            "disagreement_label": "Moderate",
            "disagreement_level": "moderate",
            "implied_prob": 0.2467,
            "is_extreme_disagreement": false,
            "model_prob": 0.3559,
            "raw_edge_display": "+10.9 percentage points",
            "raw_edge_pp": 10.9,
            "raw_implied_prob": 0.2590673575129534,
            "raw_signal_ev": 0.3738,
            "raw_signal_ev_display": "+37.4%"
          },
          "version": "v2.5",
          "xg_calibration": {
            "block_value_alert": true,
            "calibration_status": "warning",
            "deviation_pct": -3.0,
            "reasons": [
              "Low xG separation gap=0.02 (noise / no edge)"
            ],
            "recommended_action": "monitor",
            "strength_delta": -2.0,
            "uplift_away": null,
            "uplift_home": null,
            "xg_separation": {
              "band": "flat",
              "block_value_alert": true,
              "separation_score": -20,
              "strength_delta": -2.0,
              "xg_gap": 0.02
            }
          }
        },
        "bet_status": "monitor",
        "books_breadth_display": "5/12",
        "breadth_ratio": 0.4166666666666667,
        "evidence": {
          "score": 80,
          "signals": [
            {
              "icon": "\u2713",
              "key": "statistical_edge",
              "label": "Statistical edge detected",
              "status": "pass"
            },
            {
              "icon": "!",
              "key": "market_agreement",
              "label": "Direction agrees; pricing still diverges",
              "status": "caution"
            },
            {
              "icon": "\u2713",
              "key": "steam",
              "label": "Sharp steam supports model side (direction only \u2014 not pricing convergence)",
              "status": "pass"
            },
            {
              "icon": "!",
              "key": "validation",
              "label": "Validation warning",
              "status": "caution"
            }
          ],
          "stars": 4,
          "tier": "high",
          "tier_label": "High"
        },
        "forecast_reliability": {
          "breakdown": [
            {
              "key": "validation",
              "label": "Validation: Warning",
              "tone": "caution"
            },
            {
              "key": "gap",
              "label": "Large market gap (11 pp)",
              "tone": "caution"
            },
            {
              "key": "steam",
              "label": "Steam aligns with model",
              "tone": "ok"
            }
          ],
          "parts": {
            "alignment": 19.5,
            "data_quality": 12.0,
            "market_coverage": 4.2,
            "steam_coherence": 10.0,
            "validation": 14.0
          },
          "score": 65,
          "stars": 3,
          "tier": "moderate",
          "tier_label": "Moderate"
        },
        "lean_gap_pp": 10.97,
        "market_agreement": "weak",
        "max_gap_pp": 10.97,
        "model_calibration": {
          "away_xg": 1.31,
          "calibration_status": "ok",
          "deviation_pct": -3.0,
          "elevated": false,
          "home_xg": 1.29,
          "impact_note": "",
          "league_avg_xg": 1.35,
          "peak_xg": 1.31,
          "status_label": "Within typical league range",
          "summary": "Home xG 1.29 \u00b7 Away xG 1.31 \u00b7 League avg 1.35 \u00b7 Peak deviation -3%",
          "title": "Model Calibration Check"
        },
        "move_is_drift": false,
        "mv_status": "warning",
        "odds_delta_pct": -6.2,
        "steam_conflicts": false,
        "steam_move_display": "\u2193 -6.2%",
        "steam_team": "Gimnasia de Jujuy",
        "suppress_execution": false,
        "value_split": {
          "execution_confidence": {
            "label": "Betting Confidence",
            "score": 52,
            "tier": "moderate",
            "tier_label": "Moderate"
          },
          "market_compatibility": {
            "label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
            "note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
            "score": 45,
            "tier": "moderate",
            "tier_label": "Moderate"
          },
          "model_edge_strength": {
            "label": "Model Signal Strength",
            "score": 35,
            "tier": "low",
            "tier_label": "Low"
          },
          "model_value": {
            "label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
            "note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
            "score": 45,
            "tier": "moderate",
            "tier_label": "Moderate"
          },
          "recommendation": {
            "action": "monitor",
            "label": "Monitor - No Primary Bet"
          }
        },
        "verdict": {
          "agree_note": "Validation pending \u2014 monitor the line before acting.",
          "alignment": {
            "direction_aligned": false,
            "direction_key": "conflict",
            "gap_pp": 11.0,
            "key": "agree",
            "label": "Agree",
            "model_strong": false,
            "pricing_aligned": true,
            "pricing_key": "moderate",
            "probability_gap_pp": 11.0,
            "summary": "Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (Gimnasia de Jujuy)."
          },
          "authority": {
            "action": "monitor",
            "alignment": {
              "direction_aligned": false,
              "direction_key": "conflict",
              "gap_pp": 11.0,
              "key": "agree",
              "label": "Agree",
              "model_strong": false,
              "pricing_aligned": true,
              "pricing_key": "moderate",
              "probability_gap_pp": 11.0,
              "summary": "Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (Gimnasia de Jujuy)."
            },
            "alignment_key": "agree",
            "best_consensus_ev": 0.0579,
            "best_outlier_ev": 0.3739,
            "confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
            "decision_strength": 3.7,
            "decision_strength_v1": 5.0,
            "decision_strength_v2": 5.7,
            "decision_type": "VALUE_ALERT",
            "execution_confidence": 52,
            "extreme_disagreement": false,
            "final_verdict_audit": {
              "action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
              "action_label": "Action",
              "decision": "Monitor - No Primary Bet",
              "is_primary": false,
              "snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Gimnasia de Jujuy at 35.6%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 24.7%.",
              "why": [
                {
                  "text": "Decision Model identifies Gimnasia de Jujuy as the value side (35.6%)",
                  "tone": "ok"
                },
                {
                  "text": "Market broadly agrees with the direction",
                  "tone": "ok"
                },
                {
                  "text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
                  "tone": "bad"
                },
                {
                  "text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
                  "tone": "bad"
                }
              ],
              "why_label": "Decision Summary"
            },
            "gap_pp": 10.9,
            "gates_failed": [
              "Execution confidence below 65"
            ],
            "has_top_pick": true,
            "headline": "Monitor - No Primary Bet",
            "hero_mode": "default",
            "icon": "\ud83d\udc41",
            "label": "Monitor \u2014 validate before acting",
            "market_signal": "Market aligns with model lean",
            "model_conflict_detail": null,
            "model_lean": "Gimnasia de Jujuy",
            "no_primary_reasons": {
              "all_triggered": [
                "market_quality",
                "calibration_risk"
              ],
              "calibration_mode": "soft",
              "codes": [
                "market_quality",
                "calibration_risk"
              ],
              "label": "Reason",
              "other_factors": [
                {
                  "code": "calibration_risk",
                  "detail": "Confidence reduced because model assumptions exceed the normal range.",
                  "name": "Calibration Risk",
                  "short": "Calibration Risk",
                  "tone": "danger"
                }
              ],
              "other_label": "Other factors",
              "primary": {
                "code": "market_quality",
                "detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
                "name": "Market Quality Risk",
                "short": "Market Quality Risk",
                "tone": "warn"
              },
              "secondary": {
                "code": "calibration_risk",
                "detail": "Confidence reduced because model assumptions exceed the normal range.",
                "name": "Calibration Risk",
                "short": "Calibration Risk",
                "tone": "danger"
              },
              "version": "v1"
            },
            "outlier_detected": true,
            "outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market 1X2 \u00b7 side Gimnasia de Jujuy \u00b7 decimal odds ~3.86 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +37% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1498664 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22483.86 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +5.8% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
            "primary_allowed": false,
            "primary_block_explain": {
              "entries": [
                {
                  "key": "positive_ev",
                  "label": "Consensus EV +5.8% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
                  "ok": true
                },
                {
                  "key": "gate",
                  "label": "Execution confidence below 65",
                  "ok": false
                }
              ],
              "lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
              "primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
              "subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
              "title": "Why not Primary?"
            },
            "primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +5.8% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.7/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
            "primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +5.8% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.7/10 (display only)",
            "primary_gates": {
              "items": [
                {
                  "key": "extreme_gap",
                  "label": "Extreme gap",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "no"
                },
                {
                  "key": "xg_calibration",
                  "label": "xG calibration",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "warning"
                },
                {
                  "key": "reliability",
                  "label": "Rel",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "65 (\u226565)"
                },
                {
                  "key": "execution",
                  "label": "Exec",
                  "ok": false,
                  "value": "52 (\u226565)"
                },
                {
                  "key": "alignment",
                  "label": "Align",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "agree"
                },
                {
                  "key": "consensus_ev",
                  "label": "ConsEV",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "+5.8% (\u2265+5.0%)"
                },
                {
                  "key": "top_pick",
                  "label": "Pick",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "true"
                },
                {
                  "key": "validation",
                  "label": "Validation",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "true"
                }
              ],
              "passed": 7,
              "total": 8
            },
            "primary_type": null,
            "reasons": [
              "Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (Gimnasia de Jujuy).",
              "Decision strength: 3.7/10",
              "Execution confidence below 65",
              "Outlier price +37% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
            ],
            "reliability_score": 65,
            "speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
            "strength_v2_breakdown": [
              "Base decision score (v1)",
              "Reliability supports action",
              "Market aligns with model",
              "Consensus-line +EV",
              "Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
            ],
            "subline": "Validation pending \u2014 monitor the line before acting.",
            "thresholds": {
              "extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
              "lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
              "lean_min_strength": 5.0,
              "min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
              "min_execution": 65,
              "min_reliability": 65,
              "min_strength": 7.0,
              "source": "db",
              "user_id": 2
            },
            "thresholds_source": "db",
            "thresholds_user_id": 2,
            "tier": "monitor",
            "validation_ok": true,
            "value_context": {
              "consensus_ev": 0.0579,
              "consensus_ev_display": "+5.8%",
              "consensus_odds": 3.86,
              "disagreement_label": "Moderate",
              "disagreement_level": "moderate",
              "implied_prob": 0.2467,
              "is_extreme_disagreement": false,
              "model_prob": 0.3559,
              "raw_edge_display": "+10.9 percentage points",
              "raw_edge_pp": 10.9,
              "raw_implied_prob": 0.2590673575129534,
              "raw_signal_ev": 0.3738,
              "raw_signal_ev_display": "+37.4%"
            },
            "version": "v2.5",
            "xg_calibration": {
              "block_value_alert": true,
              "calibration_status": "warning",
              "deviation_pct": -3.0,
              "reasons": [
                "Low xG separation gap=0.02 (noise / no edge)"
              ],
              "recommended_action": "monitor",
              "strength_delta": -2.0,
              "uplift_away": null,
              "uplift_home": null,
              "xg_separation": {
                "band": "flat",
                "block_value_alert": true,
                "separation_score": -20,
                "strength_delta": -2.0,
                "xg_gap": 0.02
              }
            }
          },
          "headline": "Monitor - No Primary Bet",
          "icon": "\ud83d\udc41",
          "label": "Monitor \u2014 validate before acting",
          "subline": "Validation pending \u2014 monitor the line before acting.",
          "tier": "monitor"
        },
        "why": {
          "action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
          "bullets": [
            "Model: Quilmes 1.29 xG vs Gimnasia de Jujuy 1.31 \u2192 Gimnasia de Jujuy 35.6%",
            "Market: Quilmes ~24.7% implied",
            "Market Steam: Gimnasia de Jujuy \u2193 -6.2%"
          ],
          "one_liner": "Model and market both lean Gimnasia de Jujuy with no major conflict.",
          "title": "Why?"
        }
      },
      "edge_rows": [
        {
          "edge_pp": -10.21,
          "fair_prob": 34.7,
          "label": "Quilmes",
          "market_prob": 44.91,
          "market_type": "1x2",
          "outcome": "home"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": -0.77,
          "fair_prob": 29.65,
          "label": "Draw",
          "market_prob": 30.42,
          "market_type": "1x2",
          "outcome": "draw"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": 10.97,
          "fair_prob": 35.64,
          "label": "Gimnasia de Jujuy",
          "market_prob": 24.67,
          "market_type": "1x2",
          "outcome": "away"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": null,
          "fair_prob": 48.2,
          "label": "Over 2.5",
          "market_prob": null,
          "market_type": "ou25",
          "outcome": "over"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": null,
          "fair_prob": 51.8,
          "label": "Under 2.5",
          "market_prob": null,
          "market_type": "ou25",
          "outcome": "under"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": null,
          "fair_prob": 54.5,
          "label": "BTTS Yes",
          "market_prob": null,
          "market_type": "btts",
          "outcome": "yes"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": null,
          "fair_prob": 45.5,
          "label": "BTTS No",
          "market_prob": null,
          "market_type": "btts",
          "outcome": "no"
        }
      ],
      "edge_snapshot": {
        "edge_label": "strong_disagreement",
        "edge_pp": 10.97,
        "fair_prob_pct": 35.64,
        "hero_side": "away",
        "hero_team_name": "Gimnasia de Jujuy",
        "market_prob_pct": 24.67,
        "status": "strong_disagreement",
        "steam_team_name": "Gimnasia de Jujuy"
      },
      "fair_source": "poisson_pipeline",
      "fair_vs_market": {
        "closing_capture": "PRE1",
        "closing_footnote": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
        "comparison_available": true,
        "comparison_disabled": false,
        "comparison_summary": "The statistical model estimates Gimnasia de Jujuy\u0027s win probability at 35.6%, compared with the closing market\u0027s implied probability of 24.7%, a difference of 11.0 percentage points. This highlights a substantial disagreement between the model\u0027s assessment and the market consensus, rather than indicating which view is ultimately correct.",
        "degraded_note": "",
        "divergence_guard": {
          "divergence_level": "strong",
          "edge_status": "strong_disagreement",
          "max_gap_pp": 10.97,
          "suppress_hero": false,
          "suppress_value_language": false
        },
        "divergence_label": "Strong model-market divergence",
        "divergence_level": "strong",
        "divergence_level_label": "Strong divergence",
        "divergence_note": "The fair estimate differs noticeably from current market pricing. This may reflect genuine disagreement or incomplete rating inputs.",
        "divergence_tier": "strong",
        "edge_label": "Strong disagreement",
        "edge_label_key": "strong_disagreement",
        "fair_confidence": "medium",
        "fair_confidence_label": "Medium",
        "fair_source_note": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
        "forecast_assessment": {
          "favourite_class": "Balanced match",
          "favourite_label": "Gimnasia de Jujuy",
          "forecast_certainty_tier": "low",
          "headline": "Balanced match",
          "market_agreement_label": "Weak",
          "market_direction": {
            "label": "Supports model direction",
            "positive": true
          },
          "market_prob_pct": 24.7,
          "model_prob_gap_display": "+10.9 percentage points",
          "model_prob_gap_pp": 10.9,
          "model_prob_pct": 35.6,
          "outcome_separation_tier": "low",
          "paragraphs": [],
          "pricing_convergence": {
            "gap_display": "+10.9 percentage points",
            "gap_pp": 10.9,
            "label": "Moderate",
            "label_key": "mi_fa_pricing_moderate"
          },
          "reliability_headline": "Moderate reliability",
          "reliability_icon": "\u2713",
          "reliability_score": 65,
          "reliability_tier": "moderate",
          "summary": "Gimnasia de Jujuy \u2014 market direction supports the model lean.",
          "tier": "balanced",
          "title": "Prediction Assessment",
          "validation_label": "Warning",
          "value_split": {
            "execution_confidence": {
              "label": "Betting Confidence",
              "score": 52,
              "tier": "moderate",
              "tier_label": "Moderate"
            },
            "market_compatibility": {
              "label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
              "note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
              "score": 45,
              "tier": "moderate",
              "tier_label": "Moderate"
            },
            "model_edge_strength": {
              "label": "Model Signal Strength",
              "score": 35,
              "tier": "low",
              "tier_label": "Low"
            },
            "model_value": {
              "label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
              "note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
              "score": 45,
              "tier": "moderate",
              "tier_label": "Moderate"
            },
            "recommendation": {
              "action": "monitor",
              "label": "Monitor - No Primary Bet"
            }
          },
          "why": {
            "action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
            "bullets": [
              "Model: Quilmes 1.29 xG vs Gimnasia de Jujuy 1.31 \u2192 Gimnasia de Jujuy 35.6%",
              "Market: Quilmes ~24.7% implied",
              "Market Steam: Gimnasia de Jujuy \u2193 -6.2%"
            ],
            "one_liner": "Model and market both lean Gimnasia de Jujuy with no major conflict.",
            "title": "Why?"
          }
        },
        "forecast_certainty": {
          "note": "Three outcomes remain closely bunched \u2014 treat as a relatively open match.",
          "tier": "low",
          "tier_label": "Low"
        },
        "forecast_certainty_label": "Low",
        "has_market_probs": true,
        "hero_edge_pp": 10.97,
        "hero_label": "Gimnasia de Jujuy",
        "hero_side": "away",
        "market_activity": "Gimnasia de Jujuy odds shortened \u2193 -6.2%.",
        "market_agreement": "weak",
        "market_agreement_label": "Weak",
        "market_interpretation": {
          "bullets": [
            "The model may see a slower-scoring or closer matchup than the market.",
            "Monitor line movement before kickoff \u2014 not a betting recommendation."
          ],
          "follow_up": "Confirmation remains limited (5/12 books), suggesting early interest rather than a broad market move.",
          "gap_tier": "strong",
          "lead": "The statistical fair estimate is materially higher than the market on Gimnasia de Jujuy.",
          "note": "Market activity aligns with the largest pricing gap on Gimnasia de Jujuy.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "The statistical fair estimate is materially higher than the market on Gimnasia de Jujuy.",
            "Confirmation remains limited (5/12 books), suggesting early interest rather than a broad market move.",
            "Market activity aligns with the largest pricing gap on Gimnasia de Jujuy."
          ],
          "quiet_market": false,
          "title": "Market Assessment"
        },
        "market_narrative": {
          "paragraphs": [
            "The fair estimate favors Gimnasia de Jujuy more strongly than current market pricing.",
            "Recent line movement on Gimnasia de Jujuy (\u2193 -6.2%) aligns with the pricing gap.",
            "Market confirmation remains limited (5/12), suggesting an early move rather than a broad consensus."
          ],
          "title": "Current Market Narrative"
        },
        "market_source": "closing_1x2",
        "max_gap_pp": 10.97,
        "model_validation": {
          "score_label_key": "mi_mv_warning",
          "status": "warning"
        },
        "model_validation_label": "Warning",
        "outcome_separation": {
          "breakdown": [
            "No outcome exceeds 50% on the 1X2 grid.",
            "Top two 1X2 outcomes within 0.9 percentage points."
          ],
          "lead_gap_pp": 0.9,
          "max_prob_pct": 35.6,
          "note": "How spread out the model 1X2 probabilities are \u2014 crowded splits mean no single outcome dominates. Not accuracy vs the market.",
          "tier": "low",
          "tier_label": "Low"
        },
        "outcome_separation_label": "Low",
        "overall_assessment": {
          "badge_class": "strong",
          "largest_gap_label": "Gimnasia de Jujuy",
          "largest_gap_pp": 11.0,
          "lead": "The model rates Gimnasia de Jujuy considerably stronger than the closing betting market.",
          "level": "strong",
          "max_gap_pp": 11.0,
          "title": "Strong Disagreement"
        },
        "rows": [
          {
            "difference_pp": -10.21,
            "edge_pp": -10.21,
            "fair_prob_pct": 34.7,
            "is_hero": false,
            "label": "Quilmes",
            "market_prob_pct": 44.91,
            "side": "home",
            "signal_key": "market_higher",
            "signal_label": "Market Higher"
          },
          {
            "difference_pp": -0.77,
            "edge_pp": -0.77,
            "fair_prob_pct": 29.65,
            "is_hero": false,
            "label": "Draw",
            "market_prob_pct": 30.42,
            "side": "draw",
            "signal_key": "aligned",
            "signal_label": "Aligned"
          },
          {
            "difference_pp": 10.97,
            "edge_pp": 10.97,
            "fair_prob_pct": 35.64,
            "is_hero": true,
            "label": "Gimnasia de Jujuy",
            "market_prob_pct": 24.67,
            "side": "away",
            "signal_key": "model_edge",
            "signal_label": "Model Edge"
          }
        ],
        "status": "strong_disagreement",
        "status_label": "Strong Disagreement",
        "steam_note": "Market activity aligns with the largest pricing gap on Gimnasia de Jujuy.",
        "unavailable_note": ""
      },
      "interpretation": {
        "has_conflict": true,
        "paragraphs": [
          "The betting market strongly prefers Quilmes (24.7%).",
          "Gimnasia de Jujuy has attracted notable multi-book line movement (\u2193 -6.2%, 5/12).",
          "This creates a conflict: Model \u2192 Gimnasia de Jujuy, Market \u2192 Quilmes, Recent sharp money \u2192 Gimnasia de Jujuy.",
          "Because signals disagree, confidence remains limited."
        ],
        "show": true,
        "title": "OddsGPT Interpretation"
      },
      "lifecycle": {
        "closing_implied_pct": 25.91,
        "closing_odds": 3.86,
        "closing_reason": "",
        "closing_status": "recorded",
        "closing_status_label": "Recorded",
        "clv_pending": true,
        "clv_pp": 0.0,
        "clv_reason": "",
        "clv_status": "pending",
        "context": "match",
        "current_stage": "waiting_for_kickoff",
        "current_stage_detail": "",
        "current_stage_label": "Waiting for kickoff",
        "entry_implied_pct": 25.91,
        "entry_odds": 3.86,
        "match_phase": "upcoming",
        "match_phase_detail": "",
        "match_phase_display": "Upcoming",
        "match_phase_label": "Upcoming",
        "model_validation_label": "Warning",
        "model_validation_status": "warning",
        "stages": [
          {
            "detail": "",
            "id": "forecast_generated",
            "label": "Prediction Generated",
            "status": "done"
          },
          {
            "detail": "",
            "id": "market_detected",
            "label": "Market Compared",
            "status": "active"
          },
          {
            "detail": "",
            "id": "model_validated",
            "label": "Validation Passed",
            "status": "active"
          },
          {
            "detail": "PRE1",
            "id": "closing_recorded",
            "label": "Closing Recorded",
            "status": "done"
          },
          {
            "detail": "",
            "id": "clv_evaluated",
            "label": "CLV Evaluated",
            "status": "pending"
          }
        ]
      },
      "market_move_intelligence": {
        "books_reacting": 5,
        "books_reacting_detail": [
          {
            "bookmaker_id": 1,
            "bookmaker_name": "10Bet",
            "is_sharp": false,
            "move_delta_display": "\u2193 -6.8%",
            "odds_delta_pct": -6.8
          },
          {
            "bookmaker_id": 8,
            "bookmaker_name": "Bet365",
            "is_sharp": true,
            "move_delta_display": "\u2193 -6.2%",
            "odds_delta_pct": -6.2
          },
          {
            "bookmaker_id": 36,
            "bookmaker_name": "BetVictor",
            "is_sharp": false,
            "move_delta_display": "\u2193 -4.0%",
            "odds_delta_pct": -4.0
          },
          {
            "bookmaker_id": 2,
            "bookmaker_name": "Marathonbet",
            "is_sharp": false,
            "move_delta_display": "\u2193 -2.2%",
            "odds_delta_pct": -2.2
          },
          {
            "bookmaker_id": 11,
            "bookmaker_name": "1xBet",
            "is_sharp": false,
            "move_delta_display": "\u2193 -2.1%",
            "odds_delta_pct": -2.1
          }
        ],
        "books_total": 12,
        "breadth_display": "5/12",
        "clv_label": "+0.00 pp",
        "clv_status": "evaluated",
        "current_odds": 3.75,
        "is_drift": false,
        "move_context": "Largest move today",
        "move_display": "\u2193 -6.2%",
        "move_pct_abs": 6.2,
        "move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
        "move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 33h 45m",
        "narrative_paragraphs": [
          "Volatile two-way pricing on Gimnasia de Jujuy (swing 4.00 \u2192 3.26 \u2192 3.75) \u2014 net 6.2% but intraday chop is elevated.",
          "Price swings look choppy \u2014 volatility reduced overall confidence in the directional signal."
        ],
        "narrative_title": "Market Narrative",
        "odds_delta_pct": -6.2,
        "odds_path": {
          "chart_y_labels": [
            "4.00",
            "3.88",
            "3.75"
          ],
          "display": "4.00 \u2192 3.26 \u2192 3.75",
          "move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
          "move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 33h 45m",
          "pick_team": "Gimnasia de Jujuy",
          "points": [
            {
              "label_key": "open",
              "value": "4.00"
            },
            {
              "label_key": "extreme",
              "value": "3.26"
            },
            {
              "label_key": "current",
              "value": "3.75"
            }
          ],
          "sparkline_points": [
            4.0,
            3.86,
            3.75
          ],
          "sparkline_polyline": "0.0,0.0 28.0,10.1 56.0,18.0",
          "sparkline_trend": "down",
          "sparkline_trend_label": "One-way drop",
          "summary_boxes": [
            {
              "label_key": "open",
              "value": "4.00"
            },
            {
              "label_key": "low",
              "value": "3.75"
            },
            {
              "label_key": "high",
              "value": "4.00"
            },
            {
              "label_key": "current",
              "value": "3.75"
            }
          ]
        },
        "open_odds": 4.0,
        "page_alert_line": "",
        "phase_label": "Volatile",
        "phase_tip": "High disagreement or chop \u2014 low reliability for directional bets.",
        "pick_team": "Gimnasia de Jujuy",
        "ref_book": "Bet365",
        "seo_title_alert": "",
        "sharp_leader": "Bet365",
        "show": true,
        "signal_badge_class": "warn",
        "signal_icon": "\u26a0\ufe0f",
        "signal_impact": {
          "current_odds": 3.75,
          "is_drift": false,
          "label": "Sharp signal",
          "move_display": "\u2193 -6.2%",
          "open_odds": 4.0,
          "summary": "Sharp money supports the same direction as the model lean.",
          "team": "Gimnasia de Jujuy",
          "tone": "with"
        },
        "signal_key": "volatile_market",
        "signal_label": "Volatile market",
        "steam_score": 32,
        "steam_subtitle": "Limited conviction",
        "steam_tier": "C",
        "title": "Market Move Intelligence"
      },
      "market_overview": {
        "breadth_display": "5/12",
        "current_odds": 3.75,
        "move_display": "\u2193 -6.2%",
        "open_odds": 4.0,
        "pick_team": "Gimnasia de Jujuy",
        "steam_score": 32,
        "steam_team_name": "Gimnasia de Jujuy",
        "steam_tier": "C"
      },
      "premium_teaser": {
        "current_divergence_pp": 11.0,
        "divergence_label": "Current divergence",
        "title": "Premium Market Intelligence",
        "unlock_items": [
          "Historical similar matches",
          "Closing odds analysis",
          "CLV tracking",
          "Sharp money signals",
          "Market efficiency rating",
          "Historical model vs market results"
        ],
        "unlock_label": "Unlock"
      },
      "show": true
    },
    "match": {
      "away_expected_goals": null,
      "away_goal_display": null,
      "away_team_display_name": "Gimnasia de Jujuy",
      "away_team_id": 479,
      "away_team_logo": "/static/teams/479.webp",
      "away_team_name": "Gimnasia de Jujuy",
      "away_team_slug": "gimnasia-jujuy",
      "country_code": "AR",
      "country_display_name": "Argentina",
      "country_flag": "/static/images/country/ar.svg",
      "country_id": 6,
      "country_name": "Argentina",
      "fixture_id": 1498664,
      "goals_away": null,
      "goals_home": null,
      "home_expected_goals": null,
      "home_goal_display": null,
      "home_team_country": "Argentina",
      "home_team_display_name": "Quilmes",
      "home_team_id": 480,
      "home_team_logo": "/static/teams/480.webp",
      "home_team_name": "Quilmes",
      "home_team_slug": "quilmes",
      "league_country": "Argentina",
      "league_country_display": "Argentina",
      "league_display_name": "Primera Nacional",
      "league_id": 129,
      "league_logo": "/static/leagues/129.webp",
      "league_name": "Primera Nacional",
      "league_season": 2026,
      "match_date": "2026-08-05 22:00:00",
      "score_fulltime_away": null,
      "score_fulltime_home": null,
      "score_penalty_away": null,
      "score_penalty_home": null,
      "status_long": "Not Started",
      "status_short": "NS",
      "venue_city": "Quilmes",
      "venue_name": "Estadio Centenario Ciudad de Quilmes"
    },
    "match_decision": {
      "confidence": {
        "breakdown": [
          "pred_conf_md_max_1x2_under_50",
          "pred_conf_md_top_two_close",
          "pred_conf_md_line_above_ev"
        ],
        "breakdown_resolved": [
          "Max 1X2 prob under 50% (open contest) (\u22121.0)",
          "Top two outcomes relatively close in probability (\u22120.5)",
          "At least one tracked line above +EV threshold (+0.5)"
        ],
        "score": 6.0
      },
      "markets": {
        "1x2": {
          "1x2_ev_mode": "market_first_p15",
          "away": {
            "alpha": 0.2508,
            "best_odd": 3.86,
            "calibration": {
              "active": false,
              "hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
            },
            "edge": 0.0274,
            "ev": 0.0579,
            "implied_prob": 0.2467,
            "joint_probs": {
              "away": 0.2467,
              "draw": 0.3042,
              "home": 0.4491
            },
            "model_prob": 0.3559,
            "p_final": 0.2741
          },
          "draw": {
            "alpha": 0.2967,
            "best_odd": 3.13,
            "calibration": {
              "active": false,
              "hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
            },
            "edge": -0.0022,
            "ev": -0.0547,
            "implied_prob": 0.3042,
            "joint_probs": {
              "away": 0.2467,
              "draw": 0.3042,
              "home": 0.4491
            },
            "model_prob": 0.2968,
            "p_final": 0.302
          },
          "ev_available": true,
          "home": {
            "alpha": 0.3813,
            "best_odd": 2.12,
            "calibration": {
              "active": false,
              "hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
            },
            "edge": -0.0388,
            "ev": -0.1302,
            "implied_prob": 0.4491,
            "joint_probs": {
              "away": 0.2467,
              "draw": 0.3042,
              "home": 0.4491
            },
            "model_prob": 0.3473,
            "p_final": 0.4103
          }
        },
        "1x2_outlier": {
          "1x2_ev_mode": "legacy_max_odd",
          "away": {
            "best_odd": 3.86,
            "edge": 0.0969,
            "ev": 0.3739,
            "implied_prob": 0.2591,
            "model_prob": 0.3559
          },
          "draw": {
            "best_odd": 3.13,
            "edge": -0.0227,
            "ev": -0.0711,
            "implied_prob": 0.3195,
            "model_prob": 0.2968
          },
          "ev_available": true,
          "home": {
            "best_odd": 2.12,
            "edge": -0.1244,
            "ev": -0.2638,
            "implied_prob": 0.4717,
            "model_prob": 0.3473
          }
        },
        "btts": {
          "ev_available": false,
          "n_bookmakers": 0,
          "reliability": "low"
        },
        "ou25": {
          "ev_available": false,
          "n_bookmakers": 0,
          "reliability": "low"
        }
      },
      "match_tier": "value_game",
      "min_ev": 0.02,
      "total_xg": 2.6,
      "variance_flag": false
    },
    "unified_decision": {
      "actionable_ev_threshold": 0.02,
      "algorithm": {
        "enabled_since": "2026-05-26",
        "game_typing_module": true,
        "version": "2.5.0"
      },
      "balanced_alternative": null,
      "best_consensus_ev": 0.0579,
      "best_outlier_ev": 0.3739,
      "best_tracked_ev": 0.0579,
      "confidence": 5.0,
      "decision_confidence_v1": {
        "breakdown": [
          "pred_conf_v1_primary_line",
          "pred_conf_v1_max_1x2_under_50"
        ],
        "breakdown_resolved": [
          "Primary line identified (+1.0)",
          "Max 1X2 prob under 50% (no dominant 1X2) (\u22121.0)"
        ],
        "breakdown_v2": [
          "Base decision score (v1)",
          "Reliability supports action",
          "Market aligns with model",
          "Consensus-line +EV",
          "Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
        ],
        "score": 3.7,
        "score_v1_legacy": 5.0,
        "score_v2_pre_penalty": 5.7,
        "strength_v2": true
      },
      "decision_strength_v2": {
        "breakdown": [
          "Base decision score (v1)",
          "Reliability supports action",
          "Market aligns with model",
          "Consensus-line +EV",
          "Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
        ],
        "score": 3.7,
        "score_pre_penalty": 5.7
      },
      "decision_type": "VALUE_ALERT",
      "execution": {
        "1x2_dominant": false,
        "1x2_open_contest": true,
        "grade": "B",
        "stake_factor": 0.5
      },
      "favourite_misaligned_1x2": {
        "active": false,
        "gap": null,
        "side": null
      },
      "final_action": "monitor",
      "final_decision": {
        "action": "monitor",
        "alignment": {
          "direction_aligned": false,
          "direction_key": "conflict",
          "gap_pp": 11.0,
          "key": "agree",
          "label": "Agree",
          "model_strong": false,
          "pricing_aligned": true,
          "pricing_key": "moderate",
          "probability_gap_pp": 11.0,
          "summary": "Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (Gimnasia de Jujuy)."
        },
        "alignment_key": "agree",
        "best_consensus_ev": 0.0579,
        "best_outlier_ev": 0.3739,
        "confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
        "decision_strength": 3.7,
        "decision_strength_v1": 5.0,
        "decision_strength_v2": 5.7,
        "decision_type": "VALUE_ALERT",
        "execution_confidence": 52,
        "extreme_disagreement": false,
        "final_verdict_audit": {
          "action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
          "action_label": "Action",
          "decision": "Monitor - No Primary Bet",
          "is_primary": false,
          "snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Gimnasia de Jujuy at 35.6%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 24.7%.",
          "why": [
            {
              "text": "Decision Model identifies Gimnasia de Jujuy as the value side (35.6%)",
              "tone": "ok"
            },
            {
              "text": "Market broadly agrees with the direction",
              "tone": "ok"
            },
            {
              "text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
              "tone": "bad"
            },
            {
              "text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
              "tone": "bad"
            }
          ],
          "why_label": "Decision Summary"
        },
        "gap_pp": 10.9,
        "gates_failed": [
          "Execution confidence below 65"
        ],
        "has_top_pick": true,
        "headline": "Monitor - No Primary Bet",
        "hero_mode": "default",
        "icon": "\ud83d\udc41",
        "label": "Monitor \u2014 validate before acting",
        "market_signal": "Market aligns with model lean",
        "model_conflict_detail": null,
        "model_lean": "Gimnasia de Jujuy",
        "no_primary_reasons": {
          "all_triggered": [
            "market_quality",
            "calibration_risk"
          ],
          "calibration_mode": "soft",
          "codes": [
            "market_quality",
            "calibration_risk"
          ],
          "label": "Reason",
          "other_factors": [
            {
              "code": "calibration_risk",
              "detail": "Confidence reduced because model assumptions exceed the normal range.",
              "name": "Calibration Risk",
              "short": "Calibration Risk",
              "tone": "danger"
            }
          ],
          "other_label": "Other factors",
          "primary": {
            "code": "market_quality",
            "detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
            "name": "Market Quality Risk",
            "short": "Market Quality Risk",
            "tone": "warn"
          },
          "secondary": {
            "code": "calibration_risk",
            "detail": "Confidence reduced because model assumptions exceed the normal range.",
            "name": "Calibration Risk",
            "short": "Calibration Risk",
            "tone": "danger"
          },
          "version": "v1"
        },
        "outlier_detected": true,
        "outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market 1X2 \u00b7 side Gimnasia de Jujuy \u00b7 decimal odds ~3.86 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +37% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1498664 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22483.86 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +5.8% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
        "primary_allowed": false,
        "primary_block_explain": {
          "entries": [
            {
              "key": "positive_ev",
              "label": "Consensus EV +5.8% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
              "ok": true
            },
            {
              "key": "gate",
              "label": "Execution confidence below 65",
              "ok": false
            }
          ],
          "lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
          "primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
          "subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
          "title": "Why not Primary?"
        },
        "primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +5.8% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.7/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
        "primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +5.8% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.7/10 (display only)",
        "primary_gates": {
          "items": [
            {
              "key": "extreme_gap",
              "label": "Extreme gap",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "no"
            },
            {
              "key": "xg_calibration",
              "label": "xG calibration",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "warning"
            },
            {
              "key": "reliability",
              "label": "Rel",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "65 (\u226565)"
            },
            {
              "key": "execution",
              "label": "Exec",
              "ok": false,
              "value": "52 (\u226565)"
            },
            {
              "key": "alignment",
              "label": "Align",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "agree"
            },
            {
              "key": "consensus_ev",
              "label": "ConsEV",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "+5.8% (\u2265+5.0%)"
            },
            {
              "key": "top_pick",
              "label": "Pick",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "true"
            },
            {
              "key": "validation",
              "label": "Validation",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "true"
            }
          ],
          "passed": 7,
          "total": 8
        },
        "primary_type": null,
        "reasons": [
          "Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (Gimnasia de Jujuy).",
          "Decision strength: 3.7/10",
          "Execution confidence below 65",
          "Outlier price +37% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
        ],
        "reliability_score": 65,
        "speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
        "strength_v2_breakdown": [
          "Base decision score (v1)",
          "Reliability supports action",
          "Market aligns with model",
          "Consensus-line +EV",
          "Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
        ],
        "subline": "Validation pending \u2014 monitor the line before acting.",
        "thresholds": {
          "extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
          "lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
          "lean_min_strength": 5.0,
          "min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
          "min_execution": 65,
          "min_reliability": 65,
          "min_strength": 7.0,
          "source": "db",
          "user_id": 2
        },
        "thresholds_source": "db",
        "thresholds_user_id": 2,
        "tier": "monitor",
        "validation_ok": true,
        "value_context": {
          "consensus_ev": 0.0579,
          "consensus_ev_display": "+5.8%",
          "consensus_odds": 3.86,
          "disagreement_label": "Moderate",
          "disagreement_level": "moderate",
          "implied_prob": 0.2467,
          "is_extreme_disagreement": false,
          "model_prob": 0.3559,
          "raw_edge_display": "+10.9 percentage points",
          "raw_edge_pp": 10.9,
          "raw_implied_prob": 0.2590673575129534,
          "raw_signal_ev": 0.3738,
          "raw_signal_ev_display": "+37.4%"
        },
        "version": "v2.5",
        "xg_calibration": {
          "block_value_alert": true,
          "calibration_status": "warning",
          "deviation_pct": -3.0,
          "reasons": [
            "Low xG separation gap=0.02 (noise / no edge)"
          ],
          "recommended_action": "monitor",
          "strength_delta": -2.0,
          "uplift_away": null,
          "uplift_home": null,
          "xg_separation": {
            "band": "flat",
            "block_value_alert": true,
            "separation_score": -20,
            "strength_delta": -2.0,
            "xg_gap": 0.02
          }
        }
      },
      "game_type": {
        "label_zh": "\u5747\u8861\uff08\u5f00\u653e\u8d5b\u679c\uff09",
        "scoring_type": "balanced",
        "signals": {
          "btts_yes_prob": 0.545,
          "draw_prob": 0.2968,
          "max_1x2_prob": 0.3559,
          "over_prob": 0.482,
          "total_xg": 2.6,
          "under_prob": 0.518,
          "xg_diff": 0.02
        },
        "type": "balanced",
        "typing_weights_enabled": true
      },
      "hero_display_pick": null,
      "hero_mode": "default",
      "longshot_picks": [],
      "markets": {
        "1x2": {
          "consensus_odds": 3.86,
          "decision": "value_bet",
          "edge": 0.0274,
          "ev": 0.0579,
          "implied_prob": 0.2467,
          "max_ev_side": "away",
          "model_prob": 0.3559,
          "side": "away",
          "side_label": "Gimnasia de Jujuy"
        },
        "btts": {
          "decision": "lean",
          "edge": null,
          "ev": null,
          "implied_prob": null,
          "model_prob": 0.545,
          "side": "yes",
          "value_side": "yes"
        },
        "ou_2_5": {
          "decision": "no_bet",
          "edge": null,
          "ev": null,
          "implied_prob": null,
          "model_prob": 0.518,
          "side": "under",
          "value_side": "under"
        }
      },
      "match_id": 1498664,
      "match_regime": {
        "action": "optional",
        "actionable": true,
        "clear_edge": false,
        "code": "thin_edge",
        "execution_line_key": null,
        "insight_line_key": null,
        "max_valid_ev": 0.0579,
        "min_ev": 0.02,
        "stake_mult": 0.25,
        "use_split_strip": false
      },
      "match_tier": "value_game",
      "no_clear_primary": false,
      "probabilities": {
        "away": 0.3559,
        "draw": 0.2968,
        "home": 0.3473
      },
      "reason_codes": [
        "model_summary"
      ],
      "secondary_pick": null,
      "secondary_picks": [],
      "show_betting_primary_label": false,
      "suppressed_primary": null,
      "teams": {
        "away": "Gimnasia de Jujuy",
        "home": "Quilmes"
      },
      "top_pick": {
        "composite_score": 0.022667,
        "decision": "value_bet",
        "ev": 0.0579,
        "implied_prob": 0.2467,
        "market": "1x2",
        "model_prob": 0.3559,
        "not_dominant": true,
        "primary_strength": "weak",
        "risk_band": "speculative",
        "risk_tier": "primary",
        "side": "away",
        "side_label": "Gimnasia de Jujuy",
        "slot": "primary",
        "speculative_primary": true
      },
      "valid_markets_count": 1,
      "value_context_1x2": {
        "consensus_ev": 0.0579,
        "consensus_ev_display": "+5.8%",
        "consensus_odds": 3.86,
        "disagreement_label": "Moderate",
        "disagreement_level": "moderate",
        "implied_prob": 0.2467,
        "is_extreme_disagreement": false,
        "model_prob": 0.3559,
        "raw_edge_display": "+10.9 percentage points",
        "raw_edge_pp": 10.9,
        "raw_implied_prob": 0.2590673575129534,
        "raw_signal_ev": 0.3738,
        "raw_signal_ev_display": "+37.4%"
      }
    }
  },
  "fixture_id": 1498664,
  "generated_at_utc": "2026-08-05T21:59:06.729883+00:00",
  "lang_id": "en"
}

Obtén predicciones premium para Quilmes & Gimnasia de Jujuy!

Desbloquea análisis en profundidad, consejos de apuestas exclusivos y pronósticos de partidos con nuestro servicio de suscripción premium.

Suscríbete ahora
Volver a Estadísticas
Primera Nacional Primera Nacional — Clasificación
# EQUIPO PJ G E P Pts
1 Ferro Carril Oeste 31 18 7 6 61
2 Deportivo Morón 31 16 7 8 55
3 Godoy Cruz 31 15 8 8 53
4 Deportivo Madryn 31 13 11 7 50
5 Colón de Santa Fe 31 13 10 8 49
6 Almirante Brown 31 12 10 9 46
7 Estudiantes de Buenos Aires 31 12 9 10 45
8 Ciudad de Bolívar 31 10 12 9 42
9 Los Andes 31 9 13 9 40
10 Chaco For Ever 31 9 9 13 36
11 Defensores de Belgrano 31 8 12 11 36
12 Racing de Córdoba 31 9 9 13 36
13 San Telmo 31 8 10 13 34
14 All Boys 31 6 15 10 33
15 Central Norte 31 6 14 11 32
16 Atlético Mitre 31 6 14 11 32
17 San Miguel 31 6 13 12 31
18 Acassuso 31 7 8 16 29
# EQUIPO PJ GF GC +/- Pts
1 Deportivo Morón 31 49 31 +18 55
2 Deportivo Madryn 31 44 28 +16 50
3 Godoy Cruz 31 40 28 +12 53
4 Colón de Santa Fe 31 38 25 +13 49
5 Ferro Carril Oeste 31 36 25 +11 61
6 Estudiantes de Buenos Aires 31 29 26 +3 45
7 Chaco For Ever 31 28 31 -3 36
8 Racing de Córdoba 31 28 38 -10 36
9 Atlético Mitre 31 27 39 -12 32
10 Ciudad de Bolívar 31 26 28 -2 42
11 San Telmo 31 25 34 -9 34
12 San Miguel 31 25 36 -11 31
13 Los Andes 31 24 21 +3 40
14 Almirante Brown 31 23 18 +5 46
15 Defensores de Belgrano 31 23 27 -4 36
16 Acassuso 31 22 34 -12 29
17 Central Norte 31 19 28 -9 32
18 All Boys 31 17 26 -9 33