Estadísticas / Fútbol / Saudi-Arabia. Pro League / Damac vs Al Khaleej Saihat

Damac vs Al Khaleej Saihat Statistics & Analysis

May 02, 2026 - 16:10
0 0.84
2 1.17
xG Accuracy: 63%
Casa de apuestas premium 1xBet: los nuevos usuarios pueden usar el código promocional 1x_3342271. Registrarse

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Each row compares the model’s highlighted side (or lean) to what happened at full time.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Más / Menos de 2.5 Menos de 2.5 Menos de 2.5 (2 goals) ✔ Correct
  • Ambos Equipos Marcarán BTTS No No ✔ Correct
  • 1X2 Al Khaleej Saihat Al Khaleej Saihat ✔ Correct
  • Perspectivas de marcador exacto 0-1 0-2 ✖ Incorrect

Informe IA del partido

Resumen del partido IA

Quick read on how the model reads this matchup.

  • League: Pro League
  • Fixture: Damac vs Al Khaleej Saihat
  • Kickoff: 2026-05-02 17:00:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 24.6% · Draw 33.6% · Away 41.8%
  • xG (showing): Damac 0.84 — Al Khaleej Saihat 1.17 (total xG ≈ 2.01)
  • Primary / headline line (Betting Primary Pick when shown): Under 2.5 goals
  • Model: 67.4% · Implied: 48.5% · Probability edge: +18.9 pts · Est. EV: +42.9%
  • BTTS (model): Yes 40.9% · No 59.1%
  • Correct score (top bin): 0-1 (15.7%)

Where EV is shown, it is estimated return per unit stake at the best tracked decimal price — not the same thing as a raw probability gap.

1X2 can look balanced even when side markets show clearer structure.

Mejor apuesta y razones

Primary angle highlighted on the page: Under 2.5 goals.

If 1X2 looks tight, the engine may still find clearer structure in totals or BTTS — that is intentional.

No pick is a guarantee; variance is especially large in scoreline markets.

FAQ

What is the best-supported line in this snapshot?

Match the hero card above: if it says “Betting Primary Pick”, that leg cleared primary rules; if it says “Best +EV (tracked markets)”, it is the strongest +EV line that did not meet stricter Primary thresholds. The bullets below repeat the same model %, implied %, edge (pts), and EV % as that card.

Safer market than correct score?

Markets with more liquidity and smoother prices (often 1X2 or O/U 2.5 from many books) are usually easier to reason about than long-tail correct-score prices; still read EV on each leg.

What changes first if odds move?

Implied probabilities and EV move immediately with price; model probabilities in this snapshot do not update until the pipeline is re-run. Refresh after material line moves.

How should I read EV versus a probability gap?

Probability edge = model probability minus implied probability (reported here in percentage points). EV ≈ model probability × best tracked decimal odds − 1, shown as return per unit stake. They are related but not interchangeable labels.

Factores de riesgo

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Metodología

  • Inputs: Same structured facts bundle as the public prediction page (xG / Poisson snapshot, market EV where available, decision engine v2).
  • Narrative: Template sentence library with fixture-stable selection (no per-request LLM for this block).
  • Compliance: Educational framing only; not personalised advice.

Última actualización

May 01, 2026 (UTC)

¿Cómo usar esto?
  • Concéntrese en la línea principal cuando desee una idea viable.
  • No combine muchas púas de punta fina;Los bordes no se suman de manera confiable.
  • Trate las apuestas arriesgadas como jugadas opcionales y de alto riesgo únicamente.

Obtén predicciones premium para Damac & Al Khaleej Saihat!

Desbloquea análisis en profundidad, consejos de apuestas exclusivos y pronósticos de partidos con nuestro servicio de suscripción premium.

Suscríbete ahora
Volver a Estadísticas
Pro League Pro LeagueClasificación
# EQUIPO PJ G E P Pts
1 Al-Nassr 33 27 2 4 83
2 Al-Hilal Saudi FC 33 24 9 0 81
3 Al-Ahli Jeddah 33 24 6 3 78
4 Al-Qadisiyah FC 33 22 8 3 74
5 Al-Ittihad FC 32 16 7 9 55
6 Al Taawon 33 15 8 10 53
7 Al-Ettifaq 33 14 7 12 49
8 NEOM 33 12 8 13 44
9 Al-Hazm 33 10 9 14 39
10 Al-Fayha 33 10 8 15 38
11 Al Khaleej Saihat 33 10 7 16 37
12 Al-Fateh 33 9 9 15 36
13 Al Kholood 33 9 5 19 32
14 Al Shabab 32 7 11 14 32
15 Damac 33 6 11 16 29
16 Al Riyadh 33 6 9 18 27
17 Al Okhdood 33 5 5 23 20
18 Al Najma 33 2 7 24 13
# EQUIPO PJ GF GC +/- Pts
1 Al-Nassr 33 87 27 +60 83
2 Al-Hilal Saudi FC 33 84 27 +57 81
3 Al-Qadisiyah FC 33 78 33 +45 74
4 Al-Ahli Jeddah 33 67 24 +43 78
5 Al Taawon 33 59 44 +15 53
6 Al Khaleej Saihat 33 53 58 -5 37
7 Al-Ittihad FC 32 52 40 +12 55
8 Al-Ettifaq 33 50 54 -4 49
9 NEOM 33 42 47 -5 44
10 Al-Fayha 33 41 53 -12 38
11 Al Shabab 32 41 54 -13 32
12 Al-Fateh 33 41 55 -14 36
13 Al Kholood 33 39 61 -22 32
14 Al-Hazm 33 36 57 -21 39
15 Al Riyadh 33 34 63 -29 27
16 Damac 33 31 51 -20 29
17 Al Najma 33 31 76 -45 13
18 Al Okhdood 33 27 69 -42 20
# EQUIPO PJ xG xGC +/- Pts
1 Al-Nassr 33 65.9 24.9 +41.0 83
2 Al-Hilal Saudi FC 33 63.9 24.5 +39.4 81
3 Al-Ahli Jeddah 33 54.1 23.6 +30.5 78
4 Al-Qadisiyah FC 33 58.8 33.4 +25.4 74
5 Al-Ittihad FC 32 47.6 37.0 +10.6 55
6 NEOM 33 43.5 36.8 +6.7 44
7 Al Shabab 32 43.1 43.3 -0.2 32
8 Al Taawon 33 41.1 42.2 -1.1 53
9 Al Khaleej Saihat 33 39.8 41.3 -1.5 37
10 Al-Fateh 33 40.9 43.5 -2.6 36
11 Al-Fayha 33 33.1 42.3 -9.2 38
12 Al Riyadh 33 40.3 50.0 -9.7 27
13 Damac 33 24.2 37.4 -13.2 29
14 Al-Hazm 33 31.7 46.5 -14.8 39
15 Al Kholood 33 30.9 47.0 -16.1 32
16 Al-Ettifaq 33 38.4 54.9 -16.5 49
17 Al Najma 33 26.8 60.1 -33.3 13
18 Al Okhdood 33 25.0 60.7 -35.7 20