Estadísticas / Fútbol / Germany. 2. Bundesliga / SV Elversberg vs SC Paderborn 07

SV Elversberg vs SC Paderborn 07 Statistics & Analysis

May 03, 2026 - 11:30
5 1.59
1 1.13
xG Accuracy: 38%
Casa de apuestas premium 1xBet: los nuevos usuarios pueden usar el código promocional 1x_3342271. Registrarse

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Each row compares the model’s highlighted side (or lean) to what happened at full time.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Más / Menos de 2.5 Menos de 2.5 Más de 2.5 (6 goals) ✖ Incorrect
  • Ambos Equipos Marcarán BTTS No ✖ Incorrect
  • 1X2 SV Elversberg SV Elversberg ✔ Correct
  • Perspectivas de marcador exacto 1-1 5-1 ✖ Incorrect

Informe IA del partido

Resumen del partido IA

Below is a compact, numbers-first snapshot aligned with the same engine as the cards above.

  • League: 2. Bundesliga
  • Fixture: SV Elversberg vs SC Paderborn 07
  • Kickoff: 2026-05-02 11:30:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 46.5% · Draw 28.0% · Away 25.5%
  • xG (showing): SV Elversberg 1.59 — SC Paderborn 07 1.13 (total xG ≈ 2.72)
  • Primary / headline line (Betting Primary Pick when shown): Under 2.5 goals
  • Model: 48.9% · Implied: 34.6% · Probability edge: +14.2 pts · Est. EV: +38.4%
  • BTTS (model): Yes 55.4% · No 44.6%
  • Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (11.8%)

Use the cards for tiering; this text only restates the same inputs in narrative form.

1X2 can look balanced even when side markets show clearer structure.

Mejor apuesta y razones

Primary pick from the decision engine: Under 2.5 goals.

If 1X2 looks tight, the engine may still find clearer structure in totals or BTTS — that is intentional.

When several markets sit near +EV, keep stakes small — correlation means edges do not add cleanly.

FAQ

What changes first if odds move?

Implied probabilities and EV move immediately with price; model probabilities in this snapshot do not update until the pipeline is re-run. Refresh after material line moves.

Safer market than correct score?

Markets with more liquidity and smoother prices (often 1X2 or O/U 2.5 from many books) are usually easier to reason about than long-tail correct-score prices; still read EV on each leg.

Who has the edge in the match-winner market?

Use the 1X2 model percentages in the summary and the 1X2 market card: the side with the highest model % is the model lean, but check EV — a lean can still be -EV after prices.

Why might 1X2 look unattractive while totals do not?

Tight 1X2 prices often embed a fair three-way split, so EV on match-winner can sit negative even when Over/Under or BTTS still diverges from the model — compare the 1X2 row on the market cards to O/U and BTTS.

Factores de riesgo

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Metodología

  • Inputs: Same structured facts bundle as the public prediction page (xG / Poisson snapshot, market EV where available, decision engine v2).
  • Narrative: Template sentence library with fixture-stable selection (no per-request LLM for this block).
  • Compliance: Educational framing only; not personalised advice.

Última actualización

May 01, 2026 (UTC)

¿Cómo usar esto?
  • Concéntrese en la línea principal cuando desee una idea viable.
  • No combine muchas púas de punta fina;Los bordes no se suman de manera confiable.
  • Trate las apuestas arriesgadas como jugadas opcionales y de alto riesgo únicamente.

Obtén predicciones premium para SV Elversberg & SC Paderborn 07!

Desbloquea análisis en profundidad, consejos de apuestas exclusivos y pronósticos de partidos con nuestro servicio de suscripción premium.

Suscríbete ahora
Volver a Estadísticas
2. Bundesliga 2. BundesligaClasificación
# EQUIPO PJ G E P Pts
1 FC Schalke 04 33 20 7 6 67
2 SV Elversberg 33 17 8 8 59
3 Hannover 96 33 16 11 6 59
4 SC Paderborn 07 33 17 8 8 59
5 SV Darmstadt 98 33 13 13 7 52
6 Hertha BSC 33 14 9 10 51
7 1. FC Kaiserslautern 33 15 4 14 49
8 1. FC Nürnberg 33 12 9 12 45
9 Karlsruher SC 33 12 8 13 44
10 VfL Bochum 33 10 11 12 41
11 Holstein Kiel 33 11 8 14 41
12 1. FC Magdeburg 33 12 3 18 39
13 Dynamo Dresden 33 10 8 15 38
14 Eintracht Braunschweig 33 10 7 16 37
15 Fortuna Düsseldorf 33 11 4 18 37
16 Arminia Bielefeld 33 9 9 15 36
17 SpVgg Greuther Fürth 33 9 7 17 34
18 Preußen Münster 33 6 12 15 30
# EQUIPO PJ GF GC +/- Pts
1 SV Elversberg 33 61 39 +22 59
2 Hannover 96 33 57 41 +16 59
3 SV Darmstadt 98 33 57 43 +14 52
4 SC Paderborn 07 33 57 45 +12 59
5 Dynamo Dresden 33 52 52 0 38
6 1. FC Magdeburg 33 52 57 -5 39
7 Karlsruher SC 33 52 62 -10 44
8 1. FC Kaiserslautern 33 51 47 +4 49
9 FC Schalke 04 33 49 31 +18 67
10 VfL Bochum 33 47 46 +1 41
11 Arminia Bielefeld 33 47 50 -3 36
12 Hertha BSC 33 46 38 +8 51
13 SpVgg Greuther Fürth 33 46 68 -22 34
14 1. FC Nürnberg 33 44 42 +2 45
15 Holstein Kiel 33 43 46 -3 41
16 Preußen Münster 33 38 58 -20 30
17 Eintracht Braunschweig 33 36 53 -17 37
18 Fortuna Düsseldorf 33 33 50 -17 37
# EQUIPO PJ xG xGC +/- Pts
1 SC Paderborn 07 33 56.3 36.5 +19.8 59
2 FC Schalke 04 33 49.1 30.0 +19.1 67
3 Hannover 96 33 52.2 36.8 +15.4 59
4 SV Elversberg 33 49.5 37.0 +12.5 59
5 1. FC Magdeburg 33 51.5 44.5 +7.0 39
6 VfL Bochum 33 50.7 45.7 +5.0 41
7 1. FC Nürnberg 33 44.6 41.1 +3.5 45
8 1. FC Kaiserslautern 33 44.9 43.0 +1.9 49
9 SV Darmstadt 98 33 50.5 50.0 +0.5 52
10 Arminia Bielefeld 33 45.2 44.8 +0.4 36
11 Dynamo Dresden 33 42.4 42.9 -0.5 38
12 Hertha BSC 33 43.4 46.3 -2.9 51
13 Fortuna Düsseldorf 33 39.6 47.4 -7.8 37
14 Eintracht Braunschweig 33 36.4 46.3 -9.9 37
15 Holstein Kiel 33 40.0 52.2 -12.2 41
16 SpVgg Greuther Fürth 33 37.4 50.6 -13.2 34
17 Preußen Münster 33 36.4 53.8 -17.4 30
18 Karlsruher SC 33 39.5 60.6 -21.1 44