The model missed the final outcome (Da Nang win 3–0).
The model had projected Nam Dinh at 42.4%, but the full-time result went the other way.
追蹤市場與全場比賽結果
每行比較賽前模型傾向與全場比賽結果。
- 市場 預測 結果 結果
- 大小球2.5 小於2.5球 大於2.5球 (3 進球) ✖ 錯誤
- 雙方進球 雙方進球 (BTTS) 否 否 ✔ 正確
- 1X2 Nam Dinh Da Nang ✖ 錯誤
- 波膽洞察 1-1, 0-1, 1-2, 1-0, 0-2 3-0 ✖ 錯誤
模型與收盤市場
| 結果 | 模型 | 收盤市場 | 差異 | 信號 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Da Nang | 28.4% | 21.8% | +6.6 pp | Model Higher |
| Draw | 29.3% | 23.4% | +5.8 pp | Model Higher |
| Nam Dinh | 42.4% | 54.8% | -12.5 pp | Market Higher |
The closing market estimates Nam Dinh's win probability at 54.8%, compared with the model's estimate of 42.4%, a difference of 12.5 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.
Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.
全場比賽結束後,結果為 Da Nang win 3–0。
Market Assessment
The market is materially more optimistic about Nam Dinh than the current fair estimate.
- Investors may be incorporating information not fully reflected in the baseline model.
- Tournament-specific context can shift market pricing.
赛后洞察
有效之处
- Expected goals projected a high-scoring match (ΣxG 2.60) — 3 goals materialised
- Both Teams To Score (No) matched the full-time result
失误之处
- Over / Under 2.5: model leaned Under 2.5; match finished Over 2.5 (3 goals)
- 1X2: model leaned Nam Dinh; match finished Da Nang
市场启示
The closing market differed from the model on Nam Dinh by 12.5 percentage points (54.9% vs model 42.4%) — in this case the market view proved closer.
預測時間線
此預測如何從預測轉變為全場回顧。
-
Sep 11, 2026 · 10:59 UTC Forecast generated
- Model 1X2 · Da Nang 28.4% · Draw 29.2% · Nam Dinh 42.4%
- xG · Da Nang 1.15 — Nam Dinh 1.45
-
Sep 11, 2026 · 10:29 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
- 1X2 odds · Da Nang 4.21 · Draw 3.91 · Nam Dinh 1.67
- Implied 1X2 · Da Nang 21.8% · Draw 23.4% · Nam Dinh 54.8%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Sep 11, 2026 · 10:59 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
- 1X2 odds · Da Nang 4.21 · Draw 3.91 · Nam Dinh 1.67
- Implied 1X2 · Da Nang 21.8% · Draw 23.4% · Nam Dinh 54.8%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Sep 11, 2026 · 11:00 UTC Kickoff
-
FT Full-time result Da Nang win · 3–0
-
FT Prediction missed 1X2 lean did not match full-time result
-
Archived Prediction review
歷史快照
開賽時凍結 — 模型在比賽開始前的輸出。
賽前指標(歷史背景)
- Validation: Warning
- Large market gap (12 pp)
- No strong statistical edge
- Market has already priced much of the edge
- Validation warning
验证报告
Immutable Snapshot模型绩效
本场预测计入:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
回顧常見問題
- 預測的準確性如何?
- 本頁面評估方向性市場(1X2、大小球 2.5、雙方進球)與全場比賽結果的對應情況。預測評級反映了這些追蹤市場中有多少與實際結果相符。
- xG 準確性測量什麼?
- xG 準確性比較模型賽前的預期進球數與實際比分 — 而非每個市場是否命中。即使方向性回顧表現強勁,xG 準確性得分也可能中等。
- 為什麼未能預測精確比分?
- 即使模型對比賽輪廓的解讀良好,精確比分的結果仍屬於低概率事件。我們會突出顯示主要的比分範圍作為參考;未命中精確賠率線並不會否定方向性回顧。
- 這是否改善了 AI 的記錄?
- 每場完成的比賽都會記錄在我們的驗證流程中。彙總的命中率和 CLV 研究會另行發布 — 本頁面為逐場比賽的審核記錄。
預測僅供參考。請負責任地投注並量力而行。過去的表現不保證未來的結果。
探索更多預測內容
V.League 1 — 積分榜
| # | 球隊(TEAM) | 出賽場次(MP) | 勝(W) | 平局(D) | 輸(L) | 積分(PTS) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Công An Nhân Dân | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 9 |
| 2 | Phu Dong | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| 3 | Song Lam Nghe An | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| 4 | Da Nang | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| 5 | Nam Dinh | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| 6 | 胡志明市 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| 7 | Viettel | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| 8 | Thanh Hóa | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| 9 | 北寧 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| 10 | Hai Phong | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| 11 | Hồng Lĩnh Hà Tĩnh | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| 12 | Ha Noi | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| 13 | Hoang Anh Gia Lai | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| 14 | 平福 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 |
| # | 球隊(TEAM) | 出賽場次(MP) | 進球(GS) | 失球(GC) | +/- | 積分(PTS) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Công An Nhân Dân | 3 | 6 | 0 | +6 | 9 |
| 2 | Phu Dong | 2 | 6 | 2 | +4 | 6 |
| 3 | Song Lam Nghe An | 2 | 5 | 1 | +4 | 6 |
| 4 | Da Nang | 2 | 5 | 3 | +2 | 3 |
| 5 | Nam Dinh | 2 | 4 | 3 | +1 | 3 |
| 6 | Thanh Hóa | 2 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 3 |
| 7 | Hai Phong | 2 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 3 |
| 8 | 胡志明市 | 2 | 3 | 2 | +1 | 3 |
| 9 | Viettel | 2 | 2 | 1 | +1 | 3 |
| 10 | Ha Noi | 2 | 2 | 7 | -5 | 0 |
| 11 | 北寧 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| 12 | Hồng Lĩnh Hà Tĩnh | 2 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 3 |
| 13 | Hoang Anh Gia Lai | 2 | 1 | 7 | -6 | 0 |
| 14 | 平福 | 3 | 0 | 6 | -6 | 0 |