預測審核: Krems / Rehberg vs 霍恩 預測、賠率與AI投注建議

Aug 28, 2026 - 17:30
0 1.30
1 1.30
xG Accuracy: 64%

The model missed the final outcome (霍恩 win 0–1).

The model had projected Krems / Rehberg at 35.2%, but the full-time result went the other way.

追蹤市場與全場比賽結果

預測評級 F

每行比較賽前模型傾向與全場比賽結果。

  • 市場 預測 結果 結果
  • 大小球2.5 小於2.5球 小於2.5球 (1 進球) ✔ 正確
  • 雙方進球 雙方進球 (BTTS) 是 ✖ 錯誤
  • 1X2 Krems / Rehberg 霍恩 ✖ 錯誤
  • 波膽洞察 1-1, 0-1, 1-0, 1-2, 2-1 0-1 ✔ 正確

模型與收盤市場

Moderate Disagreement

The closing market prices Krems / Rehberg higher than the statistical model.

最大概率差距: Krems / Rehberg -6.7 pp

結果 模型 收盤市場 差異 信號
Krems / Rehberg 35.2% 41.9% -6.7 pp Market Higher
Draw 29.6% 25.6% +4.0 pp Aligned
霍恩 35.2% 32.5% +2.7 pp Aligned

The closing market estimates Krems / Rehberg's win probability at 41.9%, compared with the model's estimate of 35.2%, a difference of 6.7 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.

Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.

全場比賽結束後,結果為 霍恩 win 0–1。

Market Assessment

The market and model broadly agree on Krems / Rehberg. The remaining divergence may reflect differences in team-strength assumptions rather than a directional disagreement.

  • Monitor line movement before kickoff — not a betting recommendation.

赛后洞察

有效之处

  • Under 2.5 goals aligned with the xG profile
  • Exact score 0–1 fell within the model's highlighted bins

失误之处

  • Both Teams To Score: model leaned BTTS Yes; match finished BTTS No
  • 1X2: model leaned Krems / Rehberg; match finished 霍恩

市场启示

The closing market differed from the model on Krems / Rehberg by 6.7 percentage points (41.9% vs model 35.2%) — in this case the market view proved closer.

Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

預測時間線

此預測如何從預測轉變為全場回顧。

  1. Aug 28, 2026 · 17:30 UTC Forecast generated
    • Model 1X2 · Krems / Rehberg 35.2% · Draw 29.6% · 霍恩 35.2%
    • xG · Krems / Rehberg 1.30 — 霍恩 1.30
  2. Aug 28, 2026 · 17:01 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
    • 1X2 odds · Krems / Rehberg 2.11 · Draw 3.45 · 霍恩 2.72
    • Implied 1X2 · Krems / Rehberg 41.9% · Draw 25.6% · 霍恩 32.5%
    • Bookmaker · Pinnacle
  3. Aug 28, 2026 · 17:29 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
    • 1X2 odds · Krems / Rehberg 2.11 · Draw 3.45 · 霍恩 2.72
    • Implied 1X2 · Krems / Rehberg 41.9% · Draw 25.6% · 霍恩 32.5%
    • Bookmaker · Pinnacle
  4. Aug 28, 2026 · 17:30 UTC Kickoff
  5. FT Full-time result 霍恩 win · 0–1
  6. FT Prediction missed 1X2 lean did not match full-time result
  7. Archived Prediction review

歷史快照

開賽時凍結 — 模型在比賽開始前的輸出。

歷史判決: Observe
歷史決策 No Primary Bet
結果 Missed
賽前指標(歷史背景)
預測可靠性 76/100 · High
  • Validation: Pass
證據
  • No strong statistical edge
  • Direction agrees with model lean
  • Validation passed
Pricing proximity (inverse gap) 66/100
Betting Confidence 79/100

验证报告

Immutable Snapshot

预测时间: Aug 22, 2026 · 03:25 UTC 快照 ID: dp-4939068

收盘赔率 2.11
AI 公平赔率
CLV 待定
最终赛果 霍恩 win · Krems / Rehberg 0–1 霍恩
预测结果 ✖ Missed
决策评级 F

模型绩效

本场预测计入:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

回顧常見問題

預測的準確性如何?
本頁面評估方向性市場(1X2、大小球 2.5、雙方進球)與全場比賽結果的對應情況。預測評級反映了這些追蹤市場中有多少與實際結果相符。
xG 準確性測量什麼?
xG 準確性比較模型賽前的預期進球數與實際比分 — 而非每個市場是否命中。即使方向性回顧表現強勁,xG 準確性得分也可能中等。
為什麼未能預測精確比分?
即使模型對比賽輪廓的解讀良好,精確比分的結果仍屬於低概率事件。我們會突出顯示主要的比分範圍作為參考;未命中精確賠率線並不會否定方向性回顧。
這是否改善了 AI 的記錄?
每場完成的比賽都會記錄在我們的驗證流程中。彙總的命中率和 CLV 研究會另行發布 — 本頁面為逐場比賽的審核記錄。

預測僅供參考。請負責任地投注並量力而行。過去的表現不保證未來的結果。

AI 比賽簡報

AI 比賽摘要

Quick read on how the model reads this matchup.

  • League: 奧地利地區聯賽(東區)
  • Fixture: Krems / Rehberg vs 霍恩
  • Kickoff: 2026-08-28 17:30:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 35.2% · Draw 29.6% · Away 35.2%
  • xG (showing): Krems / Rehberg 1.3 — 霍恩 1.3 (total xG ≈ 2.6)
  • Value headline: None — no positive EV on tracked lines at current best prices (same as the decision block: no default bet).
  • Structural leans (not bets): Structural lean (model): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5 (Under 2.5 51.8% · Over 2.5 48.2%); BTTS Yes (Yes 54.5% · No 45.5%) Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5; BTTS Yes
  • BTTS (model): Yes 54.5% · No 45.5%
  • Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (12.6%)

When book depth is thin or odds are missing, EV may be unavailable even though the model still prefers one side on totals or BTTS — wait for cleaner prices or skip.

Most likely correct score stays a low-probability tail: use it for context, not as a must-bet story.

歷史推薦

歷史決策: No Primary Bet

結果: Missed — Pre-match 1X2 lean did not match the full-time result.

開賽前考慮的風險因素

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

最後更新

September 16, 2026 (UTC)

獲取高級預測 Krems / Rehberg & 霍恩!

透過我們的高級訂閱服務,解鎖深入分析、獨家投注建議和比賽預測。

立即訂閱
返回預測
奧地利地區聯賽(東區) 奧地利地區聯賽(東區)積分榜
# 球隊(TEAM) 出賽場次(MP) 勝(W) 平局(D) 輸(L) 積分(PTS)
1 曼斯多夫-格羅森澤爾斯多夫 6 5 0 1 15
2 維也納 SC 6 4 1 1 13
3 奧伯瓦特 6 4 0 2 12
4 帕恩多夫 6 3 2 1 11
5 法赫-多瑙費爾德 6 3 1 2 10
6 舍布林基肯 6 3 1 2 10
7 馬特斯堡SV 2020 6 3 0 3 9
8 法沃里特納 AC 6 3 0 3 9
9 霍恩 6 2 2 2 8
10 特賴斯基爾亨 5 2 2 1 8
11 維也納維多利亞 6 2 1 3 7
12 格洛格尼茨 6 2 1 3 7
13 多瑙 6 1 3 2 6
14 萊奧本多夫 6 1 2 3 5
15 Krems / Rehberg 5 0 2 3 2
16 維也納貝格 6 0 0 6 0
# 球隊(TEAM) 出賽場次(MP) 進球(GS) 失球(GC) +/- 積分(PTS)
1 曼斯多夫-格羅森澤爾斯多夫 6 19 6 +13 15
2 奧伯瓦特 6 13 8 +5 12
3 特賴斯基爾亨 5 13 12 +1 8
4 帕恩多夫 6 12 7 +5 11
5 維也納 SC 6 11 3 +8 13
6 維也納維多利亞 6 10 9 +1 7
7 格洛格尼茨 6 9 11 -2 7
8 舍布林基肯 6 9 12 -3 10
9 馬特斯堡SV 2020 6 8 6 +2 9
10 多瑙 6 7 13 -6 6
11 法沃里特納 AC 6 6 4 +2 9
12 霍恩 6 6 4 +2 8
13 萊奧本多夫 6 6 10 -4 5
14 法赫-多瑙費爾德 6 5 7 -2 10
15 維也納貝格 6 5 22 -17 0
16 Krems / Rehberg 5 4 9 -5 2