預測 / 足球 / 捷克. 捷克3級聯賽(ČFL B組) / 索科爾扎皮 vs 瓦恩斯多夫

預測審核: 索科爾扎皮 vs 瓦恩斯多夫 預測、賠率與AI投注建議

Sep 12, 2026 - 15:00
4 1.39
4 1.21
xG Accuracy: 23%

The model missed the final outcome (Draw 4–4).

The model had projected 索科爾扎皮 at 39.5%, but the full-time result went the other way.

追蹤市場與全場比賽結果

預測評級 F

每行比較賽前模型傾向與全場比賽結果。

  • 市場 預測 結果 結果
  • 大小球2.5 小於2.5球 大於2.5球 (8 進球) ✖ 錯誤
  • 雙方進球 雙方進球 (BTTS) 是 是 ✔ 正確
  • 1X2 索科爾扎皮 和局 ✖ 錯誤
  • 波膽洞察 1-1, 1-0, 0-1, 2-1, 1-2 4-4 ✖ 錯誤

模型與收盤市場

Strong Disagreement

The closing market prices 索科爾扎皮 higher than the statistical model.

最大概率差距: 索科爾扎皮 -22.1 pp

結果 模型 收盤市場 差異 信號
索科爾扎皮 39.5% 61.5% -22.1 pp Market Higher
Draw 29.5% 20.6% +8.9 pp Model Higher
瓦恩斯多夫 31.0% 17.9% +13.2 pp Model Edge

The closing market estimates 索科爾扎皮's win probability at 61.5%, compared with the model's estimate of 39.5%, a difference of 22.1 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.

Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.

全場比賽結束後,結果為 Draw 4–4。

赛后洞察

有效之处

  • Expected goals projected a high-scoring match (ΣxG 2.60) — 8 goals materialised
  • Both Teams To Score (Yes) matched the full-time result

失误之处

  • Over / Under 2.5: model leaned Under 2.5; match finished Over 2.5 (8 goals)
  • 1X2: model leaned 索科爾扎皮; match finished Draw

市场启示

The closing market differed from the model on 索科爾扎皮 by 22.1 percentage points (61.6% vs model 39.5%) — in this case the market view proved closer.

Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

預測時間線

此預測如何從預測轉變為全場回顧。

  1. Sep 12, 2026 · 15:00 UTC Forecast generated
    • Model 1X2 · 索科爾扎皮 39.5% · Draw 29.5% · 瓦恩斯多夫 31.0%
    • xG · 索科爾扎皮 1.39 — 瓦恩斯多夫 1.21
  2. Sep 12, 2026 · 14:33 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
    • 1X2 odds · 索科爾扎皮 1.45 · Draw 4.33 · 瓦恩斯多夫 5.00
    • Implied 1X2 · 索科爾扎皮 61.5% · Draw 20.6% · 瓦恩斯多夫 17.9%
    • Bookmaker · Bet365
  3. Sep 12, 2026 · 15:00 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
    • 1X2 odds · 索科爾扎皮 1.45 · Draw 4.33 · 瓦恩斯多夫 5.00
    • Implied 1X2 · 索科爾扎皮 61.5% · Draw 20.6% · 瓦恩斯多夫 17.9%
    • Bookmaker · Bet365
  4. Sep 12, 2026 · 15:00 UTC Kickoff
  5. FT Full-time result Draw · 4–4
  6. FT Prediction missed 1X2 lean did not match full-time result
  7. Archived Prediction review

歷史快照

開賽時凍結 — 模型在比賽開始前的輸出。

歷史判決: Cautious / Wait

歷史標籤: Originally displayed as "Wait for validation".

歷史決策 Wait
結果 Missed
賽前指標(歷史背景)
預測可靠性 52/100 · Moderate
  • Validation: Warning
  • Large market gap (22 pp)
證據 ★★★★★
  • No strong statistical edge
  • Pricing remains divergent
  • Validation warning
Pricing proximity (inverse gap) 0/100
Betting Confidence 33/100

验证报告

Immutable Snapshot

预测时间: Sep 07, 2026 · 02:18 UTC 快照 ID: dp-7458471

收盘赔率 1.45
AI 公平赔率 —
CLV 待定
最终赛果 Draw · 索科爾扎皮 4–4 瓦恩斯多夫
预测结果 ✖ Missed
决策评级 F

模型绩效

本场预测计入:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

回顧常見問題

預測的準確性如何?
本頁面評估方向性市場(1X2、大小球 2.5、雙方進球)與全場比賽結果的對應情況。預測評級反映了這些追蹤市場中有多少與實際結果相符。
xG 準確性測量什麼?
xG 準確性比較模型賽前的預期進球數與實際比分 — 而非每個市場是否命中。即使方向性回顧表現強勁,xG 準確性得分也可能中等。
為什麼未能預測精確比分?
即使模型對比賽輪廓的解讀良好,精確比分的結果仍屬於低概率事件。我們會突出顯示主要的比分範圍作為參考;未命中精確賠率線並不會否定方向性回顧。
這是否改善了 AI 的記錄?
每場完成的比賽都會記錄在我們的驗證流程中。彙總的命中率和 CLV 研究會另行發布 — 本頁面為逐場比賽的審核記錄。

預測僅供參考。請負責任地投注並量力而行。過去的表現不保證未來的結果。

AI 比賽簡報

AI 比賽摘要

Quick read on how the model reads this matchup.

  • League: 捷克3級聯賽(ČFL B組)
  • Fixture: 索科爾扎皮 vs 瓦恩斯多夫
  • Kickoff: 2026-09-12 15:00:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 39.5% · Draw 29.5% · Away 31.0%
  • xG (showing): 索科爾扎皮 1.39 — 瓦恩斯多夫 1.21 (total xG ≈ 2.6)
  • Value headline: At least one tracked line reaches the headline EV threshold — align with the hero / Primary card if shown.
  • Structural leans (not bets): Structural lean (model): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5 (Under 2.5 51.8% · Over 2.5 48.2%); BTTS Yes (Yes 54.3% · No 45.7%) Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5; BTTS Yes
  • BTTS (model): Yes 54.3% · No 45.7%
  • Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (12.5%)

When book depth is thin or odds are missing, EV may be unavailable even though the model still prefers one side on totals or BTTS — wait for cleaner prices or skip.

Most likely correct score stays a low-probability tail: use it for context, not as a must-bet story.

歷史推薦

歷史決策: Wait

結果: Missed — Pre-match 1X2 lean did not match the full-time result.

開賽前考慮的風險因素

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

最後更新

September 29, 2026 (UTC)

獲取高級預測 索科爾扎皮 & 瓦恩斯多夫!

透過我們的高級訂閱服務,解鎖深入分析、獨家投注建議和比賽預測。

立即訂閱
返回預測