預測審核: 贝1 NFA vs 戴納瓦 預測、賠率與AI投注建議

Oct 09, 2026 - 14:30
2 1.33
2 1.27
xG Accuracy: 68%

The model missed the final outcome (Draw 2–2).

The model had projected 贝1 NFA at 36.6%, but the full-time result went the other way.

追蹤市場與全場比賽結果

預測評級 F

每行比較賽前模型傾向與全場比賽結果。

  • 市場 預測 結果 結果
  • 大小球2.5 小於2.5球 大於2.5球 (4 進球) ✖ 錯誤
  • 雙方進球 雙方進球 (BTTS) 是 是 ✔ 正確
  • 1X2 贝1 NFA 和局 ✖ 錯誤
  • 波膽洞察 1-1, 1-0, 0-1, 2-1, 1-2 2-2 ✖ 錯誤

模型與收盤市場

Moderate Disagreement

The closing market prices 贝1 NFA higher than the statistical model.

最大概率差距: 贝1 NFA -9.5 pp

結果 模型 收盤市場 差異 信號
贝1 NFA 36.6% 46.1% -9.5 pp Market Higher
Draw 29.6% 26.1% +3.5 pp Aligned
戴納瓦 33.8% 27.8% +6.0 pp Model Higher

The closing market estimates 贝1 NFA's win probability at 46.1%, compared with the model's estimate of 36.6%, a difference of 9.5 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.

Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.

全場比賽結束後,結果為 Draw 2–2。

Market Assessment

The market and model broadly agree on 贝1 NFA. The remaining divergence may reflect differences in team-strength assumptions rather than a directional disagreement.

  • Monitor line movement before kickoff — not a betting recommendation.

赛后洞察

有效之处

  • Expected goals projected a high-scoring match (ΣxG 2.60) — 4 goals materialised
  • Both Teams To Score (Yes) matched the full-time result

失误之处

  • Over / Under 2.5: model leaned Under 2.5; match finished Over 2.5 (4 goals)
  • 1X2: model leaned 贝1 NFA; match finished Draw

市场启示

The closing market differed from the model on 贝1 NFA by 9.5 percentage points (46.1% vs model 36.6%) — in this case the market view proved closer.

Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

預測時間線

此預測如何從預測轉變為全場回顧。

  1. Oct 03, 2026 · 01:35 UTC Forecast generated
    • Model 1X2 · 贝1 NFA 36.6% · Draw 29.6% · 戴納瓦 33.8%
    • xG · 贝1 NFA 1.33 — 戴納瓦 1.27
  2. Oct 09, 2026 · 14:11 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE20
    • 1X2 odds · 贝1 NFA 1.93 · Draw 3.40 · 戴納瓦 3.20
    • Implied 1X2 · 贝1 NFA 46.1% · Draw 26.1% · 戴納瓦 27.8%
    • Bookmaker · betmgm us
  3. Oct 09, 2026 · 14:29 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
    • 1X2 odds · 贝1 NFA 1.93 · Draw 3.40 · 戴納瓦 3.20
    • Implied 1X2 · 贝1 NFA 46.1% · Draw 26.1% · 戴納瓦 27.8%
    • Bookmaker · betmgm us
  4. Oct 09, 2026 · 14:30 UTC Kickoff
  5. FT Full-time result Draw · 2–2
  6. FT Prediction missed 1X2 lean did not match full-time result
  7. Archived Prediction review

歷史快照

開賽時凍結 — 模型在比賽開始前的輸出。

歷史判決: Observe
歷史決策 No Primary Bet
結果 Missed
賽前指標(歷史背景)
預測可靠性 74/100 · High
  • Validation: Pass
證據 ★★★★★
  • No strong statistical edge
  • Direction agrees with model lean
  • Validation passed
Pricing proximity (inverse gap) 52/100
Betting Confidence 77/100

验证报告

Immutable Snapshot

预测时间: Oct 03, 2026 · 01:35 UTC 快照 ID: dp-12689926

收盘赔率 1.93
AI 公平赔率 —
CLV 待定
最终赛果 Draw · 贝1 NFA 2–2 戴納瓦
预测结果 ✖ Missed
决策评级 F

模型绩效

本场预测计入:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

回顧常見問題

預測的準確性如何?
本頁面評估方向性市場(1X2、大小球 2.5、雙方進球)與全場比賽結果的對應情況。預測評級反映了這些追蹤市場中有多少與實際結果相符。
xG 準確性測量什麼?
xG 準確性比較模型賽前的預期進球數與實際比分 — 而非每個市場是否命中。即使方向性回顧表現強勁,xG 準確性得分也可能中等。
為什麼未能預測精確比分?
即使模型對比賽輪廓的解讀良好,精確比分的結果仍屬於低概率事件。我們會突出顯示主要的比分範圍作為參考;未命中精確賠率線並不會否定方向性回顧。
這是否改善了 AI 的記錄?
每場完成的比賽都會記錄在我們的驗證流程中。彙總的命中率和 CLV 研究會另行發布 — 本頁面為逐場比賽的審核記錄。

預測僅供參考。請負責任地投注並量力而行。過去的表現不保證未來的結果。

AI 比賽簡報

AI 比賽摘要

Pre-match snapshot for this fixture.

  • League: 立陶宛甲級聯賽
  • Fixture: 贝1 NFA vs 戴納瓦
  • Kickoff: 2026-10-09 14:30:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 36.6% · Draw 29.6% · Away 33.8%
  • xG (showing): 贝1 NFA 1.33 — 戴納瓦 1.27 (total xG ≈ 2.6)
  • Value headline: None — no positive EV could be estimated on tracked lines at current best prices (missing odds or thin book depth).
  • Structural leans (not bets): Structural lean (model): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5 (Under 2.5 51.8% · Over 2.5 48.2%); BTTS Yes (Yes 54.5% · No 45.5%) Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5; BTTS Yes
  • BTTS (model): Yes 54.5% · No 45.5%
  • Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (12.5%)

The decision block shows no default Primary: Primary needs consensus EV ≥ +5.0% plus strength/reliability/calibration gates. A separate Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only). Lean labels are directional only — not bankroll-sized recommendations.

Prefer skipping to over-staking when the engine is honest about missing edge.

歷史推薦

歷史決策: No Primary Bet

結果: Missed — Pre-match 1X2 lean did not match the full-time result.

開賽前考慮的風險因素

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

最後更新

October 09, 2026 (UTC)

獲取高級預測 贝1 NFA & 戴納瓦!

透過我們的高級訂閱服務,解鎖深入分析、獨家投注建議和比賽預測。

立即訂閱
返回預測
立陶宛甲級聯賽 立陶宛甲級聯賽 — 積分榜
# 球隊(TEAM) 出賽場次(MP) 勝(W) 平局(D) 輸(L) 積分(PTS)
1 米尼亞 25 22 1 2 67
2 巴布倫加斯 25 19 4 2 61
3 贝1 NFA 24 16 2 6 50
4 克萊佩達海神 25 14 2 9 44
5 陶拉斯 25 13 4 8 43
6 日爾基里斯二隊 25 13 4 8 43
7 BFA 25 13 4 8 43
8 戴納瓦 25 11 7 7 40
9 大氣隊 24 8 6 10 30
10 約納瓦 25 7 6 12 27
11 加爾利亞瓦 25 7 4 14 25
12 考納斯薩基利斯二隊 25 7 1 17 22
13 赫格爾曼 II 25 7 1 17 22
14 特蘭斯因韋斯特2 25 6 3 16 21
15 希奧利艾II 25 4 5 16 17
16 艾克拉納斯 25 4 2 19 14
# 球隊(TEAM) 出賽場次(MP) 進球(GS) 失球(GC) +/- 積分(PTS)
1 米尼亞 25 68 13 +55 67
2 巴布倫加斯 25 43 11 +32 61
3 贝1 NFA 24 43 25 +18 50
4 陶拉斯 25 43 31 +12 43
5 BFA 25 39 35 +4 43
6 日爾基里斯二隊 25 38 32 +6 43
7 大氣隊 24 37 33 +4 30
8 戴納瓦 25 35 25 +10 40
9 克萊佩達海神 25 33 30 +3 44
10 赫格爾曼 II 25 30 56 -26 22
11 加爾利亞瓦 25 29 31 -2 25
12 特蘭斯因韋斯特2 25 29 58 -29 21
13 約納瓦 25 28 33 -5 27
14 希奧利艾II 25 27 56 -29 17
15 艾克拉納斯 25 25 58 -33 14
16 考納斯薩基利斯二隊 25 23 43 -20 22