預測 / 足球 / 中國. 中國甲級聯賽 (中甲) / 南通支雲 vs 廣州E-Power

預測審核: 南通支雲 vs 廣州E-Power 預測、賠率與AI投注建議

Sep 05, 2026 - 11:30
1 1.32
1 1.28
xG Accuracy: 85%

The model missed the final outcome (Draw 1–1).

The model had projected 南通支雲 at 36.1%, but the full-time result went the other way.

追蹤市場與全場比賽結果

預測評級 C

每行比較賽前模型傾向與全場比賽結果。

  • 市場 預測 結果 結果
  • 大小球2.5 小於2.5球 小於2.5球 (2 進球) ✔ 正確
  • 雙方進球 雙方進球 (BTTS) 是 是 ✔ 正確
  • 1X2 南通支雲 和局 ✖ 錯誤
  • 波膽洞察 1-1, 1-0, 0-1, 2-1, 1-2 1-1 ✔ 正確

模型與收盤市場

Strong Disagreement

The closing market prices 廣州E-Power higher than the statistical model.

最大概率差距: 廣州E-Power -12.5 pp

結果 模型 收盤市場 差異 信號
南通支雲 36.1% 25.5% +10.7 pp Model Edge
Draw 29.6% 27.8% +1.9 pp Aligned
廣州E-Power 34.2% 46.8% -12.5 pp Market Higher

The closing market estimates 廣州E-Power's win probability at 46.8%, compared with the model's estimate of 34.2%, a difference of 12.5 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.

Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.

全場比賽結束後,結果為 Draw 1–1。

Market Assessment

The market is materially more optimistic about 廣州E-Power than the current fair estimate.

  • Investors may be incorporating information not fully reflected in the baseline model.
  • Tournament-specific context can shift market pricing.

赛后洞察

有效之处

  • Both Teams To Score (Yes) matched the full-time result
  • Under 2.5 goals aligned with the xG profile
  • Exact score 1–1 fell within the model's highlighted bins

失误之处

  • 1X2: model leaned 南通支雲; match finished Draw

市场启示

The closing market differed from the model on 南通支雲 by 12.5 percentage points (48.6% vs model 36.1%) — in this case the market view proved closer.

Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

預測時間線

此預測如何從預測轉變為全場回顧。

  1. Sep 05, 2026 · 11:29 UTC Forecast generated
    • Model 1X2 · 南通支雲 36.1% · Draw 29.7% · 廣州E-Power 34.2%
    • xG · 南通支雲 1.32 — 廣州E-Power 1.28
  2. Sep 05, 2026 · 11:03 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
    • 1X2 odds · 南通支雲 3.62 · Draw 3.32 · 廣州E-Power 1.97
    • Implied 1X2 · 南通支雲 25.5% · Draw 27.8% · 廣州E-Power 46.8%
    • Bookmaker · Pinnacle
  3. Sep 05, 2026 · 11:29 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
    • 1X2 odds · 南通支雲 3.62 · Draw 3.32 · 廣州E-Power 1.97
    • Implied 1X2 · 南通支雲 25.5% · Draw 27.8% · 廣州E-Power 46.8%
    • Bookmaker · Pinnacle
  4. Sep 05, 2026 · 11:30 UTC Kickoff
  5. FT Full-time result Draw · 1–1
  6. FT Prediction missed 1X2 lean did not match full-time result
  7. Archived Prediction review

歷史快照

開賽時凍結 — 模型在比賽開始前的輸出。

歷史判決: Monitor
歷史決策 Monitor
結果 Missed
賽前指標(歷史背景)
預測可靠性 57/100 · Moderate
  • Validation: Warning
  • Large market gap (13 pp)
證據 ★★★★★
  • No strong statistical edge
  • Market has already priced much of the edge
  • Validation warning
Pricing proximity (inverse gap) 12/100
Monitoring Confidence 20/100

验证报告

Immutable Snapshot

预测时间: Aug 30, 2026 · 01:29 UTC 快照 ID: dp-6129508

收盘赔率 1.97
AI 公平赔率 —
CLV 待定
最终赛果 Draw · 南通支雲 1–1 廣州E-Power
预测结果 ✖ Missed
决策评级 C

模型绩效

本场预测计入:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

回顧常見問題

預測的準確性如何?
本頁面評估方向性市場(1X2、大小球 2.5、雙方進球)與全場比賽結果的對應情況。預測評級反映了這些追蹤市場中有多少與實際結果相符。
xG 準確性測量什麼?
xG 準確性比較模型賽前的預期進球數與實際比分 — 而非每個市場是否命中。即使方向性回顧表現強勁,xG 準確性得分也可能中等。
為什麼未能預測精確比分?
即使模型對比賽輪廓的解讀良好,精確比分的結果仍屬於低概率事件。我們會突出顯示主要的比分範圍作為參考;未命中精確賠率線並不會否定方向性回顧。
這是否改善了 AI 的記錄?
每場完成的比賽都會記錄在我們的驗證流程中。彙總的命中率和 CLV 研究會另行發布 — 本頁面為逐場比賽的審核記錄。

預測僅供參考。請負責任地投注並量力而行。過去的表現不保證未來的結果。

AI 比賽簡報

AI 比賽摘要

Quick read on how the model reads this matchup.

  • League: 中國甲級聯賽 (中甲)
  • Fixture: 南通支雲 vs 廣州E-Power
  • Kickoff: 2026-09-05 11:30:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 36.1% · Draw 29.7% · Away 34.2%
  • xG (showing): 南通支雲 1.32 — 廣州E-Power 1.28 (total xG ≈ 2.6)
  • Value headline: None (actionable) — best tracked EV is about +1.9%, still below the +2.0% minimum for a headline / default stake (no default bet).
  • Structural leans (not bets): Structural lean (model): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5 (Under 2.5 51.8% · Over 2.5 48.2%); BTTS Yes (Yes 54.5% · No 45.5%) Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5; BTTS Yes
  • BTTS (model): Yes 54.5% · No 45.5%
  • Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (12.5%)

The decision block shows no default Primary: Primary needs consensus EV ≥ +5.0% plus strength/reliability/calibration gates. A separate Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only). Lean labels are directional only — not bankroll-sized recommendations.

If lines move materially, re-run generation or refresh — implied probabilities and any future EV readouts will change first.

歷史推薦

歷史決策: Monitor

結果: Missed — Pre-match 1X2 lean did not match the full-time result.

開賽前考慮的風險因素

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

最後更新

October 01, 2026 (UTC)

獲取高級預測 南通支雲 & 廣州E-Power!

透過我們的高級訂閱服務,解鎖深入分析、獨家投注建議和比賽預測。

立即訂閱
返回預測
中國甲級聯賽 (中甲) 中國甲級聯賽 (中甲) — 積分榜
# 球隊(TEAM) 出賽場次(MP) 勝(W) 平局(D) 輸(L) 積分(PTS)
1 廣州E-Power 24 16 6 2 54
2 廣西恆宸 24 13 6 5 45
3 深圳青年隊 24 12 8 4 44
4 南通支雲 23 10 9 4 39
5 延邊龍鼎 24 9 8 7 35
6 陝西聯合 23 9 6 8 33
7 河北功夫 24 8 7 9 31
8 無錫吳鈎 23 8 5 10 29
9 長春亞泰 23 10 3 10 29
10 寧波職業 23 9 5 9 29
11 大連華藝 23 7 8 8 29
12 蘇州東吳 24 7 8 9 26
13 黑龍江火山鳴泉 24 4 11 9 23
14 南京城市 24 5 6 13 21
15 梅州客家 24 7 3 14 15
16 東莞聯 24 2 7 15 13
# 球隊(TEAM) 出賽場次(MP) 進球(GS) 失球(GC) +/- 積分(PTS)
1 廣州E-Power 24 48 20 +28 54
2 廣西恆宸 24 40 26 +14 45
3 深圳青年隊 24 39 25 +14 44
4 長春亞泰 23 37 38 -1 29
5 陝西聯合 23 35 26 +9 33
6 無錫吳鈎 23 35 29 +6 29
7 黑龍江火山鳴泉 24 35 46 -11 23
8 延邊龍鼎 24 33 27 +6 35
9 南通支雲 23 31 20 +11 39
10 大連華藝 23 30 33 -3 29
11 蘇州東吳 24 28 33 -5 26
12 寧波職業 23 27 29 -2 29
13 梅州客家 24 25 50 -25 15
14 東莞聯 24 24 49 -25 13
15 河北功夫 24 22 25 -3 31
16 南京城市 24 20 33 -13 21