Jablonec II vs Neratovice-Byškovice Prediction, Odds & AI Betting Tips

Jablonec II

May 28, 2026 - 15:00

1.45

1.25

42% 26% 33%

Neratovice-Byškovice

Final betting verdict

Different markets price efficiency differently — 1X2 can be a pass while goals markets still show edge.

No value on 1X2 (Jablonec II vs. current odds)
Possible value: Over 2.5 (+3.6% EV at best odds)
Possible value: BTTS No (+7.8% EV at best odds)

Moderate conviction (5.5/10) — one selective line, not a multi-market parlay.

Betting Primary Pick (highest +EV)

BTTS No — Value

EV +7.8% Model 42.1%

Not a dominant outcome (model probability is below 50% on this leg).

Over / Under 2.5 Model edge (+EV)

Over 2.5 66.0% · Under 2.5 34.0%

EV Over +3.6% · EV Under -15.3%

Value lean: Over 2.5

1X2 Poor value

Jablonec II · Model 41.8%

implied 46.1%

Main consensus market · EV: -15.0%

Best available bookmaker line: -6.5% EV

Some outlier bookmaker prices may still show small theoretical value vs. the consensus line above.

Correct Score Insights Longshot / fun

Most Likely

1-1

Probability 9.6%

Correct score is high-variance — small stakes for fun only.

Betting decision (model vs. market EV)

Selective value — At least one tracked market may clear +EV at best odds, but conviction is limited (5.5/10) — size down.

Decision strength: 5.5 / 10

Primary line identified (+1.0)
Max 1X2 prob under 50% (no dominant 1X2) (−1.0)
Two or more valid +EV lines at threshold (+0.5)

O/U 2.5: EV Over +3.6% · EV Under -15.3% (6 book pairs)
BTTS: EV Yes -14.3% · EV No +7.8%

Should you bet on this match? Only where +EV is shown; always compare with your own limits.

OddsGPT Decision Engine v2.1.0(EV + Market Structure + Risk Adjustment) Check Odds at 1xBet

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Below is a compact, numbers-first snapshot aligned with the same engine as the cards above.

League: 3. liga - CFL B
Fixture: Jablonec II vs Neratovice-Byškovice
Kickoff: 2026-05-28 15:00:00
1X2 (model): Home 41.8% · Draw 25.7% · Away 32.6%
xG (showing): Jablonec II 1.45 — Neratovice-Byškovice 1.25 (total xG ≈ 2.7)
Primary / headline line (Betting Primary Pick when shown): BTTS No
Model: 42.1% · Implied: 36.8% · Probability edge: +5.3 pts · Est. EV: +7.8%
BTTS (model): Yes 57.9% · No 42.1%
Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (9.6%)

Use the cards for tiering; this text only restates the same inputs in narrative form.

1X2 can look balanced even when side markets show clearer structure.

Best Bet + Reason

Primary pick from the decision engine: BTTS No.

We separate probability edge (model minus implied, in points of probability) from estimated EV (economic edge at the best price shown on the page).

No pick is a guarantee; variance is especially large in scoreline markets.

FAQ

What changes first if odds move?

Implied probabilities and EV move immediately with price; model probabilities in this snapshot do not update until the pipeline is re-run. Refresh after material line moves.

Is the most likely correct score a good bet?

Usually no as a standalone bet: the “most likely” scoreline is still a low absolute probability tail event (often single digits, sometimes low teens). Use it as context; keep any correct-score stake in the “fun / small” bucket.

What is the best-supported line in this snapshot?

Match the hero card above: if it says “Betting Primary Pick”, that leg cleared primary rules; if it says “Best +EV (tracked markets)”, it is the strongest +EV line that did not meet stricter Primary thresholds. The bullets below repeat the same model %, implied %, edge (pts), and EV % as that card.

How should I read EV versus a probability gap?

Probability edge = model probability minus implied probability (reported here in percentage points). EV ≈ model probability × best tracked decimal odds − 1, shown as return per unit stake. They are related but not interchangeable labels.

Risk Factors

Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Methodology

Inputs: Same structured facts bundle as the public prediction page (xG / Poisson snapshot, market EV where available, decision engine v2).
Compliance: Educational framing only; not personalised advice.

Last Updated

May 25, 2026 (UTC)

How to use this

Focus on the Primary line when you want one actionable idea.
Do not parlay many thin-edge picks together; edges do not add reliably.
Treat longshots as optional, high-stake-sizing plays only.

Explore More Predictions Content

Get Premium Predictions for Jablonec II & Neratovice-Byškovice!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now

Back to Predictions

3. liga - CFL B — Standings

#	TEAM	MP	W	D	L	PTS
1	Kladno	30	21	5	4	68
2	Jiskra Domažlice	29	19	3	7	60
3	Viktoria Plzeň II	29	17	7	5	58
4	Písek	29	13	7	9	46
5	Aritma Praha	31	11	11	9	44
6	Králův Dvůr	30	13	4	13	43
7	Loko Vltavín	30	13	4	13	43
8	Admira Praha	29	12	6	11	42
9	Slavia III	29	12	5	12	41
10	České Budějovice II	29	10	10	9	40
11	Příbram II	30	12	2	16	38
12	Dukla Praha II	29	11	4	14	37
13	Bohemians 1905 II	29	9	8	12	35
14	Motorlet Praha	29	8	8	13	32
15	Sokol Hostouň	29	7	10	12	31
16	Petřín Plzeň	29	7	4	18	25
17	Táborsko II	30	4	4	22	16

#	TEAM	MP	GS	GC	+/-	PTS
1	Kladno	30	81	25	+56	68
2	Viktoria Plzeň II	29	70	46	+24	58
3	Jiskra Domažlice	29	69	39	+30	60
4	České Budějovice II	29	54	52	+2	40
5	Bohemians 1905 II	29	53	52	+1	35
6	Králův Dvůr	30	53	54	-1	43
7	Slavia III	29	50	45	+5	41
8	Dukla Praha II	29	45	49	-4	37
9	Písek	29	43	34	+9	46
10	Aritma Praha	31	43	43	0	44
11	Příbram II	30	43	54	-11	38
12	Admira Praha	29	39	43	-4	42
13	Petřín Plzeň	29	34	67	-33	25
14	Loko Vltavín	30	33	39	-6	43
15	Motorlet Praha	29	31	42	-11	32
16	Sokol Hostouň	29	28	41	-13	31
17	Táborsko II	30	25	69	-44	16