Baník Souš vs Ústí nad Orlicí Prediction, Odds & AI Betting Tips

Baník Souš

May 20, 2026 - 15:00

1.45

1.25

42% 26% 33%

Ústí nad Orlicí

1X2 ❌ No bet — no value vs. current odds

Match: 41.8% Baník Souš; implied 70.3%; EV -21.9%

No standard primary for this match: the best +EV line in the 25–40% model band is not shown as a main pick (settings). Use the alternative or secondary lines below.

No Primary pick for default sizing on this strip (1X2 can still read “no bet”), but at least one other market clears the +EV threshold — check the Over/Under and BTTS cards below.

Why The model prices Ústí nad Orlicí (1X2) about 20.2 percentage points above closing implied — the main structural read vs. the line.

Market intelligence

Supporting read on how the prioritized closing feed moved versus the model — use after the Primary pick above.

Market briefing

Market remained largely stable before kickoff. No meaningful late implied-price shift was detected between PRE30 and PRE1 on the prioritized bookmaker snapshot.

Despite limited late movement, the model still prices Draw (1X2), Ústí nad Orlicí (1X2), Under 2.5 goals meaningfully above what those closing snapshots implied — that gap is a static “model vs. price” read, not a late steam or chase story.

The model still exceeds closing implied on Ústí nad Orlicí (1X2) by about 20.2 percentage points — the clearest mispricing signal summarized on this page.

Model vs. closing implied

Market	Model %	Closing impl. %	Gap (pp)
Baník Souš (1X2)	41.8	70.3	-28.6
Draw (1X2)	25.7	17.3	+8.4
Ústí nad Orlicí (1X2)	32.6	12.4	+20.2
Over 2.5 goals	58.8	62.7	-3.9
Under 2.5 goals	41.2	37.3	+3.9

What this means

In plain terms: the model lands near 32.6% on Ústí nad Orlicí (1X2), while the closing snapshot implied about 12.4%. The difference — about 20.2 percentage points — is the largest model-vs.-market gap highlighted on this page.

Quick definitions: “closing implied” is the probability for that outcome implied by the final captured odds (after a simple de-vig). “Gap (pp)” is the model percentage minus that implied value, in percentage points (pp).

Closing-window line move

Single prioritized bookmaker per snapshot (not all books). Capture path: PRE30 → PRE1 · Book: Pinnacle

Column tags in parentheses: Closing uses the first available snapshot in PRE1→PRE5→PRE10→PRE30; Early uses the first available in PRE30→PRE10→PRE5 that is not the same capture as Closing.

Detailed capture odds are folded below — movement was negligible on de-vig implied prices.

View full line-by-line capture table

Market	Early (PRE30)	Closing (PRE1)
Baník Souš (1X2)	1.29	1.29
Draw (1X2)	5.24	5.24
Ústí nad Orlicí (1X2)	7.33	7.33
Over 2.5 goals	1.47	1.47
Under 2.5 goals	2.47	2.47

⭐ Both Teams To Score Best value (+EV)

Yes 64.3% · No 35.7%

EV Yes 15.74% · EV No -30.38%

Value lean: BTTS Yes

Over / Under 2.5 Best value (+EV)

Over 2.5 58.8% · Under 2.5 41.2%

EV Over -12.98% · EV Under 5.06%

Value lean: Under 2.5

1X2 Lean

Baník Souš · Model 41.8%

implied 70.3%

EV: -21.9%

Best line EV (1X2) 11.3%

Correct Score Insights Longshot / fun

Most Likely

1-1

Probability 10.5%

Correct score is high-variance — small stakes for fun only.

Betting decision (model vs. market EV)

Value opportunity — At least one market shows estimated +EV at current best decimal odds (threshold: 2.0%).

Decision strength: 4.5 / 10

Max 1X2 prob under 50% (no dominant 1X2) (−1.0)
Two or more valid +EV lines at threshold (+0.5)

O/U 2.5: EV Over -12.98% · EV Under 5.06% (6 book pairs)
BTTS: EV Yes 15.74% · EV No -30.38%

Should you bet on this match? Only where +EV is shown; always compare with your own limits.

OddsGPT Decision Engine v2.1.0(EV + Market Structure + Risk Adjustment) Check Odds at 1xBet

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Quick read on how the model reads this matchup.

League: 3. liga - CFL B
Fixture: Baník Souš vs Ústí nad Orlicí
Kickoff: 2026-05-20 15:00:00
1X2 (model): Home 41.8% · Draw 25.7% · Away 32.6%
xG (showing): Baník Souš 1.45 — Ústí nad Orlicí 1.25 (total xG ≈ 2.7)
Value headline: At least one tracked line reaches the headline EV threshold — align with the hero / Primary card if shown.
Structural leans (not bets): Structural lean (model): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5 (Under 2.5 41.2% · Over 2.5 58.8%); BTTS Yes (Yes 64.3% · No 35.7%) Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5; BTTS Yes
BTTS (model): Yes 64.3% · No 35.7%
Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (10.5%)

Saying “no value” on a snapshot is a feature, not a bug: it protects readers from forcing a play when the edge is not there.

Prefer skipping to over-staking when the engine is honest about missing edge.

Best Bet + Reason

No clear +EV headline on this snapshot.

The cards may still show value leans (e.g. a preferred Under or a BTTS side) where prices are inefficient or incomplete — that is not the same as a positive-EV ticket at the configured threshold.

Correct-score markets remain high-variance even when one scoreline leads the table.

FAQ

What do the grey “lean” labels mean then?

They summarise where the model tilts (e.g. Under 2.5 or BTTS No) without claiming a positive economic edge. Use them as context; size to zero unless you deliberately accept discretionary risk.

Is the most likely correct score still relevant?

As context only: it is still a low absolute probability tail outcome (often in the single digits, sometimes low teens). It does not override the “no headline +EV” stance — treat score bets as fun-sized if you play them at all.

Why is there no “best bet” on this page?

The headline engine uses a minimum +EV threshold (e.g. 2%) for a default pick. A line can still show tiny +EV that fails that bar — we still call it no default bet so readers do not over-size thin edges.

Should I still read the 1X2 card?

Yes — it shows whether any winner price clears value. Here it often explains why there is no headline: probabilities can be clustered while prices already embed that uncertainty.

Risk Factors

Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Methodology

Inputs: Same structured facts bundle as the public prediction page (xG / Poisson snapshot, market EV where available, decision engine v2).
Compliance: Educational framing only; not personalised advice.

Last Updated

May 21, 2026 (UTC)

How to use this

When there is no Primary line, compare the +EV rows in the market cards below (not only 1X2).
Do not parlay many thin-edge picks together; edges do not add reliably.
Treat longshots as optional, high-stake-sizing plays only.

Explore More Predictions Content

Get Premium Predictions for Baník Souš & Ústí nad Orlicí!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now

Back to Predictions

3. liga - CFL B — Standings

#	TEAM	MP	W	D	L	PTS
1	Kladno	28	19	5	4	62
2	Jiskra Domažlice	28	18	3	7	57
3	Viktoria Plzeň II	28	16	7	5	55
4	Písek	28	12	7	9	43
5	Králův Dvůr	29	13	4	12	43
6	Admira Praha	27	12	6	9	42
7	Slavia III	28	12	5	11	41
8	Aritma Praha	29	10	11	8	41
9	Loko Vltavín	28	12	4	12	40
10	České Budějovice II	28	9	10	9	37
11	Příbram II	27	11	2	14	35
12	Bohemians 1905 II	28	9	7	12	34
13	Dukla Praha II	27	10	4	13	34
14	Motorlet Praha	27	8	7	12	31
15	Sokol Hostouň	29	7	10	12	31
16	Petřín Plzeň	28	6	4	18	22
17	Táborsko II	29	4	4	21	16

#	TEAM	MP	GS	GC	+/-	PTS
1	Kladno	28	78	25	+53	62
2	Jiskra Domažlice	28	66	37	+29	57
3	Viktoria Plzeň II	28	65	43	+22	55
4	Králův Dvůr	29	52	51	+1	43
5	Bohemians 1905 II	28	51	50	+1	34
6	České Budějovice II	28	48	49	-1	37
7	Slavia III	28	47	40	+7	41
8	Dukla Praha II	27	42	48	-6	34
9	Písek	28	40	33	+7	43
10	Příbram II	27	40	50	-10	35
11	Aritma Praha	29	38	38	0	41
12	Admira Praha	27	36	34	+2	42
13	Petřín Plzeň	28	33	67	-34	22
14	Loko Vltavín	28	32	37	-5	40
15	Motorlet Praha	27	29	39	-10	31
16	Sokol Hostouň	29	28	41	-13	31
17	Táborsko II	29	25	68	-43	16