Statistics / Football / England. Non League Premier - Southern South / Bath City vs Chippenham Town

Bath City vs Chippenham Town Statistics & Analysis

Bath City Bath City
Sep 12, 2026 - 14:00
2 1.32
0 1.28
xG Accuracy: 58%
Chippenham Town Chippenham Town
Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Under 2.5 (2 goals) ✔ Correct
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS No No ✔ Correct
  • 1X2 Bath City Bath City ✔ Correct
  • Correct Score Insights 1-1, 1-0, 0-1, 2-1, 1-2 2-0 ✖ Incorrect

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Sep 07, 2026 · 01:57 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-7448767

Closing Odds 1.84
AI Fair Odds —
CLV +0.0%
Final Result Bath City win · Bath City 2–0 Chippenham Town
Prediction ✔ Correct
Decision Grade A

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Market intelligence

Supporting read on how the prioritized closing feed moved versus the model — use after the Primary pick above.

Market briefing

Market remained largely stable before kickoff. No meaningful late implied-price shift was detected between PRE30 and PRE5 on the prioritized bookmaker snapshot.

Despite limited late movement, the model still prices Draw (1X2), Chippenham Town (1X2), Under 2.5 goals meaningfully above what those closing snapshots implied — that gap is a static “model vs. price” read, not a late steam or chase story.

The model still exceeds closing implied on Chippenham Town (1X2) by about 7.4 percentage points — the clearest mispricing signal summarized on this page.

Model vs. closing implied

Market Model % Closing impl. % Gap (pp)
Bath City (1X2) 36.1 49.1 -13.0
Draw (1X2) 29.7 24.1 +5.6
Chippenham Town (1X2) 34.2 26.8 +7.4
Over 2.5 goals 48.2 54.1 -5.9
Under 2.5 goals 51.8 45.9 +5.9
What this means

In plain terms: the model lands near 34.2% on Chippenham Town (1X2), while the closing snapshot implied about 26.8%. The difference — about 7.4 percentage points — is the largest model-vs.-market gap highlighted on this page.

Quick definitions: “closing implied” is the probability for that outcome implied by the final captured odds (after a simple de-vig). “Gap (pp)” is the model percentage minus that implied value, in percentage points (pp).

Closing-window line move

Single prioritized bookmaker per snapshot (not all books). Capture path: PRE30 → PRE5 · Book: Pinnacle

Column tags in parentheses: Closing uses the first available snapshot in PRE1→PRE5→PRE10→PRE30; Early uses the first available in PRE30→PRE10→PRE5 that is not the same capture as Closing.

Detailed capture odds are folded below — movement was negligible on de-vig implied prices.

View full line-by-line capture table
Market Early (PRE30) Closing (PRE5) Implied Δ (pp)
Bath City (1X2) 1.84 1.84 0.0
Draw (1X2) 3.75 3.75 0.0
Chippenham Town (1X2) 3.37 3.37 0.0
Over 2.5 goals 1.72 1.72 0.0
Under 2.5 goals 2.03 2.03 0.0

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Below is a compact, numbers-first snapshot aligned with the same engine as the cards above.

  • League: Non League Premier - Southern South
  • Fixture: Bath City vs Chippenham Town
  • Kickoff: 2026-09-12 14:00:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 36.1% · Draw 29.7% · Away 34.2%
  • xG (showing): Bath City 1.32 — Chippenham Town 1.28 (total xG ≈ 2.6)
  • Best +EV line (same label as hero card when Primary thresholds are not met): Under 2.5 goals
  • Model: 51.8% · Implied: 46.2% · Probability edge: +5.6 pts · Est. EV: +6.2%
  • BTTS (model): Yes 54.5% · No 45.5%
  • Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (12.5%)

Where EV is shown, it is estimated return per unit stake at the best tracked decimal price — not the same thing as a raw probability gap.

Correct score remains high-variance even when a line is most likely on paper.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: No Primary Bet

Outcome: Validated — Pre-match lean validated against the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

September 28, 2026 (UTC)

Get Premium Predictions for Bath City & Chippenham Town!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Statistics
Non League Premier - Southern South Non League Premier - Southern South — Standings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 Plymouth Parkway 8 6 1 1 19
2 Uxbridge 8 5 2 1 17
3 Hanworth Villa 8 5 1 2 16
4 Chertsey Town 8 4 2 2 14
5 Bath City 8 4 2 2 14
6 Frome Town 8 4 1 3 13
7 Chichester City 8 4 1 3 13
8 Berkhamsted 9 4 1 4 13
9 Taunton Town 8 4 0 4 12
10 Poole Town 7 4 0 3 12
11 Gosport Borough 8 3 2 3 11
12 Yate Town 7 3 2 2 11
13 Evesham United 7 3 1 3 10
14 Bracknell Town 8 3 1 4 10
15 Wimborne Town 7 2 3 2 9
16 Basingstoke Town 8 2 3 3 9
17 Sholing 7 2 1 4 7
18 Chippenham Town 7 2 1 4 7
19 Hanwell Town 7 1 3 3 6
20 Gloucester City 8 1 3 4 6
21 Malvern Town 8 1 2 5 5
22 Havant & Wville 8 1 1 6 4
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 Plymouth Parkway 8 22 7 +15 19
2 Taunton Town 8 21 20 +1 12
3 Chertsey Town 8 19 12 +7 14
4 Uxbridge 8 17 7 +10 17
5 Hanworth Villa 8 15 7 +8 16
6 Chichester City 8 13 14 -1 13
7 Basingstoke Town 8 13 14 -1 9
8 Frome Town 8 12 8 +4 13
9 Malvern Town 8 12 23 -11 5
10 Bath City 8 11 7 +4 14
11 Gosport Borough 8 11 9 +2 11
12 Berkhamsted 9 11 12 -1 13
13 Evesham United 7 11 14 -3 10
14 Gloucester City 8 11 16 -5 6
15 Yate Town 7 10 11 -1 11
16 Bracknell Town 8 10 17 -7 10
17 Poole Town 7 8 9 -1 12
18 Havant & Wville 8 8 15 -7 4
19 Sholing 7 7 12 -5 7
20 Chippenham Town 7 7 14 -7 7
21 Wimborne Town 7 6 4 +2 9
22 Hanwell Town 7 6 9 -3 6
Non League Premier - Southern South England. Non League Premier - Southern South Predictions