Statistics / Football / Estonia. Esiliiga B / Tulevik vs Levadia U19

Tulevik vs Levadia U19 Statistics & Analysis

Jun 19, 2026 - 16:30
2 1.31
3 1.29
xG Accuracy: 52%
Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Over 2.5 (5 goals) ✖ Incorrect
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS No Yes ✖ Incorrect
  • 1X2 Tulevik Levadia U19 ✖ Incorrect
  • Correct Score Insights 1-1, 1-0, 0-1, 2-1, 1-2 2-3 ✖ Incorrect

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Aug 07, 2026 · 13:08 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-3176880

Closing Odds 1.45
AI Fair Odds
CLV +0.0%
Final Result Levadia U19 win · Tulevik 2–3 Levadia U19
Prediction ✖ Missed
Decision Grade F

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Market intelligence

Supporting read on how the prioritized closing feed moved versus the model — use after the Primary pick above.

Market briefing

Market remained largely stable before kickoff. No meaningful late implied-price shift was detected between PRE30 and PRE1 on the prioritized bookmaker snapshot.

Despite limited late movement, the model still prices Draw (1X2), Levadia U19 (1X2) meaningfully above what those closing snapshots implied — that gap is a static “model vs. price” read, not a late steam or chase story.

The model still exceeds closing implied on Draw (1X2) by about 9.4 percentage points — the clearest mispricing signal summarized on this page.

Model vs. closing implied

Market Model % Closing impl. % Gap (pp)
Tulevik (1X2) 42.8 60.8 -18.0
Draw (1X2) 26.1 16.6 +9.4
Levadia U19 (1X2) 31.2 22.6 +8.6
What this means

In plain terms: the model lands near 26.1% on Draw (1X2), while the closing snapshot implied about 16.6%. The difference — about 9.4 percentage points — is the largest model-vs.-market gap highlighted on this page.

Quick definitions: “closing implied” is the probability for that outcome implied by the final captured odds (after a simple de-vig). “Gap (pp)” is the model percentage minus that implied value, in percentage points (pp).

Closing-window line move

Single prioritized bookmaker per snapshot (not all books). Capture path: PRE30 → PRE1 · Book: Pinnacle

Column tags in parentheses: Closing uses the first available snapshot in PRE1→PRE5→PRE10→PRE30; Early uses the first available in PRE30→PRE10→PRE5 that is not the same capture as Closing.

Detailed capture odds are folded below — movement was negligible on de-vig implied prices.

View full line-by-line capture table
Market Early (PRE30) Closing (PRE1) Implied Δ (pp)
Tulevik (1X2) 1.45 1.45 0.0
Draw (1X2) 5.3 5.3 0.0
Levadia U19 (1X2) 3.9 3.9 0.0

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Below is a compact, numbers-first snapshot aligned with the same engine as the cards above.

  • League: Esiliiga B
  • Fixture: Tulevik vs Levadia U19
  • Kickoff: 2026-06-19 16:30:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 42.8% · Draw 26.1% · Away 31.2%
  • xG (showing): Tulevik 1.31 — Levadia U19 1.29 (total xG ≈ 2.6)
  • Value headline: At least one tracked line reaches the headline EV threshold — align with the hero / Primary card if shown.
  • Structural leans (not bets): Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5; BTTS No
  • BTTS (model): Yes N/A · No N/A
  • Correct score (top bin): N/A

The decision block shows no default Primary: Primary needs consensus EV ≥ +5.0% plus strength/reliability/calibration gates. A separate Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only). Lean labels are directional only — not bankroll-sized recommendations.

If lines move materially, re-run generation or refresh — implied probabilities and any future EV readouts will change first.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: No Primary Bet

Outcome: Missed — Pre-match 1X2 lean did not match the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

September 21, 2026 (UTC)

Get Premium Predictions for Tulevik & Levadia U19!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Statistics
Esiliiga B Esiliiga BStandings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 Narva U21 29 19 3 7 60
2 Phoenix 30 17 3 10 54
3 Levadia U19 29 17 2 10 53
4 Johvi Phoenix 19 11 1 7 34
4 Tartu Kalev 29 15 2 12 47
5 Luunja 29 14 5 10 47
6 Parnu JK Vaprus U21 30 14 4 12 46
7 Tulevik 29 13 5 11 44
8 JK Tabasalu 30 10 3 17 33
9 Tallinna Kalev II 30 7 5 18 26
10 Legion 29 3 4 22 13
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 Parnu JK Vaprus U21 30 95 62 +33 46
2 Levadia U19 29 74 52 +22 53
3 Tulevik 29 74 60 +14 44
4 Luunja 29 74 62 +12 47
5 Tartu Kalev 29 71 52 +19 47
6 Phoenix 30 71 68 +3 54
7 Narva U21 29 69 35 +34 60
8 Tallinna Kalev II 30 60 77 -17 26
9 Johvi Phoenix 19 49 47 +2 34
10 JK Tabasalu 30 44 81 -37 33
11 Legion 29 28 111 -83 13