Telavi vs Samtredia Statistics & Analysis

Sep 07, 2026 - 16:00
0 1.31
3 1.29
xG Accuracy: 44%
Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Over 2.5 Over 2.5 (3 goals) ✔ Correct
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes No ✖ Incorrect
  • 1X2 Telavi Samtredia ✖ Incorrect
  • Correct Score Insights 1-1, 1-0, 0-1, 2-1, 1-2 0-3 ✖ Incorrect

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Sep 01, 2026 · 02:22 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-6472912

Closing Odds 2.01
AI Fair Odds
CLV +0.0%
Final Result Samtredia win · Telavi 0–3 Samtredia
Prediction ✖ Missed
Decision Grade F

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Market intelligence

Supporting read on how the prioritized closing feed moved versus the model — use after the Primary pick above.

Market briefing

Market remained largely stable before kickoff. No meaningful late implied-price shift was detected between PRE30 and PRE1 on the prioritized bookmaker snapshot.

Despite limited late movement, the model still prices Samtredia (1X2), Over 2.5 goals meaningfully above what those closing snapshots implied — that gap is a static “model vs. price” read, not a late steam or chase story.

The model still exceeds closing implied on Samtredia (1X2) by about 7.8 percentage points — the clearest mispricing signal summarized on this page.

Model vs. closing implied

Market Model % Closing impl. % Gap (pp)
Telavi (1X2) 35.6 44.2 -8.6
Draw (1X2) 29.7 28.9 +0.8
Samtredia (1X2) 34.7 26.9 +7.8
Over 2.5 goals 48.2 44.8 +3.4
Under 2.5 goals 51.8 55.2 -3.4
What this means

In plain terms: the model lands near 34.7% on Samtredia (1X2), while the closing snapshot implied about 26.9%. The difference — about 7.8 percentage points — is the largest model-vs.-market gap highlighted on this page.

Quick definitions: “closing implied” is the probability for that outcome implied by the final captured odds (after a simple de-vig). “Gap (pp)” is the model percentage minus that implied value, in percentage points (pp).

Closing-window line move

Single prioritized bookmaker per snapshot (not all books). Capture path: PRE30 → PRE1 · Book: Pinnacle

Column tags in parentheses: Closing uses the first available snapshot in PRE1→PRE5→PRE10→PRE30; Early uses the first available in PRE30→PRE10→PRE5 that is not the same capture as Closing.

Detailed capture odds are folded below — movement was negligible on de-vig implied prices.

View full line-by-line capture table
Market Early (PRE30) Closing (PRE1) Implied Δ (pp)
Telavi (1X2) 2.01 2.01 0.0
Draw (1X2) 3.08 3.08 0.0
Samtredia (1X2) 3.3 3.3 0.0
Over 2.5 goals 2.06 2.06 0.0
Under 2.5 goals 1.67 1.67 0.0

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Quick read on how the model reads this matchup.

  • League: Erovnuli Liga 2
  • Fixture: Telavi vs Samtredia
  • Kickoff: 2026-09-07 16:00:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 35.6% · Draw 29.7% · Away 34.7%
  • xG (showing): Telavi 1.31 — Samtredia 1.29 (total xG ≈ 2.6)
  • Value headline: None (actionable) — best tracked EV is about +1.9%, still below the +2.0% minimum for a headline / default stake (no default bet).
  • Structural leans (not bets): Structural lean (model): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5 (Under 2.5 51.8% · Over 2.5 48.2%); BTTS Yes (Yes 54.5% · No 45.5%) Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Over 2.5; BTTS Yes
  • BTTS (model): Yes 54.5% · No 45.5%
  • Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (12.6%)

Saying “no value” on a snapshot is a feature, not a bug: it protects readers from forcing a play when the edge is not there.

Most likely correct score stays a low-probability tail: use it for context, not as a must-bet story.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: No Primary Bet

Outcome: Missed — Pre-match 1X2 lean did not match the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

September 16, 2026 (UTC)

Get Premium Predictions for Telavi & Samtredia!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Statistics
Erovnuli Liga 2 Erovnuli Liga 2Standings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 Gareji 25 13 8 4 47
2 Telavi 25 11 8 6 41
3 Shturmi 25 10 9 6 39
4 Merani Martvili 25 9 7 9 34
5 Samtredia 25 10 4 11 34
6 Sioni 25 8 9 8 33
7 Aragvi Dusheti 25 9 5 11 32
8 Odishi 1919 25 7 7 11 28
9 Gori 25 6 8 11 26
10 Kolkheti Poti 25 5 9 11 24
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 Samtredia 25 43 39 +4 34
2 Gareji 25 33 26 +7 47
3 Sioni 25 33 30 +3 33
4 Kolkheti Poti 25 32 32 0 24
5 Merani Martvili 25 28 28 0 34
6 Aragvi Dusheti 25 28 35 -7 32
7 Shturmi 25 27 22 +5 39
8 Telavi 25 27 23 +4 41
9 Odishi 1919 25 27 36 -9 28
10 Gori 25 25 32 -7 26