Statistics / Football / Saudi-Arabia. Pro League / Al-Ahli Jeddah vs Al Kholood

Al-Ahli Jeddah vs Al Kholood Statistics & Analysis

May 16, 2026 - 18:00
3 2.25
0 0.62
xG Accuracy: 69%
Premium betting site 1xbet: New users can use the promo code 1x_3342271 to receive $100 cash.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Each row compares the model’s highlighted side (or lean) to what happened at full time.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Over 2.5 (3 goals) ✖ Incorrect
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS No No ✔ Correct
  • 1X2 Al-Ahli Jeddah Al-Ahli Jeddah ✔ Correct
  • Correct Score Insights 2-0 3-0 ✖ Incorrect

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Pre-match snapshot for this fixture.

  • League: Pro League
  • Fixture: Al-Ahli Jeddah vs Al Kholood
  • Kickoff: 2026-05-16 18:00:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 73.5% · Draw 18.9% · Away 7.6%
  • xG (showing): Al-Ahli Jeddah 2.25 — Al Kholood 0.62 (total xG ≈ 2.87)
  • Primary / headline line (Betting Primary Pick when shown): Under 2.5 goals
  • Model: 45.3% · Implied: 37.3% · Probability edge: +8.0 pts · Est. EV: +26.8%
  • BTTS (model): Yes 42.4% · No 57.6%
  • Correct score (top bin): 2-0 (14.4%)

Where EV is shown, it is estimated return per unit stake at the best tracked decimal price — not the same thing as a raw probability gap.

Correct score remains high-variance even when a line is most likely on paper.

Best Bet + Reason

Primary angle highlighted on the page: Under 2.5 goals.

We separate probability edge (model minus implied, in points of probability) from estimated EV (economic edge at the best price shown on the page).

When several markets sit near +EV, keep stakes small — correlation means edges do not add cleanly.

FAQ

Is the most likely correct score a good bet?

Usually no as a standalone bet: the “most likely” scoreline is still a low absolute probability tail event (often single digits, sometimes low teens). Use it as context; keep any correct-score stake in the “fun / small” bucket.

Who has the edge in the match-winner market?

Use the 1X2 model percentages in the summary and the 1X2 market card: the side with the highest model % is the model lean, but check EV — a lean can still be -EV after prices.

Safer market than correct score?

Markets with more liquidity and smoother prices (often 1X2 or O/U 2.5 from many books) are usually easier to reason about than long-tail correct-score prices; still read EV on each leg.

How should I read EV versus a probability gap?

Probability edge = model probability minus implied probability (reported here in percentage points). EV ≈ model probability × best tracked decimal odds − 1, shown as return per unit stake. They are related but not interchangeable labels.

Risk Factors

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Methodology

  • Inputs: Same structured facts bundle as the public prediction page (xG / Poisson snapshot, market EV where available, decision engine v2).
  • Compliance: Educational framing only; not personalised advice.

Last Updated

May 18, 2026 (UTC)

How to use this
  • Focus on the Primary line when you want one actionable idea.
  • Do not parlay many thin-edge picks together; edges do not add reliably.
  • Treat longshots as optional, high-stake-sizing plays only.

Get Premium Predictions for Al-Ahli Jeddah & Al Kholood!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Statistics
Pro League Pro LeagueStandings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 Al-Nassr 33 27 2 4 83
2 Al-Hilal Saudi FC 33 24 9 0 81
3 Al-Ahli Jeddah 33 24 6 3 78
4 Al-Qadisiyah FC 33 22 8 3 74
5 Al-Ittihad FC 33 16 7 10 55
6 Al Taawon 33 15 8 10 53
7 Al-Ettifaq 33 14 7 12 49
8 NEOM 33 12 8 13 44
9 Al-Hazm 33 10 9 14 39
10 Al-Fayha 33 10 8 15 38
11 Al Khaleej Saihat 33 10 7 16 37
12 Al-Fateh 33 9 9 15 36
13 Al Shabab 33 8 11 14 35
14 Al Kholood 33 9 5 19 32
15 Damac 33 6 11 16 29
16 Al Riyadh 33 6 9 18 27
17 Al Okhdood 33 5 5 23 20
18 Al Najma 33 2 7 24 13
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 Al-Nassr 33 87 27 +60 83
2 Al-Hilal Saudi FC 33 84 27 +57 81
3 Al-Qadisiyah FC 33 78 33 +45 74
4 Al-Ahli Jeddah 33 67 24 +43 78
5 Al Taawon 33 59 44 +15 53
6 Al-Ittihad FC 33 54 43 +11 55
7 Al Khaleej Saihat 33 53 58 -5 37
8 Al-Ettifaq 33 50 54 -4 49
9 Al Shabab 33 44 56 -12 35
10 NEOM 33 42 47 -5 44
11 Al-Fayha 33 41 53 -12 38
12 Al-Fateh 33 41 55 -14 36
13 Al Kholood 33 39 61 -22 32
14 Al-Hazm 33 36 57 -21 39
15 Al Riyadh 33 34 63 -29 27
16 Damac 33 31 51 -20 29
17 Al Najma 33 31 76 -45 13
18 Al Okhdood 33 27 69 -42 20
# TEAM MP xG xGC +/- PTS
1 Al-Nassr 33 65.9 24.9 +41.0 83
2 Al-Hilal Saudi FC 33 66.0 25.1 +40.9 81
3 Al-Ahli Jeddah 33 55.6 24.3 +31.3 78
4 Al-Qadisiyah FC 33 58.8 33.4 +25.4 74
5 Al-Ittihad FC 33 47.6 37.0 +10.6 55
6 NEOM 33 44.2 38.9 +5.3 44
7 Al Shabab 33 43.1 43.3 -0.2 35
8 Al Taawon 33 41.1 42.2 -1.1 53
9 Al Khaleej Saihat 33 40.9 42.6 -1.7 37
10 Al-Fateh 33 40.9 43.5 -2.6 36
11 Al-Fayha 33 33.1 42.3 -9.2 38
12 Al Riyadh 33 40.3 50.0 -9.7 27
13 Damac 33 24.2 37.4 -13.2 29
14 Al-Hazm 33 31.7 46.5 -14.8 39
15 Al-Ettifaq 33 38.4 54.9 -16.5 49
16 Al Kholood 33 31.6 48.5 -16.9 32
17 Al Najma 33 26.8 60.1 -33.3 13
18 Al Okhdood 33 26.3 61.8 -35.5 20