Lugo vs Arenteiro Statistics & Analysis

May 23, 2026 - 16:30
0 1.45
0 1.25
xG Accuracy: 48%
Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Under 2.5 (0 goals) ✔ Correct
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS No No ✔ Correct
  • 1X2 Lugo Draw ✖ Incorrect
  • Correct Score Insights 1-0, 1-1, 0-0, 0-1, 2-0 0-0 ✔ Correct

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Jul 26, 2026 · 01:00 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-1782106

Closing Odds 1.4
AI Fair Odds —
CLV +0.0%
Final Result Draw · Lugo 0–0 Arenteiro
Prediction ✖ Missed
Decision Grade C

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Market intelligence

Supporting read on how the prioritized closing feed moved versus the model — use after the Primary pick above.

Market briefing

Market remained largely stable before kickoff. No meaningful late implied-price shift was detected between PRE30 and PRE1 on the prioritized bookmaker snapshot.

Despite limited late movement, the model still prices Draw (1X2), Arenteiro (1X2) meaningfully above what those closing snapshots implied — that gap is a static “model vs. price” read, not a late steam or chase story.

The model still exceeds closing implied on Arenteiro (1X2) by about 18.2 percentage points — the clearest mispricing signal summarized on this page.

Model vs. closing implied

Market Model % Closing impl. % Gap (pp)
Lugo (1X2) 41.8 63.3 -21.5
Draw (1X2) 25.7 22.3 +3.3
Arenteiro (1X2) 32.6 14.4 +18.2
Over 2.5 goals 50.6 50.7 -0.1
Under 2.5 goals 49.4 49.3 +0.1
What this means

In plain terms: the model lands near 32.6% on Arenteiro (1X2), while the closing snapshot implied about 14.4%. The difference — about 18.2 percentage points — is the largest model-vs.-market gap highlighted on this page.

Quick definitions: “closing implied” is the probability for that outcome implied by the final captured odds (after a simple de-vig). “Gap (pp)” is the model percentage minus that implied value, in percentage points (pp).

Closing-window line move

Single prioritized bookmaker per snapshot (not all books). Capture path: PRE30 → PRE1 · Book: Pinnacle

Column tags in parentheses: Closing uses the first available snapshot in PRE1→PRE5→PRE10→PRE30; Early uses the first available in PRE30→PRE10→PRE5 that is not the same capture as Closing.

Detailed capture odds are folded below — movement was negligible on de-vig implied prices.

View full line-by-line capture table
Market Early (PRE30) Closing (PRE1) Implied Δ (pp)
Lugo (1X2) 1.4 1.4 0.0
Draw (1X2) 3.97 3.97 0.0
Arenteiro (1X2) 6.17 6.17 0.0
Over 2.5 goals 1.83 1.83 0.0
Under 2.5 goals 1.88 1.88 0.0

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Pre-match snapshot for this fixture.

  • League: Primera División RFEF - Group 1
  • Fixture: Lugo vs Arenteiro
  • Kickoff: 2026-05-24 16:00:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 41.8% · Draw 25.7% · Away 32.6%
  • xG (showing): Lugo 1.45 — Arenteiro 1.25 (total xG ≈ 2.7)
  • Value headline: At least one tracked line reaches the headline EV threshold — align with the hero / Primary card if shown.
  • Structural leans (not bets): Structural lean (model): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5 (Under 2.5 63.6% · Over 2.5 36.4%); BTTS No (Yes 34.7% · No 65.3%) Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Over 2.5; BTTS Yes
  • BTTS (model): Yes 34.7% · No 65.3%
  • Correct score (top bin): 1-0 (14.0%)

When book depth is thin or odds are missing, EV may be unavailable even though the model still prefers one side on totals or BTTS — wait for cleaner prices or skip.

If lines move materially, re-run generation or refresh — implied probabilities and any future EV readouts will change first.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: Wait - No Primary Bet

Outcome: Missed — Pre-match 1X2 lean did not match the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

September 27, 2026 (UTC)

Get Premium Predictions for Lugo & Arenteiro!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Statistics
Primera División RFEF - Group 1 Primera División RFEF - Group 1 — Standings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 Tenerife 38 22 10 6 76
2 Celta de Vigo II 38 18 11 9 65
3 Zamora 38 17 10 11 61
4 Ponferradina 38 17 9 12 60
5 Real Madrid U21 36 16 8 12 56
5 Real Madrid II 38 16 10 12 58
6 Pontevedra 38 14 16 8 58
7 Barakaldo 38 15 13 10 58
8 Unionistas de Salamanca 38 15 11 12 56
9 Lugo 38 13 14 11 53
10 Mérida AD 38 14 10 14 52
11 Arenas Getxo 38 15 7 16 52
12 Racing Ferrol 38 13 10 15 49
13 Athletic Club II 38 13 10 15 49
14 Real Avilés 38 11 11 16 44
15 Cacereño 38 10 14 14 44
16 CF Talavera 38 11 10 17 43
17 Ourense CF 38 10 13 15 43
18 Guadalajara 38 10 11 17 41
19 Osasuna II 38 10 10 18 40
20 Arenteiro 38 6 10 22 28
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 Tenerife 38 62 24 +38 76
2 Celta de Vigo II 38 61 48 +13 65
3 Real Madrid II 38 61 52 +9 58
4 Real Madrid U21 36 56 47 +9 56
5 Real Avilés 38 55 67 -12 44
6 Zamora 38 53 42 +11 61
7 Unionistas de Salamanca 38 53 49 +4 56
8 Barakaldo 38 51 38 +13 58
9 Pontevedra 38 49 31 +18 58
10 Mérida AD 38 47 53 -6 52
11 Arenas Getxo 38 46 55 -9 52
12 Ourense CF 38 44 47 -3 43
13 Guadalajara 38 44 58 -14 41
14 Ponferradina 38 43 33 +10 60
15 Cacereño 38 42 49 -7 44
16 Racing Ferrol 38 41 47 -6 49
17 Athletic Club II 38 38 46 -8 49
18 CF Talavera 38 38 47 -9 43
19 Lugo 38 36 40 -4 53
20 Arenteiro 38 29 53 -24 28
21 Osasuna II 38 28 42 -14 40