Statistics / Football / France. National 2 - Group C / Cannes vs St Maur Lusitanos

Cannes vs St Maur Lusitanos Statistics & Analysis

May 16, 2026 - 16:00
2 1.45
0 1.25
xG Accuracy: 61%
Premium betting site 1xbet: New users can use the promo code 1x_3342271 to receive $100 cash.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Each row compares the model’s highlighted side (or lean) to what happened at full time.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Under 2.5 (2 goals) ✔ Correct
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes No ✖ Incorrect
  • 1X2 Cannes Cannes ✔ Correct
  • Correct Score Insights 1-1 2-0 ✖ Incorrect

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Pre-match snapshot for this fixture.

  • League: National 2 - Group C
  • Fixture: Cannes vs St Maur Lusitanos
  • Kickoff: 2026-05-16 16:00:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 41.8% · Draw 25.7% · Away 32.6%
  • xG (showing): Cannes 1.45 — St Maur Lusitanos 1.25 (total xG ≈ 2.7)
  • Value headline: None — no positive EV could be estimated on tracked lines at current best prices (missing odds or thin book depth).
  • Structural leans (not bets): Structural lean (model): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5 (Under 2.5 55.7% · Over 2.5 44.3%); BTTS Yes (Yes 73.3% · No 26.7%) Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5; BTTS Yes
  • BTTS (model): Yes 73.3% · No 26.7%
  • Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (12.9%)

When book depth is thin or odds are missing, EV may be unavailable even though the model still prefers one side on totals or BTTS — wait for cleaner prices or skip.

Prefer skipping to over-staking when the engine is honest about missing edge.

Best Bet + Reason

Skip unless odds move — the engine sees no line clearing the +EV gate.

The cards may still show value leans (e.g. a preferred Under or a BTTS side) where prices are inefficient or incomplete — that is not the same as a positive-EV ticket at the configured threshold.

Correct-score markets remain high-variance even when one scoreline leads the table.

FAQ

Is the most likely correct score still relevant?

As context only: it is still a low absolute probability tail outcome (often in the single digits, sometimes low teens). It does not override the “no headline +EV” stance — treat score bets as fun-sized if you play them at all.

Should I still read the 1X2 card?

Yes — it shows whether any winner price clears value. Here it often explains why there is no headline: probabilities can be clustered while prices already embed that uncertainty.

What do the grey “lean” labels mean then?

They summarise where the model tilts (e.g. Under 2.5 or BTTS No) without claiming a positive economic edge. Use them as context; size to zero unless you deliberately accept discretionary risk.

When would a headline +EV return?

When odds move enough that implied probabilities drop relative to the same model snapshot, or when more book prices arrive so EV can be computed reliably — then re-run the pipeline.

Risk Factors

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Methodology

  • Inputs: Same structured facts bundle as the public prediction page (xG / Poisson snapshot, market EV where available, decision engine v2).
  • Compliance: Educational framing only; not personalised advice.

Last Updated

May 18, 2026 (UTC)

How to use this
  • Focus on the Primary line when you want one actionable idea.
  • Do not parlay many thin-edge picks together; edges do not add reliably.
  • Treat longshots as optional, high-stake-sizing plays only.

Get Premium Predictions for Cannes & St Maur Lusitanos!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Statistics
National 2 - Group C National 2 - Group CStandings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 Cannes 29 16 9 4 57
2 Nimes 29 17 5 7 56
3 St Maur Lusitanos 29 15 10 4 55
4 Rumilly Vallières 29 13 8 8 47
5 Istres 29 11 10 8 43
6 Hyères 29 10 12 7 42
7 Andrézieux 29 11 9 9 42
8 Creteil 29 11 7 11 40
9 Chasselay MDA 29 10 8 11 37
10 Grasse 29 9 9 11 36
11 Limonest 29 9 7 13 34
12 Fréjus St-Raphaël 29 8 8 13 32
13 Bobigny 29 7 10 12 31
14 Saint-Priest 29 7 9 13 30
15 Toulon 29 8 9 12 30
16 Rousset-Ste Victoire 29 2 6 21 12
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 Cannes 29 51 30 +21 57
2 Rumilly Vallières 29 49 35 +14 47
3 Nimes 29 43 23 +20 56
4 Andrézieux 29 42 30 +12 42
5 Istres 29 41 30 +11 43
6 Grasse 29 41 41 0 36
7 St Maur Lusitanos 29 40 22 +18 55
8 Toulon 29 38 47 -9 30
9 Chasselay MDA 29 36 45 -9 37
10 Fréjus St-Raphaël 29 36 50 -14 32
11 Creteil 29 35 34 +1 40
12 Limonest 29 34 46 -12 34
13 Saint-Priest 29 34 46 -12 30
14 Hyères 29 32 26 +6 42
15 Bobigny 29 29 31 -2 31
16 Rousset-Ste Victoire 29 25 70 -45 12