Statistics / Football / Germany. Oberliga - Baden-Württemberg / Reutlingen vs TSV Singen

Reutlingen vs TSV Singen Statistics & Analysis

Reutlingen Reutlingen
May 23, 2026 - 13:30
0 1.45
2 1.25
xG Accuracy: 55%
TSV Singen TSV Singen
Premium betting site 1xbet: New users can use the promo code 1x_3342271 to receive $100 cash.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Each row compares the model’s highlighted side (or lean) to what happened at full time.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Over 2.5 Under 2.5 (0 goals) ✖ Incorrect
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes No ✖ Incorrect
  • 1X2 Reutlingen Draw ✖ Incorrect
  • Correct Score Insights 2-1, 1-1, 2-2, 1-2, 3-1 0-0 ✖ Incorrect

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Quick read on how the model reads this matchup.

  • League: Oberliga - Baden-Württemberg
  • Fixture: Reutlingen vs TSV Singen
  • Kickoff: 2026-05-23 13:30:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 41.8% · Draw 25.7% · Away 32.6%
  • xG (showing): Reutlingen 1.45 — TSV Singen 1.25 (total xG ≈ 2.7)
  • Value headline: None — no positive EV could be estimated on tracked lines at current best prices (missing odds or thin book depth).
  • Structural leans (not bets): Structural lean (model): O/U 2.5 Over 2.5 (Under 2.5 30.3% · Over 2.5 69.7%); BTTS Yes (Yes 58.0% · No 42.0%) Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Over 2.5; BTTS Yes
  • BTTS (model): Yes 58.0% · No 42.0%
  • Correct score (top bin): 2-1 (9.0%)

The decision block shows no default bet: no tracked line clears the headline minimum +EV threshold at the best prices we have (a leg can still show small +EV below that bar). Lean labels are directional only — not bankroll-sized recommendations.

Most likely correct score stays a low-probability tail: use it for context, not as a must-bet story.

Best Bet + Reason

No bankroll-sized bet is implied here.

The cards may still show value leans (e.g. a preferred Under or a BTTS side) where prices are inefficient or incomplete — that is not the same as a positive-EV ticket at the configured threshold.

Re-check after material price moves; edges appear and disappear with liquidity.

FAQ

Is the most likely correct score still relevant?

As context only: it is still a low absolute probability tail outcome (often in the single digits, sometimes low teens). It does not override the “no headline +EV” stance — treat score bets as fun-sized if you play them at all.

Should I still read the 1X2 card?

Yes — it shows whether any winner price clears value. Here it often explains why there is no headline: probabilities can be clustered while prices already embed that uncertainty.

What do the grey “lean” labels mean then?

They summarise where the model tilts (e.g. Under 2.5 or BTTS No) without claiming a positive economic edge. Use them as context; size to zero unless you deliberately accept discretionary risk.

Why is there no “best bet” on this page?

The headline engine uses a minimum +EV threshold (e.g. 2%) for a default pick. A line can still show tiny +EV that fails that bar — we still call it no default bet so readers do not over-size thin edges.

Risk Factors

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Methodology

  • Inputs: Same structured facts bundle as the public prediction page (xG / Poisson snapshot, market EV where available, decision engine v2).
  • Compliance: Educational framing only; not personalised advice.

Last Updated

June 07, 2026 (UTC)

How to use this
  • Focus on the Primary line when you want one actionable idea.
  • Do not parlay many thin-edge picks together; edges do not add reliably.
  • Treat longshots as optional, high-stake-sizing plays only.

Get Premium Predictions for Reutlingen & TSV Singen!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Statistics
Oberliga - Baden-Württemberg Oberliga - Baden-Württemberg — Standings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 VfR Aalen 34 26 5 3 83
2 VfR Mannheim 34 20 9 5 69
3 FC Nöttingen 34 18 4 12 58
4 FV Ravensburg 34 16 9 9 57
5 Essingen 34 14 12 8 54
6 Oberachern 34 16 6 12 54
7 CFR Pforzheim 34 12 12 10 48
8 Reutlingen 34 12 11 11 47
9 FC 08 Villingen 34 12 11 11 47
10 Karlsruhe II 34 11 10 13 43
11 Backnang 34 12 7 16 42
12 TSV Singen 34 12 4 18 40
13 Normannia Gmünd 34 9 12 13 39
14 Türkspor Neckarsulm 34 11 6 17 39
15 Göppinger SV 34 9 9 16 36
16 Hollenbach 34 9 8 17 35
17 Bissingen 34 7 12 15 33
18 Denzlingen 34 5 4 25 19
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 VfR Aalen 34 87 24 +63 83
2 FC Nöttingen 34 82 61 +21 58
3 VfR Mannheim 34 81 34 +47 69
4 CFR Pforzheim 34 68 61 +7 48
5 FV Ravensburg 34 61 52 +9 57
6 Reutlingen 34 56 50 +6 47
7 Hollenbach 34 56 69 -13 35
8 FC 08 Villingen 34 55 56 -1 47
9 TSV Singen 34 55 81 -26 40
10 Essingen 34 54 58 -4 54
11 Karlsruhe II 34 54 61 -7 43
12 Oberachern 34 54 62 -8 54
13 Bissingen 34 54 81 -27 33
14 Normannia Gmünd 34 53 51 +2 39
15 Göppinger SV 34 53 53 0 36
16 Türkspor Neckarsulm 34 52 61 -9 39
17 Backnang 34 50 67 -17 42
18 Denzlingen 34 35 78 -43 19
Popular Leagues