Statistics / Football / Spain. Segunda División / Eibar vs Cordoba

Eibar vs Cordoba Statistics & Analysis

Eibar Eibar
May 24, 2026 - 16:30
2 1.57
0 1.19
xG Accuracy: 64%
Cordoba Cordoba
Premium betting site 1xbet: New users can use the promo code 1x_3342271 to receive $100 cash.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Each row compares the model’s highlighted side (or lean) to what happened at full time.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Under 2.5 (2 goals) ✔ Correct
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes No ✖ Incorrect
  • 1X2 Eibar Eibar ✔ Correct
  • Correct Score Insights 1-1, 1-0, 2-1, 2-0, 0-1 2-0 ✔ Correct

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Pre-match snapshot for this fixture.

  • League: Segunda División
  • Fixture: Eibar vs Cordoba
  • Kickoff: 2026-05-24 16:00:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 44.6% · Draw 28.0% · Away 27.3%
  • xG (showing): Eibar 1.57 — Cordoba 1.19 (total xG ≈ 2.76)
  • Value headline: At least one tracked line reaches the headline EV threshold — align with the hero / Primary card if shown.
  • Structural leans (not bets): Structural lean (model): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5 (Under 2.5 47.9% · Over 2.5 52.1%); BTTS Yes (Yes 56.6% · No 43.4%) Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5; BTTS Yes
  • BTTS (model): Yes 56.6% · No 43.4%
  • Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (11.8%)

Saying “no value” on a snapshot is a feature, not a bug: it protects readers from forcing a play when the edge is not there.

Prefer skipping to over-staking when the engine is honest about missing edge.

Best Bet + Reason

No bankroll-sized bet is implied here.

The cards may still show value leans (e.g. a preferred Under or a BTTS side) where prices are inefficient or incomplete — that is not the same as a positive-EV ticket at the configured threshold.

Correct-score markets remain high-variance even when one scoreline leads the table.

FAQ

What do the grey “lean” labels mean then?

They summarise where the model tilts (e.g. Under 2.5 or BTTS No) without claiming a positive economic edge. Use them as context; size to zero unless you deliberately accept discretionary risk.

Should I still read the 1X2 card?

Yes — it shows whether any winner price clears value. Here it often explains why there is no headline: probabilities can be clustered while prices already embed that uncertainty.

Why is there no “best bet” on this page?

The headline engine uses a minimum +EV threshold (e.g. 2%) for a default pick. A line can still show tiny +EV that fails that bar — we still call it no default bet so readers do not over-size thin edges.

When would a headline +EV return?

When odds move enough that implied probabilities drop relative to the same model snapshot, or when more book prices arrive so EV can be computed reliably — then re-run the pipeline.

Risk Factors

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Methodology

  • Inputs: Same structured facts bundle as the public prediction page (xG / Poisson snapshot, market EV where available, decision engine v2).
  • Compliance: Educational framing only; not personalised advice.

Last Updated

June 08, 2026 (UTC)

How to use this
  • Focus on the Primary line when you want one actionable idea.
  • Do not parlay many thin-edge picks together; edges do not add reliably.
  • Treat longshots as optional, high-stake-sizing plays only.

Get Premium Predictions for Eibar & Cordoba!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Statistics
Segunda División Segunda División — Standings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 Racing Santander 42 25 7 10 82
2 Deportivo La Coruna 42 22 11 9 77
3 Almeria 42 22 8 12 74
4 Malaga 42 21 10 11 73
5 Las Palmas 42 20 13 9 73
6 Castellón 42 20 12 10 72
7 Burgos 42 20 12 10 72
8 Eibar 42 19 10 13 67
9 Cordoba 42 17 10 15 61
10 Sporting Gijon 42 18 7 17 61
11 AD Ceuta FC 42 17 10 15 61
12 Albacete 42 16 11 15 59
13 FC Andorra 42 16 10 16 58
14 Granada CF 42 12 12 18 48
15 Real Sociedad II 42 12 11 19 47
16 Leganes 42 11 13 18 46
17 Valladolid 42 12 10 20 46
18 Cadiz 42 11 10 21 43
19 Mirandes 42 10 10 22 40
20 Huesca 42 9 11 22 38
21 Cultural Leonesa 42 9 10 23 37
22 Zaragoza 42 8 12 22 36
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 Racing Santander 42 90 61 +29 82
2 Almeria 42 81 63 +18 74
3 Malaga 42 75 52 +23 73
4 Castellón 42 70 51 +19 72
5 Deportivo La Coruna 42 65 44 +21 77
6 FC Andorra 42 62 54 +8 58
7 Sporting Gijon 42 60 54 +6 61
8 Las Palmas 42 57 40 +17 73
9 Cordoba 42 57 61 -4 61
10 Albacete 42 56 55 +1 59
11 Eibar 42 52 40 +12 67
12 Real Sociedad II 42 52 61 -9 47
13 AD Ceuta FC 42 51 63 -12 61
14 Granada CF 42 50 56 -6 48
15 Burgos 42 48 33 +15 72
16 Mirandes 42 47 69 -22 40
17 Valladolid 42 44 57 -13 46
18 Leganes 42 43 51 -8 46
19 Cadiz 42 41 61 -20 43
20 Huesca 42 41 63 -22 38
21 Cultural Leonesa 42 39 68 -29 37
22 Zaragoza 42 35 59 -24 36
# TEAM MP xG xGC +/- PTS
1 Castellón 42 41.1 29.0 +12.1 72
2 Valladolid 42 34.2 23.6 +10.6 46
3 Cordoba 42 39.1 32.6 +6.5 61
4 Eibar 42 38.5 32.4 +6.1 67
5 Racing Santander 42 36.6 32.0 +4.6 82
6 Burgos 42 32.1 27.9 +4.2 72
7 Malaga 42 36.9 33.4 +3.5 73
8 Granada CF 42 32.0 29.2 +2.8 48
9 Las Palmas 42 22.9 20.6 +2.3 73
10 Deportivo La Coruna 42 30.2 28.3 +1.9 77
11 Albacete 42 35.2 33.7 +1.5 59
12 Sporting Gijon 42 30.8 29.4 +1.4 61
13 Almeria 42 32.7 31.4 +1.3 74
14 Zaragoza 42 30.6 30.5 +0.1 36
15 Leganes 42 34.1 35.4 -1.3 46
16 FC Andorra 42 31.8 33.5 -1.7 58
17 Huesca 42 27.3 29.6 -2.3 38
18 Real Sociedad II 42 30.7 38.6 -7.9 47
19 AD Ceuta FC 42 35.3 44.9 -9.6 61
20 Mirandes 42 28.2 38.8 -10.6 40
21 Cadiz 42 26.9 39.4 -12.5 43
22 Cultural Leonesa 42 29.1 42.3 -13.2 37
Popular Leagues