Statistics / Football / Spain. Segunda División / Las Palmas vs Zaragoza

Las Palmas vs Zaragoza Statistics & Analysis

May 24, 2026 - 16:30
1 1.34
1 1.07
xG Accuracy: 89%
Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Under 2.5 (2 goals) ✔ Correct
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes Yes ✔ Correct
  • 1X2 Las Palmas Draw ✖ Incorrect
  • Correct Score Insights 1-1, 1-0, 0-1, 0-0, 2-1 1-1 ✔ Correct

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Jul 24, 2026 · 02:30 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-1535135

Closing Odds 1.41
AI Fair Odds —
CLV +0.0%
Final Result Draw · Las Palmas 1–1 Zaragoza
Prediction ✖ Missed
Decision Grade C

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Market intelligence

Supporting read on how the prioritized closing feed moved versus the model — use after the Primary pick above.

Market briefing

Market remained largely stable before kickoff. No meaningful late implied-price shift was detected between PRE30 and PRE1 on the prioritized bookmaker snapshot.

Despite limited late movement, the model still prices Draw (1X2), Zaragoza (1X2), Under 2.5 goals meaningfully above what those closing snapshots implied — that gap is a static “model vs. price” read, not a late steam or chase story.

The model still exceeds closing implied on Zaragoza (1X2) by about 16.9 percentage points — the clearest mispricing signal summarized on this page.

Model vs. closing implied

Market Model % Closing impl. % Gap (pp)
Las Palmas (1X2) 41.1 67.9 -26.8
Draw (1X2) 30.7 20.8 +9.9
Zaragoza (1X2) 28.2 11.3 +16.9
Over 2.5 goals 43.3 52.2 -8.9
Under 2.5 goals 56.7 47.8 +8.9
What this means

In plain terms: the model lands near 28.2% on Zaragoza (1X2), while the closing snapshot implied about 11.3%. The difference — about 16.9 percentage points — is the largest model-vs.-market gap highlighted on this page.

Quick definitions: “closing implied” is the probability for that outcome implied by the final captured odds (after a simple de-vig). “Gap (pp)” is the model percentage minus that implied value, in percentage points (pp).

Closing-window line move

Single prioritized bookmaker per snapshot (not all books). Capture path: PRE30 → PRE1 · Book: Pinnacle

Column tags in parentheses: Closing uses the first available snapshot in PRE1→PRE5→PRE10→PRE30; Early uses the first available in PRE30→PRE10→PRE5 that is not the same capture as Closing.

Detailed capture odds are folded below — movement was negligible on de-vig implied prices.

View full line-by-line capture table
Market Early (PRE30) Closing (PRE1) Implied Δ (pp)
Las Palmas (1X2) 1.41 1.41 0.0
Draw (1X2) 4.6 4.6 0.0
Zaragoza (1X2) 8.5 8.5 0.0
Over 2.5 goals 1.85 1.85 0.0
Under 2.5 goals 2.02 2.02 0.0

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Pre-match snapshot for this fixture.

  • League: Segunda División
  • Fixture: Las Palmas vs Zaragoza
  • Kickoff: 2026-05-24 16:00:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 41.1% · Draw 30.7% · Away 28.2%
  • xG (showing): Las Palmas 1.34 — Zaragoza 1.07 (total xG ≈ 2.41)
  • Value headline: At least one tracked line reaches the headline EV threshold — align with the hero / Primary card if shown.
  • Structural leans (not bets): Structural lean (model): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5 (Under 2.5 56.7% · Over 2.5 43.3%); BTTS Yes (Yes 50.2% · No 49.8%) Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5; BTTS Yes
  • BTTS (model): Yes 50.2% · No 49.8%
  • Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (12.9%)

When book depth is thin or odds are missing, EV may be unavailable even though the model still prefers one side on totals or BTTS — wait for cleaner prices or skip.

Prefer skipping to over-staking when the engine is honest about missing edge.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: Wait - No Primary Bet

Outcome: Missed — Pre-match 1X2 lean did not match the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

September 29, 2026 (UTC)

Get Premium Predictions for Las Palmas & Zaragoza!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Statistics
Segunda División Segunda División — Standings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 Racing Santander 42 25 7 10 82
2 Deportivo La Coruna 42 22 11 9 77
3 Almeria 42 22 8 12 74
4 Malaga 42 21 10 11 73
5 Las Palmas 42 20 13 9 73
6 Castellón 42 20 12 10 72
7 Burgos 42 20 12 10 72
8 Eibar 42 19 10 13 67
9 Sporting Gijon 42 18 7 17 61
10 Cordoba 42 17 10 15 61
11 AD Ceuta FC 42 17 10 15 61
12 Albacete 42 16 11 15 59
13 FC Andorra 42 16 10 16 58
14 Granada CF 42 12 12 18 48
15 Real Sociedad II 42 12 11 19 47
16 Leganes 42 11 13 18 46
17 Valladolid 42 12 10 20 46
18 Cadiz 42 11 10 21 43
19 Mirandes 42 10 10 22 40
20 Huesca 42 9 11 22 38
21 Cultural Leonesa 42 9 10 23 37
22 Zaragoza 42 8 12 22 36
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 Racing Santander 42 90 61 +29 82
2 Almeria 42 81 63 +18 74
3 Malaga 42 75 52 +23 73
4 Castellón 42 70 51 +19 72
5 Deportivo La Coruna 42 65 44 +21 77
6 FC Andorra 42 62 54 +8 58
7 Sporting Gijon 42 60 54 +6 61
8 Las Palmas 42 57 40 +17 73
9 Cordoba 42 57 61 -4 61
10 Albacete 42 56 55 +1 59
11 Eibar 42 52 40 +12 67
12 Real Sociedad II 42 52 61 -9 47
13 AD Ceuta FC 42 51 63 -12 61
14 Granada CF 42 50 56 -6 48
15 Burgos 42 48 33 +15 72
16 Mirandes 42 47 69 -22 40
17 Valladolid 42 44 57 -13 46
18 Leganes 42 43 51 -8 46
19 Cadiz 42 41 61 -20 43
20 Huesca 42 41 63 -22 38
21 Cultural Leonesa 42 39 68 -29 37
22 Zaragoza 42 35 59 -24 36
# TEAM MP xG xGC +/- PTS
1 Castellón 42 41.1 29.0 +12.1 72
2 Valladolid 42 34.2 23.6 +10.6 46
3 Cordoba 42 39.1 32.6 +6.5 61
4 Eibar 42 38.5 32.4 +6.1 67
5 Racing Santander 42 36.6 32.0 +4.6 82
6 Burgos 42 32.1 27.9 +4.2 72
7 Malaga 42 36.9 33.4 +3.5 73
8 Granada CF 42 32.0 29.2 +2.8 48
9 Las Palmas 42 22.9 20.6 +2.3 73
10 Deportivo La Coruna 42 30.2 28.3 +1.9 77
11 Albacete 42 35.2 33.7 +1.5 59
12 Sporting Gijon 42 30.8 29.4 +1.4 61
13 Almeria 42 32.7 31.4 +1.3 74
14 Zaragoza 42 30.6 30.5 +0.1 36
15 Leganes 42 34.1 35.4 -1.3 46
16 FC Andorra 42 31.8 33.5 -1.7 58
17 Huesca 42 27.3 29.6 -2.3 38
18 Real Sociedad II 42 30.7 38.6 -7.9 47
19 AD Ceuta FC 42 35.3 44.9 -9.6 61
20 Mirandes 42 28.2 38.8 -10.6 40
21 Cadiz 42 26.9 39.4 -12.5 43
22 Cultural Leonesa 42 29.1 42.3 -13.2 37