Osasuna vs Atletico Madrid Statistics & Analysis

Below is a compact, numbers-first snapshot aligned with the same engine as the cards above.

• League: La Liga
• Fixture: Osasuna vs Atletico Madrid
• Kickoff: 2026-05-13 16:00:00
• 1X2 (model): Home 48.3% · Draw 28.5% · Away 23.2%
• xG (showing): Osasuna 1.56 — Atletico Madrid 1.02 (total xG ≈ 2.58)
• Primary / headline line (Betting Primary Pick when shown): BTTS No
• Model: 47.9% · Implied: 41.0% · Probability edge: +6.9 pts · Est. EV: +11.1%
• BTTS (model): Yes 52.1% · No 47.9%
• Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (12.1%)

Totals and BTTS are evaluated against current market prices where available.

1X2 can look balanced even when side markets show clearer structure.

Primary angle highlighted on the page: BTTS No.

If 1X2 looks tight, the engine may still find clearer structure in totals or BTTS — that is intentional.

When several markets sit near +EV, keep stakes small — correlation means edges do not add cleanly.

Safer market than correct score?

Markets with more liquidity and smoother prices (often 1X2 or O/U 2.5 from many books) are usually easier to reason about than long-tail correct-score prices; still read EV on each leg.

What changes first if odds move?

Implied probabilities and EV move immediately with price; model probabilities in this snapshot do not update until the pipeline is re-run. Refresh after material line moves.

Is the most likely correct score a good bet?

Usually no as a standalone bet: the “most likely” scoreline is still a low absolute probability tail event (often single digits, sometimes low teens). Use it as context; keep any correct-score stake in the “fun / small” bucket.

How should I read EV versus a probability gap?

Probability edge = model probability minus implied probability (reported here in percentage points). EV ≈ model probability × best tracked decimal odds − 1, shown as return per unit stake. They are related but not interchangeable labels.

• Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
• Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
• In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
• Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

• Inputs: Same structured facts bundle as the public prediction page (xG / Poisson snapshot, market EV where available, decision engine v2).
• Compliance: Educational framing only; not personalised advice.

May 17, 2026 (UTC)