Statistics / Football / Germany. 2. Bundesliga / 1. FC Magdeburg vs 1. FC Kaiserslautern

1. FC Magdeburg vs 1. FC Kaiserslautern Statistics & Analysis

1. FC Magdeburg 1. FC Magdeburg
May 17, 2026 - 13:30
0 1.62
1 1.10
xG Accuracy: 62%
1. FC Kaiserslautern 1. FC Kaiserslautern
Premium betting site 1xbet: New users can use the promo code 1x_3342271 to receive $100 cash.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Each row compares the model’s highlighted side (or lean) to what happened at full time.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Under 2.5 (1 goals) ✔ Correct
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS No No ✔ Correct
  • 1X2 1. FC Magdeburg 1. FC Kaiserslautern ✖ Incorrect
  • Correct Score Insights 1-1 0-1 ✖ Incorrect

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Quick read on how the model reads this matchup.

  • League: 2. Bundesliga
  • Fixture: 1. FC Magdeburg vs 1. FC Kaiserslautern
  • Kickoff: 2026-05-17 13:30:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 47.9% · Draw 27.8% · Away 24.3%
  • xG (showing): 1. FC Magdeburg 1.62 — 1. FC Kaiserslautern 1.1 (total xG ≈ 2.72)
  • Primary / headline line (Betting Primary Pick when shown): Under 2.5 goals
  • Model: 48.9% · Implied: 33.4% · Probability edge: +15.5 pts · Est. EV: +41.3%
  • BTTS (model): Yes 55.0% · No 45.0%
  • Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (11.7%)

Where EV is shown, it is estimated return per unit stake at the best tracked decimal price — not the same thing as a raw probability gap.

1X2 can look balanced even when side markets show clearer structure.

Best Bet + Reason

Primary angle highlighted on the page: Under 2.5 goals.

We separate probability edge (model minus implied, in points of probability) from estimated EV (economic edge at the best price shown on the page).

When several markets sit near +EV, keep stakes small — correlation means edges do not add cleanly.

FAQ

Safer market than correct score?

Markets with more liquidity and smoother prices (often 1X2 or O/U 2.5 from many books) are usually easier to reason about than long-tail correct-score prices; still read EV on each leg.

Why might 1X2 look unattractive while totals do not?

Tight 1X2 prices often embed a fair three-way split, so EV on match-winner can sit negative even when Over/Under or BTTS still diverges from the model — compare the 1X2 row on the market cards to O/U and BTTS.

How should I read EV versus a probability gap?

Probability edge = model probability minus implied probability (reported here in percentage points). EV ≈ model probability × best tracked decimal odds − 1, shown as return per unit stake. They are related but not interchangeable labels.

What changes first if odds move?

Implied probabilities and EV move immediately with price; model probabilities in this snapshot do not update until the pipeline is re-run. Refresh after material line moves.

Risk Factors

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Methodology

  • Inputs: Same structured facts bundle as the public prediction page (xG / Poisson snapshot, market EV where available, decision engine v2).
  • Compliance: Educational framing only; not personalised advice.

Last Updated

May 19, 2026 (UTC)

How to use this
  • Focus on the Primary line when you want one actionable idea.
  • Do not parlay many thin-edge picks together; edges do not add reliably.
  • Treat longshots as optional, high-stake-sizing plays only.

Get Premium Predictions for 1. FC Magdeburg & 1. FC Kaiserslautern!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Statistics
2. Bundesliga 2. Bundesliga — Standings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 FC Schalke 04 33 20 7 6 67
2 SV Elversberg 33 17 8 8 59
3 Hannover 96 33 16 11 6 59
4 SC Paderborn 07 33 17 8 8 59
5 SV Darmstadt 98 33 13 13 7 52
6 Hertha BSC 33 14 9 10 51
7 1. FC Kaiserslautern 33 15 4 14 49
8 1. FC Nürnberg 33 12 9 12 45
9 Karlsruher SC 33 12 8 13 44
10 VfL Bochum 33 10 11 12 41
11 Holstein Kiel 33 11 8 14 41
12 1. FC Magdeburg 33 12 3 18 39
13 Dynamo Dresden 33 10 8 15 38
14 Eintracht Braunschweig 33 10 7 16 37
15 Fortuna Düsseldorf 33 11 4 18 37
16 Arminia Bielefeld 33 9 9 15 36
17 SpVgg Greuther Fürth 33 9 7 17 34
18 Preußen Münster 33 6 12 15 30
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 SV Elversberg 33 61 39 +22 59
2 Hannover 96 33 57 41 +16 59
3 SV Darmstadt 98 33 57 43 +14 52
4 SC Paderborn 07 33 57 45 +12 59
5 Dynamo Dresden 33 52 52 0 38
6 1. FC Magdeburg 33 52 57 -5 39
7 Karlsruher SC 33 52 62 -10 44
8 1. FC Kaiserslautern 33 51 47 +4 49
9 FC Schalke 04 33 49 31 +18 67
10 VfL Bochum 33 47 46 +1 41
11 Arminia Bielefeld 33 47 50 -3 36
12 Hertha BSC 33 46 38 +8 51
13 SpVgg Greuther Fürth 33 46 68 -22 34
14 1. FC Nürnberg 33 44 42 +2 45
15 Holstein Kiel 33 43 46 -3 41
16 Preußen Münster 33 38 58 -20 30
17 Eintracht Braunschweig 33 36 53 -17 37
18 Fortuna Düsseldorf 33 33 50 -17 37
# TEAM MP xG xGC +/- PTS
1 FC Schalke 04 33 51.0 30.4 +20.6 67
2 SC Paderborn 07 33 58.1 38.1 +20.0 59
3 Hannover 96 33 55.4 38.5 +16.9 59
4 SV Elversberg 33 51.6 37.3 +14.3 59
5 1. FC Magdeburg 33 52.6 45.9 +6.7 39
6 Arminia Bielefeld 33 50.3 46.2 +4.1 36
7 VfL Bochum 33 51.9 48.6 +3.3 41
8 1. FC Kaiserslautern 33 46.2 44.1 +2.1 49
9 1. FC Nürnberg 33 46.2 44.2 +2.0 45
10 SV Darmstadt 98 33 52.1 51.8 +0.3 52
11 Dynamo Dresden 33 43.2 43.9 -0.7 38
12 Hertha BSC 33 44.7 51.4 -6.7 51
13 Fortuna Düsseldorf 33 40.3 49.4 -9.1 37
14 Eintracht Braunschweig 33 36.7 48.1 -11.4 37
15 SpVgg Greuther Fürth 33 39.4 51.4 -12.0 34
16 Holstein Kiel 33 41.0 53.1 -12.1 41
17 Preußen Münster 33 36.7 55.9 -19.2 30
18 Karlsruher SC 33 42.5 61.9 -19.4 44
Popular Leagues