Statistics / Football / Germany. 2. Bundesliga / Hannover 96 vs 1. FC Nürnberg

Hannover 96 vs 1. FC Nürnberg Statistics & Analysis

Hannover 96 Hannover 96
May 17, 2026 - 13:30
3 1.46
3 1.12
xG Accuracy: 39%
1. FC Nürnberg 1. FC Nürnberg
Premium betting site 1xbet: New users can use the promo code 1x_3342271 to receive $100 cash.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Each row compares the model’s highlighted side (or lean) to what happened at full time.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Over 2.5 (6 goals) ✖ Incorrect
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS No Yes ✖ Incorrect
  • 1X2 Hannover 96 Draw ✖ Incorrect
  • Correct Score Insights 1-1 3-3 ✖ Incorrect

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Pre-match snapshot for this fixture.

  • League: 2. Bundesliga
  • Fixture: Hannover 96 vs 1. FC Nürnberg
  • Kickoff: 2026-05-17 13:30:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 43.3% · Draw 29.3% · Away 27.4%
  • xG (showing): Hannover 96 1.46 — 1. FC Nürnberg 1.12 (total xG ≈ 2.58)
  • Value headline: At least one tracked line reaches the headline EV threshold — align with the hero / Primary card if shown.
  • Structural leans (not bets): Structural lean (model): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5 (Under 2.5 52.3% · Over 2.5 47.6%); BTTS No (Yes 53.3% · No 46.7%) Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5; BTTS No
  • BTTS (model): Yes 53.3% · No 46.7%
  • Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (12.4%)

The decision block shows no default bet: no tracked line clears the headline minimum +EV threshold at the best prices we have (a leg can still show small +EV below that bar). Lean labels are directional only — not bankroll-sized recommendations.

Most likely correct score stays a low-probability tail: use it for context, not as a must-bet story.

Best Bet + Reason

No clear +EV headline on this snapshot.

Treat this page as a read-only diagnostic: totals/BTTS structure can be informative even when the honest answer is to wait.

Re-check after material price moves; edges appear and disappear with liquidity.

FAQ

Why is there no “best bet” on this page?

The headline engine uses a minimum +EV threshold (e.g. 2%) for a default pick. A line can still show tiny +EV that fails that bar — we still call it no default bet so readers do not over-size thin edges.

When would a headline +EV return?

When odds move enough that implied probabilities drop relative to the same model snapshot, or when more book prices arrive so EV can be computed reliably — then re-run the pipeline.

What do the grey “lean” labels mean then?

They summarise where the model tilts (e.g. Under 2.5 or BTTS No) without claiming a positive economic edge. Use them as context; size to zero unless you deliberately accept discretionary risk.

Should I still read the 1X2 card?

Yes — it shows whether any winner price clears value. Here it often explains why there is no headline: probabilities can be clustered while prices already embed that uncertainty.

Risk Factors

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Methodology

  • Inputs: Same structured facts bundle as the public prediction page (xG / Poisson snapshot, market EV where available, decision engine v2).
  • Compliance: Educational framing only; not personalised advice.

Last Updated

May 19, 2026 (UTC)

How to use this
  • When there is no Primary line, compare the +EV rows in the market cards below (not only 1X2).
  • Do not parlay many thin-edge picks together; edges do not add reliably.
  • Treat longshots as optional, high-stake-sizing plays only.

Get Premium Predictions for Hannover 96 & 1. FC Nürnberg!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Statistics
2. Bundesliga 2. Bundesliga — Standings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 FC Schalke 04 33 20 7 6 67
2 SV Elversberg 33 17 8 8 59
3 Hannover 96 33 16 11 6 59
4 SC Paderborn 07 33 17 8 8 59
5 SV Darmstadt 98 33 13 13 7 52
6 Hertha BSC 33 14 9 10 51
7 1. FC Kaiserslautern 33 15 4 14 49
8 1. FC Nürnberg 33 12 9 12 45
9 Karlsruher SC 33 12 8 13 44
10 VfL Bochum 33 10 11 12 41
11 Holstein Kiel 33 11 8 14 41
12 1. FC Magdeburg 33 12 3 18 39
13 Dynamo Dresden 33 10 8 15 38
14 Eintracht Braunschweig 33 10 7 16 37
15 Fortuna Düsseldorf 33 11 4 18 37
16 Arminia Bielefeld 33 9 9 15 36
17 SpVgg Greuther Fürth 33 9 7 17 34
18 Preußen Münster 33 6 12 15 30
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 SV Elversberg 33 61 39 +22 59
2 Hannover 96 33 57 41 +16 59
3 SV Darmstadt 98 33 57 43 +14 52
4 SC Paderborn 07 33 57 45 +12 59
5 Dynamo Dresden 33 52 52 0 38
6 1. FC Magdeburg 33 52 57 -5 39
7 Karlsruher SC 33 52 62 -10 44
8 1. FC Kaiserslautern 33 51 47 +4 49
9 FC Schalke 04 33 49 31 +18 67
10 VfL Bochum 33 47 46 +1 41
11 Arminia Bielefeld 33 47 50 -3 36
12 Hertha BSC 33 46 38 +8 51
13 SpVgg Greuther Fürth 33 46 68 -22 34
14 1. FC Nürnberg 33 44 42 +2 45
15 Holstein Kiel 33 43 46 -3 41
16 Preußen Münster 33 38 58 -20 30
17 Eintracht Braunschweig 33 36 53 -17 37
18 Fortuna Düsseldorf 33 33 50 -17 37
# TEAM MP xG xGC +/- PTS
1 FC Schalke 04 33 51.0 30.4 +20.6 67
2 SC Paderborn 07 33 58.1 38.1 +20.0 59
3 Hannover 96 33 55.4 38.5 +16.9 59
4 SV Elversberg 33 51.6 37.3 +14.3 59
5 1. FC Magdeburg 33 52.6 45.9 +6.7 39
6 Arminia Bielefeld 33 50.3 46.2 +4.1 36
7 VfL Bochum 33 51.9 48.6 +3.3 41
8 1. FC Kaiserslautern 33 46.2 44.1 +2.1 49
9 1. FC Nürnberg 33 46.2 44.2 +2.0 45
10 SV Darmstadt 98 33 52.1 51.8 +0.3 52
11 Dynamo Dresden 33 43.2 43.9 -0.7 38
12 Hertha BSC 33 44.7 51.4 -6.7 51
13 Fortuna Düsseldorf 33 40.3 49.4 -9.1 37
14 Eintracht Braunschweig 33 36.7 48.1 -11.4 37
15 SpVgg Greuther Fürth 33 39.4 51.4 -12.0 34
16 Holstein Kiel 33 41.0 53.1 -12.1 41
17 Preußen Münster 33 36.7 55.9 -19.2 30
18 Karlsruher SC 33 42.5 61.9 -19.4 44
Popular Leagues