Statistics / Football / England. League One / Stevenage vs Wigan

Stevenage vs Wigan Statistics & Analysis

May 02, 2026 - 14:00
1 1.56
0 1.26
xG Accuracy: 61%
Premium betting site 1xbet: New users can use the promo code 1x_3342271 to receive $100 cash.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Each row compares the model’s highlighted side (or lean) to what happened at full time.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Under 2.5 (1 goals) ✔ Correct
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes No ✖ Incorrect
  • 1X2 Stevenage Stevenage ✔ Correct
  • Correct Score Insights 1-1 1-0 ✖ Incorrect

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Pre-match snapshot for this fixture.

  • League: League One
  • Fixture: Stevenage vs Wigan
  • Kickoff: 2026-05-02 14:00:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 45.0% · Draw 45.0% · Away 10.0%
  • xG (showing): Stevenage 1.56 — Wigan 1.26 (total xG ≈ 2.82)
  • Primary / headline line (Betting Primary Pick when shown): BTTS Yes
  • Model: 50.4% · Implied: 42.1% · Probability edge: +8.3 pts · Est. EV: +14.4%
  • BTTS (model): Yes 50.4% · No 49.6%
  • Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (13.3%)

Totals and BTTS are evaluated against current market prices where available.

Early match state can move realised goals away from pre-kick projections.

Best Bet + Reason

Primary angle highlighted on the page: BTTS Yes.

If 1X2 looks tight, the engine may still find clearer structure in totals or BTTS — that is intentional.

Only one modest +EV edge is highlighted here; size cautiously and re-check if odds move.

FAQ

Who has the edge in the match-winner market?

Use the 1X2 model percentages in the summary and the 1X2 market card: the side with the highest model % is the model lean, but check EV — a lean can still be -EV after prices.

Why might 1X2 look unattractive while totals do not?

Tight 1X2 prices often embed a fair three-way split, so EV on match-winner can sit negative even when Over/Under or BTTS still diverges from the model — compare the 1X2 row on the market cards to O/U and BTTS.

Is the most likely correct score a good bet?

Usually no as a standalone bet: the “most likely” scoreline is still a low absolute probability tail event (often single digits, sometimes low teens). Use it as context; keep any correct-score stake in the “fun / small” bucket.

What changes first if odds move?

Implied probabilities and EV move immediately with price; model probabilities in this snapshot do not update until the pipeline is re-run. Refresh after material line moves.

Risk Factors

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Methodology

  • Inputs: Same structured facts bundle as the public prediction page (xG / Poisson snapshot, market EV where available, decision engine v2).
  • Compliance: Educational framing only; not personalised advice.

Last Updated

May 17, 2026 (UTC)

How to use this
  • When there is no Primary line, compare the +EV rows in the market cards below (not only 1X2).
  • Do not parlay many thin-edge picks together; edges do not add reliably.
  • Treat longshots as optional, high-stake-sizing plays only.

Get Premium Predictions for Stevenage & Wigan!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Statistics
League One League OneStandings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 Lincoln 46 31 10 5 103
2 Cardiff 46 27 10 9 91
3 Stockport County 46 22 11 13 77
4 Bradford 46 22 11 13 77
5 Bolton 46 19 18 9 75
6 Stevenage 46 21 12 13 75
7 Luton 46 21 11 14 74
8 Plymouth 46 22 7 17 73
9 Huddersfield 46 18 13 15 67
10 Mansfield Town 46 16 17 13 65
11 Wycombe 46 17 12 17 63
12 Reading 46 16 15 15 63
13 Blackpool 46 17 9 20 60
14 Doncaster 46 17 9 20 60
15 Barnsley 46 15 14 17 59
16 Wigan 46 14 14 18 56
17 Burton Albion 46 13 15 18 54
18 Peterborough 46 15 8 23 53
19 AFC Wimbledon 46 15 8 23 53
20 Leyton Orient 46 14 10 22 52
21 Exeter City 46 12 13 21 49
22 Port Vale 46 10 12 24 42
23 Rotherham 46 10 11 25 41
24 Northampton 46 9 8 29 35
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 Cardiff 46 90 50 +40 91
2 Lincoln 46 89 41 +48 103
3 Plymouth 46 75 63 +12 73
4 Huddersfield 46 74 64 +10 67
5 Stockport County 46 71 58 +13 77
6 Bolton 46 70 52 +18 75
7 Wycombe 46 69 58 +11 63
8 Luton 46 68 56 +12 74
9 Barnsley 46 68 73 -5 59
10 Reading 46 64 60 +4 63
11 Peterborough 46 64 68 -4 53
12 Mansfield Town 46 62 50 +12 65
13 Leyton Orient 46 59 71 -12 52
14 Bradford 46 58 51 +7 77
15 Blackpool 46 54 65 -11 60
16 Exeter City 46 52 61 -9 49
17 AFC Wimbledon 46 51 72 -21 53
18 Burton Albion 46 50 60 -10 54
19 Doncaster 46 50 69 -19 60
20 Stevenage 46 49 46 +3 75
21 Wigan 46 49 58 -9 56
22 Rotherham 46 41 71 -30 41
23 Northampton 46 39 74 -35 35
24 Port Vale 46 36 61 -25 42
# TEAM MP xG xGC +/- PTS
1 Huddersfield 46 21.2 12.8 +8.4 67
2 Bolton 46 18.1 12.5 +5.6 75
3 Cardiff 46 22.0 17.0 +5.0 91
4 Wigan 46 15.6 11.5 +4.1 56
5 Peterborough 46 22.5 18.5 +4.0 53
6 Wycombe 46 17.0 14.0 +3.0 63
7 Luton 46 16.8 14.1 +2.7 74
8 Reading 46 16.6 14.8 +1.8 63
9 Stockport County 46 15.4 15.2 +0.2 77
10 Port Vale 46 12.9 12.8 +0.1 42
11 Plymouth 46 19.2 19.2 0.0 73
12 Burton Albion 46 14.6 14.8 -0.2 54
13 Doncaster 46 16.8 17.3 -0.5 60
14 Stevenage 46 11.2 12.4 -1.2 75
15 Rotherham 46 11.9 13.2 -1.3 41
16 Lincoln 46 16.7 18.8 -2.1 103
17 Leyton Orient 46 19.6 22.4 -2.8 52
18 Bradford 46 13.4 16.2 -2.8 77
19 Barnsley 46 12.3 15.2 -2.9 59
20 AFC Wimbledon 46 11.0 14.4 -3.4 53
21 Mansfield Town 46 12.7 16.6 -3.9 65
22 Exeter City 46 10.7 15.1 -4.4 49
23 Northampton 46 13.5 18.0 -4.5 35
24 Blackpool 46 21.6 26.3 -4.7 60