Statistics / Football / Netherlands. Eredivisie / Fortuna Sittard vs PEC Zwolle

Fortuna Sittard vs PEC Zwolle Statistics & Analysis

Fortuna Sittard Fortuna Sittard
May 10, 2026 - 14:45
3 1.72
2 1.41
xG Accuracy: 60%
PEC Zwolle PEC Zwolle
Premium betting site 1xbet: New users can use the promo code 1x_3342271 to receive $100 cash.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Each row compares the model’s highlighted side (or lean) to what happened at full time.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Over 2.5 (5 goals) ✖ Incorrect
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS No Yes ✖ Incorrect
  • 1X2 Fortuna Sittard Fortuna Sittard ✔ Correct
  • Correct Score Insights 1-1 3-2 ✖ Incorrect

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Pre-match snapshot for this fixture.

  • League: Eredivisie
  • Fixture: Fortuna Sittard vs PEC Zwolle
  • Kickoff: 2026-05-10 14:45:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 43.6% · Draw 26.2% · Away 30.2%
  • xG (showing): Fortuna Sittard 1.72 — PEC Zwolle 1.41 (total xG ≈ 3.13)
  • Value headline: None (actionable) — best tracked EV is about +0.7%, still below the +2.0% minimum for a headline / default stake (no default bet).
  • Structural leans (not bets): Structural lean (model): O/U 2.5 Over 2.5 (Under 2.5 39.5% · Over 2.5 60.5%); BTTS Yes (Yes 63.4% · No 36.6%) Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5; BTTS No
  • BTTS (model): Yes 63.4% · No 36.6%
  • Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (10.6%)

When book depth is thin or odds are missing, EV may be unavailable even though the model still prefers one side on totals or BTTS — wait for cleaner prices or skip.

Prefer skipping to over-staking when the engine is honest about missing edge.

Best Bet + Reason

No clear +EV headline on this snapshot.

The cards may still show value leans (e.g. a preferred Under or a BTTS side) where prices are inefficient or incomplete — that is not the same as a positive-EV ticket at the configured threshold.

Re-check after material price moves; edges appear and disappear with liquidity.

FAQ

Why is there no “best bet” on this page?

The headline engine uses a minimum +EV threshold (e.g. 2%) for a default pick. A line can still show tiny +EV that fails that bar — we still call it no default bet so readers do not over-size thin edges.

Should I still read the 1X2 card?

Yes — it shows whether any winner price clears value. Here it often explains why there is no headline: probabilities can be clustered while prices already embed that uncertainty.

Is the most likely correct score still relevant?

As context only: it is still a low absolute probability tail outcome (often in the single digits, sometimes low teens). It does not override the “no headline +EV” stance — treat score bets as fun-sized if you play them at all.

When would a headline +EV return?

When odds move enough that implied probabilities drop relative to the same model snapshot, or when more book prices arrive so EV can be computed reliably — then re-run the pipeline.

Risk Factors

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Methodology

  • Inputs: Same structured facts bundle as the public prediction page (xG / Poisson snapshot, market EV where available, decision engine v2).
  • Compliance: Educational framing only; not personalised advice.

Last Updated

May 17, 2026 (UTC)

How to use this
  • Focus on the Primary line when you want one actionable idea.
  • Do not parlay many thin-edge picks together; edges do not add reliably.
  • Treat longshots as optional, high-stake-sizing plays only.

Get Premium Predictions for Fortuna Sittard & PEC Zwolle!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Statistics
Eredivisie Eredivisie — Standings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 PSV Eindhoven 33 26 3 4 81
2 Feyenoord 33 18 8 7 62
3 Twente 33 15 13 5 58
4 NEC Nijmegen 33 15 11 7 56
5 Ajax 33 14 13 6 55
6 AZ Alkmaar 33 14 9 10 51
7 Utrecht 33 14 8 11 50
8 Heerenveen 33 14 8 11 50
9 Groningen 33 13 6 14 45
10 Sparta Rotterdam 33 12 7 14 43
11 Fortuna Sittard 33 11 6 16 39
12 GO Ahead Eagles 33 8 14 11 38
13 PEC Zwolle 33 9 10 14 37
14 Excelsior 33 9 8 16 35
15 Telstar 33 8 10 15 34
16 FC Volendam 33 8 8 17 32
17 NAC Breda 33 6 10 17 28
18 Heracles 33 5 4 24 19
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 PSV Eindhoven 33 96 44 +52 81
2 NEC Nijmegen 33 75 52 +23 56
3 Feyenoord 33 68 44 +24 62
4 Ajax 33 62 41 +21 55
5 Twente 33 58 35 +23 58
6 Heerenveen 33 57 53 +4 50
7 AZ Alkmaar 33 55 48 +7 51
8 Utrecht 33 53 42 +11 50
9 GO Ahead Eagles 33 53 51 +2 38
10 Fortuna Sittard 33 49 61 -12 39
11 Groningen 33 47 44 +3 45
12 Telstar 33 47 54 -7 34
13 PEC Zwolle 33 44 69 -25 37
14 Excelsior 33 40 54 -14 35
15 Sparta Rotterdam 33 38 59 -21 43
16 FC Volendam 33 34 53 -19 32
17 Heracles 33 34 83 -49 19
18 NAC Breda 33 32 55 -23 28
# TEAM MP xG xGC +/- PTS
1 PSV Eindhoven 33 67.2 35.9 +31.3 81
2 Feyenoord 33 63.9 36.5 +27.4 62
3 Twente 33 58.9 33.7 +25.2 58
4 AZ Alkmaar 33 60.5 40.4 +20.1 51
5 NEC Nijmegen 33 57.1 45.6 +11.5 56
6 Groningen 33 56.8 45.6 +11.2 45
7 Heerenveen 33 56.7 47.5 +9.2 50
8 Ajax 33 51.6 44.0 +7.6 55
9 Utrecht 33 47.9 43.9 +4.0 50
10 Sparta Rotterdam 33 40.0 47.1 -7.1 43
11 Telstar 33 45.9 57.2 -11.3 34
12 NAC Breda 33 37.3 48.9 -11.6 28
13 Excelsior 33 43.2 56.6 -13.4 35
14 GO Ahead Eagles 33 41.4 57.9 -16.5 38
15 Fortuna Sittard 33 39.4 56.4 -17.0 39
16 PEC Zwolle 33 35.5 55.4 -19.9 37
17 FC Volendam 33 33.4 57.9 -24.5 32
18 Heracles 33 38.5 64.5 -26.0 19
Popular Leagues