Statistics / Football / Netherlands. Eredivisie / NAC Breda vs Heerenveen

NAC Breda vs Heerenveen Statistics & Analysis

NAC Breda NAC Breda
May 11, 2026 - 12:30
2 1.17
0 1.57
xG Accuracy: 52%
Heerenveen Heerenveen
Premium betting site 1xbet: New users can use the promo code 1x_3342271 to receive $100 cash.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Each row compares the model’s highlighted side (or lean) to what happened at full time.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Under 2.5 (2 goals) ✔ Correct
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS No No ✔ Correct
  • 1X2 Heerenveen NAC Breda ✖ Incorrect
  • Correct Score Insights 1-1 2-0 ✖ Incorrect

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Below is a compact, numbers-first snapshot aligned with the same engine as the cards above.

  • League: Eredivisie
  • Fixture: NAC Breda vs Heerenveen
  • Kickoff: 2026-05-10 14:45:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 26.9% · Draw 28.1% · Away 45.0%
  • xG (showing): NAC Breda 1.17 — Heerenveen 1.57 (total xG ≈ 2.74)
  • Primary / headline line (Betting Primary Pick when shown): Under 2.5 goals
  • Model: 48.4% · Implied: 37.1% · Probability edge: +11.3 pts · Est. EV: +30.7%
  • BTTS (model): Yes 56.2% · No 43.8%
  • Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (11.9%)

Where EV is shown, it is estimated return per unit stake at the best tracked decimal price — not the same thing as a raw probability gap.

Correct score remains high-variance even when a line is most likely on paper.

Best Bet + Reason

Primary angle highlighted on the page: Under 2.5 goals.

Model probability is compared to implied probability from odds to highlight a probability edge; EV uses the same model probability with the best decimal price tracked.

No pick is a guarantee; variance is especially large in scoreline markets.

FAQ

Why might 1X2 look unattractive while totals do not?

Tight 1X2 prices often embed a fair three-way split, so EV on match-winner can sit negative even when Over/Under or BTTS still diverges from the model — compare the 1X2 row on the market cards to O/U and BTTS.

What is the best-supported line in this snapshot?

Match the hero card above: if it says “Betting Primary Pick”, that leg cleared primary rules; if it says “Best +EV (tracked markets)”, it is the strongest +EV line that did not meet stricter Primary thresholds. The bullets below repeat the same model %, implied %, edge (pts), and EV % as that card.

What changes first if odds move?

Implied probabilities and EV move immediately with price; model probabilities in this snapshot do not update until the pipeline is re-run. Refresh after material line moves.

How should I read EV versus a probability gap?

Probability edge = model probability minus implied probability (reported here in percentage points). EV ≈ model probability × best tracked decimal odds − 1, shown as return per unit stake. They are related but not interchangeable labels.

Risk Factors

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Methodology

  • Inputs: Same structured facts bundle as the public prediction page (xG / Poisson snapshot, market EV where available, decision engine v2).
  • Compliance: Educational framing only; not personalised advice.

Last Updated

May 17, 2026 (UTC)

How to use this
  • Focus on the Primary line when you want one actionable idea.
  • Do not parlay many thin-edge picks together; edges do not add reliably.
  • Treat longshots as optional, high-stake-sizing plays only.

Get Premium Predictions for NAC Breda & Heerenveen!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Statistics
Eredivisie Eredivisie — Standings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 PSV Eindhoven 33 26 3 4 81
2 Feyenoord 33 18 8 7 62
3 Twente 33 15 13 5 58
4 NEC Nijmegen 33 15 11 7 56
5 Ajax 33 14 13 6 55
6 AZ Alkmaar 33 14 9 10 51
7 Utrecht 33 14 8 11 50
8 Heerenveen 33 14 8 11 50
9 Groningen 33 13 6 14 45
10 Sparta Rotterdam 33 12 7 14 43
11 Fortuna Sittard 33 11 6 16 39
12 GO Ahead Eagles 33 8 14 11 38
13 PEC Zwolle 33 9 10 14 37
14 Excelsior 33 9 8 16 35
15 Telstar 33 8 10 15 34
16 FC Volendam 33 8 8 17 32
17 NAC Breda 33 6 10 17 28
18 Heracles 33 5 4 24 19
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 PSV Eindhoven 33 96 44 +52 81
2 NEC Nijmegen 33 75 52 +23 56
3 Feyenoord 33 68 44 +24 62
4 Ajax 33 62 41 +21 55
5 Twente 33 58 35 +23 58
6 Heerenveen 33 57 53 +4 50
7 AZ Alkmaar 33 55 48 +7 51
8 Utrecht 33 53 42 +11 50
9 GO Ahead Eagles 33 53 51 +2 38
10 Fortuna Sittard 33 49 61 -12 39
11 Groningen 33 47 44 +3 45
12 Telstar 33 47 54 -7 34
13 PEC Zwolle 33 44 69 -25 37
14 Excelsior 33 40 54 -14 35
15 Sparta Rotterdam 33 38 59 -21 43
16 FC Volendam 33 34 53 -19 32
17 Heracles 33 34 83 -49 19
18 NAC Breda 33 32 55 -23 28
# TEAM MP xG xGC +/- PTS
1 PSV Eindhoven 33 67.2 35.9 +31.3 81
2 Feyenoord 33 63.9 36.5 +27.4 62
3 Twente 33 58.9 33.7 +25.2 58
4 AZ Alkmaar 33 60.5 40.4 +20.1 51
5 NEC Nijmegen 33 57.1 45.6 +11.5 56
6 Groningen 33 56.8 45.6 +11.2 45
7 Heerenveen 33 56.7 47.5 +9.2 50
8 Ajax 33 51.6 44.0 +7.6 55
9 Utrecht 33 47.9 43.9 +4.0 50
10 Sparta Rotterdam 33 40.0 47.1 -7.1 43
11 Telstar 33 45.9 57.2 -11.3 34
12 NAC Breda 33 37.3 48.9 -11.6 28
13 Excelsior 33 43.2 56.6 -13.4 35
14 GO Ahead Eagles 33 41.4 57.9 -16.5 38
15 Fortuna Sittard 33 39.4 56.4 -17.0 39
16 PEC Zwolle 33 35.5 55.4 -19.9 37
17 FC Volendam 33 33.4 57.9 -24.5 32
18 Heracles 33 38.5 64.5 -26.0 19
Eredivisie Netherlands. Eredivisie Predictions
Popular Leagues