The model missed the final outcome (Bradford win 0–1).
The model had projected Notts County at 49.0%, but the full-time result went the other way.
Tracked markets vs full-time result
Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.
- Market Prediction Result Outcome
- Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Under 2.5 (1 goals) ✔ Correct
- Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes No ✖ Incorrect
- 1X2 Notts County Bradford ✖ Incorrect
- Correct Score Insights 1-1, 1-0, 2-1, 2-0, 0-1 0-1 ✔ Correct
Model vs Closing Market
| Outcome | Model | Closing Market | Difference | Signal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Notts County | 49.0% | 33.0% | +16.0 pp | Model Edge |
| Draw | 28.3% | 28.4% | -0.1 pp | Aligned |
| Bradford | 22.7% | 38.6% | -15.9 pp | Market Higher |
The statistical model estimates Notts County's win probability at 49.0%, compared with the closing market's implied probability of 33.0%, a difference of 16.0 percentage points. This highlights a substantial disagreement between the model's assessment and the market consensus, rather than indicating which view is ultimately correct.
Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.
After full time, the result was Bradford win 0–1.
Market Assessment
The statistical fair estimate is materially higher than the market on Notts County.
- The model may see a slower-scoring or closer matchup than the market.
- Monitor line movement before kickoff — not a betting recommendation.
Post Match Insights
What worked
- Under 2.5 goals aligned with the xG profile
- Exact score 0–1 fell within the model's highlighted bins
What failed
- Both Teams To Score: model leaned BTTS Yes; match finished BTTS No
- 1X2: model leaned Notts County; match finished Bradford
Market lesson
The closing market differed from the model on Notts County by 16.0 percentage points (33.0% vs model 49.0%) — in this case the market view proved closer.
Prediction Timeline
How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.
-
Sep 12, 2026 · 19:17 UTC Forecast generated
- Model 1X2 · Notts County 49.0% · Draw 28.3% · Bradford 22.7%
- xG · Notts County 1.58 — Bradford 1.01
-
Sep 12, 2026 · 11:04 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
- 1X2 odds · Notts County 2.92 · Draw 3.39 · Bradford 2.50
- Implied 1X2 · Notts County 33.0% · Draw 28.4% · Bradford 38.6%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Sep 12, 2026 · 11:30 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
- 1X2 odds · Notts County 2.92 · Draw 3.39 · Bradford 2.50
- Implied 1X2 · Notts County 33.0% · Draw 28.4% · Bradford 38.6%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Sep 12, 2026 · 11:30 UTC Kickoff
-
FT Full-time result Bradford win · 0–1
-
FT Prediction missed 1X2 lean did not match full-time result
-
Archived Prediction review
Historical Snapshot
Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
- Validation: Warning
- Large market gap (16 pp)
- Statistical edge detected
- Pricing remains divergent
- Validation warning
Validation Report
Immutable SnapshotModel Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
Review FAQ
- How accurate was the prediction?
- This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
- What does xG Accuracy measure?
- xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
- Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
- Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
- Does this improve the AI record?
- Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.
Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Explore More Predictions Content
Get Premium Predictions for Notts County & Bradford!
Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.
Subscribe Now
League One — Standings
| # | TEAM | MP | W | D | L | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bradford | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 15 |
| 2 | Sheffield Wednesday | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 14 |
| 3 | Plymouth | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 13 |
| 4 | Huddersfield | 7 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 12 |
| 5 | Cambridge United | 7 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 12 |
| 6 | Oxford United | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 11 |
| 7 | AFC Wimbledon | 7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 11 |
| 8 | Reading | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 10 |
| 9 | Stockport County | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 10 |
| 10 | Leyton Orient | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 10 |
| 11 | Stevenage | 7 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 9 |
| 12 | Burton Albion | 7 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 9 |
| 13 | Leicester | 7 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 9 |
| 14 | Wycombe | 7 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 9 |
| 15 | Blackpool | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 8 |
| 16 | Luton | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 8 |
| 17 | Mansfield Town | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 8 |
| 18 | Barnsley | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 8 |
| 19 | Bromley | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 8 |
| 20 | Notts County | 7 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 7 |
| 21 | Doncaster | 7 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
| 22 | Milton Keynes Dons | 7 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 6 |
| 23 | Peterborough | 7 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 5 |
| 24 | Wigan | 7 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 4 |
| # | TEAM | MP | GS | GC | +/- | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Stockport County | 7 | 16 | 10 | +6 | 10 |
| 2 | Reading | 6 | 14 | 7 | +7 | 10 |
| 3 | Plymouth | 7 | 14 | 10 | +4 | 13 |
| 4 | Sheffield Wednesday | 7 | 13 | 6 | +7 | 14 |
| 5 | Oxford United | 6 | 13 | 7 | +6 | 11 |
| 6 | Leyton Orient | 7 | 13 | 9 | +4 | 10 |
| 7 | Blackpool | 7 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 8 |
| 8 | Cambridge United | 7 | 12 | 10 | +2 | 12 |
| 9 | Burton Albion | 7 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 9 |
| 10 | Luton | 7 | 12 | 14 | -2 | 8 |
| 11 | Huddersfield | 7 | 11 | 6 | +5 | 12 |
| 12 | Stevenage | 7 | 11 | 8 | +3 | 9 |
| 13 | Wycombe | 7 | 11 | 14 | -3 | 9 |
| 14 | Mansfield Town | 7 | 10 | 13 | -3 | 8 |
| 15 | Leicester | 7 | 9 | 11 | -2 | 9 |
| 16 | Doncaster | 7 | 8 | 9 | -1 | 6 |
| 17 | Milton Keynes Dons | 7 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 6 |
| 18 | Bromley | 7 | 8 | 18 | -10 | 8 |
| 19 | Bradford | 7 | 7 | 4 | +3 | 15 |
| 20 | Notts County | 7 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 7 |
| 21 | Barnsley | 7 | 7 | 12 | -5 | 8 |
| 22 | AFC Wimbledon | 7 | 5 | 7 | -2 | 11 |
| 23 | Wigan | 7 | 5 | 12 | -7 | 4 |
| 24 | Peterborough | 7 | 4 | 12 | -8 | 5 |
| # | TEAM | MP | xG | xGC | +/- | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sheffield Wednesday | 7 | 8.6 | 3.5 | +5.1 | 14 |
| 2 | Wigan | 7 | 6.9 | 3.6 | +3.3 | 4 |
| 3 | Notts County | 7 | 5.3 | 2.8 | +2.5 | 7 |
| 4 | Reading | 6 | 5.3 | 3.3 | +2.0 | 10 |
| 5 | Huddersfield | 7 | 4.7 | 2.7 | +2.0 | 12 |
| 6 | Stockport County | 7 | 7.0 | 5.5 | +1.5 | 10 |
| 7 | Luton | 7 | 6.2 | 4.7 | +1.5 | 8 |
| 8 | Doncaster | 7 | 3.1 | 2.0 | +1.1 | 6 |
| 9 | Blackpool | 7 | 8.7 | 8.2 | +0.5 | 8 |
| 10 | Wycombe | 7 | 4.4 | 4.1 | +0.3 | 9 |
| 11 | Barnsley | 7 | 5.6 | 5.5 | +0.1 | 8 |
| 12 | Leicester | 7 | 3.4 | 3.5 | -0.1 | 9 |
| 13 | Oxford United | 6 | 2.4 | 2.8 | -0.4 | 11 |
| 14 | Bradford | 7 | 3.0 | 3.6 | -0.6 | 15 |
| 15 | Stevenage | 7 | 2.0 | 2.8 | -0.8 | 9 |
| 16 | Cambridge United | 7 | 3.6 | 4.5 | -0.9 | 12 |
| 17 | Peterborough | 7 | 4.3 | 5.6 | -1.3 | 5 |
| 18 | Plymouth | 7 | 3.4 | 4.7 | -1.3 | 13 |
| 19 | Mansfield Town | 7 | 5.2 | 6.6 | -1.4 | 8 |
| 20 | Milton Keynes Dons | 7 | 3.7 | 5.2 | -1.5 | 6 |
| 21 | Burton Albion | 7 | 2.7 | 5.3 | -2.6 | 9 |
| 22 | AFC Wimbledon | 7 | 2.9 | 5.7 | -2.8 | 11 |
| 23 | Leyton Orient | 7 | 3.1 | 6.0 | -2.9 | 10 |
| 24 | Bromley | 7 | 3.1 | 6.5 | -3.4 | 8 |