AI correctly predicted the Rapid Vienna win.
The match finished 3–1, validating the model's directional assessment.
Tracked markets vs full-time result
Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.
- Market Prediction Result Outcome
- Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Over 2.5 (4 goals) ✖ Incorrect
- Both Teams To Score BTTS No Yes ✖ Incorrect
- 1X2 Rapid Vienna Rapid Vienna ✔ Correct
- Correct Score Insights 1-1, 1-0, 0-1, 0-0, 2-1 3-1 ✖ Incorrect
Model vs Closing Market
| Outcome | Model | Closing Market | Difference | Signal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rapid Vienna | 39.3% | 45.8% | -6.5 pp | Market Higher |
| Draw | 29.3% | 23.9% | +5.4 pp | Model Higher |
| Sturm Graz | 31.4% | 30.3% | +1.1 pp | Aligned |
The closing market estimates Rapid Vienna's win probability at 45.8%, compared with the model's estimate of 39.3%, a difference of 6.5 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.
Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.
After full time, the model's directional lean matched the result (Rapid Vienna win 3–1).
Market Assessment
The market and model broadly agree on Rapid Vienna. The remaining divergence may reflect differences in team-strength assumptions rather than a directional disagreement.
- Monitor line movement before kickoff — not a betting recommendation.
Post Match Insights
What failed
- Both Teams To Score: model leaned BTTS No; match finished BTTS Yes
- Over / Under 2.5: model leaned Under 2.5; match finished Over 2.5 (4 goals)
Market lesson
Large model–market gaps do not automatically mean the market is right. Here the closing market priced Rapid Vienna higher (45.8% vs model 39.3%, 6.5 pp), but the model's lean was validated (Rapid Vienna win 3–1).
Prediction Timeline
How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.
-
Aug 30, 2026 · 19:32 UTC Forecast generated
- Model 1X2 · Rapid Vienna 39.2% · Draw 29.3% · Sturm Graz 31.4%
- xG · Rapid Vienna 1.22 — Sturm Graz 1.12
-
Aug 30, 2026 · 14:34 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
- 1X2 odds · Rapid Vienna 2.11 · Draw 4.04 · Sturm Graz 3.19
- Implied 1X2 · Rapid Vienna 45.8% · Draw 23.9% · Sturm Graz 30.3%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Aug 30, 2026 · 15:03 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
- 1X2 odds · Rapid Vienna 2.11 · Draw 4.04 · Sturm Graz 3.19
- Implied 1X2 · Rapid Vienna 45.8% · Draw 23.9% · Sturm Graz 30.3%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Aug 30, 2026 · 15:00 UTC Kickoff
-
FT Full-time result Rapid Vienna win · 3–1
-
FT Prediction validated Directional lean matched full-time result
-
Archived Prediction review
Historical Snapshot
Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
- Validation: Pass
- No strong statistical edge
- Direction agrees with model lean
- Validation passed
Validation Report
Immutable SnapshotModel Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
Review FAQ
- How accurate was the prediction?
- This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
- What does xG Accuracy measure?
- xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
- Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
- Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
- Does this improve the AI record?
- Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.
Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Explore More Predictions Content
Get Premium Predictions for Rapid Vienna & Sturm Graz!
Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.
Subscribe Now
Bundesliga — Standings
| # | TEAM | MP | W | D | L | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lask Linz | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 15 |
| 2 | Red Bull Salzburg | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 13 |
| 3 | Rapid Vienna | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 12 |
| 4 | Sturm Graz | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 8 |
| 5 | WSG Wattens | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 |
| 6 | TSV Hartberg | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 6 |
| 7 | Wolfsberger AC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 |
| 8 | Austria Lustenau | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 |
| 9 | Ried | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| 10 | Grazer AK | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| 11 | SCR Altach | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3 |
| 12 | Austria Vienna | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3 |
| # | TEAM | MP | GS | GC | +/- | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lask Linz | 5 | 15 | 2 | +13 | 15 |
| 2 | Rapid Vienna | 5 | 15 | 7 | +8 | 12 |
| 3 | Red Bull Salzburg | 5 | 14 | 3 | +11 | 13 |
| 4 | WSG Wattens | 5 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| 5 | Sturm Graz | 5 | 6 | 5 | +1 | 8 |
| 6 | Wolfsberger AC | 5 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 5 |
| 7 | Ried | 5 | 6 | 10 | -4 | 4 |
| 8 | TSV Hartberg | 5 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 6 |
| 9 | Austria Lustenau | 5 | 5 | 9 | -4 | 5 |
| 10 | SCR Altach | 5 | 4 | 8 | -4 | 3 |
| 11 | Austria Vienna | 5 | 3 | 10 | -7 | 3 |
| 12 | Grazer AK | 5 | 2 | 13 | -11 | 4 |
| # | TEAM | MP | xG | xGC | +/- | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lask Linz | 5 | 11.0 | 2.3 | +8.7 | 15 |
| 2 | Red Bull Salzburg | 5 | 12.7 | 4.4 | +8.3 | 13 |
| 3 | Rapid Vienna | 5 | 10.5 | 3.9 | +6.6 | 12 |
| 4 | Sturm Graz | 5 | 7.5 | 4.8 | +2.7 | 8 |
| 5 | Ried | 5 | 7.8 | 8.2 | -0.4 | 4 |
| 6 | SCR Altach | 5 | 6.1 | 7.9 | -1.8 | 3 |
| 7 | WSG Wattens | 5 | 5.6 | 8.2 | -2.6 | 7 |
| 8 | Austria Lustenau | 5 | 5.8 | 9.0 | -3.2 | 5 |
| 9 | Wolfsberger AC | 5 | 4.8 | 8.6 | -3.8 | 5 |
| 10 | TSV Hartberg | 5 | 5.9 | 10.1 | -4.2 | 6 |
| 11 | Grazer AK | 5 | 5.9 | 10.2 | -4.3 | 4 |
| 12 | Austria Vienna | 5 | 2.4 | 8.5 | -6.1 | 3 |