Predictions / Football / China. League Two / Nantong Haimen Codion vs Rizhao Yuqi

Prediction Audit: Nantong Haimen Codion vs Rizhao Yuqi Prediction, Odds & AI Betting Tips

Jul 19, 2026 - 11:30
0 1.42
0 1.18
xG Accuracy: 49%

The model missed the final outcome (Draw 0–0).

The model had projected Nantong Haimen Codion at 40.9%, but the full-time result went the other way.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Prediction grade F

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Under 2.5 (0 goals) ✔ Correct
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes No ✖ Incorrect
  • 1X2 Nantong Haimen Codion Draw ✖ Incorrect
  • Correct Score Insights 1-1, 1-0, 2-1, 0-1, 2-0 0-0 ✖ Incorrect

Model vs Closing Market

Moderate Disagreement

The model rates Rizhao Yuqi considerably stronger than the closing betting market.

Largest probability gap: Rizhao Yuqi +7.2 pp

Outcome Model Closing Market Difference Signal
Nantong Haimen Codion 40.9% 44.8% -3.9 pp Aligned
Draw 29.4% 32.8% -3.4 pp Aligned
Rizhao Yuqi 29.7% 22.5% +7.2 pp Model Higher

The statistical model estimates Rizhao Yuqi's win probability at 29.7%, compared with the closing market's implied probability of 22.5%, a difference of 7.2 percentage points. This highlights a substantial disagreement between the model's assessment and the market consensus, rather than indicating which view is ultimately correct.

Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.

After full time, the result was Draw 0–0.

Market Assessment

The fair estimate shows a modest edge over current market pricing on Rizhao Yuqi.

  • Monitor line movement before kickoff — not a betting recommendation.

Post Match Insights

What worked

  • Under 2.5 goals aligned with the xG profile

What failed

  • Both Teams To Score: model leaned BTTS Yes; match finished BTTS No
  • 1X2: model leaned Nantong Haimen Codion; match finished Draw

Market lesson

The closing market differed from the model on Nantong Haimen Codion by 7.2 percentage points (33.7% vs model 40.9%) — in this case the market view proved closer.

Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Prediction Timeline

How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.

  1. Jul 19, 2026 · 19:26 UTC Forecast generated
    • Model 1X2 · Nantong Haimen Codion 41.0% · Draw 29.4% · Rizhao Yuqi 29.6%
    • xG · Nantong Haimen Codion 1.42 — Rizhao Yuqi 1.18
  2. Jul 19, 2026 · 10:59 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
    • 1X2 odds · Nantong Haimen Codion 2.02 · Draw 2.76 · Rizhao Yuqi 4.02
    • Implied 1X2 · Nantong Haimen Codion 44.8% · Draw 32.8% · Rizhao Yuqi 22.5%
    • Bookmaker · Pinnacle
  3. Jul 19, 2026 · 11:29 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
    • 1X2 odds · Nantong Haimen Codion 2.02 · Draw 2.76 · Rizhao Yuqi 4.02
    • Implied 1X2 · Nantong Haimen Codion 44.8% · Draw 32.8% · Rizhao Yuqi 22.5%
    • Bookmaker · Pinnacle
  4. Jul 19, 2026 · 11:30 UTC Kickoff
  5. FT Full-time result Draw · 0–0
  6. FT Prediction missed 1X2 lean did not match full-time result
  7. Archived Prediction review

Historical Snapshot

Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.

Historical verdict: Observe
Historical Decision No Primary Bet
Outcome Missed
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
Prediction Reliability 75/100 · High
  • Validation: Pass
Evidence
  • No strong statistical edge
  • Direction agrees with model lean
  • Validation passed
Pricing proximity (inverse gap) 64/100
Betting Confidence 78/100

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Jul 23, 2026 · 18:43 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-1485920

Closing Odds 4.02
AI Fair Odds
CLV Pending
Final Result Draw · Nantong Haimen Codion 0–0 Rizhao Yuqi
Prediction ✖ Missed
Decision Grade F

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Review FAQ

How accurate was the prediction?
This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
What does xG Accuracy measure?
xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
Does this improve the AI record?
Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.

Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Quick read on how the model reads this matchup.

  • League: China League Two
  • Fixture: Nantong Haimen Codion vs Rizhao Yuqi
  • Kickoff: 2026-07-19 11:30:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 45.0% · Draw 45.0% · Away 10.0%
  • xG (showing): Nantong Haimen Codion 1.42 — Rizhao Yuqi 1.18 (total xG ≈ 2.6)
  • Value headline: None — no positive EV could be estimated on tracked lines at current best prices (missing odds or thin book depth).
  • Structural leans (not bets): See the Over/Under and BTTS cards for any directional lean text.
  • BTTS (model): Yes N/A · No N/A
  • Correct score (top bin): N/A

Saying “no value” on a snapshot is a feature, not a bug: it protects readers from forcing a play when the edge is not there.

Prefer skipping to over-staking when the engine is honest about missing edge.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: No Primary Bet

Outcome: Missed — Pre-match 1X2 lean did not match the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

September 18, 2026 (UTC)

Get Premium Predictions for Nantong Haimen Codion & Rizhao Yuqi!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Predictions