Predictions / Football / Austria. Landesliga - Tirol / St. Johann in Tirol vs Völs

St. Johann in Tirol vs Völs Prediction, Odds & AI Betting Tips

Jun 13, 2026 - 15:00
2.12
1.61
49% 23% 28%

Forecast Assessment

Reliable forecast

Favourite
St. Johann in Tirol Slight favourite
Model probability
48.6%
Market agreement
Validation
Pending

Summary:

The model leans St. Johann in Tirol, with modest separation from other outcomes. Monitor market movement before kickoff.

Final betting verdict

No default bet at standard thresholds — use leans for context only.

  • No value on 1X2 (St. Johann in Tirol vs. current odds)
  • Model lean (not a default bet): Over 2.5
  • Model lean (not a default bet): BTTS Yes
Low conviction (4/10) — prefer smaller stakes or skip.
Premium betting site 1xbet: New users can use the promo code 1x_3342271 to receive $100 cash.
1X2 No bet on 1X2 — no value vs. current odds on this market
Match: 48.6% St. Johann in Tirol
No positive EV could be estimated on tracked lines at current best odds (missing prices or insufficient book depth).
Both Teams To Score Lean
Yes 71.5% · No 28.5%
Value lean: BTTS Yes
1X2 Pass
St. Johann in Tirol · Model probability 48.6%
Correct Score Insights Longshot / fun
Most Likely
2-1
Probability 8.7%
Correct score is high-variance — small stakes for fun only.
Betting decision (model vs. market EV)
Lean only (below +EV threshold) — The model leans a side in at least one market, but no tracked line reaches the engine’s minimum EV threshold for a default stake suggestion.
Decision strength: 4.0 / 10
  • Max 1X2 prob under 50% (no dominant 1X2) (−1.0)
O/U 2.5: insufficient book odds for EV
BTTS: insufficient book odds for EV
Should you bet on this match? No default bet: the model does not show +EV at the configured threshold on available lines.

Decision Lifecycle

Current stage: Waiting for closing line

  1. Forecast Generated
  2. Market Compared
  3. Validation Passed
  4. Closing Recorded
  5. CLV Evaluated
Entry
Pending
Closing
Pending
CLV
Pending

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Below is a compact, numbers-first snapshot aligned with the same engine as the cards above.

  • League: Landesliga - Tirol
  • Fixture: St. Johann in Tirol vs Völs
  • Kickoff: 2026-06-13 15:00:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 48.6% · Draw 23.0% · Away 28.4%
  • xG (showing): St. Johann in Tirol 2.12 — Völs 1.61 (total xG ≈ 3.73)
  • Value headline: None — no positive EV could be estimated on tracked lines at current best prices (missing odds or thin book depth).
  • Structural leans (not bets): Structural lean (model): O/U 2.5 Over 2.5 (Under 2.5 28.0% · Over 2.5 72.0%); BTTS Yes (Yes 71.5% · No 28.5%) Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Over 2.5; BTTS Yes
  • BTTS (model): Yes 71.5% · No 28.5%
  • Correct score (top bin): 2-1 (8.7%)

The decision block shows no default bet: no tracked line clears the headline minimum +EV threshold at the best prices we have (a leg can still show small +EV below that bar). Lean labels are directional only — not bankroll-sized recommendations.

Most likely correct score stays a low-probability tail: use it for context, not as a must-bet story.

Best Bet + Reason

No bankroll-sized bet is implied here.

Treat this page as a read-only diagnostic: totals/BTTS structure can be informative even when the honest answer is to wait.

Correct-score markets remain high-variance even when one scoreline leads the table.

FAQ

What do the grey “lean” labels mean then?

They summarise where the model tilts (e.g. Under 2.5 or BTTS No) without claiming a positive economic edge. Use them as context; size to zero unless you deliberately accept discretionary risk.

Is the most likely correct score still relevant?

As context only: it is still a low absolute probability tail outcome (often in the single digits, sometimes low teens). It does not override the “no headline +EV” stance — treat score bets as fun-sized if you play them at all.

When would a headline +EV return?

When odds move enough that implied probabilities drop relative to the same model snapshot, or when more book prices arrive so EV can be computed reliably — then re-run the pipeline.

Why is there no “best bet” on this page?

The headline engine uses a minimum +EV threshold (e.g. 2%) for a default pick. A line can still show tiny +EV that fails that bar — we still call it no default bet so readers do not over-size thin edges.

Risk Factors

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Methodology

  • Inputs: Same structured facts bundle as the public prediction page (xG / Poisson snapshot, market EV where available, decision engine v2).
  • Compliance: Educational framing only; not personalised advice.

Last Updated

June 13, 2026 (UTC)

How to use this
  • Focus on the Primary line when you want one actionable idea.
  • Do not parlay many thin-edge picks together; edges do not add reliably.
  • Treat longshots as optional, high-stake-sizing plays only.

Get Premium Predictions for St. Johann in Tirol & Völs!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Predictions
Landesliga - Tirol Landesliga - TirolStandings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 Swarovski Tirol II 24 17 5 2 56
2 St. Johann in Tirol 24 17 3 4 54
3 Fügen 25 17 2 6 53
4 Innsbrucker AC 24 11 4 9 37
5 Kundl 24 11 2 11 35
6 Ebbs 25 10 5 10 35
7 Völs 23 8 9 6 33
8 Telfs 24 9 2 13 29
9 Oberperfuss 25 9 2 14 29
10 Silz / Mötz 25 9 1 15 28
11 Wörgl 24 9 1 14 28
12 Kematen 25 6 7 12 25
13 Mils 24 5 6 13 21
14 Volders 24 5 5 14 20
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 Fügen 25 66 35 +31 53
2 Swarovski Tirol II 24 58 22 +36 56
3 St. Johann in Tirol 24 56 24 +32 54
4 Kundl 24 50 41 +9 35
5 Silz / Mötz 25 50 58 -8 28
6 Ebbs 25 49 40 +9 35
7 Oberperfuss 25 47 59 -12 29
8 Telfs 24 45 49 -4 29
9 Innsbrucker AC 24 43 34 +9 37
10 Kematen 25 41 59 -18 25
11 Völs 23 34 34 0 33
12 Wörgl 24 31 56 -25 28
13 Mils 24 30 58 -28 21
14 Volders 24 28 59 -31 20