Elana Toruń vs Noteć Czarnków Prediction, Odds & AI Betting Tips

Elana Toruń

May 23, 2026 - 16:00

1.45

1.25

42% 26% 33%

Noteć Czarnków

Betting Primary Pick (highest +EV)

Under 2.5 — Value

EV 29.2% Model 45.8%

Not a dominant outcome (model probability is below 50% on this leg).

Secondary (balanced value): BTTS No (EV 22.1%) — 53.1% Model

Secondary (balanced value): Elana Toruń (EV 14.8%) — 41.8% Model

Lower EV than primary, but with higher model probability (more “stable” when shown).

Why The model prices Elana Toruń (1X2) about 30.7 percentage points above closing implied — the main structural read vs. the line.

Market intelligence

Supporting read on how the prioritized closing feed moved versus the model — use after the Primary pick above.

Market briefing

Market remained largely stable before kickoff. No meaningful late implied-price shift was detected between PRE30 and PRE1 on the prioritized bookmaker snapshot.

Despite limited late movement, the model still prices Elana Toruń (1X2), Draw (1X2), Under 2.5 goals meaningfully above what those closing snapshots implied — that gap is a static “model vs. price” read, not a late steam or chase story.

The model still exceeds closing implied on Elana Toruń (1X2) by about 30.7 percentage points — the clearest mispricing signal summarized on this page.

Model vs. closing implied

Market	Model %	Closing impl. %	Gap (pp)
Elana Toruń (1X2)	41.8	11.1	+30.7
Draw (1X2)	25.7	17.6	+8.1
Noteć Czarnków (1X2)	32.6	71.3	-38.8
Over 2.5 goals	54.2	63.8	-9.6
Under 2.5 goals	45.8	36.2	+9.6

What this means

In plain terms: the model lands near 41.8% on Elana Toruń (1X2), while the closing snapshot implied about 11.1%. The difference — about 30.7 percentage points — is the largest model-vs.-market gap highlighted on this page.

Quick definitions: “closing implied” is the probability for that outcome implied by the final captured odds (after a simple de-vig). “Gap (pp)” is the model percentage minus that implied value, in percentage points (pp).

Closing-window line move

Single prioritized bookmaker per snapshot (not all books). Capture path: PRE30 → PRE1 · Book: Pinnacle

Column tags in parentheses: Closing uses the first available snapshot in PRE1→PRE5→PRE10→PRE30; Early uses the first available in PRE30→PRE10→PRE5 that is not the same capture as Closing.

Detailed capture odds are folded below — movement was negligible on de-vig implied prices.

View full line-by-line capture table

Market	Early (PRE30)	Closing (PRE1)
Elana Toruń (1X2)	7.97	7.97
Draw (1X2)	5.03	5.03
Noteć Czarnków (1X2)	1.24	1.24
Over 2.5 goals	1.43	1.43
Under 2.5 goals	2.52	2.52

Both Teams To Score Best value (+EV)

Yes 46.9% · No 53.1%

EV Yes -4.79% · EV No 22.13%

Value lean: BTTS No

1X2 Best value (+EV)

Elana Toruń · Model 41.8%

implied 11.1%

Main consensus market · EV: 14.8%

Correct Score Insights Longshot / fun

Most Likely

1-1

Probability 11.7%

Correct score is high-variance — small stakes for fun only.

Betting decision (model vs. market EV)

Value opportunity — At least one market shows estimated +EV at current best decimal odds (threshold: 2.0%).

Decision strength: 6.5 / 10

Primary line identified (+1.0)
Primary EV above 10% (+1.0)
Max 1X2 prob under 50% (no dominant 1X2) (−1.0)
Two or more valid +EV lines at threshold (+0.5)

O/U 2.5: EV Over -13.28% · EV Under 29.16% (6 book pairs)
BTTS: EV Yes -4.79% · EV No 22.13%

Should you bet on this match? Only where +EV is shown; always compare with your own limits.

OddsGPT Decision Engine v2.1.0(EV + Market Structure + Risk Adjustment) Check Odds at 1xBet

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Quick read on how the model reads this matchup.

League: III Liga - Group 2
Fixture: Elana Toruń vs Noteć Czarnków
Kickoff: 2026-05-23 16:00:00
1X2 (model): Home 41.8% · Draw 25.7% · Away 32.6%
xG (showing): Elana Toruń 1.45 — Noteć Czarnków 1.25 (total xG ≈ 2.7)
Primary / headline line (Betting Primary Pick when shown): Under 2.5 goals
Model: 45.8% · Implied: 38.5% · Probability edge: +7.3 pts · Est. EV: +29.2%
BTTS (model): Yes 46.9% · No 53.1%
Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (11.7%)

Totals and BTTS are evaluated against current market prices where available.

Early match state can move realised goals away from pre-kick projections.

Best Bet + Reason

Primary angle highlighted on the page: Under 2.5 goals.

If 1X2 looks tight, the engine may still find clearer structure in totals or BTTS — that is intentional.

No pick is a guarantee; variance is especially large in scoreline markets.

FAQ

Safer market than correct score?

Markets with more liquidity and smoother prices (often 1X2 or O/U 2.5 from many books) are usually easier to reason about than long-tail correct-score prices; still read EV on each leg.

What is the best-supported line in this snapshot?

Match the hero card above: if it says “Betting Primary Pick”, that leg cleared primary rules; if it says “Best +EV (tracked markets)”, it is the strongest +EV line that did not meet stricter Primary thresholds. The bullets below repeat the same model %, implied %, edge (pts), and EV % as that card.

How should I read EV versus a probability gap?

Probability edge = model probability minus implied probability (reported here in percentage points). EV ≈ model probability × best tracked decimal odds − 1, shown as return per unit stake. They are related but not interchangeable labels.

Why might 1X2 look unattractive while totals do not?

Tight 1X2 prices often embed a fair three-way split, so EV on match-winner can sit negative even when Over/Under or BTTS still diverges from the model — compare the 1X2 row on the market cards to O/U and BTTS.

Risk Factors

Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Methodology

Inputs: Same structured facts bundle as the public prediction page (xG / Poisson snapshot, market EV where available, decision engine v2).
Compliance: Educational framing only; not personalised advice.

Last Updated

May 23, 2026 (UTC)

How to use this

Focus on the Primary line when you want one actionable idea.
Do not parlay many thin-edge picks together; edges do not add reliably.
Treat longshots as optional, high-stake-sizing plays only.

Explore More Predictions Content

Get Premium Predictions for Elana Toruń & Noteć Czarnków!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now

Back to Predictions

III Liga - Group 2 — Standings

#	TEAM	MP	W	D	L	PTS
1	Zawisza Bydgoszcz	32	23	5	4	74
2	Luzino	32	23	4	5	73
3	Polonia Środa	32	18	6	8	60
4	Lech Poznań II	32	14	7	11	49
5	Elana Toruń	32	14	7	11	49
6	Flota Świnoujście	33	14	7	12	49
7	Wda Świecie	32	14	6	12	48
8	Kluczevia Stargard	32	13	7	12	46
9	Lipno Stęszew	32	13	6	13	45
10	Unia Swarzędz	32	12	8	12	44
11	Noteć Czarnków	32	12	7	14	43
12	Stargard Szczeciński	33	11	9	13	42
13	Victoria Września	32	12	3	17	39
14	Cartusia Kartuzy	33	11	5	17	38
15	Pogoń Nowe Skalmierzyce	32	9	9	14	36
16	Pogoń Szczecin II	32	10	5	17	35
17	Tłuchowia	33	7	6	19	28
18	Wybrzeże Rewalskie Rewal	32	3	6	23	15

#	TEAM	MP	GS	GC	+/-	PTS
1	Luzino	32	76	35	+41	73
2	Zawisza Bydgoszcz	32	69	23	+46	74
3	Lech Poznań II	32	66	49	+17	49
4	Polonia Środa	32	63	41	+22	60
5	Pogoń Szczecin II	32	58	64	-6	35
6	Stargard Szczeciński	33	53	51	+2	42
7	Kluczevia Stargard	32	51	38	+13	46
8	Flota Świnoujście	33	48	49	-1	49
9	Elana Toruń	32	47	47	0	49
10	Noteć Czarnków	32	43	45	-2	43
11	Wda Świecie	32	42	50	-8	48
12	Unia Swarzędz	32	41	36	+5	44
13	Lipno Stęszew	32	40	50	-10	45
14	Victoria Września	32	38	42	-4	39
15	Cartusia Kartuzy	33	38	49	-11	38
16	Tłuchowia	33	32	64	-32	28
17	Pogoń Nowe Skalmierzyce	32	31	44	-13	36
18	Wybrzeże Rewalskie Rewal	32	18	77	-59	15