Troszyn vs Łomża Prediction, Odds & AI Betting Tips

Troszyn

May 23, 2026 - 16:00

1.45

1.25

42% 26% 33%

Łomża

Betting Primary Pick (highest +EV)

BTTS Yes — Value

EV 18.9% Model 82.0%

Why The model prices Troszyn (1X2) about 12.3 percentage points above closing implied — the main structural read vs. the line.

Market intelligence

Supporting read on how the prioritized closing feed moved versus the model — use after the Primary pick above.

Market briefing

Market remained largely stable before kickoff. No meaningful late implied-price shift was detected between PRE30 and PRE1 on the prioritized bookmaker snapshot.

Despite limited late movement, the model still prices Troszyn (1X2), Over 2.5 goals meaningfully above what those closing snapshots implied — that gap is a static “model vs. price” read, not a late steam or chase story.

The model still exceeds closing implied on Troszyn (1X2) by about 12.3 percentage points — the clearest mispricing signal summarized on this page.

Model vs. closing implied

Market	Model %	Closing impl. %	Gap (pp)
Troszyn (1X2)	41.8	29.4	+12.3
Draw (1X2)	25.7	25.7	-0.0
Łomża (1X2)	32.6	44.9	-12.3
Over 2.5 goals	66.0	59.7	+6.3
Under 2.5 goals	34.0	40.3	-6.3

What this means

In plain terms: the model lands near 41.8% on Troszyn (1X2), while the closing snapshot implied about 29.4%. The difference — about 12.3 percentage points — is the largest model-vs.-market gap highlighted on this page.

Quick definitions: “closing implied” is the probability for that outcome implied by the final captured odds (after a simple de-vig). “Gap (pp)” is the model percentage minus that implied value, in percentage points (pp).

Closing-window line move

Single prioritized bookmaker per snapshot (not all books). Capture path: PRE30 → PRE1 · Book: Pinnacle

Column tags in parentheses: Closing uses the first available snapshot in PRE1→PRE5→PRE10→PRE30; Early uses the first available in PRE30→PRE10→PRE5 that is not the same capture as Closing.

Detailed capture odds are folded below — movement was negligible on de-vig implied prices.

View full line-by-line capture table

Market	Early (PRE30)	Closing (PRE1)
Troszyn (1X2)	3.02	3.02
Draw (1X2)	3.46	3.46
Łomża (1X2)	1.98	1.98
Over 2.5 goals	1.53	1.53
Under 2.5 goals	2.27	2.27

Over / Under 2.5 Best value (+EV)

Over 2.5 66.0% · Under 2.5 34.0%

EV Over 3.62% · EV Under -16.7%

Value lean: Over 2.5

1X2 Poor value

Troszyn · Model 41.8%

implied 29.4%

Main consensus market · EV: -2.0%

Correct Score Insights Longshot / fun

Most Likely

1-1

Probability 9.6%

Correct score is high-variance — small stakes for fun only.

Betting decision (model vs. market EV)

Value opportunity — At least one market shows estimated +EV at current best decimal odds (threshold: 2.0%).

Decision strength: 6.5 / 10

Primary line identified (+1.0)
Primary EV above 10% (+1.0)
Max 1X2 prob under 50% (no dominant 1X2) (−1.0)
Two or more valid +EV lines at threshold (+0.5)

O/U 2.5: EV Over 3.62% · EV Under -16.7% (5 book pairs)
BTTS: EV Yes 18.9% · EV No -53.92%

Should you bet on this match? Only where +EV is shown; always compare with your own limits.

OddsGPT Decision Engine v2.1.0(EV + Market Structure + Risk Adjustment) Check Odds at 1xBet

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Below is a compact, numbers-first snapshot aligned with the same engine as the cards above.

League: III Liga - Group 1
Fixture: Troszyn vs Łomża
Kickoff: 2026-05-23 16:00:00
1X2 (model): Home 41.8% · Draw 25.7% · Away 32.6%
xG (showing): Troszyn 1.45 — Łomża 1.25 (total xG ≈ 2.7)
Primary / headline line (Betting Primary Pick when shown): BTTS Yes
Model: 82.0% · Implied: 63.6% · Probability edge: +18.4 pts · Est. EV: +18.9%
BTTS (model): Yes 82.0% · No 18.0%
Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (9.6%)

Totals and BTTS are evaluated against current market prices where available.

1X2 can look balanced even when side markets show clearer structure.

Best Bet + Reason

Primary angle highlighted on the page: BTTS Yes.

If 1X2 looks tight, the engine may still find clearer structure in totals or BTTS — that is intentional.

No pick is a guarantee; variance is especially large in scoreline markets.

FAQ

What changes first if odds move?

Implied probabilities and EV move immediately with price; model probabilities in this snapshot do not update until the pipeline is re-run. Refresh after material line moves.

Safer market than correct score?

Markets with more liquidity and smoother prices (often 1X2 or O/U 2.5 from many books) are usually easier to reason about than long-tail correct-score prices; still read EV on each leg.

What is the best-supported line in this snapshot?

Match the hero card above: if it says “Betting Primary Pick”, that leg cleared primary rules; if it says “Best +EV (tracked markets)”, it is the strongest +EV line that did not meet stricter Primary thresholds. The bullets below repeat the same model %, implied %, edge (pts), and EV % as that card.

Who has the edge in the match-winner market?

Use the 1X2 model percentages in the summary and the 1X2 market card: the side with the highest model % is the model lean, but check EV — a lean can still be -EV after prices.

Risk Factors

Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Methodology

Inputs: Same structured facts bundle as the public prediction page (xG / Poisson snapshot, market EV where available, decision engine v2).
Compliance: Educational framing only; not personalised advice.

Last Updated

May 23, 2026 (UTC)

How to use this

Focus on the Primary line when you want one actionable idea.
Do not parlay many thin-edge picks together; edges do not add reliably.
Treat longshots as optional, high-stake-sizing plays only.

Explore More Predictions Content

Get Premium Predictions for Troszyn & Łomża!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now

Back to Predictions

III Liga - Group 1 — Standings

#	TEAM	MP	W	D	L	PTS
1	Legia Warszawa II	33	26	3	4	81
2	Warta Sieradz	33	20	8	5	68
3	Łomża	32	20	5	7	65
4	Wigry Suwałki	33	19	5	9	62
5	Troszyn	32	17	6	9	57
6	Widzew II	33	16	3	14	51
7	Wisła Płock II	32	14	8	10	50
8	Lechia T. Mazowiecki	32	13	7	12	46
9	Jagiellonia II	32	13	6	13	45
10	Ząbkovia Ząbki	32	13	4	15	43
11	Swit	32	12	5	15	41
12	Mławianka Mława	32	10	7	15	37
13	Olimpia Elbląg	32	10	7	15	37
14	Bełchatów	32	9	7	16	34
15	Wikielec	32	9	6	17	33
16	Broń Radom	32	8	9	15	33
17	Wasilków	32	7	3	22	24
18	Znicz Biała Piska	32	3	3	26	12

#	TEAM	MP	GS	GC	+/-	PTS
1	Legia Warszawa II	33	79	29	+50	81
2	Troszyn	32	74	43	+31	57
3	Łomża	32	73	30	+43	65
4	Ząbkovia Ząbki	32	69	60	+9	43
5	Widzew II	33	68	63	+5	51
6	Warta Sieradz	33	63	34	+29	68
7	Lechia T. Mazowiecki	32	63	52	+11	46
8	Wigry Suwałki	33	61	41	+20	62
9	Mławianka Mława	32	51	56	-5	37
10	Wisła Płock II	32	49	48	+1	50
11	Bełchatów	32	48	70	-22	34
12	Swit	32	47	60	-13	41
13	Jagiellonia II	32	43	43	0	45
14	Olimpia Elbląg	32	43	58	-15	37
15	Wasilków	32	38	74	-36	24
16	Wikielec	32	36	51	-15	33
17	Broń Radom	32	36	55	-19	33
18	Znicz Biała Piska	32	24	98	-74	12