The model missed the final outcome (Racing Santander win 1–2).
The model had projected Leganes at 38.1%, but the full-time result went the other way.
Tracked markets vs full-time result
Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.
- Market Prediction Result Outcome
- Over / Under 2.5 Over 2.5 Over 2.5 (3 goals) ✔ Correct
- Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes Yes ✔ Correct
- 1X2 Leganes Racing Santander ✖ Incorrect
- Correct Score Insights 1-1, 2-1, 1-2, 2-2, 1-0 1-2 ✔ Correct
Model vs Closing Market
| Outcome | Model | Closing Market | Difference | Signal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leganes | 38.1% | 32.2% | +5.8 pp | Model Higher |
| Draw | 25.1% | 25.7% | -0.6 pp | Aligned |
| Racing Santander | 36.8% | 42.0% | -5.2 pp | Market Higher |
The statistical model estimates Leganes's win probability at 38.1%, compared with the closing market's implied probability of 32.2%, a difference of 5.8 percentage points. This highlights a substantial disagreement between the model's assessment and the market consensus, rather than indicating which view is ultimately correct.
Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.
After full time, the result was Racing Santander win 1–2.
Market Assessment
The fair estimate shows a modest edge over current market pricing on Leganes.
- Monitor line movement before kickoff — not a betting recommendation.
Post Match Insights
What worked
- Expected goals projected a high-scoring match (ΣxG 3.41) — 3 goals materialised
- Both Teams To Score (Yes) matched the full-time result
- Over 2.5 goals aligned with the xG profile
What failed
- 1X2: model leaned Leganes; match finished Racing Santander
Market lesson
The closing market differed from the model on Leganes by 5.8 percentage points (32.3% vs model 38.1%) — in this case the market view proved closer.
Prediction Timeline
How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.
-
May 10, 2026 · 16:00 UTC Forecast generated
- Model 1X2 · Leganes 38.1% · Draw 25.1% · Racing Santander 36.8%
- xG · Leganes 1.72 — Racing Santander 1.69
-
May 10, 2026 · 15:30 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
- 1X2 odds · Leganes 3.00 · Draw 3.76 · Racing Santander 2.30
- Implied 1X2 · Leganes 32.2% · Draw 25.7% · Racing Santander 42.0%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
May 10, 2026 · 16:00 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
- 1X2 odds · Leganes 3.00 · Draw 3.76 · Racing Santander 2.30
- Implied 1X2 · Leganes 32.2% · Draw 25.7% · Racing Santander 42.0%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
May 10, 2026 · 14:15 UTC Kickoff
-
FT Full-time result Racing Santander win · 1–2
-
FT Prediction missed 1X2 lean did not match full-time result
-
Archived Prediction review
Historical Snapshot
Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
- Validation: Pass
- No strong statistical edge
- Direction agrees with model lean
- Validation passed
Validation Report
Immutable SnapshotModel Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
Review FAQ
- How accurate was the prediction?
- This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
- What does xG Accuracy measure?
- xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
- Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
- Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
- Does this improve the AI record?
- Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.
Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Explore More Predictions Content
Get Premium Predictions for Leganes & Racing Santander!
Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.
Subscribe Now
Segunda División — Standings
| # | TEAM | MP | W | D | L | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Racing Santander | 42 | 25 | 7 | 10 | 82 |
| 2 | Deportivo La Coruna | 42 | 22 | 11 | 9 | 77 |
| 3 | Almeria | 42 | 22 | 8 | 12 | 74 |
| 4 | Malaga | 42 | 21 | 10 | 11 | 73 |
| 5 | Las Palmas | 42 | 20 | 13 | 9 | 73 |
| 6 | Castellón | 42 | 20 | 12 | 10 | 72 |
| 7 | Burgos | 42 | 20 | 12 | 10 | 72 |
| 8 | Eibar | 42 | 19 | 10 | 13 | 67 |
| 9 | Sporting Gijon | 42 | 18 | 7 | 17 | 61 |
| 10 | Cordoba | 42 | 17 | 10 | 15 | 61 |
| 11 | AD Ceuta FC | 42 | 17 | 10 | 15 | 61 |
| 12 | Albacete | 42 | 16 | 11 | 15 | 59 |
| 13 | FC Andorra | 42 | 16 | 10 | 16 | 58 |
| 14 | Granada CF | 42 | 12 | 12 | 18 | 48 |
| 15 | Real Sociedad II | 42 | 12 | 11 | 19 | 47 |
| 16 | Leganes | 42 | 11 | 13 | 18 | 46 |
| 17 | Valladolid | 42 | 12 | 10 | 20 | 46 |
| 18 | Cadiz | 42 | 11 | 10 | 21 | 43 |
| 19 | Mirandes | 42 | 10 | 10 | 22 | 40 |
| 20 | Huesca | 42 | 9 | 11 | 22 | 38 |
| 21 | Cultural Leonesa | 42 | 9 | 10 | 23 | 37 |
| 22 | Zaragoza | 42 | 8 | 12 | 22 | 36 |
| # | TEAM | MP | GS | GC | +/- | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Racing Santander | 42 | 90 | 61 | +29 | 82 |
| 2 | Almeria | 42 | 81 | 63 | +18 | 74 |
| 3 | Malaga | 42 | 75 | 52 | +23 | 73 |
| 4 | Castellón | 42 | 70 | 51 | +19 | 72 |
| 5 | Deportivo La Coruna | 42 | 65 | 44 | +21 | 77 |
| 6 | FC Andorra | 42 | 62 | 54 | +8 | 58 |
| 7 | Sporting Gijon | 42 | 60 | 54 | +6 | 61 |
| 8 | Las Palmas | 42 | 57 | 40 | +17 | 73 |
| 9 | Cordoba | 42 | 57 | 61 | -4 | 61 |
| 10 | Albacete | 42 | 56 | 55 | +1 | 59 |
| 11 | Eibar | 42 | 52 | 40 | +12 | 67 |
| 12 | Real Sociedad II | 42 | 52 | 61 | -9 | 47 |
| 13 | AD Ceuta FC | 42 | 51 | 63 | -12 | 61 |
| 14 | Granada CF | 42 | 50 | 56 | -6 | 48 |
| 15 | Burgos | 42 | 48 | 33 | +15 | 72 |
| 16 | Mirandes | 42 | 47 | 69 | -22 | 40 |
| 17 | Valladolid | 42 | 44 | 57 | -13 | 46 |
| 18 | Leganes | 42 | 43 | 51 | -8 | 46 |
| 19 | Cadiz | 42 | 41 | 61 | -20 | 43 |
| 20 | Huesca | 42 | 41 | 63 | -22 | 38 |
| 21 | Cultural Leonesa | 42 | 39 | 68 | -29 | 37 |
| 22 | Zaragoza | 42 | 35 | 59 | -24 | 36 |
| # | TEAM | MP | xG | xGC | +/- | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Castellón | 42 | 41.1 | 29.0 | +12.1 | 72 |
| 2 | Valladolid | 42 | 34.2 | 23.6 | +10.6 | 46 |
| 3 | Cordoba | 42 | 39.1 | 32.6 | +6.5 | 61 |
| 4 | Eibar | 42 | 38.5 | 32.4 | +6.1 | 67 |
| 5 | Racing Santander | 42 | 36.6 | 32.0 | +4.6 | 82 |
| 6 | Burgos | 42 | 32.1 | 27.9 | +4.2 | 72 |
| 7 | Malaga | 42 | 36.9 | 33.4 | +3.5 | 73 |
| 8 | Granada CF | 42 | 32.0 | 29.2 | +2.8 | 48 |
| 9 | Las Palmas | 42 | 22.9 | 20.6 | +2.3 | 73 |
| 10 | Deportivo La Coruna | 42 | 30.2 | 28.3 | +1.9 | 77 |
| 11 | Albacete | 42 | 35.2 | 33.7 | +1.5 | 59 |
| 12 | Sporting Gijon | 42 | 30.8 | 29.4 | +1.4 | 61 |
| 13 | Almeria | 42 | 32.7 | 31.4 | +1.3 | 74 |
| 14 | Zaragoza | 42 | 30.6 | 30.5 | +0.1 | 36 |
| 15 | Leganes | 42 | 34.1 | 35.4 | -1.3 | 46 |
| 16 | FC Andorra | 42 | 31.8 | 33.5 | -1.7 | 58 |
| 17 | Huesca | 42 | 27.3 | 29.6 | -2.3 | 38 |
| 18 | Real Sociedad II | 42 | 30.7 | 38.6 | -7.9 | 47 |
| 19 | AD Ceuta FC | 42 | 35.3 | 44.9 | -9.6 | 61 |
| 20 | Mirandes | 42 | 28.2 | 38.8 | -10.6 | 40 |
| 21 | Cadiz | 42 | 26.9 | 39.4 | -12.5 | 43 |
| 22 | Cultural Leonesa | 42 | 29.1 | 42.3 | -13.2 | 37 |