Casa de apuestas premium stake: los nuevos usuarios pueden usar el código promoFHn2uDc1 FHn2uDc1. Registrarse
Mercados rastreados versus resultado de tiempo completo
Cada fila compara el modelo previo al partido con el resultado de tiempo completo.
- Mercado Predicción Resultado Resultado
- Más / Menos 2.5 Menos de 2.5 Menos de 2.5 (1 objetivos) ✔ Correcto
- Ambos Equipos Marcarán BTTS No No ✔ Correcto
- 1X2 Kluczevia Stargard Kalisz ✖ Incorrecto
- Perspectivas de marcador exacto 1-1, 0-1, 1-0, 1-2, 2-1 1-0 ✔ Correcto
Validation Report
Immutable Snapshot
Closing Odds
2.39
AI Fair Odds
—
CLV
+0.0%
Final Result
Kalisz win · Kalisz 1–0 Kluczevia Stargard
Prediction
✖ Missed
Decision Grade
C
Model Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
El informe IA aún no está disponible para este partido. Vuelva a ejecutar «Generación masiva de cuotas» tras actualizar el servidor para generar el resumen.
View technical JSON
{
"bundle_version": 1,
"content_hash": "78bae10481839122d31fb9327e86dd2fd0a695ecaa4a2f3fdefc67eaf42c5535",
"decision_algo_version": "2.5.0",
"facts": {
"ai_fp": {
"away_predicted_xg": 1.31,
"away_win_prob": 0.3564,
"away_win_prob_posterior": null,
"bayes_applied": 0,
"btts_no_prob": 0.455,
"btts_yes_prob": 0.546,
"dc_rho": -0.13,
"draw_prob": 0.2965,
"draw_prob_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_away": 2.81,
"fair_odds_away_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_draw": 3.37,
"fair_odds_draw_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_home": 2.88,
"fair_odds_home_posterior": null,
"home_predicted_xg": 1.29,
"home_win_prob": 0.347,
"home_win_prob_posterior": null,
"over_25_prob": 0.482,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"under_25_prob": 0.518
},
"api_prediction": {
"advice": "Double chance : Kalisz or draw",
"main_pick_display": "No Strong Winner Bet",
"percent_away": "30%",
"percent_draw": "35%",
"percent_home": "35%",
"winner_name": "Kalisz"
},
"away_xg": 1.31,
"betting_insight": {
"bet_label": "Kluczevia Stargard",
"confidence": null,
"main_pick_meta": {
"confidence": "low",
"display_text": "No Strong Winner Bet",
"edge": 0.0071,
"edge_gap": 0.0087,
"market": "1X2",
"market_prob": 0.3489,
"model_prob": 0.3559,
"pick_type": "no_strong",
"probabilities": {
"away": 35.6,
"draw": 29.7,
"home": 34.7
},
"reason": "No clear edge in 1X2 market",
"selection": null,
"selection_name": null
},
"market_comparison": [
{
"affi_link": "",
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"odd": 2.55
}
],
"risk_color": null,
"risk_key": null,
"stacked_market": null,
"value_bet": {
"best_odds": 2.55,
"bookmaker_id": 0,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"display_market": "Kluczevia Stargard Win",
"is_value": false,
"label": "Away",
"market_fair_odds": 2.87,
"market_odds": 2.55,
"model_odds": 2.81,
"overround": 12.4,
"prob_edge": -3.6,
"value_pct": -9.3,
"value_rating": "no_value"
}
},
"betting_markets": {
"btts": {
"away_clean_sheet": 1,
"away_failed_to_score": 0,
"away_played": 8,
"away_score_rate": 73.0,
"home_clean_sheet": 2,
"home_failed_to_score": 1,
"home_played": 9,
"home_score_rate": 72.5,
"no_prob": 45.5,
"pick": "No",
"pick_prob": 54.5,
"source": "xG_dc",
"strong_pick": true,
"yes_prob": 54.5
},
"correct_score": {
"away_expected": 1.31,
"home_expected": 1.29,
"scores": [
{
"away": 1,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 12.6
},
{
"away": 1,
"home": 0,
"label": "0-1",
"prob": 9.7
},
{
"away": 0,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-0",
"prob": 9.6
},
{
"away": 2,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-2",
"prob": 8.2
},
{
"away": 1,
"home": 2,
"label": "2-1",
"prob": 8.1
}
],
"source": "xG"
},
"double_chance": {
"options": [
{
"key": "1X",
"label": "Kalisz or Draw",
"prob": 64.3
},
{
"key": "12",
"label": "Kalisz or Kluczevia Stargard",
"prob": 70.3
},
{
"key": "X2",
"label": "Draw or Kluczevia Stargard",
"prob": 65.2
}
],
"pick_key": "12",
"pick_label": "Kalisz or Kluczevia Stargard",
"pick_prob": 70.3
},
"match_winner": {
"away_pct": 35.6,
"draw_pct": 29.6,
"home_pct": 34.7,
"lean_key": "away",
"lean_label": "Kluczevia Stargard"
},
"over_under": {
"api_hint": null,
"avg_total": 2.6,
"away_avg_scored": 2.4,
"confidence": "low",
"home_avg_scored": 1.7,
"over_prob": 48.2,
"pick": "Under 2.5",
"pick_prob": 51.8,
"source": "xG_dc",
"strong_pick": true,
"total_expected": 2.6,
"under_prob": 51.8
},
"prob_source": "poisson",
"value_bet_enhanced": {
"bookmaker_id": 0,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"edge": -9.3,
"implied_prob": 39.2,
"is_value": false,
"label": "Away",
"market": "Kluczevia Stargard Win",
"model_prob": 35.6,
"odds": 2.55
}
},
"closing_line_bundle": {
"away_team": "Kluczevia Stargard",
"closing_1x2_probs_pct": {
"away": 34.89,
"draw": 27.89,
"home": 37.22
},
"closing_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
"closing_capture": "PRE1",
"closing_fetched_at": "2026-09-27 11:59:34",
"early_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
"early_capture": "PRE30",
"early_fetched_at": "2026-09-27 11:29:36",
"has_data": true,
"home_team": "Kalisz",
"largest_move_kind": null,
"max_abs_move_pp": 0.0,
"model_vs_closing": [
{
"closing_implied_pct": 37.22,
"gap_pp": -2.5,
"kind": "1x2_h",
"model_pct": 34.73
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 27.89,
"gap_pp": 1.79,
"kind": "1x2_d",
"model_pct": 29.68
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 34.89,
"gap_pp": 0.71,
"kind": "1x2_a",
"model_pct": 35.59
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 56.42,
"gap_pp": -8.22,
"kind": "ou_o",
"model_pct": 48.2
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 43.58,
"gap_pp": 8.22,
"kind": "ou_u",
"model_pct": 51.8
}
],
"movement": [
{
"closing": 2.39,
"early": 2.39,
"implied_closing_pct": 37.22,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 37.22,
"kind": "1x2_h"
},
{
"closing": 3.19,
"early": 3.19,
"implied_closing_pct": 27.89,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 27.89,
"kind": "1x2_d"
},
{
"closing": 2.55,
"early": 2.55,
"implied_closing_pct": 34.89,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 34.89,
"kind": "1x2_a"
},
{
"closing": 1.63,
"early": 1.63,
"implied_closing_pct": 56.42,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 56.42,
"kind": "ou_o"
},
{
"closing": 2.11,
"early": 2.11,
"implied_closing_pct": 43.58,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 43.58,
"kind": "ou_u"
}
],
"movement_negligible": true,
"same_bookmaker": true,
"top_value_gap": {
"gap_pp": 8.2,
"kind": "ou_u"
}
},
"correct_score_insight": {
"best_value": null,
"lean_card": {
"diff_pp": -0.7,
"ev": -0.055,
"has_edge": false,
"label": "1-1",
"market_odds": 7.5,
"market_prob": 0.1333,
"market_prob_pct": 13.3,
"model_prob": 0.126,
"model_prob_pct": 12.6,
"n_bookmakers": 5,
"status_key": "no_value"
},
"most_likely": {
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 12.6
},
"top5": [
{
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 12.6
},
{
"label": "0-1",
"prob": 9.7
},
{
"label": "1-0",
"prob": 9.6
},
{
"label": "1-2",
"prob": 8.2
},
{
"label": "2-1",
"prob": 8.1
}
]
},
"home_xg": 1.29,
"homepage_pick": null,
"market_cards": [
{
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.1643,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 2.295,
"edge": 0.0096,
"edge_pp": 1.0,
"market_prob": 0.3968,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"model_prob": 0.455,
"n_bookmakers": 5,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.1643,
"best_odd": 2.295,
"edge": 0.0096,
"ev": -0.0673,
"implied_prob": 0.3968,
"model_prob": 0.455,
"p_final": 0.4064
},
"p_final": 0.4064,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"raw_edge_pp": 5.8,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.0442,
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0673,
"value_side": "no",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.2259,
"best_odd": 1.51,
"edge": -0.0131,
"ev": -0.1091,
"implied_prob": 0.6032,
"model_prob": 0.545,
"p_final": 0.59
}
},
"ev_available": true,
"ev_no": 0.0829,
"ev_no_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 8.3,
"text": "+8.3%"
},
"ev_yes": -0.1443,
"ev_yes_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -14.4,
"text": "-14.4%"
},
"featured": true,
"id": "btts",
"max_ev": 0.0829,
"n_bookmakers": 5,
"no_prob": 45.5,
"sort_key": 10224.61,
"tier": "best",
"value_side": "no",
"yes_prob": 54.5
},
{
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.1972,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 2.1,
"edge": 0.0163,
"edge_pp": 1.6,
"market_prob": 0.4355,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"model_prob": 0.518,
"n_bookmakers": 6,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.2169,
"best_odd": 1.62,
"edge": -0.0179,
"ev": -0.1145,
"implied_prob": 0.5645,
"model_prob": 0.482,
"p_final": 0.5466
},
"p_final": 0.4518,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"raw_edge_pp": 8.3,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.0878,
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0513,
"under": {
"alpha": 0.1972,
"best_odd": 2.1,
"edge": 0.0163,
"ev": -0.0513,
"implied_prob": 0.4355,
"model_prob": 0.518,
"p_final": 0.4518
},
"value_side": "under"
},
"ev_available": true,
"ev_over": -0.1806,
"ev_over_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -18.1,
"text": "-18.1%"
},
"ev_under": 0.093,
"ev_under_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 9.3,
"text": "+9.3%"
},
"featured": false,
"id": "ou_2_5",
"max_ev": 0.093,
"n_bookmakers": 6,
"over_prob": 48.2,
"sort_key": 10083.7,
"tier": "best",
"under_prob": 51.8,
"value_side": "under"
},
{
"authority_action": "no_bet",
"authority_note": "The market has repriced Kalisz, but the model still strongly favours Kluczevia Stargard.",
"consensus_odds": 2.55,
"decision": "no_bet",
"disagreement_label": "Normal",
"disagreement_level": "normal",
"ev": -0.1023,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -10.2,
"text": "-10.2%"
},
"featured": false,
"id": "1x2",
"implied_prob": 0.3489,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"max_ev": -0.0937,
"max_ev_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -9.4,
"text": "-9.4%"
},
"model_prob": 0.3559,
"raw_edge_display": "+0.7 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 0.7,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.0925,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-9.2%",
"show_primary_label": false,
"side_label": "Kluczevia Stargard",
"sort_key": 1776.575,
"tier": "bad_ev"
},
{
"featured": false,
"id": "correct_score",
"sort_key": 817.8,
"tier": "risk",
"top_label": "1-1",
"top_prob": 12.6
}
],
"market_intelligence": {
"betting_signal": {
"alert_breadth": "",
"alert_breadth_note": "",
"alert_move": "",
"alert_team": "",
"alert_title": "Sharp Money Alert",
"divergence_pp": 2.5,
"has_alert": false,
"hero_edge_pp": -2.52,
"hero_label": "Kalisz",
"market_prob_pct": 34.9,
"market_team": "Kalisz",
"model_prob_pct": 35.6,
"model_team": "Kluczevia Stargard",
"show": true,
"status_icon": "\u2713",
"status_key": "aligned",
"status_label": "Reliable prediction",
"status_line": "Direction aligned; check pricing gap separately",
"steam_score": null,
"steam_subtitle": "",
"steam_tier": "",
"title": "Betting Signal"
},
"decision_chain": {
"academy_links": [
{
"key": "steam",
"read_min": 4,
"title": "What Is a Steam Move?",
"url": "/academy/betting-market/what-is-a-steam-move/en"
},
{
"key": "clv_pending",
"read_min": 3,
"title": "Why CLV Matters More Than Win Rate",
"url": "/academy/clv/why-clv-matters-more-than-win-rate/en"
}
],
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 2.5,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "high",
"probability_gap_pp": 2.5,
"summary": "The market has repriced Kalisz, but the model still strongly favours Kluczevia Stargard."
},
"authority": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 2.5,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "high",
"probability_gap_pp": 2.5,
"summary": "The market has repriced Kalisz, but the model still strongly favours Kluczevia Stargard."
},
"alignment_key": "conflict",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.093,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.093,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 3.0,
"decision_strength_v1": 5.5,
"decision_strength_v2": 4.3,
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution_confidence": 37,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Kluczevia Stargard at 35.6%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 34.9%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Kluczevia Stargard as the value side (35.6%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 0.7,
"gates_failed": [
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "The market has repriced Kalisz, but the model still strongly favours Kluczevia Stargard.",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Kluczevia Stargard",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_conflict",
"detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
"name": "Market Conflict",
"short": "Market Conflict",
"subtype": "probability_gap",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": false,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +9.3% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Execution confidence below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +9.3% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +9.3% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.0/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": true,
"value": "83 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "37 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": false,
"value": "conflict"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+9.3% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 6,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"The market has repriced Kalisz, but the model still strongly favours Kluczevia Stargard.",
"Decision strength: 3.0/10",
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"reliability_score": 83,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "The market has repriced Kalisz, but the model still strongly favours Kluczevia Stargard.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": -0.1023,
"consensus_ev_display": "-10.2%",
"consensus_odds": 2.55,
"disagreement_label": "Normal",
"disagreement_level": "normal",
"implied_prob": 0.3489,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3559,
"raw_edge_display": "+0.7 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 0.7,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.3921568627450981,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.0925,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-9.2%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": true,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": -3.0,
"reasons": [
"Low xG separation gap=0.02 (noise / no edge)"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "flat",
"block_value_alert": true,
"separation_score": -20,
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"xg_gap": 0.02
}
}
},
"bet_status": "no_bet",
"books_breadth_display": "4/8",
"breadth_ratio": 0.5,
"evidence": {
"score": 75,
"signals": [
{
"icon": "\u25cb",
"key": "statistical_edge",
"label": "No strong statistical edge",
"status": "neutral"
},
{
"icon": "!",
"key": "market_agreement",
"label": "Recent market move conflicts with the model favourite",
"status": "caution"
},
{
"icon": "\u25cb",
"key": "steam",
"label": "Sharp steam detected",
"status": "neutral"
},
{
"icon": "\u2713",
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation passed",
"status": "pass"
}
],
"stars": 4,
"tier": "high",
"tier_label": "High"
},
"forecast_reliability": {
"breakdown": [
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation: Pass",
"tone": "ok"
}
],
"parts": {
"alignment": 23.7,
"data_quality": 12.0,
"market_coverage": 5.0,
"steam_coherence": 7.0,
"validation": 30.0
},
"score": 83,
"stars": 4,
"tier": "high",
"tier_label": "High"
},
"lean_gap_pp": 2.52,
"market_agreement": "strong",
"max_gap_pp": 2.52,
"model_calibration": {
"away_xg": 1.31,
"calibration_status": "ok",
"deviation_pct": -3.0,
"elevated": false,
"home_xg": 1.29,
"impact_note": "",
"league_avg_xg": 1.35,
"peak_xg": 1.31,
"status_label": "Within typical league range",
"summary": "Home xG 1.29 \u00b7 Away xG 1.31 \u00b7 League avg 1.35 \u00b7 Peak deviation -3%",
"title": "Model Calibration Check"
},
"move_is_drift": false,
"mv_status": "pass",
"odds_delta_pct": 0.0,
"steam_conflicts": null,
"steam_move_display": "+0.0%",
"steam_team": "Kalisz",
"suppress_execution": false,
"value_split": {
"execution_confidence": {
"label": "Monitoring Confidence",
"score": 37,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"market_compatibility": {
"label": "Market Compatibility",
"note": "Price proximity vs model (inverse of pp gap) \u2014 not the same as a Primary go-ahead. Read alongside Decision Strength and Alignment.",
"score": 33,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_edge_strength": {
"label": "Model Signal Strength",
"score": 35,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_value": {
"label": "Market Compatibility",
"note": "Price proximity vs model (inverse of pp gap) \u2014 not the same as a Primary go-ahead. Read alongside Decision Strength and Alignment.",
"score": 33,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"recommendation": {
"action": "no_bet",
"label": "No Primary Bet"
}
},
"verdict": {
"agree_note": "The market has repriced Kalisz, but the model still strongly favours Kluczevia Stargard.",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 2.5,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "high",
"probability_gap_pp": 2.5,
"summary": "The market has repriced Kalisz, but the model still strongly favours Kluczevia Stargard."
},
"authority": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 2.5,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "high",
"probability_gap_pp": 2.5,
"summary": "The market has repriced Kalisz, but the model still strongly favours Kluczevia Stargard."
},
"alignment_key": "conflict",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.093,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.093,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 3.0,
"decision_strength_v1": 5.5,
"decision_strength_v2": 4.3,
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution_confidence": 37,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Kluczevia Stargard at 35.6%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 34.9%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Kluczevia Stargard as the value side (35.6%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 0.7,
"gates_failed": [
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "The market has repriced Kalisz, but the model still strongly favours Kluczevia Stargard.",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Kluczevia Stargard",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_conflict",
"detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
"name": "Market Conflict",
"short": "Market Conflict",
"subtype": "probability_gap",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": false,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +9.3% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Execution confidence below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +9.3% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +9.3% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.0/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": true,
"value": "83 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "37 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": false,
"value": "conflict"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+9.3% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 6,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"The market has repriced Kalisz, but the model still strongly favours Kluczevia Stargard.",
"Decision strength: 3.0/10",
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"reliability_score": 83,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "The market has repriced Kalisz, but the model still strongly favours Kluczevia Stargard.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": -0.1023,
"consensus_ev_display": "-10.2%",
"consensus_odds": 2.55,
"disagreement_label": "Normal",
"disagreement_level": "normal",
"implied_prob": 0.3489,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3559,
"raw_edge_display": "+0.7 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 0.7,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.3921568627450981,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.0925,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-9.2%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": true,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": -3.0,
"reasons": [
"Low xG separation gap=0.02 (noise / no edge)"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "flat",
"block_value_alert": true,
"separation_score": -20,
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"xg_gap": 0.02
}
}
},
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"subline": "The market has repriced Kalisz, but the model still strongly favours Kluczevia Stargard.",
"tier": "observe"
},
"why": {
"action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
"bullets": [
"Model: Kalisz 1.29 xG vs Kluczevia Stargard 1.31 \u2192 Kluczevia Stargard 35.6%",
"Market: Kalisz ~34.9% implied",
"Market Steam: Kalisz +0.0%"
],
"one_liner": "Model and market both lean Kluczevia Stargard with no major conflict.",
"title": "Why?"
}
},
"edge_rows": [
{
"edge_pp": -2.52,
"fair_prob": 34.7,
"label": "Kalisz",
"market_prob": 37.22,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "home"
},
{
"edge_pp": 1.76,
"fair_prob": 29.65,
"label": "Draw",
"market_prob": 27.89,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "draw"
},
{
"edge_pp": 0.75,
"fair_prob": 35.64,
"label": "Kluczevia Stargard",
"market_prob": 34.89,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "away"
},
{
"edge_pp": -7.9,
"fair_prob": 48.2,
"label": "Over 2.5",
"market_prob": 56.1,
"market_type": "ou25",
"outcome": "over"
},
{
"edge_pp": 7.9,
"fair_prob": 51.8,
"label": "Under 2.5",
"market_prob": 43.9,
"market_type": "ou25",
"outcome": "under"
},
{
"edge_pp": -5.77,
"fair_prob": 54.5,
"label": "BTTS Yes",
"market_prob": 60.27,
"market_type": "btts",
"outcome": "yes"
},
{
"edge_pp": 5.77,
"fair_prob": 45.5,
"label": "BTTS No",
"market_prob": 39.73,
"market_type": "btts",
"outcome": "no"
}
],
"edge_snapshot": {
"edge_label": "aligned",
"edge_pp": -2.52,
"fair_prob_pct": 34.7,
"hero_side": "home",
"hero_team_name": "Kalisz",
"market_prob_pct": 37.22,
"status": "aligned",
"steam_team_name": "Kalisz"
},
"fair_source": "poisson_pipeline",
"fair_vs_market": {
"closing_capture": "PRE1",
"closing_footnote": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
"comparison_available": true,
"comparison_disabled": false,
"comparison_summary": "The model and closing market are broadly aligned, with probability differences below 5 percentage points.",
"degraded_note": "",
"divergence_guard": {
"divergence_level": "aligned",
"edge_status": "aligned",
"max_gap_pp": 2.52,
"suppress_hero": false,
"suppress_value_language": false
},
"divergence_label": "",
"divergence_level": "aligned",
"divergence_level_label": "Aligned",
"divergence_note": "",
"divergence_tier": "aligned",
"edge_label": "Aligned",
"edge_label_key": "aligned",
"fair_confidence": "medium",
"fair_confidence_label": "Medium",
"fair_source_note": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
"forecast_assessment": {
"favourite_class": "Balanced match",
"favourite_label": "Kluczevia Stargard",
"forecast_certainty_tier": "low",
"headline": "Balanced match",
"market_agreement_label": "Strong",
"market_direction": {
"label": "Conflicts with model",
"positive": false
},
"market_prob_pct": 34.9,
"model_prob_gap_display": "+0.7 percentage points",
"model_prob_gap_pp": 0.7,
"model_prob_pct": 35.6,
"outcome_separation_tier": "low",
"paragraphs": [],
"pricing_convergence": {
"gap_display": "+0.7 percentage points",
"gap_pp": 0.7,
"label": "High",
"label_key": "mi_fa_pricing_high"
},
"reliability_headline": "High reliability",
"reliability_icon": "\u2713",
"reliability_score": 83,
"reliability_tier": "high",
"summary": "The market has repriced Kalisz, but the model still strongly favours Kluczevia Stargard. This disagreement reduces confidence and prevents a Primary bet.",
"tier": "balanced",
"title": "Prediction Assessment",
"validation_label": "Pass",
"value_split": {
"execution_confidence": {
"label": "Monitoring Confidence",
"score": 37,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"market_compatibility": {
"label": "Market Compatibility",
"note": "Price proximity vs model (inverse of pp gap) \u2014 not the same as a Primary go-ahead. Read alongside Decision Strength and Alignment.",
"score": 33,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_edge_strength": {
"label": "Model Signal Strength",
"score": 35,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_value": {
"label": "Market Compatibility",
"note": "Price proximity vs model (inverse of pp gap) \u2014 not the same as a Primary go-ahead. Read alongside Decision Strength and Alignment.",
"score": 33,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"recommendation": {
"action": "no_bet",
"label": "No Primary Bet"
}
},
"why": {
"action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
"bullets": [
"Model: Kalisz 1.29 xG vs Kluczevia Stargard 1.31 \u2192 Kluczevia Stargard 35.6%",
"Market: Kalisz ~34.9% implied",
"Market Steam: Kalisz +0.0%"
],
"one_liner": "Model and market both lean Kluczevia Stargard with no major conflict.",
"title": "Why?"
}
},
"forecast_certainty": {
"note": "Three outcomes remain closely bunched \u2014 treat as a relatively open match.",
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"forecast_certainty_label": "Low",
"has_market_probs": true,
"hero_edge_pp": -2.52,
"hero_label": "Kalisz",
"hero_side": "home",
"market_activity": "No meaningful directional movement yet.",
"market_agreement": "strong",
"market_agreement_label": "Strong",
"market_interpretation": {
"bullets": [
"Current pricing remains close to the model baseline."
],
"follow_up": "",
"gap_tier": "aligned",
"lead": "The market and model are broadly aligned. Any small pricing gap likely reflects rounding or bookmaker margin, not a structural disagreement.",
"note": "Market and fair estimate are broadly aligned on current pricing.",
"paragraphs": [
"The market and model are broadly aligned. Any small pricing gap likely reflects rounding or bookmaker margin, not a structural disagreement."
],
"quiet_market": true,
"title": "Market Assessment"
},
"market_narrative": {
"paragraphs": [
"Market pricing and the fair estimate remain broadly aligned.",
"No meaningful directional movement has emerged, and pricing remains stable across tracked sportsbooks."
],
"title": "Current Market Narrative"
},
"market_source": "closing_1x2",
"max_gap_pp": 2.52,
"model_validation": {
"score_label_key": "mi_mv_pass",
"status": "pass"
},
"model_validation_label": "Pass",
"outcome_separation": {
"breakdown": [
"No outcome exceeds 50% on the 1X2 grid.",
"Top two 1X2 outcomes within 0.9 percentage points."
],
"lead_gap_pp": 0.9,
"max_prob_pct": 35.6,
"note": "How spread out the model 1X2 probabilities are \u2014 crowded splits mean no single outcome dominates. Not accuracy vs the market.",
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"outcome_separation_label": "Low",
"overall_assessment": {
"badge_class": "aligned",
"largest_gap_label": "Kalisz",
"largest_gap_pp": -2.5,
"lead": "The model and closing market are broadly aligned.",
"level": "aligned",
"max_gap_pp": 2.5,
"title": "Broadly Aligned"
},
"rows": [
{
"difference_pp": -2.52,
"edge_pp": -2.52,
"fair_prob_pct": 34.7,
"is_hero": true,
"label": "Kalisz",
"market_prob_pct": 37.22,
"side": "home",
"signal_key": "aligned",
"signal_label": "Aligned"
},
{
"difference_pp": 1.76,
"edge_pp": 1.76,
"fair_prob_pct": 29.65,
"is_hero": false,
"label": "Draw",
"market_prob_pct": 27.89,
"side": "draw",
"signal_key": "aligned",
"signal_label": "Aligned"
},
{
"difference_pp": 0.75,
"edge_pp": 0.75,
"fair_prob_pct": 35.64,
"is_hero": false,
"label": "Kluczevia Stargard",
"market_prob_pct": 34.89,
"side": "away",
"signal_key": "aligned",
"signal_label": "Aligned"
}
],
"status": "aligned",
"status_label": "Aligned",
"steam_note": "Market and fair estimate are broadly aligned on current pricing.",
"unavailable_note": ""
},
"interpretation": {
"has_conflict": true,
"paragraphs": [
"The betting market strongly prefers Kalisz (34.9%).",
"This creates a conflict: Model \u2192 Kluczevia Stargard, Market \u2192 Kalisz, Recent sharp money \u2192 recent line movement.",
"Because signals disagree, confidence remains limited."
],
"show": true,
"title": "OddsGPT Interpretation"
},
"lifecycle": {
"closing_implied_pct": 41.84,
"closing_odds": 2.39,
"closing_reason": "",
"closing_status": "recorded",
"closing_status_label": "Recorded",
"clv_pending": true,
"clv_pp": 0.0,
"clv_reason": "",
"clv_status": "pending",
"context": "match",
"current_stage": "waiting_for_kickoff",
"current_stage_detail": "",
"current_stage_label": "Waiting for kickoff",
"entry_implied_pct": 41.84,
"entry_odds": 2.39,
"match_phase": "upcoming",
"match_phase_detail": "",
"match_phase_display": "Upcoming",
"match_phase_label": "Upcoming",
"model_validation_label": "Pass",
"model_validation_status": "pass",
"stages": [
{
"detail": "",
"id": "forecast_generated",
"label": "Prediction Generated",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "market_detected",
"label": "Market Compared",
"status": "active"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "model_validated",
"label": "Validation Passed",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "PRE1",
"id": "closing_recorded",
"label": "Closing Recorded",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "clv_evaluated",
"label": "CLV Evaluated",
"status": "pending"
}
]
},
"market_move_intelligence": {
"show": false
},
"market_overview": {
"breadth_display": "4/8",
"current_odds": 2.25,
"move_display": "+0.0%",
"open_odds": 2.25,
"pick_team": "Kalisz",
"steam_score": 13,
"steam_team_name": "Kalisz",
"steam_tier": "C"
},
"premium_teaser": {
"current_divergence_pp": 2.5,
"divergence_label": "Current divergence",
"title": "Premium Market Intelligence",
"unlock_items": [
"Historical similar matches",
"Closing odds analysis",
"CLV tracking",
"Sharp money signals",
"Market efficiency rating",
"Historical model vs market results"
],
"unlock_label": "Unlock"
},
"show": true
},
"match": {
"at2.away_team_slug": "kluczevia-stargard",
"away_expected_goals": null,
"away_goal_display": null,
"away_team_display_name": "Kluczevia Stargard",
"away_team_id": 17398,
"away_team_logo": "/static/teams/17398.webp",
"away_team_name": "Kluczevia Stargard",
"away_team_public_id": "4uNaKky6tcdhJB",
"away_team_slug": "kluczevia-stargard",
"country_code": "PL",
"country_display_name": "Poland",
"country_flag": "/static/images/country/pl.svg",
"country_id": 128,
"country_name": "Poland",
"fixture_id": 1568804,
"goals_away": null,
"goals_home": null,
"home_expected_goals": null,
"home_goal_display": null,
"home_team_country": "Poland",
"home_team_display_name": "Kalisz",
"home_team_id": 12801,
"home_team_logo": "/static/teams/12801.webp",
"home_team_name": "Kalisz",
"home_team_public_id": "00tLOzPTqPftZ7",
"home_team_slug": "kalisz",
"ht.home_team_slug": "kalisz",
"league_country": "Poland",
"league_country_display": "Poland",
"league_display_name": "III Liga - Grupo 2",
"league_id": 781,
"league_logo": "/static/leagues/781.webp",
"league_name": "III Liga - Grupo 2",
"league_public_id": "3zSCpGHchE7TXd",
"league_season": 2026,
"match_date": "2026-09-27 12:00:00",
"public_id": "367RpqoDH4jlqT",
"score_fulltime_away": null,
"score_fulltime_home": null,
"score_penalty_away": null,
"score_penalty_home": null,
"status_long": "Not Started",
"status_short": "NS",
"venue_city": "Kalisz",
"venue_name": "Stadion Miejski"
},
"match_decision": {
"confidence": {
"breakdown": [
"pred_conf_md_max_1x2_under_50",
"pred_conf_md_top_two_close",
"pred_conf_md_line_above_ev"
],
"breakdown_resolved": [
"Max 1X2 prob under 50% (open contest) (\u22121.0)",
"Top two outcomes relatively close in probability (\u22120.5)",
"At least one tracked line above +EV threshold (+0.5)"
],
"score": 6.0
},
"markets": {
"1x2": {
"1x2_ev_mode": "market_first_p15",
"away": {
"alpha": 0.4452,
"best_odd": 2.55,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": 0.0031,
"ev": -0.1023,
"implied_prob": 0.3489,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.3489,
"draw": 0.2789,
"home": 0.3722
},
"model_prob": 0.3559,
"p_final": 0.352
},
"draw": {
"alpha": 0.2919,
"best_odd": 3.19,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": 0.0052,
"ev": -0.0937,
"implied_prob": 0.2789,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.3489,
"draw": 0.2789,
"home": 0.3722
},
"model_prob": 0.2968,
"p_final": 0.2841
},
"ev_available": true,
"home": {
"alpha": 0.4332,
"best_odd": 2.39,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": -0.0108,
"ev": -0.1362,
"implied_prob": 0.3722,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.3489,
"draw": 0.2789,
"home": 0.3722
},
"model_prob": 0.3473,
"p_final": 0.3614
}
},
"1x2_outlier": {
"1x2_ev_mode": "legacy_max_odd",
"away": {
"best_odd": 2.55,
"edge": -0.0362,
"ev": -0.0924,
"implied_prob": 0.3922,
"model_prob": 0.3559
},
"draw": {
"best_odd": 3.19,
"edge": -0.0167,
"ev": -0.0533,
"implied_prob": 0.3135,
"model_prob": 0.2968
},
"ev_available": true,
"home": {
"best_odd": 2.39,
"edge": -0.0711,
"ev": -0.17,
"implied_prob": 0.4184,
"model_prob": 0.3473
}
},
"btts": {
"alpha_no": 0.1643,
"alpha_yes": 0.2259,
"best_no_odd": 2.38,
"best_yes_odd": 1.57,
"btts_ev_mode": "market_first_available",
"edge_no": 0.0577,
"edge_yes": -0.0577,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_no": 0.0829,
"ev_no_risk_adj": -0.0673,
"ev_yes": -0.1443,
"ev_yes_risk_adj": -0.1091,
"implied_no": 0.3973,
"implied_yes": 0.6027,
"market_first": {
"available": true,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"n_bookmakers": 5,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.1643,
"best_odd": 2.295,
"edge": 0.0096,
"ev": -0.0673,
"implied_prob": 0.3968,
"model_prob": 0.455,
"p_final": 0.4064
},
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.2259,
"best_odd": 1.51,
"edge": -0.0131,
"ev": -0.1091,
"implied_prob": 0.6032,
"model_prob": 0.545,
"p_final": 0.59
}
},
"n_bookmakers": 5,
"p_final_no": 0.4064,
"p_final_yes": 0.59,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"reliability": "medium"
},
"ou25": {
"alpha_over": 0.2169,
"alpha_under": 0.1972,
"best_over_odd": 1.7,
"best_under_odd": 2.11,
"consensus_over_odd": 1.62,
"consensus_under_odd": 2.1,
"edge_over": -0.079,
"edge_under": 0.079,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_over": -0.1806,
"ev_over_risk_adj": -0.1145,
"ev_under": 0.093,
"ev_under_risk_adj": -0.0513,
"implied_over": 0.561,
"implied_over_mf": 0.5645,
"implied_under": 0.439,
"implied_under_mf": 0.4355,
"market_first": {
"available": true,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"n_bookmakers": 6,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.2169,
"best_odd": 1.62,
"edge": -0.0179,
"ev": -0.1145,
"implied_prob": 0.5645,
"model_prob": 0.482,
"p_final": 0.5466
},
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"under": {
"alpha": 0.1972,
"best_odd": 2.1,
"edge": 0.0163,
"ev": -0.0513,
"implied_prob": 0.4355,
"model_prob": 0.518,
"p_final": 0.4518
}
},
"n_bookmakers": 6,
"ou_ev_mode": "market_first_available",
"p_final_over": 0.5466,
"p_final_under": 0.4518,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"reliability": "medium"
}
},
"match_regime": {
"action": "avoid",
"code": "no_edge",
"execution_line_key": "pred_regime_exec_no_actionable",
"insight_line_key": "pred_regime_insight_minor_inefficiency",
"stake_mult": 0.0,
"use_split_strip": true
},
"match_tier": "no_bet",
"min_ev": 0.02,
"total_xg": 2.6,
"variance_flag": false
},
"unified_decision": {
"actionable_ev_threshold": 0.02,
"algorithm": {
"enabled_since": "2026-05-26",
"game_typing_module": true,
"version": "2.5.0"
},
"balanced_alternative": null,
"best_consensus_ev": 0.093,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.093,
"best_tracked_ev": 0.093,
"confidence": 5.5,
"decision_confidence_v1": {
"breakdown": [
"pred_conf_v1_primary_line",
"pred_conf_v1_max_1x2_under_50",
"pred_conf_v1_multi_ev_lines"
],
"breakdown_resolved": [
"Primary line identified (+1.0)",
"Max 1X2 prob under 50% (no dominant 1X2) (\u22121.0)",
"Two or more valid +EV lines at threshold (+0.5)"
],
"breakdown_v2": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"score": 3.0,
"score_v1_legacy": 5.5,
"score_v2_pre_penalty": 4.3,
"strength_v2": true
},
"decision_strength_v2": {
"breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"score": 3.0,
"score_pre_penalty": 4.3
},
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution": {
"1x2_dominant": false,
"1x2_open_contest": true,
"grade": "A",
"stake_factor": 1.0
},
"favourite_misaligned_1x2": {
"active": false,
"gap": null,
"side": null
},
"final_action": "no_bet",
"final_decision": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 2.5,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "high",
"probability_gap_pp": 2.5,
"summary": "The market has repriced Kalisz, but the model still strongly favours Kluczevia Stargard."
},
"alignment_key": "conflict",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.093,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.093,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 3.0,
"decision_strength_v1": 5.5,
"decision_strength_v2": 4.3,
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution_confidence": 37,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Kluczevia Stargard at 35.6%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 34.9%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Kluczevia Stargard as the value side (35.6%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 0.7,
"gates_failed": [
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "The market has repriced Kalisz, but the model still strongly favours Kluczevia Stargard.",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Kluczevia Stargard",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_conflict",
"detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
"name": "Market Conflict",
"short": "Market Conflict",
"subtype": "probability_gap",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": false,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +9.3% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Execution confidence below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +9.3% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +9.3% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.0/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": true,
"value": "83 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "37 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": false,
"value": "conflict"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+9.3% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 6,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"The market has repriced Kalisz, but the model still strongly favours Kluczevia Stargard.",
"Decision strength: 3.0/10",
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"reliability_score": 83,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "The market has repriced Kalisz, but the model still strongly favours Kluczevia Stargard.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": -0.1023,
"consensus_ev_display": "-10.2%",
"consensus_odds": 2.55,
"disagreement_label": "Normal",
"disagreement_level": "normal",
"implied_prob": 0.3489,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3559,
"raw_edge_display": "+0.7 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 0.7,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.3921568627450981,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.0925,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-9.2%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": true,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": -3.0,
"reasons": [
"Low xG separation gap=0.02 (noise / no edge)"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "flat",
"block_value_alert": true,
"separation_score": -20,
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"xg_gap": 0.02
}
}
},
"game_type": {
"label_zh": "\u5747\u8861\uff08\u5f00\u653e\u8d5b\u679c\uff09",
"scoring_type": "balanced",
"signals": {
"btts_yes_prob": 0.545,
"draw_prob": 0.2968,
"max_1x2_prob": 0.3559,
"over_prob": 0.482,
"total_xg": 2.6,
"under_prob": 0.518,
"xg_diff": 0.02
},
"type": "balanced",
"typing_weights_enabled": true
},
"hero_display_pick": null,
"hero_mode": "default",
"longshot_picks": [],
"markets": {
"1x2": {
"consensus_odds": 2.55,
"decision": "no_bet",
"edge": 0.0031,
"ev": -0.1023,
"implied_prob": 0.3489,
"max_ev_side": "draw",
"model_prob": 0.3559,
"side": "away",
"side_label": "Kluczevia Stargard"
},
"btts": {
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.1643,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 2.295,
"edge": 0.0096,
"market_prob": 0.3968,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"model_prob": 0.455,
"n_bookmakers": 5,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.1643,
"best_odd": 2.295,
"edge": 0.0096,
"ev": -0.0673,
"implied_prob": 0.3968,
"model_prob": 0.455,
"p_final": 0.4064
},
"p_final": 0.4064,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0673,
"value_side": "no",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.2259,
"best_odd": 1.51,
"edge": -0.0131,
"ev": -0.1091,
"implied_prob": 0.6032,
"model_prob": 0.545,
"p_final": 0.59
}
},
"edge": 0.0577,
"ev": 0.0829,
"implied_prob": 0.3973,
"model_prob": 0.455,
"side": "no",
"value_side": "no"
},
"ou_2_5": {
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.1972,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 2.1,
"edge": 0.0163,
"market_prob": 0.4355,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"model_prob": 0.518,
"n_bookmakers": 6,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.2169,
"best_odd": 1.62,
"edge": -0.0179,
"ev": -0.1145,
"implied_prob": 0.5645,
"model_prob": 0.482,
"p_final": 0.5466
},
"p_final": 0.4518,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0513,
"under": {
"alpha": 0.1972,
"best_odd": 2.1,
"edge": 0.0163,
"ev": -0.0513,
"implied_prob": 0.4355,
"model_prob": 0.518,
"p_final": 0.4518
},
"value_side": "under"
},
"edge": 0.079,
"ev": 0.093,
"implied_prob": 0.439,
"model_prob": 0.518,
"side": "under",
"value_side": "under"
}
},
"match_id": 1568804,
"match_regime": {
"action": "bet",
"actionable": true,
"clear_edge": true,
"code": "clear_edge",
"execution_line_key": null,
"insight_line_key": null,
"max_valid_ev": 0.093,
"min_ev": 0.02,
"stake_mult": 1.0,
"use_split_strip": false
},
"match_tier": "value_game",
"no_clear_primary": false,
"probabilities": {
"away": 0.3559,
"draw": 0.2968,
"home": 0.3473
},
"reason_codes": [
"no_ev_1x2"
],
"secondary_pick": {
"decision": "value_bet",
"ev": 0.093,
"implied_prob": 0.439,
"market": "ou_2_5",
"model_prob": 0.518,
"not_dominant": false,
"risk_band": "strong",
"risk_tier": "secondary",
"side": "under",
"slot": "secondary"
},
"secondary_picks": [
{
"decision": "value_bet",
"ev": 0.093,
"implied_prob": 0.439,
"market": "ou_2_5",
"model_prob": 0.518,
"not_dominant": false,
"risk_band": "strong",
"risk_tier": "secondary",
"side": "under",
"slot": "secondary"
}
],
"show_betting_primary_label": false,
"suppressed_primary": null,
"teams": {
"away": "Kluczevia Stargard",
"home": "Kalisz"
},
"top_pick": {
"composite_score": 0.03772,
"decision": "value_bet",
"ev": 0.0829,
"implied_prob": 0.3973,
"market": "btts",
"model_prob": 0.455,
"not_dominant": true,
"primary_strength": "clear",
"risk_band": "medium",
"risk_tier": "primary",
"side": "no",
"slot": "primary",
"speculative_primary": false
},
"valid_markets_count": 2,
"value_context_1x2": {
"consensus_ev": -0.1023,
"consensus_ev_display": "-10.2%",
"consensus_odds": 2.55,
"disagreement_label": "Normal",
"disagreement_level": "normal",
"implied_prob": 0.3489,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3559,
"raw_edge_display": "+0.7 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 0.7,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.3921568627450981,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.0925,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-9.2%"
}
}
},
"fixture_id": 1568804,
"generated_at_utc": "2026-09-27T11:59:36.186704+00:00",
"lang_id": "en"
}
Explora Más Contenido de Predicciones
Obtén predicciones premium para Kalisz & Kluczevia Stargard!
Desbloquea análisis en profundidad, consejos de apuestas exclusivos y pronósticos de partidos con nuestro servicio de suscripción premium.
Suscríbete ahora
III Liga - Grupo 2 — Clasificación
| # | EQUIPO | PJ | G | E | P | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Polonia Środa | 9 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 23 |
| 2 | Luzino | 9 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 22 |
| 3 | Kluczevia Stargard | 9 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 19 |
| 4 | Wda Świecie | 9 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 18 |
| 5 | Lech Poznań II | 9 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 15 |
| 6 | Kalisz | 9 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 14 |
| 7 | Stargard Szczeciński | 9 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 14 |
| 8 | Flota Świnoujście | 9 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 14 |
| 9 | Noteć Czarnków | 9 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 13 |
| 10 | Gedania Gdańsk | 9 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 10 |
| 11 | Grom Nowy Staw | 9 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 10 |
| 12 | Kotwica Kórnik | 9 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 10 |
| 13 | Bałtyk Koszalin | 9 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 9 |
| 14 | Chemik Bydgoszcz | 9 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 8 |
| 15 | Unia Swarzędz | 9 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 7 |
| 16 | Elana Toruń | 9 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 6 |
| 17 | Victoria Września | 9 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 6 |
| 18 | Lipno Stęszew | 9 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 4 |
| # | EQUIPO | PJ | GF | GC | +/- | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Luzino | 9 | 28 | 10 | +18 | 22 |
| 2 | Polonia Środa | 9 | 27 | 14 | +13 | 23 |
| 3 | Grom Nowy Staw | 9 | 24 | 24 | 0 | 10 |
| 4 | Gedania Gdańsk | 9 | 22 | 21 | +1 | 10 |
| 5 | Kluczevia Stargard | 9 | 19 | 15 | +4 | 19 |
| 6 | Stargard Szczeciński | 9 | 19 | 16 | +3 | 14 |
| 7 | Lech Poznań II | 9 | 17 | 15 | +2 | 15 |
| 8 | Kotwica Kórnik | 9 | 17 | 22 | -5 | 10 |
| 9 | Wda Świecie | 9 | 15 | 10 | +5 | 18 |
| 10 | Kalisz | 9 | 15 | 10 | +5 | 14 |
| 11 | Noteć Czarnków | 9 | 15 | 13 | +2 | 13 |
| 12 | Flota Świnoujście | 9 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 14 |
| 13 | Chemik Bydgoszcz | 9 | 13 | 18 | -5 | 8 |
| 14 | Unia Swarzędz | 9 | 11 | 19 | -8 | 7 |
| 15 | Elana Toruń | 9 | 11 | 19 | -8 | 6 |
| 16 | Lipno Stęszew | 9 | 10 | 21 | -11 | 4 |
| 17 | Victoria Września | 9 | 10 | 22 | -12 | 6 |
| 18 | Bałtyk Koszalin | 9 | 9 | 13 | -4 | 9 |
