Casa de apuestas premium stake: los nuevos usuarios pueden usar el código promoFHn2uDc1 FHn2uDc1. Registrarse
Mercados rastreados versus resultado de tiempo completo
Cada fila compara el modelo previo al partido con el resultado de tiempo completo.
- Mercado Predicción Resultado Resultado
- Más / Menos 2.5 Menos de 2.5 Menos de 2.5 (1 objetivos) ✔ Correcto
- Ambos Equipos Marcarán BTTS No No ✔ Correcto
- 1X2 FC Volendam Almere City FC ✖ Incorrecto
- Perspectivas de marcador exacto 1-1, 1-2, 2-1, 2-2, 0-1 1-0 ✖ Incorrecto
Validation Report
Immutable Snapshot
Closing Odds
1.93
AI Fair Odds
—
CLV
+0.0%
Final Result
Almere City FC win · Almere City FC 1–0 FC Volendam
Prediction
✖ Missed
Decision Grade
C
Model Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
El informe IA aún no está disponible para este partido. Vuelva a ejecutar «Generación masiva de cuotas» tras actualizar el servidor para generar el resumen.
View technical JSON
{
"bundle_version": 1,
"content_hash": "9c0d0a8d9bb77c317c9dd8c61ffb92bb25c3456758acf18a748ec8d69c720ec0",
"decision_algo_version": "2.5.0",
"facts": {
"ai_fp": {
"away_predicted_xg": 1.78,
"away_win_prob": 0.4117,
"away_win_prob_posterior": null,
"bayes_applied": 0,
"btts_no_prob": 0.324,
"btts_yes_prob": 0.676,
"dc_rho": -0.13,
"draw_prob": 0.2515,
"draw_prob_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_away": 2.43,
"fair_odds_away_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_draw": 3.98,
"fair_odds_draw_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_home": 2.97,
"fair_odds_home_posterior": null,
"home_predicted_xg": 1.6,
"home_win_prob": 0.3368,
"home_win_prob_posterior": null,
"over_25_prob": 0.656,
"prediction_confidence": "low",
"under_25_prob": 0.344
},
"api_prediction": {
"advice": "Combo Double chance : Almere City FC or draw and +1.5 goals",
"main_pick_display": "No Strong Winner Bet",
"percent_away": "10%",
"percent_draw": "45%",
"percent_home": "45%",
"winner_name": "Almere City FC"
},
"away_xg": 1.78,
"betting_insight": {
"bet_label": "FC Volendam",
"confidence": null,
"main_pick_meta": {
"confidence": "low",
"display_text": "No Strong Winner Bet",
"edge": 0.1326,
"edge_gap": 0.0749,
"market": "1X2",
"market_prob": 0.2791,
"model_prob": 0.4117,
"pick_type": "no_strong",
"probabilities": {
"away": 41.2,
"draw": 25.1,
"home": 33.7
},
"reason": "No clear edge in 1X2 market",
"selection": null,
"selection_name": null
},
"market_comparison": [
{
"affi_link": "",
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"odd": 3.4
}
],
"risk_color": null,
"risk_key": null,
"stacked_market": null,
"value_bet": {
"best_odds": 3.4,
"bookmaker_id": 0,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"display_market": "FC Volendam Win",
"is_value": true,
"label": "Away",
"market_fair_odds": 3.58,
"market_odds": 3.4,
"model_odds": 2.43,
"overround": 5.4,
"prob_edge": 11.7,
"value_pct": 39.9,
"value_rating": "strong_value"
}
},
"betting_markets": {
"btts": {
"away_clean_sheet": 2,
"away_failed_to_score": 1,
"away_played": 8,
"away_score_rate": 83.1,
"home_clean_sheet": 3,
"home_failed_to_score": 1,
"home_played": 8,
"home_score_rate": 79.8,
"no_prob": 32.4,
"pick": "Yes",
"pick_prob": 67.6,
"source": "xG_dc",
"strong_pick": false,
"yes_prob": 67.6
},
"correct_score": {
"away_expected": 1.78,
"home_expected": 1.6,
"scores": [
{
"away": 1,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 9.7
},
{
"away": 2,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-2",
"prob": 8.6
},
{
"away": 1,
"home": 2,
"label": "2-1",
"prob": 7.8
},
{
"away": 2,
"home": 2,
"label": "2-2",
"prob": 6.9
},
{
"away": 1,
"home": 0,
"label": "0-1",
"prob": 6.1
}
],
"source": "xG"
},
"double_chance": {
"options": [
{
"key": "1X",
"label": "Almere City FC or Draw",
"prob": 58.8
},
{
"key": "12",
"label": "Almere City FC or FC Volendam",
"prob": 74.9
},
{
"key": "X2",
"label": "Draw or FC Volendam",
"prob": 66.3
}
],
"pick_key": "12",
"pick_label": "Almere City FC or FC Volendam",
"pick_prob": 74.9
},
"match_winner": {
"away_pct": 41.2,
"draw_pct": 25.1,
"home_pct": 33.7,
"lean_key": "away",
"lean_label": "FC Volendam"
},
"over_under": {
"api_hint": "+1.5",
"avg_total": 3.38,
"away_avg_scored": 2.5,
"confidence": "high",
"home_avg_scored": 2.3,
"over_prob": 65.6,
"pick": "Under 2.5",
"pick_prob": 65.6,
"source": "xG_dc",
"strong_pick": true,
"total_expected": 3.38,
"under_prob": 34.4
},
"prob_source": "poisson",
"value_bet_enhanced": {
"bookmaker_id": 0,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"edge": 40.1,
"implied_prob": 29.4,
"is_value": true,
"label": "Away",
"market": "FC Volendam Win",
"model_prob": 41.2,
"odds": 3.4
}
},
"closing_line_bundle": {
"away_team": "FC Volendam",
"closing_1x2_probs_pct": {
"away": 27.91,
"draw": 22.92,
"home": 49.17
},
"closing_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
"closing_capture": "PRE5",
"closing_fetched_at": "2026-10-03 17:56:11",
"early_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
"early_capture": "PRE30",
"early_fetched_at": "2026-10-03 17:30:23",
"has_data": true,
"home_team": "Almere City FC",
"largest_move_kind": null,
"max_abs_move_pp": 0.0,
"model_vs_closing": [
{
"closing_implied_pct": 49.17,
"gap_pp": -15.48,
"kind": "1x2_h",
"model_pct": 33.69
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 22.92,
"gap_pp": 2.22,
"kind": "1x2_d",
"model_pct": 25.14
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 27.91,
"gap_pp": 13.26,
"kind": "1x2_a",
"model_pct": 41.17
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 68.05,
"gap_pp": -2.45,
"kind": "ou_o",
"model_pct": 65.6
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 31.95,
"gap_pp": 2.45,
"kind": "ou_u",
"model_pct": 34.4
}
],
"movement": [
{
"closing": 1.93,
"early": 1.93,
"implied_closing_pct": 49.17,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 49.17,
"kind": "1x2_h"
},
{
"closing": 4.14,
"early": 4.14,
"implied_closing_pct": 22.92,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 22.92,
"kind": "1x2_d"
},
{
"closing": 3.4,
"early": 3.4,
"implied_closing_pct": 27.91,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 27.91,
"kind": "1x2_a"
},
{
"closing": 1.39,
"early": 1.39,
"implied_closing_pct": 68.05,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 68.05,
"kind": "ou_o"
},
{
"closing": 2.96,
"early": 2.96,
"implied_closing_pct": 31.95,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 31.95,
"kind": "ou_u"
}
],
"movement_negligible": true,
"same_bookmaker": true,
"top_value_gap": {
"gap_pp": 13.3,
"kind": "1x2_a"
}
},
"correct_score_insight": {
"best_value": null,
"lean_card": {
"diff_pp": -1.1,
"ev": -0.1028,
"has_edge": false,
"label": "1-1",
"market_odds": 9.25,
"market_prob": 0.1081,
"market_prob_pct": 10.8,
"model_prob": 0.097,
"model_prob_pct": 9.7,
"n_bookmakers": 8,
"status_key": "no_value"
},
"most_likely": {
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 9.7
},
"top5": [
{
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 9.7
},
{
"label": "1-2",
"prob": 8.6
},
{
"label": "2-1",
"prob": 7.8
},
{
"label": "2-2",
"prob": 6.9
},
{
"label": "0-1",
"prob": 6.1
}
]
},
"home_xg": 1.6,
"homepage_pick": null,
"market_cards": [
{
"authority_action": "lean",
"authority_note": "Selective consensus value may exist \u2014 below default Primary sizing bar.",
"consensus_odds": 3.4,
"decision": "value_bet",
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"ev": 0.0573,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 5.7,
"text": "+5.7%"
},
"featured": true,
"id": "1x2",
"implied_prob": 0.2791,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"max_ev": 0.0573,
"max_ev_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 5.7,
"text": "+5.7%"
},
"model_prob": 0.4117,
"raw_edge_display": "+13.3 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 13.3,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.3998,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+40.0%",
"show_primary_label": false,
"side_label": "FC Volendam",
"sort_key": 10201.57,
"tier": "best"
},
{
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.2704,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 2.875,
"edge": 0.0062,
"edge_pp": 0.6,
"market_prob": 0.3211,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"model_prob": 0.344,
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.3718,
"best_odd": 1.36,
"edge": -0.0085,
"ev": -0.0883,
"implied_prob": 0.6789,
"model_prob": 0.656,
"p_final": 0.6704
},
"p_final": 0.3273,
"prediction_confidence": "low",
"raw_edge_pp": 2.3,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.011,
"risk_adj_ev": -0.059,
"under": {
"alpha": 0.2704,
"best_odd": 2.875,
"edge": 0.0062,
"ev": -0.059,
"implied_prob": 0.3211,
"model_prob": 0.344,
"p_final": 0.3273
},
"value_side": "under"
},
"ev_available": true,
"ev_over": -0.0816,
"ev_over_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -8.2,
"text": "-8.2%"
},
"ev_under": 0.0664,
"ev_under_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 6.6,
"text": "+6.6%"
},
"featured": false,
"id": "ou_2_5",
"max_ev": 0.0664,
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"over_prob": 65.6,
"sort_key": 10059.76,
"tier": "best",
"under_prob": 34.4,
"value_side": "under"
},
{
"decision": "small_edge",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.2783,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 2.89,
"edge": 0.0011,
"edge_pp": 0.1,
"market_prob": 0.32,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"model_prob": 0.324,
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.2783,
"best_odd": 2.89,
"edge": 0.0011,
"ev": -0.072,
"implied_prob": 0.32,
"model_prob": 0.324,
"p_final": 0.3211
},
"p_final": 0.3211,
"prediction_confidence": "low",
"raw_edge_pp": 0.4,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.0636,
"risk_adj_ev": -0.072,
"value_side": "no",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.3827,
"best_odd": 1.36,
"edge": -0.0015,
"ev": -0.0773,
"implied_prob": 0.68,
"model_prob": 0.676,
"p_final": 0.6785
}
},
"ev_available": true,
"ev_no": 0.0044,
"ev_no_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 0.4,
"text": "+0.4%"
},
"ev_yes": -0.0806,
"ev_yes_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -8.1,
"text": "-8.1%"
},
"featured": false,
"id": "btts",
"max_ev": 0.0044,
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"no_prob": 32.4,
"sort_key": 5203.52,
"tier": "lean",
"value_side": "no",
"yes_prob": 67.6
},
{
"featured": false,
"id": "correct_score",
"sort_key": 809.1,
"tier": "risk",
"top_label": "1-1",
"top_prob": 9.7
}
],
"market_intelligence": {
"betting_signal": {
"alert_breadth": "6/9",
"alert_breadth_note": "6/9 sportsbooks confirmed",
"alert_move": "\u2191 +2.6%",
"alert_team": "Draw",
"alert_title": "Sharp Money Alert",
"divergence_pp": 15.5,
"has_alert": false,
"hero_edge_pp": -15.49,
"hero_label": "Almere City FC",
"market_prob_pct": 27.9,
"market_team": "Almere City FC",
"model_prob_pct": 41.2,
"model_team": "FC Volendam",
"show": true,
"status_icon": "!",
"status_key": "caution",
"status_label": "Use caution",
"status_line": "Use caution \u2014 signals are mixed",
"steam_score": 33,
"steam_subtitle": "Limited conviction",
"steam_tier": "C",
"title": "Betting Signal"
},
"decision_chain": {
"academy_links": [
{
"key": "market_disagree",
"read_min": 5,
"title": "When Should You Trust AI Over the Market?",
"url": "/academy/ai-betting/when-should-you-trust-ai-over-the-market/en"
},
{
"key": "steam",
"read_min": 4,
"title": "What Is a Steam Move?",
"url": "/academy/betting-market/what-is-a-steam-move/en"
},
{
"key": "clv_pending",
"read_min": 3,
"title": "Why CLV Matters More Than Win Rate",
"url": "/academy/clv/why-clv-matters-more-than-win-rate/en"
}
],
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 15.5,
"key": "agree",
"label": "Direction agree \u00b7 Pricing diverges",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": false,
"pricing_key": "low",
"probability_gap_pp": 15.5,
"summary": "Model and market favour the same side (FC Volendam), but pricing still diverges by 15.5 pp."
},
"authority": {
"action": "lean",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 15.5,
"key": "agree",
"label": "Direction agree \u00b7 Pricing diverges",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": false,
"pricing_key": "low",
"probability_gap_pp": 15.5,
"summary": "Model and market favour the same side (FC Volendam), but pricing still diverges by 15.5 pp."
},
"alignment_key": "agree",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.0664,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.3999,
"confidence_band": "Moderate",
"decision_strength": 5.0,
"decision_strength_v1": 5.5,
"decision_strength_v2": 6.0,
"decision_type": "VALUE_ALERT",
"execution_confidence": 52,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "Selective Lean - No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates FC Volendam at 41.2%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 27.9%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies FC Volendam as the value side (41.2%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market broadly agrees with the direction",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 13.3,
"gates_failed": [
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "Selective Lean - No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u2192",
"label": "Lean only \u2014 not a default Primary",
"market_signal": "Market aligns with model lean",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "FC Volendam",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "calibration_risk",
"detail": "Confidence reduced because model assumptions exceed the normal range.",
"name": "Calibration Risk",
"short": "Calibration Risk",
"tone": "danger"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "calibration_risk",
"detail": "Confidence reduced because model assumptions exceed the normal range.",
"name": "Calibration Risk",
"short": "Calibration Risk",
"tone": "danger"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": true,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market 1X2 \u00b7 side FC Volendam \u00b7 decimal odds ~3.40 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +40% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1551821 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22483.40 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +6.6% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +6.6% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Execution confidence below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +6.6% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 5.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +6.6% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 5.0/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": true,
"value": "65 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "52 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": true,
"value": "agree"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+6.6% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 7,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"Model and market favour the same side (FC Volendam), but pricing still diverges by 15.5 pp.",
"Decision strength: 5.0/10",
"Execution confidence below 65",
"Outlier price +40% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
],
"reliability_score": 65,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market aligns with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "Selective consensus value may exist \u2014 below default Primary sizing bar.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "lean",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": 0.0573,
"consensus_ev_display": "+5.7%",
"consensus_odds": 3.4,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.2791,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.4117,
"raw_edge_display": "+13.3 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 13.3,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.29411764705882354,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.3998,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+40.0%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": false,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": 31.9,
"reasons": [
"Thin xG separation gap=0.18"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -1.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "low",
"block_value_alert": false,
"separation_score": -10,
"strength_delta": -1.0,
"xg_gap": 0.18
}
}
},
"bet_status": "lean",
"books_breadth_display": "6/9",
"breadth_ratio": 0.6666666666666666,
"evidence": {
"score": 68,
"signals": [
{
"icon": "\u25cb",
"key": "statistical_edge",
"label": "No strong statistical edge",
"status": "neutral"
},
{
"icon": "!",
"key": "market_agreement",
"label": "Direction agrees; pricing still diverges",
"status": "caution"
},
{
"icon": "\u2713",
"key": "steam",
"label": "Market drift supports model side (direction only \u2014 not pricing convergence)",
"status": "pass"
},
{
"icon": "!",
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation warning",
"status": "caution"
}
],
"stars": 3,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"forecast_reliability": {
"breakdown": [
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation: Warning",
"tone": "caution"
},
{
"key": "gap",
"label": "Large market gap (15 pp)",
"tone": "caution"
},
{
"key": "steam",
"label": "Market drift aligns with model",
"tone": "ok"
}
],
"parts": {
"alignment": 17.3,
"data_quality": 12.0,
"market_coverage": 6.7,
"steam_coherence": 10.0,
"validation": 14.0
},
"score": 65,
"stars": 3,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"lean_gap_pp": 15.49,
"market_agreement": "weak",
"max_gap_pp": 15.49,
"model_calibration": {
"away_xg": 1.78,
"calibration_status": "ok",
"deviation_pct": 32.0,
"elevated": false,
"home_xg": 1.6,
"impact_note": "",
"league_avg_xg": 1.35,
"peak_xg": 1.78,
"status_label": "Within typical league range",
"summary": "Home xG 1.60 \u00b7 Away xG 1.78 \u00b7 League avg 1.35 \u00b7 Peak deviation +32%",
"title": "Model Calibration Check"
},
"move_is_drift": true,
"mv_status": "warning",
"odds_delta_pct": 2.6,
"steam_conflicts": false,
"steam_move_display": "\u2191 +2.6%",
"steam_team": "Draw",
"suppress_execution": false,
"value_split": {
"execution_confidence": {
"label": "Betting Confidence",
"score": 52,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"market_compatibility": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 33,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_edge_strength": {
"label": "Model Signal Strength",
"score": 41,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_value": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 33,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"recommendation": {
"action": "lean",
"label": "Selective Lean - No Primary Bet"
}
},
"verdict": {
"agree_note": "Selective consensus value may exist \u2014 below default Primary sizing bar.",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 15.5,
"key": "agree",
"label": "Direction agree \u00b7 Pricing diverges",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": false,
"pricing_key": "low",
"probability_gap_pp": 15.5,
"summary": "Model and market favour the same side (FC Volendam), but pricing still diverges by 15.5 pp."
},
"authority": {
"action": "lean",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 15.5,
"key": "agree",
"label": "Direction agree \u00b7 Pricing diverges",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": false,
"pricing_key": "low",
"probability_gap_pp": 15.5,
"summary": "Model and market favour the same side (FC Volendam), but pricing still diverges by 15.5 pp."
},
"alignment_key": "agree",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.0664,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.3999,
"confidence_band": "Moderate",
"decision_strength": 5.0,
"decision_strength_v1": 5.5,
"decision_strength_v2": 6.0,
"decision_type": "VALUE_ALERT",
"execution_confidence": 52,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "Selective Lean - No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates FC Volendam at 41.2%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 27.9%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies FC Volendam as the value side (41.2%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market broadly agrees with the direction",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 13.3,
"gates_failed": [
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "Selective Lean - No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u2192",
"label": "Lean only \u2014 not a default Primary",
"market_signal": "Market aligns with model lean",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "FC Volendam",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "calibration_risk",
"detail": "Confidence reduced because model assumptions exceed the normal range.",
"name": "Calibration Risk",
"short": "Calibration Risk",
"tone": "danger"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "calibration_risk",
"detail": "Confidence reduced because model assumptions exceed the normal range.",
"name": "Calibration Risk",
"short": "Calibration Risk",
"tone": "danger"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": true,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market 1X2 \u00b7 side FC Volendam \u00b7 decimal odds ~3.40 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +40% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1551821 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22483.40 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +6.6% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +6.6% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Execution confidence below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +6.6% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 5.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +6.6% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 5.0/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": true,
"value": "65 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "52 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": true,
"value": "agree"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+6.6% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 7,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"Model and market favour the same side (FC Volendam), but pricing still diverges by 15.5 pp.",
"Decision strength: 5.0/10",
"Execution confidence below 65",
"Outlier price +40% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
],
"reliability_score": 65,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market aligns with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "Selective consensus value may exist \u2014 below default Primary sizing bar.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "lean",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": 0.0573,
"consensus_ev_display": "+5.7%",
"consensus_odds": 3.4,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.2791,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.4117,
"raw_edge_display": "+13.3 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 13.3,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.29411764705882354,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.3998,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+40.0%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": false,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": 31.9,
"reasons": [
"Thin xG separation gap=0.18"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -1.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "low",
"block_value_alert": false,
"separation_score": -10,
"strength_delta": -1.0,
"xg_gap": 0.18
}
}
},
"headline": "Selective Lean - No Primary Bet",
"icon": "\u2192",
"label": "Lean only \u2014 not a default Primary",
"subline": "Selective consensus value may exist \u2014 below default Primary sizing bar.",
"tier": "lean"
},
"why": {
"action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
"bullets": [
"Model: Almere City FC 1.60 xG vs FC Volendam 1.78 \u2192 FC Volendam 41.2%",
"Market: Almere City FC ~27.9% implied",
"Market Drift: Draw odds \u2191 +2.6%"
],
"one_liner": "Model leans FC Volendam, but market pricing diverges by 15 pp.",
"title": "Why?"
}
},
"edge_rows": [
{
"edge_pp": -15.49,
"fair_prob": 33.68,
"label": "Almere City FC",
"market_prob": 49.17,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "home"
},
{
"edge_pp": 2.23,
"fair_prob": 25.15,
"label": "Draw",
"market_prob": 22.92,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "draw"
},
{
"edge_pp": 13.26,
"fair_prob": 41.17,
"label": "FC Volendam",
"market_prob": 27.91,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "away"
},
{
"edge_pp": -2.44,
"fair_prob": 65.6,
"label": "Over 2.5",
"market_prob": 68.04,
"market_type": "ou25",
"outcome": "over"
},
{
"edge_pp": 2.44,
"fair_prob": 34.4,
"label": "Under 2.5",
"market_prob": 31.96,
"market_type": "ou25",
"outcome": "under"
},
{
"edge_pp": -0.85,
"fair_prob": 67.6,
"label": "BTTS Yes",
"market_prob": 68.45,
"market_type": "btts",
"outcome": "yes"
},
{
"edge_pp": 0.85,
"fair_prob": 32.4,
"label": "BTTS No",
"market_prob": 31.55,
"market_type": "btts",
"outcome": "no"
}
],
"edge_snapshot": {
"edge_label": "strong_disagreement",
"edge_pp": -15.49,
"fair_prob_pct": 33.68,
"hero_side": "home",
"hero_team_name": "Almere City FC",
"market_prob_pct": 49.17,
"status": "strong_market_ahead",
"steam_team_name": "Draw"
},
"fair_source": "poisson_pipeline",
"fair_vs_market": {
"closing_capture": "PRE5",
"closing_footnote": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE5.",
"comparison_available": true,
"comparison_disabled": false,
"comparison_summary": "The closing market estimates Almere City FC\u0027s win probability at 49.2%, compared with the model\u0027s estimate of 33.7%, a difference of 15.5 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.",
"degraded_note": "",
"divergence_guard": {
"divergence_level": "strong",
"edge_status": "strong_market_ahead",
"max_gap_pp": 15.49,
"suppress_hero": false,
"suppress_value_language": false
},
"divergence_label": "Strong model-market divergence",
"divergence_level": "strong",
"divergence_level_label": "Strong divergence",
"divergence_note": "The fair estimate differs noticeably from current market pricing. This may reflect genuine disagreement or incomplete rating inputs.",
"divergence_tier": "strong",
"edge_label": "Strong disagreement",
"edge_label_key": "strong_disagreement",
"fair_confidence": "medium",
"fair_confidence_label": "Medium",
"fair_source_note": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE5.",
"forecast_assessment": {
"favourite_class": "Balanced match",
"favourite_label": "FC Volendam",
"forecast_certainty_tier": "low",
"headline": "Balanced match",
"market_agreement_label": "Weak",
"market_direction": {
"label": "Supports model direction",
"positive": true
},
"market_prob_pct": 27.9,
"model_prob_gap_display": "+13.3 percentage points",
"model_prob_gap_pp": 13.3,
"model_prob_pct": 41.2,
"outcome_separation_tier": "medium",
"paragraphs": [],
"pricing_convergence": {
"gap_display": "+13.3 percentage points",
"gap_pp": 13.3,
"label": "Moderate",
"label_key": "mi_fa_pricing_moderate"
},
"reliability_headline": "Moderate reliability",
"reliability_icon": "\u2713",
"reliability_score": 65,
"reliability_tier": "moderate",
"summary": "FC Volendam \u2014 market direction supports the model lean.",
"tier": "balanced",
"title": "Prediction Assessment",
"validation_label": "Warning",
"value_split": {
"execution_confidence": {
"label": "Betting Confidence",
"score": 52,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"market_compatibility": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 33,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_edge_strength": {
"label": "Model Signal Strength",
"score": 41,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_value": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 33,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"recommendation": {
"action": "lean",
"label": "Selective Lean - No Primary Bet"
}
},
"why": {
"action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
"bullets": [
"Model: Almere City FC 1.60 xG vs FC Volendam 1.78 \u2192 FC Volendam 41.2%",
"Market: Almere City FC ~27.9% implied",
"Market Drift: Draw odds \u2191 +2.6%"
],
"one_liner": "Model leans FC Volendam, but market pricing diverges by 15 pp.",
"title": "Why?"
}
},
"forecast_certainty": {
"note": "Three outcomes remain closely bunched \u2014 treat as a relatively open match.",
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"forecast_certainty_label": "Low",
"has_market_probs": true,
"hero_edge_pp": -15.49,
"hero_label": "Almere City FC",
"hero_side": "home",
"market_activity": "Draw odds lengthened \u2191 +2.6%.",
"market_agreement": "weak",
"market_agreement_label": "Weak",
"market_interpretation": {
"bullets": [
"Investors may be incorporating information not fully reflected in the baseline model.",
"Tournament-specific context can shift market pricing."
],
"follow_up": "However, Draw has seen drift \u2014 odds lengthened by 2.6%, suggesting weakening support.",
"gap_tier": "strong",
"lead": "The market is materially more optimistic about Almere City FC than the current fair estimate.",
"note": "Drift away from Draw \u2014 odds lengthened by 2.6% (weakening support).",
"paragraphs": [
"The market is materially more optimistic about Almere City FC than the current fair estimate.",
"However, Draw has seen drift \u2014 odds lengthened by 2.6%, suggesting weakening support.",
"Drift away from Draw \u2014 odds lengthened by 2.6% (weakening support)."
],
"quiet_market": false,
"title": "Market Assessment"
},
"market_narrative": {
"paragraphs": [
"The market favors Almere City FC more strongly than the current fair estimate.",
"At the same time, Draw has drifted \u2014 odds lengthened by 2.6%, suggesting weakening support."
],
"title": "Current Market Narrative"
},
"market_source": "closing_1x2",
"max_gap_pp": 15.49,
"model_validation": {
"score_label_key": "mi_mv_warning",
"status": "warning"
},
"model_validation_label": "Warning",
"outcome_separation": {
"breakdown": [
"No outcome exceeds 50% on the 1X2 grid.",
"Favourite exceeds second outcome by 7.5 pp (at 41.2%)."
],
"lead_gap_pp": 7.5,
"max_prob_pct": 41.2,
"note": "How spread out the model 1X2 probabilities are \u2014 crowded splits mean no single outcome dominates. Not accuracy vs the market.",
"tier": "medium",
"tier_label": "Medium"
},
"outcome_separation_label": "Medium",
"overall_assessment": {
"badge_class": "strong",
"largest_gap_label": "Almere City FC",
"largest_gap_pp": -15.5,
"lead": "The closing market prices Almere City FC higher than the statistical model.",
"level": "strong",
"max_gap_pp": 15.5,
"title": "Strong Disagreement"
},
"rows": [
{
"difference_pp": -15.49,
"edge_pp": -15.49,
"fair_prob_pct": 33.68,
"is_hero": true,
"label": "Almere City FC",
"market_prob_pct": 49.17,
"side": "home",
"signal_key": "market_higher",
"signal_label": "Market Higher"
},
{
"difference_pp": 2.23,
"edge_pp": 2.23,
"fair_prob_pct": 25.15,
"is_hero": false,
"label": "Draw",
"market_prob_pct": 22.92,
"side": "draw",
"signal_key": "aligned",
"signal_label": "Aligned"
},
{
"difference_pp": 13.26,
"edge_pp": 13.26,
"fair_prob_pct": 41.17,
"is_hero": false,
"label": "FC Volendam",
"market_prob_pct": 27.91,
"side": "away",
"signal_key": "model_edge",
"signal_label": "Model Edge"
}
],
"status": "strong_market_ahead",
"status_label": "Strong Market Ahead",
"steam_note": "Drift away from Draw \u2014 odds lengthened by 2.6% (weakening support).",
"unavailable_note": ""
},
"interpretation": {
"has_conflict": true,
"paragraphs": [
"The betting market strongly prefers Almere City FC (27.9%).",
"Draw odds have drifted longer across books (\u2191 +2.6%, 6/9) \u2014 market pricing moves against this side.",
"This creates a conflict: Model \u2192 FC Volendam, Market \u2192 Almere City FC, while Draw odds drifted longer (market fade).",
"Because signals disagree, confidence remains limited."
],
"show": true,
"title": "OddsGPT Interpretation"
},
"lifecycle": {
"closing_implied_pct": 51.81,
"closing_odds": 1.93,
"closing_reason": "",
"closing_status": "recorded",
"closing_status_label": "Recorded",
"clv_pending": true,
"clv_pp": 0.0,
"clv_reason": "",
"clv_status": "pending",
"context": "match",
"current_stage": "waiting_for_kickoff",
"current_stage_detail": "",
"current_stage_label": "Waiting for kickoff",
"entry_implied_pct": 51.81,
"entry_odds": 1.93,
"match_phase": "upcoming",
"match_phase_detail": "",
"match_phase_display": "Upcoming",
"match_phase_label": "Upcoming",
"model_validation_label": "Warning",
"model_validation_status": "warning",
"stages": [
{
"detail": "",
"id": "forecast_generated",
"label": "Prediction Generated",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "market_detected",
"label": "Market Compared",
"status": "active"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "model_validated",
"label": "Validation Passed",
"status": "active"
},
{
"detail": "PRE5",
"id": "closing_recorded",
"label": "Closing Recorded",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "clv_evaluated",
"label": "CLV Evaluated",
"status": "pending"
}
]
},
"market_move_intelligence": {
"books_reacting": 6,
"books_reacting_detail": [
{
"bookmaker_id": 4,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +5.1%",
"odds_delta_pct": 5.1
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 7,
"bookmaker_name": "William Hill",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +2.7%",
"odds_delta_pct": 2.7
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 8,
"bookmaker_name": "Bet365",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +2.6%",
"odds_delta_pct": 2.6
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 32,
"bookmaker_name": "Betano",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +2.6%",
"odds_delta_pct": 2.6
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 11,
"bookmaker_name": "1xBet",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +2.1%",
"odds_delta_pct": 2.1
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 2,
"bookmaker_name": "Marathonbet",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +2.1%",
"odds_delta_pct": 2.1
}
],
"books_total": 9,
"breadth_display": "6/9",
"clv_label": "+0.00 pp",
"clv_status": "evaluated",
"current_odds": 4.0,
"is_drift": true,
"move_context": "Highest consensus move",
"move_display": "\u2191 +2.6%",
"move_pct_abs": 2.6,
"move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
"move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 106h 17m",
"narrative_paragraphs": [
"Market fading Draw (2.6%) \u2014 line drifting longer vs. open (6/9).",
"Modest lengthening \u2014 treat as drift tracking rather than steam."
],
"narrative_title": "Market Narrative",
"odds_delta_pct": 2.6,
"odds_path": {
"chart_y_labels": [
"4.14",
"4.02",
"3.90"
],
"display": "4.20 \u2192 3.57 \u2192 4.00",
"move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
"move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 106h 17m",
"pick_team": "Draw",
"points": [
{
"label_key": "open",
"value": "4.20"
},
{
"label_key": "extreme",
"value": "3.57"
},
{
"label_key": "current",
"value": "4.00"
}
],
"sparkline_points": [
3.9,
4.14,
4.0
],
"sparkline_polyline": "0.0,18.0 28.0,0.0 56.0,10.5",
"sparkline_trend": "flat",
"sparkline_trend_label": "Stable",
"summary_boxes": [
{
"label_key": "open",
"value": "3.90"
},
{
"label_key": "low",
"value": "3.90"
},
{
"label_key": "high",
"value": "4.14"
},
{
"label_key": "current",
"value": "4.00"
}
]
},
"open_odds": 3.9,
"page_alert_line": "",
"phase_label": "Discovery",
"phase_tip": "Early price formation \u2014 opening equilibrium still forming.",
"pick_team": "Draw",
"ref_book": "Bet365",
"seo_title_alert": "",
"sharp_leader": "Pinnacle",
"show": true,
"signal_badge_class": "fade",
"signal_icon": "\ud83d\udcc9",
"signal_impact": {
"current_odds": 4.0,
"is_drift": true,
"label": "Market Signal",
"move_display": "\u2191 +2.6%",
"open_odds": 3.9,
"summary": "Broad market drift supports the same direction as the model lean.",
"team": "Draw",
"tone": "with"
},
"signal_key": "market_fading",
"signal_label": "Weakening",
"steam_score": 33,
"steam_subtitle": "Limited conviction",
"steam_tier": "C",
"title": "Market Move Intelligence"
},
"market_overview": {
"breadth_display": "6/9",
"current_odds": 4.0,
"move_display": "\u2191 +2.6%",
"open_odds": 3.9,
"pick_team": "Draw",
"steam_score": 33,
"steam_team_name": "Draw",
"steam_tier": "C"
},
"premium_teaser": {
"current_divergence_pp": 15.5,
"divergence_label": "Current divergence",
"title": "Premium Market Intelligence",
"unlock_items": [
"Historical similar matches",
"Closing odds analysis",
"CLV tracking",
"Sharp money signals",
"Market efficiency rating",
"Historical model vs market results"
],
"unlock_label": "Unlock"
},
"show": true
},
"match": {
"at2.away_team_slug": "fc-volendam",
"away_expected_goals": null,
"away_goal_display": null,
"away_team_display_name": "FC Volendam",
"away_team_id": 416,
"away_team_logo": "/static/teams/416.webp",
"away_team_name": "FC Volendam",
"away_team_public_id": "5tSmExhnvr6tXG",
"away_team_slug": "fc-volendam",
"country_code": "NL",
"country_display_name": "Netherlands",
"country_flag": "/static/images/country/nl.svg",
"country_id": 115,
"country_name": "Netherlands",
"fixture_id": 1551821,
"goals_away": null,
"goals_home": null,
"home_expected_goals": null,
"home_goal_display": null,
"home_team_country": "Netherlands",
"home_team_display_name": "Almere City FC",
"home_team_id": 419,
"home_team_logo": "/static/teams/419.webp",
"home_team_name": "Almere City FC",
"home_team_public_id": "4D2ZBkMPcT8Cbq",
"home_team_slug": "almere-city-fc",
"ht.home_team_slug": "almere-city-fc",
"league_country": "Netherlands",
"league_country_display": "Netherlands",
"league_display_name": "Eerste Divisie",
"league_id": 89,
"league_logo": "/static/leagues/89.webp",
"league_name": "Eerste Divisie",
"league_public_id": "3fIkfoWJytykc5",
"league_season": 2026,
"match_date": "2026-10-03 18:00:00",
"public_id": "4pTPQRv0CiXEJi",
"score_fulltime_away": null,
"score_fulltime_home": null,
"score_penalty_away": null,
"score_penalty_home": null,
"status_long": "Not Started",
"status_short": "NS",
"venue_city": "Almere",
"venue_name": "Yanmar Stadion"
},
"match_decision": {
"confidence": {
"breakdown": [
"pred_conf_md_max_1x2_under_50",
"pred_conf_md_line_above_ev"
],
"breakdown_resolved": [
"Max 1X2 prob under 50% (open contest) (\u22121.0)",
"At least one tracked line above +EV threshold (+0.5)"
],
"score": 6.5
},
"markets": {
"1x2": {
"1x2_ev_mode": "market_first_p15",
"away": {
"alpha": 0.2403,
"best_odd": 3.4,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": 0.0319,
"ev": 0.0573,
"implied_prob": 0.2791,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.2791,
"draw": 0.2292,
"home": 0.4917
},
"model_prob": 0.4117,
"p_final": 0.311
},
"draw": {
"alpha": 0.1933,
"best_odd": 4.14,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": 0.0043,
"ev": -0.0333,
"implied_prob": 0.2292,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.2791,
"draw": 0.2292,
"home": 0.4917
},
"model_prob": 0.2514,
"p_final": 0.2335
},
"ev_available": true,
"home": {
"alpha": 0.4607,
"best_odd": 1.93,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": -0.0713,
"ev": -0.1887,
"implied_prob": 0.4917,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.2791,
"draw": 0.2292,
"home": 0.4917
},
"model_prob": 0.3369,
"p_final": 0.4204
}
},
"1x2_outlier": {
"1x2_ev_mode": "legacy_max_odd",
"away": {
"best_odd": 3.4,
"edge": 0.1176,
"ev": 0.3999,
"implied_prob": 0.2941,
"model_prob": 0.4117
},
"draw": {
"best_odd": 4.14,
"edge": 0.0098,
"ev": 0.0407,
"implied_prob": 0.2415,
"model_prob": 0.2514
},
"ev_available": true,
"home": {
"best_odd": 1.93,
"edge": -0.1813,
"ev": -0.3498,
"implied_prob": 0.5181,
"model_prob": 0.3369
}
},
"btts": {
"alpha_no": 0.2783,
"alpha_yes": 0.3827,
"best_no_odd": 3.1,
"best_yes_odd": 1.36,
"btts_ev_mode": "market_first_available",
"edge_no": 0.0085,
"edge_yes": -0.0085,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_no": 0.0044,
"ev_no_risk_adj": -0.072,
"ev_yes": -0.0806,
"ev_yes_risk_adj": -0.0773,
"implied_no": 0.3155,
"implied_yes": 0.6845,
"market_first": {
"available": true,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.2783,
"best_odd": 2.89,
"edge": 0.0011,
"ev": -0.072,
"implied_prob": 0.32,
"model_prob": 0.324,
"p_final": 0.3211
},
"prediction_confidence": "low",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.3827,
"best_odd": 1.36,
"edge": -0.0015,
"ev": -0.0773,
"implied_prob": 0.68,
"model_prob": 0.676,
"p_final": 0.6785
}
},
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"p_final_no": 0.3211,
"p_final_yes": 0.6785,
"prediction_confidence": "low",
"reliability": "medium"
},
"ou25": {
"alpha_over": 0.3718,
"alpha_under": 0.2704,
"best_over_odd": 1.4,
"best_under_odd": 3.1,
"consensus_over_odd": 1.36,
"consensus_under_odd": 2.875,
"edge_over": -0.0244,
"edge_under": 0.0244,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_over": -0.0816,
"ev_over_risk_adj": -0.0883,
"ev_under": 0.0664,
"ev_under_risk_adj": -0.059,
"implied_over": 0.6804,
"implied_over_mf": 0.6789,
"implied_under": 0.3196,
"implied_under_mf": 0.3211,
"market_first": {
"available": true,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.3718,
"best_odd": 1.36,
"edge": -0.0085,
"ev": -0.0883,
"implied_prob": 0.6789,
"model_prob": 0.656,
"p_final": 0.6704
},
"prediction_confidence": "low",
"under": {
"alpha": 0.2704,
"best_odd": 2.875,
"edge": 0.0062,
"ev": -0.059,
"implied_prob": 0.3211,
"model_prob": 0.344,
"p_final": 0.3273
}
},
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"ou_ev_mode": "market_first_available",
"p_final_over": 0.6704,
"p_final_under": 0.3273,
"prediction_confidence": "low",
"reliability": "medium"
}
},
"match_tier": "value_game",
"min_ev": 0.02,
"total_xg": 3.38,
"variance_flag": false
},
"unified_decision": {
"actionable_ev_threshold": 0.02,
"algorithm": {
"enabled_since": "2026-05-26",
"game_typing_module": true,
"version": "2.5.0"
},
"balanced_alternative": null,
"best_consensus_ev": 0.0664,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.3999,
"best_tracked_ev": 0.0664,
"confidence": 5.5,
"decision_confidence_v1": {
"breakdown": [
"pred_conf_v1_primary_line",
"pred_conf_v1_max_1x2_under_50",
"pred_conf_v1_multi_ev_lines"
],
"breakdown_resolved": [
"Primary line identified (+1.0)",
"Max 1X2 prob under 50% (no dominant 1X2) (\u22121.0)",
"Two or more valid +EV lines at threshold (+0.5)"
],
"breakdown_v2": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market aligns with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"score": 5.0,
"score_v1_legacy": 5.5,
"score_v2_pre_penalty": 6.0,
"strength_v2": true
},
"decision_strength_v2": {
"breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market aligns with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"score": 5.0,
"score_pre_penalty": 6.0
},
"decision_type": "VALUE_ALERT",
"execution": {
"1x2_dominant": false,
"1x2_open_contest": true,
"grade": "B",
"stake_factor": 0.5
},
"favourite_misaligned_1x2": {
"active": false,
"gap": null,
"side": null
},
"final_action": "lean",
"final_decision": {
"action": "lean",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 15.5,
"key": "agree",
"label": "Direction agree \u00b7 Pricing diverges",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": false,
"pricing_key": "low",
"probability_gap_pp": 15.5,
"summary": "Model and market favour the same side (FC Volendam), but pricing still diverges by 15.5 pp."
},
"alignment_key": "agree",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.0664,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.3999,
"confidence_band": "Moderate",
"decision_strength": 5.0,
"decision_strength_v1": 5.5,
"decision_strength_v2": 6.0,
"decision_type": "VALUE_ALERT",
"execution_confidence": 52,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "Selective Lean - No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates FC Volendam at 41.2%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 27.9%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies FC Volendam as the value side (41.2%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market broadly agrees with the direction",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 13.3,
"gates_failed": [
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "Selective Lean - No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u2192",
"label": "Lean only \u2014 not a default Primary",
"market_signal": "Market aligns with model lean",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "FC Volendam",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "calibration_risk",
"detail": "Confidence reduced because model assumptions exceed the normal range.",
"name": "Calibration Risk",
"short": "Calibration Risk",
"tone": "danger"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "calibration_risk",
"detail": "Confidence reduced because model assumptions exceed the normal range.",
"name": "Calibration Risk",
"short": "Calibration Risk",
"tone": "danger"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": true,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market 1X2 \u00b7 side FC Volendam \u00b7 decimal odds ~3.40 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +40% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1551821 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22483.40 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +6.6% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +6.6% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Execution confidence below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +6.6% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 5.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +6.6% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 5.0/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": true,
"value": "65 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "52 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": true,
"value": "agree"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+6.6% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 7,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"Model and market favour the same side (FC Volendam), but pricing still diverges by 15.5 pp.",
"Decision strength: 5.0/10",
"Execution confidence below 65",
"Outlier price +40% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
],
"reliability_score": 65,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market aligns with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "Selective consensus value may exist \u2014 below default Primary sizing bar.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "lean",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": 0.0573,
"consensus_ev_display": "+5.7%",
"consensus_odds": 3.4,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.2791,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.4117,
"raw_edge_display": "+13.3 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 13.3,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.29411764705882354,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.3998,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+40.0%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": false,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": 31.9,
"reasons": [
"Thin xG separation gap=0.18"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -1.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "low",
"block_value_alert": false,
"separation_score": -10,
"strength_delta": -1.0,
"xg_gap": 0.18
}
}
},
"game_type": {
"label_zh": "\u5927\u5f00\u5927\u5408\uff08\u8fdb\u7403\u578b\uff09",
"scoring_type": "high_scoring",
"signals": {
"btts_yes_prob": 0.676,
"draw_prob": 0.2514,
"max_1x2_prob": 0.4117,
"over_prob": 0.656,
"total_xg": 3.38,
"under_prob": 0.344,
"xg_diff": 0.18
},
"type": "high_scoring",
"typing_weights_enabled": true
},
"hero_display_pick": null,
"hero_mode": "default",
"longshot_picks": [
{
"decision": "value_bet",
"ev": 0.0664,
"implied_prob": 0.3196,
"market": "ou_2_5",
"model_prob": 0.344,
"not_dominant": true,
"risk_band": "speculative",
"risk_tier": "longshot",
"side": "under",
"slot": "longshot"
}
],
"markets": {
"1x2": {
"consensus_odds": 3.4,
"decision": "value_bet",
"edge": 0.0319,
"ev": 0.0573,
"implied_prob": 0.2791,
"max_ev_side": "away",
"model_prob": 0.4117,
"side": "away",
"side_label": "FC Volendam"
},
"btts": {
"decision": "small_edge",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.2783,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 2.89,
"edge": 0.0011,
"market_prob": 0.32,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"model_prob": 0.324,
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.2783,
"best_odd": 2.89,
"edge": 0.0011,
"ev": -0.072,
"implied_prob": 0.32,
"model_prob": 0.324,
"p_final": 0.3211
},
"p_final": 0.3211,
"prediction_confidence": "low",
"risk_adj_ev": -0.072,
"value_side": "no",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.3827,
"best_odd": 1.36,
"edge": -0.0015,
"ev": -0.0773,
"implied_prob": 0.68,
"model_prob": 0.676,
"p_final": 0.6785
}
},
"edge": 0.0085,
"ev": 0.0044,
"implied_prob": 0.3155,
"model_prob": 0.324,
"side": "no",
"value_side": "no"
},
"ou_2_5": {
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.2704,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 2.875,
"edge": 0.0062,
"market_prob": 0.3211,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"model_prob": 0.344,
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.3718,
"best_odd": 1.36,
"edge": -0.0085,
"ev": -0.0883,
"implied_prob": 0.6789,
"model_prob": 0.656,
"p_final": 0.6704
},
"p_final": 0.3273,
"prediction_confidence": "low",
"risk_adj_ev": -0.059,
"under": {
"alpha": 0.2704,
"best_odd": 2.875,
"edge": 0.0062,
"ev": -0.059,
"implied_prob": 0.3211,
"model_prob": 0.344,
"p_final": 0.3273
},
"value_side": "under"
},
"edge": 0.0244,
"ev": 0.0664,
"implied_prob": 0.3196,
"model_prob": 0.344,
"side": "under",
"value_side": "under"
}
},
"match_id": 1551821,
"match_regime": {
"action": "optional",
"actionable": true,
"clear_edge": false,
"code": "thin_edge",
"execution_line_key": null,
"insight_line_key": null,
"max_valid_ev": 0.0664,
"min_ev": 0.02,
"stake_mult": 0.25,
"use_split_strip": false
},
"match_tier": "value_game",
"no_clear_primary": false,
"probabilities": {
"away": 0.4117,
"draw": 0.2514,
"home": 0.3369
},
"reason_codes": [
"high_total_goals",
"longshot_high_variance"
],
"secondary_pick": null,
"secondary_picks": [],
"show_betting_primary_label": false,
"suppressed_primary": null,
"teams": {
"away": "FC Volendam",
"home": "Almere City FC"
},
"top_pick": {
"composite_score": 0.018872,
"decision": "value_bet",
"ev": 0.0573,
"implied_prob": 0.2791,
"market": "1x2",
"model_prob": 0.4117,
"not_dominant": true,
"primary_strength": "clear",
"risk_band": "medium",
"risk_tier": "primary",
"side": "away",
"side_label": "FC Volendam",
"slot": "primary",
"speculative_primary": false
},
"valid_markets_count": 2,
"value_context_1x2": {
"consensus_ev": 0.0573,
"consensus_ev_display": "+5.7%",
"consensus_odds": 3.4,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.2791,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.4117,
"raw_edge_display": "+13.3 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 13.3,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.29411764705882354,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.3998,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+40.0%"
}
}
},
"fixture_id": 1551821,
"generated_at_utc": "2026-10-03T17:56:13.547155+00:00",
"lang_id": "en"
}
Explora Más Contenido de Predicciones
Obtén predicciones premium para Almere City FC & FC Volendam!
Desbloquea análisis en profundidad, consejos de apuestas exclusivos y pronósticos de partidos con nuestro servicio de suscripción premium.
Suscríbete ahora
Eerste Divisie — Clasificación
| # | EQUIPO | PJ | G | E | P | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Heracles Almelo | 9 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 22 |
| 2 | Almere City FC | 9 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 19 |
| 3 | Emmen | 9 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 16 |
| 4 | MVV | 9 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 16 |
| 5 | VVV Venlo | 8 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 15 |
| 6 | Roda | 8 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 15 |
| 7 | Waalwijk | 9 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 14 |
| 8 | Vitesse | 9 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 14 |
| 9 | NAC Breda | 9 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 14 |
| 10 | Jong AZ | 9 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 13 |
| 11 | FC Volendam | 9 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 12 |
| 12 | Jong PSV | 9 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 12 |
| 13 | FC Eindhoven | 9 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 11 |
| 14 | Helmond Sport | 9 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 9 |
| 15 | FC OSS | 9 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 9 |
| 16 | Den Bosch | 9 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 8 |
| 17 | Jong Ajax | 9 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 8 |
| 18 | Dordrecht | 9 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 8 |
| 19 | De Graafschap | 9 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 8 |
| 20 | Jong Utrecht | 9 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 7 |
| # | EQUIPO | PJ | GF | GC | +/- | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Heracles Almelo | 9 | 28 | 12 | +16 | 22 |
| 2 | Jong AZ | 9 | 22 | 17 | +5 | 13 |
| 3 | VVV Venlo | 8 | 21 | 14 | +7 | 15 |
| 4 | FC Volendam | 9 | 20 | 17 | +3 | 12 |
| 5 | Almere City FC | 9 | 19 | 7 | +12 | 19 |
| 6 | Waalwijk | 9 | 19 | 12 | +7 | 14 |
| 7 | Emmen | 9 | 19 | 18 | +1 | 16 |
| 8 | NAC Breda | 9 | 19 | 19 | 0 | 14 |
| 9 | Vitesse | 9 | 15 | 13 | +2 | 14 |
| 10 | Helmond Sport | 9 | 15 | 16 | -1 | 9 |
| 11 | FC Eindhoven | 9 | 15 | 19 | -4 | 11 |
| 12 | Jong Utrecht | 9 | 15 | 21 | -6 | 7 |
| 13 | Jong PSV | 9 | 14 | 16 | -2 | 12 |
| 14 | Den Bosch | 9 | 13 | 18 | -5 | 8 |
| 15 | MVV | 9 | 13 | 19 | -6 | 16 |
| 16 | Jong Ajax | 9 | 13 | 22 | -9 | 8 |
| 17 | Dordrecht | 9 | 13 | 24 | -11 | 8 |
| 18 | FC OSS | 9 | 12 | 14 | -2 | 9 |
| 19 | De Graafschap | 9 | 11 | 22 | -11 | 8 |
| 20 | Roda | 8 | 9 | 5 | +4 | 15 |
| # | EQUIPO | PJ | xG | xGC | +/- | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FC Volendam | 9 | 9.6 | 5.1 | +4.5 | 12 |
| 2 | Heracles Almelo | 9 | 10.1 | 6.0 | +4.1 | 22 |
| 3 | Emmen | 9 | 9.2 | 6.2 | +3.0 | 16 |
| 4 | NAC Breda | 9 | 9.8 | 6.9 | +2.9 | 14 |
| 5 | MVV | 9 | 6.7 | 3.8 | +2.9 | 16 |
| 6 | Jong PSV | 9 | 8.5 | 5.7 | +2.8 | 12 |
| 7 | Den Bosch | 9 | 9.6 | 7.0 | +2.6 | 8 |
| 8 | Vitesse | 9 | 8.0 | 6.8 | +1.2 | 14 |
| 9 | Jong AZ | 9 | 6.9 | 5.7 | +1.2 | 13 |
| 10 | Almere City FC | 9 | 7.2 | 6.1 | +1.1 | 19 |
| 11 | Roda | 8 | 8.1 | 7.2 | +0.9 | 15 |
| 12 | Waalwijk | 9 | 4.8 | 4.6 | +0.2 | 14 |
| 13 | FC OSS | 9 | 5.3 | 7.3 | -2.0 | 9 |
| 14 | De Graafschap | 9 | 5.4 | 7.6 | -2.2 | 8 |
| 15 | Jong Ajax | 9 | 8.4 | 10.8 | -2.4 | 8 |
| 16 | VVV Venlo | 8 | 5.7 | 8.9 | -3.2 | 15 |
| 17 | Helmond Sport | 9 | 2.6 | 6.2 | -3.6 | 9 |
| 18 | Jong Utrecht | 9 | 5.4 | 9.6 | -4.2 | 7 |
| 19 | FC Eindhoven | 9 | 3.9 | 8.2 | -4.3 | 11 |
| 20 | Dordrecht | 9 | 5.0 | 10.7 | -5.7 | 8 |
