Estadísticas / Fútbol / Turkey. 1. Lig / Bodrum FK vs Sarıyer

Bodrum FK vs Sarıyer Statistics & Analysis

May 02, 2026 - 13:00
0 1.77
1 0.76
xG Accuracy: 58%
Casa de apuestas premium 1xBet: los nuevos usuarios pueden usar el código promocional 1x_3342271. Registrarse

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Each row compares the model’s highlighted side (or lean) to what happened at full time.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Más / Menos de 2.5 Menos de 2.5 Menos de 2.5 (1 goals) ✔ Correct
  • Ambos Equipos Marcarán BTTS No No ✔ Correct
  • 1X2 Bodrum FK Sarıyer ✖ Incorrect
  • Perspectivas de marcador exacto 1-0 0-1 ✖ Incorrect

Informe IA del partido

Resumen del partido IA

Quick read on how the model reads this matchup.

  • League: 1. Lig
  • Fixture: BB Bodrumspor vs Sarıyer
  • Kickoff: 2026-05-02 16:00:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 60.2% · Draw 25.6% · Away 14.2%
  • xG (showing): BB Bodrumspor 1.77 — Sarıyer 0.76 (total xG ≈ 2.53)
  • Primary / headline line (Betting Primary Pick when shown): BTTS No
  • Model: 54.4% · Implied: 47.8% · Probability edge: +6.6 pts · Est. EV: +8.8%
  • BTTS (model): Yes 45.6% · No 54.4%
  • Correct score (top bin): 1-0 (14.1%)

Use the cards for tiering; this text only restates the same inputs in narrative form.

Early match state can move realised goals away from pre-kick projections.

Mejor apuesta y razones

Primary angle highlighted on the page: BTTS No.

We separate probability edge (model minus implied, in points of probability) from estimated EV (economic edge at the best price shown on the page).

Edges shrink quickly if prices move; always re-check the number on your book.

FAQ

Safer market than correct score?

Markets with more liquidity and smoother prices (often 1X2 or O/U 2.5 from many books) are usually easier to reason about than long-tail correct-score prices; still read EV on each leg.

Why might 1X2 look unattractive while totals do not?

Tight 1X2 prices often embed a fair three-way split, so EV on match-winner can sit negative even when Over/Under or BTTS still diverges from the model — compare the 1X2 row on the market cards to O/U and BTTS.

Is the most likely correct score a good bet?

Usually no as a standalone bet: the “most likely” scoreline is still a low absolute probability tail event (often single digits, sometimes low teens). Use it as context; keep any correct-score stake in the “fun / small” bucket.

What changes first if odds move?

Implied probabilities and EV move immediately with price; model probabilities in this snapshot do not update until the pipeline is re-run. Refresh after material line moves.

Factores de riesgo

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Metodología

  • Inputs: Same structured facts bundle as the public prediction page (xG / Poisson snapshot, market EV where available, decision engine v2).
  • Narrative: Template sentence library with fixture-stable selection (no per-request LLM for this block).
  • Compliance: Educational framing only; not personalised advice.

Última actualización

May 01, 2026 (UTC)

¿Cómo usar esto?
  • Concéntrese en la línea principal cuando desee una idea viable.
  • No combine muchas púas de punta fina;Los bordes no se suman de manera confiable.
  • Trate las apuestas arriesgadas como jugadas opcionales y de alto riesgo únicamente.

Obtén predicciones premium para Bodrum FK & Sarıyer!

Desbloquea análisis en profundidad, consejos de apuestas exclusivos y pronósticos de partidos con nuestro servicio de suscripción premium.

Suscríbete ahora
Volver a Estadísticas
1. Lig 1. LigClasificación
# EQUIPO PJ G E P Pts
1 Erzurumspor FK 38 23 12 3 81
2 Amed 38 21 11 6 74
3 Esenler Erokspor 38 21 11 6 74
4 Çorum FK 38 21 8 9 71
5 Bodrum FK 38 18 10 10 64
6 Pendikspor 38 16 15 7 63
7 Keçiörengücü 38 16 12 10 60
8 Bandırmaspor 38 16 12 10 60
9 Manisa F.K. 38 16 7 15 55
10 Sivasspor 38 14 11 13 53
11 İstanbulspor 38 13 13 12 52
12 Sarıyer 38 15 7 16 52
13 Iğdır FK 38 13 11 14 50
14 Vanspor FK 38 13 10 15 49
15 Boluspor 38 14 6 18 48
16 Ümraniyespor 38 13 7 18 46
17 Serik Spor 38 11 6 21 39
18 Sakaryaspor 38 8 10 20 34
19 Hatayspor 38 2 8 28 14
20 Adana Demirspor 38 1 3 34 -57
# EQUIPO PJ GF GC +/- Pts
1 Erzurumspor FK 38 82 27 +55 81
2 Esenler Erokspor 38 81 35 +46 74
3 Amed 38 81 42 +39 74
4 Keçiörengücü 38 73 43 +30 60
5 Bodrum FK 38 71 39 +32 64
6 Çorum FK 38 63 39 +24 71
7 Boluspor 38 61 57 +4 48
8 Pendikspor 38 58 33 +25 63
9 İstanbulspor 38 57 55 +2 52
10 Manisa F.K. 38 57 56 +1 55
11 Vanspor FK 38 52 47 +5 49
12 Iğdır FK 38 52 54 -2 50
13 Bandırmaspor 38 47 34 +13 60
14 Sivasspor 38 47 43 +4 53
15 Ümraniyespor 38 47 51 -4 46
16 Sakaryaspor 38 45 72 -27 34
17 Sarıyer 38 44 44 0 52
18 Serik Spor 38 44 75 -31 39
19 Hatayspor 38 33 102 -69 14
20 Adana Demirspor 38 22 169 -147 -57
# EQUIPO PJ xG xGC +/- Pts
1 Bodrum FK 38 36.3 21.7 +14.6 64
2 Boluspor 38 34.5 20.9 +13.6 48
3 Erzurumspor FK 38 26.5 14.2 +12.3 81
4 Çorum FK 38 32.2 20.3 +11.9 71
5 Esenler Erokspor 38 30.7 19.1 +11.6 74
6 Amed 38 37.6 26.5 +11.1 74
7 Keçiörengücü 38 35.2 24.2 +11.0 60
8 Iğdır FK 38 28.2 21.6 +6.6 50
9 Pendikspor 38 29.8 24.3 +5.5 63
10 Bandırmaspor 38 26.5 23.2 +3.3 60
11 Manisa F.K. 38 29.0 29.1 -0.1 55
12 Vanspor FK 38 24.9 25.2 -0.3 49
13 Sarıyer 38 24.4 27.4 -3.0 52
14 Sivasspor 38 22.2 25.2 -3.0 53
15 İstanbulspor 38 25.2 28.8 -3.6 52
16 Ümraniyespor 38 23.9 27.9 -4.0 46
17 Serik Spor 38 20.8 29.9 -9.1 39
18 Sakaryaspor 38 24.7 34.1 -9.4 34
19 Hatayspor 38 17.8 37.7 -19.9 14
20 Adana Demirspor 38 11.0 60.4 -49.4 -57